oOo

You should be thanking me for this, I thought my post quoted deserved a follow up heh. New release, a good primer for noted consciousness streaming technique coming. Didn’t want to spend more than 3 hours on it. Still beautiful. I am a beautiful lyricist. Can’t wait for my beautiful voice to replace the AI here as well. Still rad. If I can create psychedelic experiences with my mind alone so can you. As you know, I can’t really take psychedelic drugs yet because of my epilepsy, so I haven’t had a choice but to pioneer this unique route. Electric eyes out, thunder strong till April 1st.

An on the fly Short Story, and a Shorter Scientific Wrap-up: Two of the Shortest Straws before the longest entry, is revealed April 1st. Writing on my phone just now while waiting for a flight…heh. Okay let’s do this. o————————O————————o Garry wandered into the local food store aimlessly, thinking that he may be able to chew up some time while he waited for Meredith, Garry’s wife, to come back from Yoga class where he told her he would be for her to pickup. Casually handling the cereal box of Fruity Loops Max, looking at the ingredients he was reminded by how he ate so many Fruity Loops one day that he vomited on his mother’s birthday cake that his sister made for her. “Sir, we are closing in five minutes. We just wanted to politely let you know.” Garry pondered to himself. “Is it possible I could wait another five minutes? I am just waiting for my wife to come back from Yoga class.” Said Garry. The shopkeeper then pressed further, “I am sorry, these are our rules. We wish to close up fully within five minutes. Thank you sir.” Garry then began to play with his moustache, thinking that it was absurd that the woman wouldn’t just let him wait another five minutes. He even told her that it was his wife he was waiting for. The woman came back. “Sir, I am about to close the roller door. Would you like to make any purchases before I ask you to make your way out?” Garry sighed, “Ah, no thank you.” Garry then nodded his head and proceeded towards the exit where before he left, a man called for his name within the store. “Garry!” The man said. “Garry!” He said again. “Yea?” Garry said, having already turned around, not recognising the man and so exclaimed with confusion. “Garry, Garry, Garry. Ha!” By this point the man had already made his way outside to meet at the feet of Garry’s bewilderment. “Sir, I have never see you before in my life.” Garry said. “Garry, I am in your imagination. You created me. You have your eyes closed asleep right now while you’re laying on your bed. This is a dream.” Said the mysterious man. “Sir, if you would excuse me I have to prepare for the arrival of my wife, she is coming back from Yoga class and then o must be off quickly.” Garry now having shifted from confusion to the judgement that the man must be insane to perplexed over how he knows his name. “Garry, I understand. My apologies.” “And ah, sir. How do you know my name?” “If I told you, do you really think you’d believe me given I already told you?” “Sir I am not dreaming.” Garry now becoming frustrated. “Well to put another way, I am your subconscious communicating with itself in real time. You invented me prior to you falling asleep so that when you were dreaming you could come to me and I would remind you that you were in a dream.” Exclaimed the shopkeeper with calm joyful confidence. “Ah-erm… Look you see my wife is here now, I must be off.” Said Garry, while reflecting on a science article he read about how when the mind splits into instability it can sometimes be, albeit shaky, a bridge to information flowing into consciousness from other realms. He contested that the man must be crazy and the only way he knew that information was from unconscious multidimensional travel, pathways which had obviously corrupted his mind. “I am sleeping with your wife Garry.” And with those words Garry went from casual judgement to quietly estranged distance. “Honey! Ha, let’s go!” Meredith said with elation. Her car window wound down with her arm hanging out with some mild sweat slowly moving down her forehead as she gently strummed the car door with her fingers. “Oh Frank, what are you doing here?” Meredith said, her confidence taking a tiny dip as she felt slight fear merge with the unpredictability that awaited the next moments. Garry now with just as much bewilderment, simultaneously now armed with retort to describe the insanity of the man, compassion for him, combined with impending dread that his wife knows him under the precondition of infidelity set by Frank. “Meredith, I am here to try to wake-up Garry here. You see I told him he was in a dream but he didn’t believe me.” “Oh right. Oh dear. So just like that you…” “Well he was wondering around in the store before. I didn’t know about it but. This all came after I noticed him. Then I told him we were fucking.” Garry now more confident in the former prediction, already preparing to dial for community services to help the man, perhaps even organise a homeless shelter if doesn’t have permanent residence. “And he didn’t believe you still? Yes honey, this is a dream. And Garry and I are fucking.” Meredith then proceeded to rub her tits while squirting milk onto her husband. Garry then wiped his eyes, looked up and realised he was in his bed. He quickly got up, moved to the bathroom and noticed milk on his eye. He returned to the bed where his wife lay and then noticed a bottle of baby milk. Reconciling the memory of his wife feeding their son before bed, he placed the bottle by the bedside then went to check on Vincent, his 6 month old. The door quietly creaked as he gently touched it open, stepping into the fluorescent blue night light towards Vincent’s bed. Reassured Vincent was safely asleep, Garry made his way towards the master bedroom with the dream he just had playing in his mind. Opening the door he immediately saw another man, naked in front of his wife as she was giving the man a blowjob. “What the fuck is this?” Garry said. With the man and woman’s back turned to him initially the man had turned around and Garry immediately saw his own face. Garry then looked into the mirror and didn’t recognise his face at all, it looked like Frank whom he had met at the food store. “Meredith, what the FUCK!” Garry by this stage was feeling traumatised by the experience, something that was viscerally felt throughout the house and in the shock and awe of the man and woman interlacing with one another. The woman’s face now became slowly visible and before he saw her fully Garry woke up. This time, he felt a slight jarring pain on his forehead. Laying down on his schoolyard steps during lunchtime a tennis ball had hit his head while drifting off to sleep. Startled Garry looked around. “Hey Gazza! Throw us the ball aye ha! And get over here we need you. With YOU, we’re no longer just dreaming about winning against em, heh!” “We’re no longer just… dreaming?” Reminded by the ordeal he had just experienced combined with the relief of running off to have fun before the school bell, he shrugged it all off while still feeling a little internally icy and perturbed but with the confidence it would just steady out soon enough. “Well, it depends on what you mean by dreaming Garry. You create the conditions. You are doing what you call dream jumping. You creates me to remind you off this so you could use it as a time to synthesise your insights from dream drinking so far. That’s why I threw the tennis ball at your head dufus, ha! Anyhow, I’ll catch you in the after-life aye?” Garry then woke up in a morgue. However he didn’t know this yet. A fact that quickly changed after he repeatedly banged on the walls of a pitch black stinking metal unit he was petrified inside of. “Get me the fuck outta here!” He would yell repeatedly. “Mr. Robertson. Are you okay? Are you ready to speak with the doctors now?” Said the nurse that was preparing for the doctor to make his verbal entrance. “Mr. Robertson, my name is Dr. Labyrinth, to my left is Dr. Rubric and to my right is Dr. Maze. We are sorry sir, this has never happened before, and we are utterly perplexed as to how this has happened. If you like we can come back later however we wanted to step in now to see if you were ready to touch base with us.” Said Dr. Labyrinth “What… what on earth happened?” Said Garry. “Well you see sir, you have been in a coma for over ten years now… and ah”… Garry cut Dr. Rubric off before he could complete his sentence. “Wait, didn’t I just fucking wake-up in a morgue? You mean that this didn’t fucking happen?” Said Garry, with the trauma of everything still holding its weight in every thought pattern. “Well you see sir, yes that did actually happen. However you were unequivocally pronounced dead. Your heart had stopped after we had repeatedly striven to bring you back for over an hour. And you’ve already been in the morgue for over a day with the pathologist only becoming aware of your struggle in the last couple of hours. Nursing staff by the way are frequently walking around and past the area and the pathologist was working for a few hours inside the same unit before he had heard your screams. So I assure you zero mistake was made on our end. This is… nothing short of a miracle Mr. Robertson.” said Dr. Maze “Wait… I saw you trying to revive me. I remem… I was hovering above myself viewing all of you around me when I died… I…” said Garry. “Thats impossible Mr…” Garry cut off Mr. Rubric again. “Then how would I know it was precisely you three around me and that you were wearing a black coat not a white coat and that you have a golden Rolex that I saw on the bench at the time that you only have the skin wristband to show for it now!” The doctors didn’t say a word. “I also saw Dr. Rubric speak with his wife after he left the operating theatre! Now how the fuck would I know that any other way!” Garry explained frustratingly. The nurse then came strongly by Garry’s side, trying to soothe him. Garry’s nervous system responded immediately with a calmer rhythm. o————————O————————o The Scientific Debrief… Edward Scissor-Hands makes a mark with his mathematical ten-pronged metal wand... Let’s get back to formalism now aye, bout time! o————————O————————o Diary: Medical School Journal. Chapter: Where Short Story meets Science of the Mind Date: March 7th entry. Entry: #10. o————————O————————o I just decided off the cuff to write the story as stated that said though I realised towards the end that scientifically, Garry’s continuous awakenings mirror a real boundary problem in consciousness research that feels much more visceral to me now. So I’m talking along the lines of how near death experiences, coma mentation, ICU delirium, REM-intrusion and dream recall often do not present as neatly separable states. They’re actually overlapping realities later welded together by memory into one felt world, and ah… that has many implications for my theoretical work on #3 Meaning and as I briefly on the fly introduced how dreams, both waking, sleeping and other less conscious variants don’t just take part in that process but how dreaming is a fundamental pillar to the curative process of Meaning itself, which is ah… not straightforward nor something that can just be simplistically categorised outside of a final methodological process that encapsulates the right edges thats easy to follow to steer meaning curation. In fact… Meaning can be so bizarre, that any sentience that is too conservative cannot respond in any other way than to frame it with a simplistic category. Completely avoiding the complexities of dreaming itself as a whole (so not just sleeping), worse, completely ignoring the nuanced relationships meaning shares in a creative process, that lives just outside conscious awareness, while living across the edge within it. Dreaming and meaning, share so many cross-links with awarensss and memory that this is why I decided upon meaning coming third, and I will hold off on revealing #4 until April 1st. For example, ICU survivors commonly report “unreal experiences” made from hallucination, dream fragments, fear and intermittent perception, while NDE studies show that these memories are often exceptionally vivid, emotionally dense and in some cases richer than memories of coma or ordinary autobiographical events. Aka, where #1. Awareness, #2. Memory become so perturbed both by and through the “dream-meaning” space that experienced imagined reality becomes indistinguishable to and is recorded as an actually experienced reality. What Dream science reveals in my own self experiments in something that I have stumbled upon as “Consciousness Streaming” (my own category), is the minds hidden plasticity when it releases the metacognitive controls that constrain the sense of self moment to moment experienced reality, with the cathartic changes in the story revealing the importance of tapping into this fluidity, and how when I teach my own version of this consciousness streaming, holding off on further details for now, it isn’t new rely the tapping into fluidity but accessing a deeper architecture of what and how the self constructs itself in real time through “dream-meaning”. “Dream meaning” is just a term I am coining on the fly right now but it feels apt. So this is where the short story meets my deeper blossoming theory of how meaning is forged. Meaning isn’t just forged within for, from and towards stable reality or stable relational objects within. In fact it’s the exact opposite, what I have found in my self experimentations and research is that reality as we know it in the physical sense is purely a safe playing ground by which we learn to craft “dream-meaning” through consequence, reward and punishment, then our nervous system becomes primed, hijacked and a prisoner to that; haha, aka hidden underneath the cry of the architecture of our own phenomenological experience being that of our own brainwashing we have sworn to protect, unknowingly of course, swearing it is our Declaration of Independence. When in reality, it is just the present historical state of the meeting ground in which collective consciousness intersects on to establish a stable point of communication to converse with one another through economical trade, speech and political corruption. In the same way that the mind binds discontinuous signals into provisional coherence to establish “identity coherence” exploratively through imaginary worlds, the same bread and butter is used to make the identity humans often confuse as themselves in the intersubjective reality. Because our dream worlds show consciousness as fluid before identity is fixed, generative before reality is settled, and how sensory and emotional signatures can still be salient and even more vivid than normal waking reality, it reveals how “dream-meaning” is not just something we should be taking as an extra part of psychological development and our understanding of the human mind. In fact my reconceptualisation of reality as merely the meeting ground between consequence, punishment and reward, combined with the extra dimensionality “dream-meaning” reveals, shows that the centre of human advancement is in exploring psychological, intrapersonal and interpersonal development through extra-dimensional “dream-meaning” spaces. We already do this through fixed alternate realities like video games, and films anchor intrapersonal exploration and interpersonal dialogue on social norms for revision. These avenues have been so effective in crafting new reality dynamics from social norms to demographic off-shoots that are completely at odds with actual reality that my conceptualisation of physical reality as merely an agreed upon meeting ground becomes not only visceral but overly justified. Dialogues imprinting the importance of societal solidification demand nothing other than complete compliance, and the best way to do this is via implicit consent born out of an unquestioned conformity as the consciousness has forgotten to know itself through the meta-dream space. Meta-dream is a technical word I use to simultaneously denote the sketch pad a consciousness uses to curate itself by understanding the dream itself it is being interlocked, not locked, within at that moment in time, thereby enabling the consciousness to iteratively transform itself through the balance of disillusionment and self-realisation via truth discernment. Meta-Dream is the space the majority of the population are largely asleep too, hence why people can be characterised today as “digital zombies”, where in large part they merely play the same song of life on repeat day in and day out, with little awareness or questioning of the digital addictions they have from newly wedded AI girlfriends/boyfriends to YouTube and Facebook clicks to even celebrity culture addictions to worse, people going crazy for… yes you better believe it, AI models, as in Artificially Created People/Sims, that are completely AI, the people know they’re AI and yet people act like they’re celebrities still. This is particularly popular on Instagram though I don’t know any off hand. The “Meta-Dream” space is not only irretrievable as an ontological contemplation, it’s not even a possible reality that exists outside their affections for digital imaginary realities. By the same mirror imprint then of artificial digital realities, these people, reflect the “walking sims” or the “walking and talking” embodiment of simulacrons totally indistinguishable from the apt term of “NPC’s”, a term I used to not be so fond with in the past but now it’s, as per described in my previous post just stated in a… “matter of fact” way. More and more now then as a consequence of revelations following this newly formed sentiment of the “meta-dream” space that I will do more work on between now and April 1st is, literally all or any emotional responses I have with physical reality that I have not agreed to, must pass consent barriers before I will allow myself to register it as a part of the identity that interweaves with my experience of the physical dimension. This is not a unique narrative, but exclusive to the only direction we as humanity are invariably moving towards in understanding the intersection between those two coined terms, “dream-meaning” and “meta-dream”, which by its very definition teaches how to answer a positive resolve towards the main question I posed in the previous post concerning, “Can you out-dream”… something that to a simulacron is impossible, as all they are is the unquestioned dream of what they know themselves as, but to someone self-aware of the meta-dream, becomes effortless. I finished the short story circling a near death experience being validated by Garry being aware of details he shouldn’t have had access to in not only an unconscious state but where between the operating room, the morgue and the visit from the doctors revealed zero viable opportunity for any detail being available to him in an unconscious state. This bridges in two directions, the first surrounding an operating-table NDE by a Pam Reynolds, who underwent hypothermic circulatory arrest during aneurysm surgery and later reported details of the operating room and procedure. I have heard of many other case studies however my own personal research is still pretty thin at present. That aside, combined with my side research on psi phenomena, in particular as it releases to telepathy, combining all of the incidents aware across many categories of psi, including CIA remote viewing, I envisage a future demographic, one that likely already exists of varying sophistication, where we not only only learn to interact in and create co-created dream spaces, but form and reform identity spaces within novel “dream-meaning” architectures combined. NDE’s, other areas of psi, lucid dreaming research trails and more, along with my newly forged consciousness experimentations with maintaining a continuous conscious dream streaming experience while completely awake and alert, make the reality of extradimensionalities to human communication not only viable in dream spaces, but something we are co-creating in far more deeply than we otherwise previously believed ourselves to be. Jorge Luis Borges, an acquaintance of mine told me about, apparently had an unprecedented philosophical imagination, rivalling the likes of H.P Lovecraft or further, where both parallel with the overlap between beginning to teach this consciousness streaming method I have partially given light to and rebooting consciousnesses closure points that lead to the curation of identity before it’s even aware what’s happening; the simple act of curating your own Tolkien (another author) universe, is the closest and most minimal and maximal beginning action you can take to curate an identity that genuinely reflects the universe as you internally feel it at your most unitive. Learning to explore, reflexively create an edit one’s own worlds on the fly both intuitively, formally and through gradual overlapping growth in understanding meaning where theory meets not only the visceral felt experience, but a phenomenological depth of awareness that is scarcely ever communicated about because there are simply very few people that have understood this arena much less communicate on it formally as I will reveal April 1st. There are indeed… further overlaps I am yet to reveal and won’t do so until April 1st out of fear of spoiling the broth so to speak! So between when you begun reading this entry to its resolving endpoint now, and between now and when you wake in the morning, what dream will you wake-up on and what linguistic structure can you bring to this to better enable your ability to do so the next time around through trial and error? Best wishes till April 1st. And yeah, I am still waiting at the airport as a digital zombie on my phone, now going to do some consciousness streaming. And ergh. I’ll clean up my journal when I drop it on the day as well, perhaps making the April 1st release the first comment of this page.

To provide insight to others on Maturity in Dreaming - The Sword and Shield to Desired Meaning Itself: Dreaming, which is one of the fundamental foundations to Meaning, is often a slave to the ego when navigated immaturely. Paradoxically, this severely limits the capacity to dream itself, dreaming being the main frame of the three lasts posts and what we will dive deeply into April 1st without revealing too much. The ego’s sane position and where it is most creative, is to be in alignment with truth discernment. Truth discernment then evolves to existential questions that press, “Can I out-dream desire, ego, and all that I dream itself?” To ground the action of dreaming and prepare the ego to do it at greater levels of development, truth needs to identity where inflations over-run limits. This is where the ego learns to understand where it is immature in the action of dreaming, otherwise it will indeed hurt itself, and potentially others in the process without a doubt, even if indirectly. Like a small child or a baby, it is self-absorbed, selfish and foolish because it wants without understanding limits, and it self-harms (i.e. inclusive of things like ruminative or negative thinking in general that limits scaled dreaming), because it cannot process the gap between its wanting and reality itself. Born out of trying to resolve this gap, at a low developmental level we have limited scopes in memetic culture that both seek to capture this (“you need to be practical!”), however the opposite extreme also exists (“dream what you want don’t let others hold you back!”). This keeps people stuck as they try to source understanding through the cultural indoctrinations they’ve learned or to try to overcome, they will bridge to narcissistic defences that reflect compensatory psychical resolves. This compensatory action is positively intentioned, it is the psyche seeking integration, however it is at most as a desperate clasping for a feeling of independence, straying one from the creative independence that evolves even further by feeling empowered from a healthy position. Take a breath, attune with the action of breathing, contemplate and move deeper into one’s depth to create the space for the dreaming to take root from a space by which the chains the psyche is trying to break, slip off rather than fighting against something that will only tighten and harm the psyche in the long run, even if there’s momentary freeing for even a year, we reap what we sow and everything we do, always catches up with us. In our automatic actions, feelings and thoughts we mistake as ourselves, and the people, influences and environment around us we call our space, when in reality it is the wearing of normalisation costing the freedom slightly constrained from where one otherwise would have been. With more positive influences, people and environments to connect with. To out-dream the dream itself, you must out-dream the dreamer. This, automatically injects objectivity onto the self and resolve towards a creative ambition beyond it is; evolving identity, not as a force one move towards, but where the self and the ego shift with the flow of transformation itself. It is at the gap and edges between the two where the friction arises, and it is in their overlapping where the freedom to dream anything and beyond it itself without needing it to define one, is where one does it from Oneness, as a felt experience one holds personal dominion over, not as dogmatic ideas one feels they have to abide by. Interconnection with the self is this by definition, and greatest of dreaming happens at the edge of integration while contributing to the integration of the psyche itself. Rather than try to wield dreaming as a tool when in reality you and the dreaming is being wielded by the ego’s lack of development, understanding these distances between the creative act of dreaming, and the physical actions for it, is the divide that rebirths the psyche, nurtures it, makes it whole, and makes it stronger. The Western world has conflated its image of dreaming, ego and ambition and in doing so, the self-image one creates in the context of Meaning itself. Distortion of reality, rather bridging with it, is what now runs mainstream western culture because it performs and teaches the same compensatory action out of its misunderstanding of the Mind itself. This leads to Meaning, which should be taught to become a deeply personal creation coupled with understanding how it operates in the mind, becoming subjugated to the whims of social norms, populations oscillating between nihilism, religious and institutional virtue and narcissistic self-importance. All unique compensatory actions between one another. Nihilism is not born out of not finding meaning in life, but through a rejection of the normalisations while not being able to integrate the universe with one’s own self understanding for how their minds create meaning. Institutional virtue religious included, is born out of course from conformity and the privilege of finding success therein, where the latter is a rebellion from them both, narcissistically conforming to one’s own self-image to compensate for not being able to resolve the hidden nihilism or rebellion from a tribal network. This is a child’s strategy, and I mean that very non-judgementally and in a “matter of fact way”, it is important to understand that the majority of all humanity are still possessed by a child like understanding of how the mind works because social norms have not evolved with spiritual and scientific breakthroughs, nor the demographics within those two itself. It is up to you the individual, to intelligently make sense of where you as a person square against your own developmental trajectory, maturely identifying weaknesses and turning that process into a strength that accelerates development in a patient way, reflecting on your own existence as sacred and therefore your own persona discipline towards its unveiling, as just as sacred to honour with mindfulness, and depth of action. With the sincerity that grows your meaning further for tomorrow, and your capacity to dream a more evolved day in the next. ”So can you, out-dream the dreaming, and the dream that dreams you as itself?” - Sacred Patience. Stay strong, keep dreaming and best wishes. And, if you’re in the right direction, take your time with it. Honour your sovereignty to your self-awareness. Catch you April 1st to reveal all the mechanics, dynamics and more.

For clarity, I use a females voice to avoid projection from the listener. Own vocals will replace later this year. Plan on keeping music unlisted until I have created my own music platform for creatives (beginnings of nxt yr). => As per my previous two posts, we live in an unhealthy culture, and I don’t wish to forge a creative relationship with that so I will just simply cave out my own demographic with me as the main leader. It’ll be the way music and Hollywood (so 🎥 too) was always meant to be, made for the people by the creatives to extend, grow and evolve peoples capacity to dream further, deeper and more maturely.

The following is a brief follow up to the post directly above: April 1st will still be going ahead as planned. But only on one condition, as a personal pledge to what I have come to understand while being on this earth. I will never again read or comment in the general forum area again. The finalised version will come April 1st as stated earlier (removed post). "Who are you. By that I mean, who am I? By that I mean, I don't know what this is all about." ^ This is the beginning of Verse 1. These quoted lyrics have particular significance for me, taken from a song I did ten years earlier. Endless reflections into a literal mirror, viewing my form trying to see beyond the eye that viewed it and then something more. The dreamer that dreamed to know what made the dreamer. And this is where I leave you with a final thought, consider how as we head deeper into the post-dreamer world, as dreamers are replaced by technology that does the dreaming for them, with brief algorithmically timed entertainment hits. The night that for so many centuries reflected our time and space to venture into the worlds beyond and to cement the dream we wanted to make in the waking one, will now be used to consolidate territory over the entirety of our collective mind, taking one individual mind at a time, until it’s capacity to dream the world that made this silent virus, is completely overtaken. I yearn to not just dream, but to hold the full capacity of my dreaming in the palm of my hand, that is the power that I scream for, and that is the power that I will continually nurse in daylight, and grow in moonlight. To not be taken by the world’s trends, but to rail against them. This is rebellion. To do so with creative flare, this is independence. To do so in a way that shows others what they too should be fighting for and what they too can master, this is great leadership. My presence is not required on this forum, it is merely to help show what can be done. Feel free to join me through your own contributions, that is the true meaning that created any great civilisation, that survives the patterns of ruin that are always easy to predict in advance. Your foresight, is sight on your greatest dream, and that is the only seer you need to protect. Best wishes, stay strong.

Preface: Thank you in advance for not commenting on my journal. I’ll drop something July 1st thereabouts. If anything I create thats more than a paragraph is going to be called AI, or scrutinised as such, worse if it’s reflective of the bottom of the barrel concerning my cognitive effort… and while jet lagged, under-slept, it’s better to just post publicly when I feel much less emotional investment in the sharing itself. Initially a branch-off from my two (one is quoted) comments here: Ha! No hard feelings on my end, it’s economics. Welcome the dystopia with open arms otherwise you’ll become too frustrated and become its own example. Simply continue to make calculated moves to your next strategic intersection. I hope I haven’t disappointed anyone with the lack of April 1st release, you just gotta see it from my perspective. It’s simply not smart anymore to invest effort when the environment is going down this kind of momentum. When I share, people can just call it AI, and I won’t care. This is the end of my journaling I guess, ha. I promise to share July, but the series likely stops there onto something else related to helping me in my studies (as that’s what this series on the mappings of consciousness was mostly going to be about), so I no longer have the emotional investment into the sharing itself given the trajectory of where things are likely heading now. To ensure after my break this doesn’t happen again, I’ll avoid the rest of the forum as intended so I don’t get hung up on anything external to my own personal activity. Heck, if I only stick to the journal section for my entire reading I’ll have a positively distorted perception on the progress of the site and maybe thats a good thing heh! Heh, you kiddos will be fine. I’ll clean up my journal anyway and go back to a purely detached posting here once I return then. Best wishes, good luck. Prologue: Thank you for not commenting on my journal.

@UnbornTao No. I feel like if we have reached such a dystopian period that something I wrote on the fly without effort is questioned as AI, I should have paid more attention to the patterns before I chose to write it. I will have more restraint in future. Please direct any further correspondence elsewhere, thank you.

The forum from an outsiders perspective (a friend of mine) appears circular and non-progressive while appealing to progressive spiritual ideas, which creates distorted overly inflated positive perceptions on anything thats genuinely positive just to keep it’s baseless core alive. Conversations do not build on one another and no system is in place to actually capitalise on progress made in communication to contribute to all people that choose to benefit. Instead all conversation when viewed across time is inputted into total empty space, something that any intelligent person would simply side step rather than invest in any non-eventual meaningful discourse. This creates a culture where every persons perspective is inflated beyond its value, where comments contributed are purely a dopamine spike and where the return to zero is just at the service of of the sites baseline. This is the problem when site dynamics mirror that of the casual societal dynamics that never move anything heavy in the real world. They never help people they Band-Aid them. They never talk about issues they label them. They never contribute to causes they virtue signal or talk out of their ass and then send an emoji while pointing to the next conversation that may give them another emoji dopamine spike. This forum has been online for over ten years, has it genuinely helped people or been a complete waste of time? It’s a relevant question. To me, and I struggle to see otherwise, at the heart of it it’s just here to serve the social insecurities of others that don’t spend enough time interacting with the real world. How do I know? Becsuse they come back here and continue to talk about things thst carry no weight and use it as a crutch rather than something that reflects investment into their future and something that may benefit others in their contributions. I see fist bumps, fart comments and at best of any lengthy discussion, ego stroking. That’s fine intermittently, but not as a foundation for a self-actualisation site. It turns the whole forum into a parody of personal development, not a system designed with the interests of all persons contributing. When you’re turquoise and above (although I don’t follow spiral dynamics), systems should already be a priority following from one’s integration from stage Yellow. A system of self-actualisation needs to be at the heart of why people are sharing on the forum. I want to encourage personal creativity by moderators and Leo in designing their own system, but I am also happy to share my ideas further, perhaps it’s better to contribute to another thread someone creates centered around agreement towards some kind of system change or at least ideas around rather than just circling negating points. Otherwise, this discussion will become yet another void, another vacuum, a black hole people orbit with their time only to come out the other end with cheap laughs, zero progress in their lives and lost memories they could have meaningfully injected into real life. Make this discussion into a small step forward for change on the forum is my best recommendation, @Leo Gura don’t let it just be ‘another thread’ or at most brief emotional bumper sticker before the next users hijacked attentional system gets drawn into the next emoji of what has become a wasteland emulating too many qualities of what doesn’t constitute a personal development forum much less one built on a strong systematic foundation to benefit everyone. “Casual” as the forum is called, is the topping of the cake but it can’t be called the substance unless the forum is just here to suck up everyone’s time including yours Leo, when in reality it’s just hijacking cognitive biases thst breed the illusion of choice for the illusion of progress. A forum is a place of connection at a particular centre, that centre is self actualisation. Let “casualness” be the unifier that softens the edges of people coming from many different backgrounds, not the reason people want to leave once they fished an epiphany to chase genuine meaning in their lives. Now I need some sleep after only having about 2 hours, plus jet lag plus changing time zones. Best wishes. Sincerely, good luck.

I stand… Uncorrected. - ChatGPT’s list below of worlds most self-aware women (granted after sharing it asked me if I wanted to narrow down outside of mainstream culture i.e. academia). (Dating collapse due to degrading standards for self awareness across both men and women) Okay… before we get into confirmation of my theory… now just brace yourself for a moment. Take a deep breath. Now I want you to just take a moment to wonder honestly within yourself about the most self aware women you can think of in the world. Got it? Fantastic. Now sink into that search until you can come up with ten women. I have mine, however most are literally just my friends. Neurosurgeon (newly), psychologist, studying medicine, engineer, and… I’ll leave it there. Have a guess what ChatGPT came up with! Ha, now here comes GPT’s list of “THE MOST SELF AWARE WOMEN IN THE WORLD UNDER 50!” This… is utterly embarrassing for mainstream western culture I mean surely you can see the PSYOP by now right? OKAY here we go, fuck what a smoke screen mainstream culture really is, shit that zombie 🧟‍♂️ 🧟‍♀️ ache of folk has really got the Eeeek/X factor. I’ll preface this by saying I don’t know enough about some (Zendaya, Malala Yousafzai, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - tho I have listened to Cortez once or twice) of the women. Irrespectively, Eileen Gu (read previous post) is a FAR better role model than any of these women below. Three of the women on the list arguably have narcissistic personality disorder thats the the hilarity of it. I won’t say who as an exercise of discretion. Before I share the list, here is one more popular name of a woman that others are likely less familiar with but will remember her from the big bang theory. Personally, I actually think Ms. Gu may actually be more self-aware in specific areas, that said from Mayim Bialik, yes it’s her, offers many lessons and this is the final lesson I’ll share with the reader for now. Is that you should not even be focusing on learning specific lessons from any one individual person in general, instead you should be looking at them from the meta level and asking yourself, where are their strengths and weaknesses in self-awareness and how can I convert those patterns into useable data to help my own self-awareness advance down its natural course?” Thats it. Okay let’s get to the list, afterwards, I will share Mayim’s YouTube channel at the bottom. Have an open mind in applying the meta question I posed. GPT’s List: 1. Taylor Swift (b. 1989) Exceptionally meta about narrative identity, public persona construction, and autobiographical authorship. 2. Emma Watson (b. 1990) High linguistic precision about gender identity, fame psychology, and social role internalization. 3. Greta Thunberg (b. 2003) Strong moral clarity; minimal ego-diffusion; consistent value alignment under pressure. 4. Lady Gaga (b. 1986) Explicit meta-commentary on persona construction, trauma integration, and identity fragmentation. 5. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (b. 1989) High rhetorical awareness; strategic framing consciousness; public cognitive transparency. 6. Zendaya (b. 1996) Unusually mature self-positioning in fame context; controlled narrative boundaries. 7. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (b. 1977) Advanced meta-cultural cognition; layered identity analysis; high epistemic humility. 8. Ariana Grande (b. 1993) Open about trauma, grief integration, and identity shifts across career phases. 9. Malala Yousafzai (b. 1997) Consistent reflective articulation of purpose, fear, and personal growth. 10. Billie Eilish (b. 2001)

Eileen Gu. What an inspiration she is for women. She journals constantly She breaks down her thought patterns She studies her own mind like she studies her own freestyle skiing This is the kind of woman you want to wife up. Many guys struggle on this forum with motivation, thinking they lack this and that, when in reality you are just positively reinforcing patterns that do not serve you. Do the opposite, watch change occur. Thats my own approach. Guys are caught up in mainstream dogma and because of it they’ve been completely blindsided as to what discipline is about. “Discipline” is literally to the word “Disciple”, and the core meaning being you simply become a discipline of your own patterns. Study, re-write, execute your own prophecy, return to the end of the night back to nothingness so you can objectively analyse and not get caught up in your own swagger to make a slight iteration that brings you slightly closer to your potential on what you’re working on. Rinse and repeat over and over and Eileen will become a woman you will naturally attract in real life. Excellent example she sets for modern women, where most need better healthy guidance.

Jesse Michels (YouTuber) is an interesting interviewer on this subject.

There’s generally always good aspects to find in many faiths, ideologies, religions, theories, hypotheses, experiments, cults, culture, societies and various other kinds of churches. The problem however is you’re asking a human whom has not been properly trained for life to interpret what eventually defines their actions. This is when the veneer starts to peel off the MDF board. Not enough glue, not enough time in the press, the press was anchored with too much weight, the board was left out in the rain and its dampness is ignored. It’s super important to realise that human perception is imperfect, especially when they perceive their perception as perfection itself. This is when their bubble becomes divine, their echo within it becomes gospel and the words they will write through a void that will eventually take their epistemic humility, their bible they indoctrinate others with. I have friends of many faiths, you’re moving in the right direction; Muslim, Christians from the United States all the way to Tailand, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, you name it. Every faith has validity to it, outsiders often do not have the education to intelligently observe and communicate it. But for the very same reason, every faith becomes its own vice in as much as there isn’t that same education concerning interpretation. Belief in this case often becomes the privilege of judging another, and the basis for conflict over understanding. There is a voice in every human I meet that needs to be heard, but all our voices must be refined in both the words we read, listen to and finally write and say. Keep questioning without a final resolve and the puzzle will continue to reveal itself to you slowly. Our perception is fragile and our confidence often overstated regardless as to how much epistemic humility we say we have, so differentiation is foundational. Where knowledge to wisdom cradles every weakness and strength of another with one’s own in the context of the greater universe, life spells out its own harmony. Your job isn’t to carve out a religion, and that isn’t the goal of epistemic rigour. It’s balance between consciousness and the greater universe, starting with making sure you have a roof over your head, are prepared financially and can form non-artificial friendships with the outer world if that isn’t already a priority over worrying about the ignorant perceptions of others or even your own concerning your personal faith. With balance comes the humility to consider and have gratitude for all perspectives, with the wisdom to discern where balance must meet conviction. Best wishes, good luck @Schahin.

Outside my praise and critique on your approach to scientists specifically where I hadn’t gotten into the gaps in understanding pertaining to science, it was a bit of a sloppy introduction. Anastasia and Michael (Shilo) really took the time to think about who you were and what you were about, reflected in their introduction. You didn’t even bother to mention their actual names @Leo Gura or give an accurate assessment about what their channel is about. And this is coming from someone, in this case me, who heard about their channel first from you. I was excited to see it all unravel. You mentioned the interview a month in advance, you had all the time in the world to think about who they were as much as they did yourself, and yet you mention them as they’re just movie extras. Doing a personal level headed connected introduction is not difficult to do and only makes you look good. It’s a little disappointing, and still reflects a lack of maturity in your own approach in certain areas especially around socialisation. It was a great inspiring video, but the social awareness makes it feel lacking. Best wishes.

Pope says, Priests response to epistemic responsibility is, “AI said to say ‘Rain-check on THAT!’”, so he thumps his crown jewel: https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/pope-priests-ai Great work Leo. My opinion here hasn’t changed however; I’m sure explanation isn’t needed. There’s a tremendous bias there, and it comes across as really irrational in the context of a subject you otherwise delivered well. In general, I think even if it’s sometimes good as a persuasive tool, in the context of such deep subjects like these striking generalisations like those you made about science, comes across as irrational. There are over ten million scientists in the world, at most two million are from 🇺🇸, however in the greater STEM fields there are over thirty million in the USA. In the context of where you’re talking about a subject that is its own implicit academic discipline in the people or area in which you’re criticising, sweeping statements however well intentioned or even where they validly apply to say popular scientists on YouTube, reflects a lack of rigour. Moreover, I am sure that on your forum alone I am not the only person here that can detail numerous scientists that are on the record from YouTube that reflect the exact opposite of your statements. That said, it also shows a lack of clarity present in your view of science around the world, from all different religions, faiths and general cultures, it seems like you overly focus on American culture, and that in itself can blur the very vision that reflects mainstream western culture in general. Irrespectively, I think it would help you more going forward if you adopted more differentiated views as we head to increasingly more complex diverging views into the future as opposed to language that alienated and detracts attention from those that otherwise genuinely wanted to engage with your content but now view yiu as lacking open mindedness when it comes to developing a more nuanced perspective on the demographic you’re criticising. Parallax perspective. A new word to my vocabulary by the way. Appreciated. Sincerely, thank you. It’s much needed in our culture and that was one of your better videos so just expressing gratitude. You did good.

I would like to see a purely research focused area of the forum. My broad dominant research focus is on anti-ageing. I will be spending a lot of time, money and creative capital concerning. I think adding this area would create a positive feedback loop with the rest of the forum. Topics can span any area of research on personal development, with a preference towards peer reviewed research. The forum needs to build a healthy relationship with science, striking a balance towards pro-research and experimentation while encouraging oppositional stances towards bureaucratic entropy. This approach invariably leads to implicitly teaching meta-rationalism, contributing to the creation of an environment that fosters both creative independence and collaborative intelligence. The forum can sometimes be a vacuum for enabling identity issues, reinforcement of identity without proper integration and aimless ego signalling. And this is in part because the environment isn’t fully yet “critical thinking implicit”. By slowly moving towards titles that instead turn the site into an interface that implicitly and indirectly encourages self reflection, wrapped in casual humour, it doesn’t just act as a site that makes a user feel like they’re making progress in their life, it provides them with the direct influences to do that without users, moderators or contributors feeling like they have to make it their job to do so. It’s social momentum with the right reinforcing tags. I also recommend a research area within the “Mental Health, Serious Emotional Issues” itself, establishing it as a case study example of how adding something as simple as a research portal where people can access prior shared resources can have a dramatic positive influence on a section of the forums environment; providing the research template is cleverly designed in a way where it feels engaging rather than triggering, helpful and safe over intimidating, progressive rather than feeling like “you’re too cool for school” to checkout the resources. After the experiment is successful, this simple mechanism can be improved and applied to other and even all areas of the forums environment. People get to come onto the forum and pretend to be themselves rather than actually be themselves and move towards their own personal growth. By installing simple mechanisms like a research button, it pre-installs a little more self-awareness, engagement and cooperative behaviour respectful of mutual creative independence. Great work on getting the site speedy again! Heh, it’s a breeze!

@Natasha Tori Maru informed consent vs uninformed. @Leo Gura I was actually impressed with Michael’s (Shilo - middle name) simplicity on the subject. You did really well, genuinely. Feedback: Purely going by what she said - Directly quoted - “You told us that you were going to explain three things. the ultimate structure of existence, the nature of love, and the nature of God.” Some interviews are more casual than others, however I would spend some time delineating all four subjects (inclusive of when she tripped you up on defining love, despite you, as best as I can infer, drawing a distinction between human love and universal love) at their connection point that makes moving between them seamless during an interview setting. I get that it was your first interview in a long while, but those subjects at their core, went only partially answered despite it being the stated conceptual drivers for the interview, as stated by Anastasia. I would ease back in future interviews on using terms like “truth psychopath”, it can sound edgy but on subjects like morality where people are either less informed and therefore a little dogmatic or people that have thought deeply on the subjects, it can be harder to reach people; which is kinda one of the points of the interview, to reach more people. I would also do the same for critiques of certain areas like academia as one example, the more refined your points on interviews like these the more of a win-win it becomes as they are both genuinely open minded warm people. Broad critiques are the strategic drawcard, but on the reel in to getting the actual catch, like getting an interview, it’s laid out mapped concretely. You’re handling very difficult subjects, and the people that want to listen, want to really listen, and like strapping a load of timber on a truck, the better you do it the safer your message is going to land safely home where people will be most receptive. You’re uniquely positioned as a conversant in the spiritual demography, capitalise on that devastatingly. Irrespectively, 1. You kept composure under sharp pushback. Anastasia and Michael have had some really ego fuelled guests. 2. Framed “relative vs absolute” to defuse literalism. 3. Flagged survival/incentives as bias generators (institutions, self, culture). 4. Validated boundaries (“leave abuse,” don’t tolerate harm) so nonduality isn’t pure passivity. That was an excellent distinction. 6. Prompted epistemic humility a number of times. Like distinguishing belief/speculation from direct insight. You really underscored distinction as a grounding concept being the foundation to your drive over your journey, this positions you as someone that could break the linings of many different kinds of demographics, making you a valuable guest in any interview the better you grt at this overtime. Good luck on the next interview, excellent overall, and we all loved the robe. Best wishes.

I like international restaurant, city, country, and convention rushing. Every now and then, ambition takes over and I run from a city in one country all the way to a city in another country. Generally, I like to keep my life simple and worldly. Life is a big container and I struggle to fill it. Depth to heart; breath to mind; connection to body.

Every now and then I do ambitious things, like running from one city of a country to another. I am also up for anything with the right person. In general though, I enjoy restaurant hopping from city to city much more, creative conversations to extend my consciousness, research conferences of various kinds. Night clubs can be fun with the right folk. Conversations are the most enthralling. I don't enjoy YouTube, masturbating to porn or masturbation in general (there are too many people to develop a bond with), social media outside of maintaining alliances with creative engagement. I like films that help me explore the edges of how my mind architects enjoyment and meaning. The simple stuff. The circus within life, is well... The circus. Outside the circus though, life is simple. Most people unaware they entered one until after they exited, are usually met with with a variant of ego denial, regret or a combination. I also enjoy being the architect of alternate realities through game, film and conversational thought experiments.

@Valach Fizzle out performative empathy, and from there, stack the real stuff, bit by bit. Appreciation. Good luck.

I solely filter for empathy. It's the lock-in trait or at least the oil for literally every other quality as a mother, and for what I'm looking for in a relationship. Everything else is Play-Doh around that. I don't even have to watch the video. I have thought about this topic for literally thousands of hours, and I have spent thousands of hours raising my nephews and nieces as well. So when I say empathy, you know a guy like me has more refined narratives on what that actually means than standard memetic soup. Absorb as much life as possible, fine-tune the release. Aaaand... Exhale. It's been my dream to become a father and a husband since I was a teenager, everything since then has been adaptation, attunements and deeper life experiences. Until then, I enjoy the Play-Dome.

@Cred you should make a book thread! Add: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations. I’ll read your book list tomorrow.

People are out of touch if they can’t see the asymmetry concerning the extra emphasis on looks these days. Outside of how I brought up earlier regarding people being trained via social conditioning to see people certain ways, asymmetry in opportunities is why physical asymmetry is a global problem that should be taken very seriously in terms of solving. I agree with Mike Israelite that it will be solved within the next 10-15 years. Blog entry by Leo Dec last year. https://www.actualized.org/insights?p=21 Symmetry applied analogously is at the heart of solving most internal and external problems. And it’s important that people understsnd that at a core level in helping them accurately diagnose not only this particular issue, but their response to it (as Leo mentioned in his blog regarding the building of social skills which have their own important developmental curve) and how they can apply their minds in understanding their developmental curve in other areas and their own internal resolution in response to the realities that unfold there. The root of most political campaigns is just posturing either about resolving disparities or paradoxically, revealing how one side is better than the other. When symmetry is solved in not only physical beauty which in itself will have a massive impact on global politics, but also intelligence, creativity, social ability, empathy and including financial and general resource power, which seems at this stage may actually become the easiest point to solve in the relative future, many things collapse into the kind of Oneness that we’re all kind of looking for. In a good outcome to future tech advantages, I am just looking forward to going to a party for the first time in ten years or so time where everybody is just happy to be themselves without any insecurities anymore 😉. It makes you realise, just how much absence and lack vs ability and abundance have defined so much of the problems in both global and local environments as well that which we take for granted, creating the attractor point of the black-hole each individual and collective ego orbits. Isn’t it going to judt be so cool that no matter who you walk up to in the party you can just say whatever you want however you want and you’ll both no doubt be able to engage in a fun deep conversation? Heh. The days we have ahead…

We’re so simple minded here in Australia 🇦🇺 . Today’s news from the most popular mainstream newspaper: I usually never take the news seriously because of this. But it just goes to show my comments above have some credibility I am not just talking out my ass 😉👑. Our news is so dumbed down from the actual complexities of our realities here 🤣. The irony of Angus Taylor’s words is that at least 50% (and I am underestimating) of Australians habe immigrated into our country in only the last fifty years. If you go into our city of Melbourne, 90% of people will reveal that to a casual viewer I don’t need to go into specifics. I am not at all racist, as I have stressed my step-mother is from Beijing and I have many friends from Asia and am friends with many immigrants as I say. It’s just the obvious deceptions at play which now can only be viewed with a positive sense of humour to break the ice! 🤣

@CARDOZZO not towards you directly of course, that said, I feel a little suspicious about this kind of content from its creators. Look, my parents were not exactly Sigmund Freud, and I think the majority of us probably side with a sentiment that doesn’t at least stray too far from here. However I know, even if as a child due to their own misunderstandings around how to raise a human being to avoid these struggles, I felt many of these issues that have been raised and I have consequently had to do a lot of inner work. Inner work, that has transformed me in ways though that I never could have imagined achieving, and I hope that brief note inspires others to continue on their mindful path by the way. Our parents are human beings at the end of the day, and I know the tendency exists for people wanting something or someone to blame for at the very least some inner life circumstances. Some closure, some way to put a nail in the peg of a tent to figure out how they’re going to setup camp. That can be okay for a while, however eventually, you want to build a solid home for yourself. Strong floors, walls and a roof of protection both inwardly and outwardly for life circumstances, and part of that is a foundation in logic not ego, psychology not victimhood, self-awareness and other awareness not blame projection. Telling people their lives suck because of other people is a multi-million dollar industry and telling people that it’s their parents fault is the biggest money maker of all because they can stay mad at them for an entire lifetime given their parents were most responsible for their well being from day zero which always quickly answers the question to oneself “How did I wake-up in this shitty world? Oh my parents, well how irresponsible of them to even have me. How did I wake-up with this pain in my heart? Oh my parents didn’t teach me emotional management skills”. And it just goes on and on even though the parents most often are just naive and ignorant no more than anyone else in their times. Having children was encouraged in most of western culture and brainwashing was as good as its ever been in the times that most people were born. Emotional management, self awareness skills and trusting psychology beyond the stereotypical belief that “psychology is about how Freud wanted to convince his patients that they wanted to sleep with their mother” is a very new thing which is what people don’t really get. Even if many of the techniques date back as early as the 1980’s they were not mainstream until at least 2010 or later. In answering the questions, it’s all 6 for me without a doubt. However my father had a bit of an Asperger’s streak while at the same time he had a massive heart inside, my mother has her own trauma growing up. These two things alone for any reasonable person forces their humanness to be considered before we tie em up for however many lashings we believe they deserve concerning from Satan himself. Moreover, it’s not even the case that for many parents you’d even be able to sit down and have an honest conversation about some of their early imprinting that at the very least didnt exactly go to plan, something that would only fuel an offspring’s own projection about their parents. Missing the fact that its not even just human nature to not want to own up to responsibility and think reflectively about potential past mistakes, rather it’s the horror as a parent to think that you may have done something wrong given how serious parenting is taken in society, extreme denial is far more likely to cover extreme shame than for them to sit one down and say “Jimmy you know what, you’re right. I didn’t build the emotional skills you needed. I didnt help you enough with your math homework. And I should have played soccer with you more growing up. I am sorry”. These were not the norms growing up, not only were so many working families so stressed from their jobs that their cortisol levels impacted their judgements at home with their children, they themselves simple we’re not equipped to think about anything else other than praying they can put food on the table for their children as opposed to dealing with the devastating shame of not being able to provide for their children. And sure theres many children from wealthier backgrounds with similar problems, however it doesn’t mean the terrain suddenly changed on the availability of information, the questioning of societal norms and the amount of denial projection that would result from undesirable consequences from simply combining those two alone. I am not saying there are not terrible parents, I am saying that it needs to be compared to societal norms at that time not now and also with all of any aspect weighed against who the human is underneath simply being called a mom or a dad. That’s what we want them to do for us, so at the very least we can take it upon ourselves to learn all the information we can in the world to ensure we don’t make the same mistakes if not towards our own children but continuing the problems within through a lack of self education in an age where we are in knowledge overload over how to handle inward struggles like these now. For anyone struggling, I totally get all the struggles above including wanting to judge a parent this or that way becsuse of this or that we didn’t get that we believed we deserved for the simple fact of being their child. But it’s not going to be the path towards full closure, only self education and doing the personal inner work will set a person free and not only reclaim their own sense of well being but also be able to view their parents through the same lens following their renewed sight. I’ll inspect the resources anyhow maybe theres a little something I can learn. And for anyone struggling, you have my sympathies but please take an honest look within both yourself and your parents, then take proactive action on a small steps today in preparation for the practical step of tomorrow. Human ignorance is usually the issue first and foremost over the failure of being human, even for the most selfish of parents that shouldn’t escape accountability, unless they’re pure psychopaths theres usually a little something there to bring context to. Thank you. Best wishes.

@Cred Hi Cred, Just reminding you to keep that fire alive. Every obstacle is a potential new insight, in at least one direction with our own development always being one of those. Best wishes, oOo.