Shermaningeorgia

Furthermore, my standard for any public medical professional is whether they push or advocate for things that breach medical ethics or are not evidence-based. Generally, he doesn't. His psychiatric views are on point for the most part. He seems like a bonafide and trained doctor, and isn't like Sadia Khan who seemingly has no firm therapetic credentials.

Most mental health pros are scum. But he is an exception. He seems to get modern generations, living and how to engage. And he seems pretty upstanding across the board. There was the issue with Reckful, and that was wrong, but the medical board gave him a light censure. There are very few professionals who don't ever get called up for stuff, no matter how minor. So yes, Reckful probably shouldn't have died, and he showed an error in judgment in aiding him, but overall, I feel his work is well done and received. He does speak about Indian spirituality and Ayurveda often. Though it seems it's like a supplementary thing and not as proper practice, which wouldbe wrong as it's not deemed practising or evidence-based medicine. Overall, I think he's a positive point. I genuinely despise most mental health professionals, but he is a rare exception since he seems to get things and relate tothe contemporary world well.

And my OP point STANDS. who can prove it wrong? If hot ladies/b****s cannot handle NORMAL working practices, then they shou;dn't be managers. plain and simple. Their only concern should be "i have a job to do, i have to act in a way that serves my company." THAT IS IT! Everybody else gets BASIC management practice, so why don't they? It shows then hotties are unprofessional, lack diligence and frankly, RUDIMENTARY social skills and psychological capabilities.

You might looks, but so what? there IS NO human trait that warrants absolute attention or adulation. So if you robbed a bank or kidnapped somebody's child, would you think you should get away with it? if so, then my suspciion of your warped social comprehension is accurate.

Due to looks, affect your interpersonal style. always telling others what's what and what to think. and if people don't adhere to that, then what? You'd beat or kill them? good! since all hail some babe who was spoilt as a little girl, and it's influenced her bad and grossly hypocritical world comprehension.

well, if you're so "nice and kind and benevolent" you won't push negative views then. You're hardly as "wise" as you purport and people (ALL PEOPLE) getting by clearly offends you. good. keep on getting offended at petty things. Or stay in in some rural Indian backwater, since life elsewhere doesn't suit you. I neither tolerate nor abide by two-faced people, or those who get offended over petty societal/professional rules.

Do you say the same racists? Did your temple tell you that haughty exceptions are acceptable? And other weird points?

Aren’t you the one who says that people aren’t entitled to medical care? I don’t engage with two faced scum.

there is no hypocrisy here. There is a difference between striking longstanding enemies, and taking the land of allies. Trump isn't the first POTUS to strike Iran in recent years. But the USA actively bullying a friendly country for land for "national security" is unprecedented.

Normalcy in life is variable. However, neurodivergent people can seek and want attachments. It's not true to say that they do not. And it's as equally confomist to say most on forums are neurodiverse.

Well, apparently i cannot express myself since you and your inner whims say so. Since apparently the world must look up to you. through threat of violence, but then "be kind" and "be nice" and "we're all one!!" If some little Indian kid can post the biggest nonsense here, and frankly I'm too polite to call it out, so can I. But it's all about YOU, isn't it? So go and beat me for challenging you. It's what your "looks kind" do. I challenge ANY person. Then your ego is very telling, as it leads to very warped perceptions of humanity and reality. And yes, I can and WILL use your ego against you. it's easy to manipulate you then. You'd probably say, "Oh, people aren't perfect and cannot be expected to be on the ball all the time!" Yes, that is true in itself. Doesn't mean people cannot be held to good or even high standards. And though you apparently dislike it when people challenge you. Fair enough. Go and shit on your neighbour's lawn and nearly run over their child with your car when you're going out for groceries. But then "challenge is evil!" loooool.

This proves the point. Isn't violence wrong? Is violence the way to get people to be amenable? Quick note - it doesn't work. "life" has taught me that no one person's view is absolute. you apparently think yours is. It's comical that you assume yours is since this isn't how people engage really.

Humans don't accept anybody's word. If you think people cannot disagree with you, or oppose you, then something is wrong. I further have no contradictions in my actions at all. I qualify what I do. I actually believe everybody has the right to a view, which you do not espouse. i may strongly disagree with some might say but i do not limit or silence them. there is no absolute freedom of expression as it stands. You once said you were "highly attractive". That explains it. You'd probably get your bf or SO to beat me up, for "daring" to challenge you. Sorry, miss, but any human can be challenged. If you assume people must be welcoming to you, then I don't know what to say. That's not very "confident", is it? Pople who look good might get attention for looks, but then it's like IMHO being rich. It's a social advantage with no absolute bearing on a person's value or quality. some actively dislike rich people.

Since you were clearly told from a young age that your view is THE view, and then probably believe all sorts of cognitive tricks that contradict, due to a self-serving nature. Fair enough. I don't ever see your views as gospel. i don't need to.

do you regulat4e who can say what? is there a reason why others must heed or care about your subjective viewpoint? Did your temple/church as a little girl tell you this?

So does "everybody have an opinion" or not? Or is this conditional based on your own inner whims and misapplication of common sentiments that are not hard to grasp?

I don't understand. Pretty clearly means attractive or good-looking.

lol. Seems it's some personal vendetta. Whatever happened "we're all human!" and "everybdoy has the right to an opinion!" I'm a human also. Thus I have a rivht to an opinion. do i not? But according to some, this is conditional, when the sentiment isn't meant to be. Got it.

this is personal development. I've decided in my life i've let too many people dictate me. i am ME. so i dictate myself. All humans hold that RIGHT. And I hold hot ladies as my enemies for that reason.

I'm not female nor hot. I'm a man. And my issue here isn't related to sex at all.

Help from whom? I am honest in my views. I hold a natural right to ward off harmful stuff. I'm personally tired of them as a class denying me normalcy. I see this as personal development.

I don't care about dating. I view things here in terms of general interactions. I maintain that every hot b***h on this Earth is scum, and made so by looks and social interactions/influence and few if any have the integrity or introspection to rise above it.

If gender identity is nonsense, then there is evidence that trans people have the same brains of their internal gender. No other method bar medical transition has worked in aiding them. People can "give them therapy!" That's nonsense. Therapy has limits. Therapy cannot cure depression necessarily. It cannot cure all mental illnesses or conditions.

The OPis conflating sex with gender. And yes, sex and gender are different. Sex is naturally biological and fixed; gender is a social construct based on societal rules. there is no absolute prescription of how men and women should behave socially. Gender roles are not solely based on perceived physical sex-based. Transgenderism is valid. It's clear there are some people born with an incongruence between their internal gender and external sex characteristics. And gender transition is the best option known to correct this.

I’m not rage baiting. It's an honest view. A healthy view would be "well, i support peope saying racist stuff, so I must support this". I guess one's temple told one that consistency is evil. Do they teach that eating and drinking daily is bad also? That's a form of consistency.