Shermaningeorgia

I don't care wht your temple told you, or how to engage. Do not trap me.

I plan to end therapy. and replace it with this: - A series of androids that is programmed with the DSM - The androids are programmed to only focus on symptoms and not superficial and non-clinical traits Anybody who disagrees is probably some midwestern dope who revels in unprofessionalism. Or otherwise is Hitler and wants people to suffer.

Society overblows a need for attachment.

No one trait makes a person better. Looks might have sexual appeal, but so what? sex isn't everything either. Seems you and others just cite things out of convenience or self-serving without actually endorsing it. Like this is a spiritual forum. Most spiritual traditions actually downplay matters of sexuality, even if they acknowledge it exists and is part of being human. I stand looks mean f-all. and if any hot b***h demands adulate for her looks or being human, then she's not for me. and i'll tell her what's what. seems fair.

I don't do obfuscations in communications. Nor from hypocritical bases either. Just tell that to the KKK in your town. if not, then you're a coward who is dishonest. I try to be neither.

where is the trolling? Seems calling out for a better system offends you. unlike you, i don't wish peope to needlessly suffer. So being a good person with good intentions and wishes is trolling now....

Just your types revel in gatekeeping. It’s funny to behold.

i don't think he pushes anything that's not clinical or proven. his indian spiritual stuff is just a supplement. I have no real issue with him.

You spend a lotof time here posting about hatever experiences you have. and then you cite that it's bad, or heavily imply, that it's bad to call out therapy and replace them all with advanced AI? looooool.

Don’t excuse bad conduct

Ah yes. It's the American dude who hates frivolity, and pushes lots of other odd and internalised bs. and follows me around to "lecture me". loooool. Anti-therapy? yes. I oppose any and all biased systems.

So it's ok for you to post vulnerable stuff, but not me. Do you pretty ladies get paid to push these odd and comically odd double points and imaginary rules?

It's got nothing to do with dating. For me, looks and character correlate. I've made it a mission in my life to get normalcy. Many denied/deny me this. And since society says "nobody is better" then it's on them for the double standard. You can assume it's about dating, but it's not. so yes, to me, looks and character correlate conversely.

I’m calling out your double standard. And your insistence on expressing yourself fully. Probably stuff you learnt young in a church.

i'm calling out a bad practice and suggesting improvements. that's distinct from defending a bad practice.

Not at all. your assumptions are false. You larp about being wise but you're not at all. you wer raised in a temple and you think that upbringing gains you that. it doesn't. there are many ways to view life. and if ypou're that "kind", you'd say this to racists, but you won't since you're a coward with no integrity.

One can presume that how he sees clients is akin to how he relates to streamers online. He doesn't judge them. He accepts modern life for what it is, and not distortions infused by his own biases and thinking. He doesn't tell Amouranth she's sick for doing OF. Making porn isn't in the DSM.

We don't know how consciousness arises. It is an emerged propety. As for science, it's an interesting point. So he wants robots or AI to do science? This then depends on the programming of said computing tools.

the best tend to give realistic and grounded advice, and otherwise not softsoap or tell them fallacies. Of women, Kezia Noble seems fair. And of men, Playing with Fire. Both acknowledge looks matter but amongst other things. It's only scammers like the redpill guys and blackpillers like Wheat Waffles who push bs points to grift. Note how Wheat Waffles ended his channel, and nearly got disowned by his paretns for his rhetoric.

Half of Gens Y and Z have tattoos. and a high proportion of Gen X. It's in these generations that tattoos have been destigmatised. The OP needs to clarify what s/he means by tattoos. Somebody they meet regularly may have tattoos in places they cannot see.

what do people get from denying life is looksocracy? Are they evil? Trying to mislead? A person can accept a reality and disgaree with it. If a person hates Trump, they stil must accept he is the POTUS. Or if a person opposes communism whislt being a Chinese citizen, they must accept that the CCP solely rules China. I genuinely think they're evil and out to mislead.

it depends. Many autistic people are very selective of who "warrants" empathy for such slights. what goes around, comes around. Few non-whites are selective of who warrants empathy for racism. Or for women are selective of who warrants empathy for sexism.

OK. so you're spiritual and "kind" but then act so contrary. and yes, you can say "I'm only human." and? We're all human. but imperfections do not override condemnation, criticism or fault. I'm saying as therapy is a biased institution, it should be banned. and replaced with AI that is truly impartial. Seems you're from India or somewhere, or you project your norms as universal. Maybe in your village or city, it's the norm to scamp. or preach "kindness and charity" whilst acting differently. Then you're not as "kind" as you purport. Good. shows what to avoid then. Or will you argue basic medical ethics are bad then? And then condemn practices done inthe Holocaust and by the Japanese in WW2, or the Tuskegee experiments? oh but those were unethical! so full of it!

I understand you, hence why i use you"you don't know me!!" irrationality against you. It's clear in your formative years, you were taught that you were owed complete posivitty. that others had to look up to you. You don't get interpersonal conduct at the root. Good. It's to my advantage then.

Yes, sicne it's bs. And those who defend are fools and hypocrites. If they're so "good", they stand for good. and? pretty simple. It's a corrupt practice based on partiality that overrides its own rules. Is drug taking a mental illness? not per se, no. But this is apportioned due to things like looks, race, gender, etc., none of which are practising points. So that is one of many reasons it should be banned for ANY human to practice it and only AI or androids with no bias. If they are programmed to be biased, they're deactivated and replaced. Why is that bad? Then go and whine about police brutality, getting shortchanged in a store, and all other things that are roots of the same issue. Institutional bias. looooolo. You people are so see-through. You spirtual people aren't who you say you are.