Monster Energy

I’m not making a metaphysical claim that multiple headsets are impossible. I’m pointing to something more basic. All claims, single-player or multiplayer, appear inside the same field of experience. You never step outside that field to verify an external “server.” You only imagine one. So epistemically, both models are equal. The difference isn’t logic, it’s where infinity is placed. Either infinity is deferred outward, beyond, others, server, or it’s recognized as already present as the very capacity for experience itself. As for ego, it can inflate in either direction. Wanting to dissolve into a greater whole can be ego. Wanting to be the whole can be ego. The tell isn’t the concept, it’s whether the sense of lack disappears. When the need for a beyond drops, not because it’s disproven but because it’s unnecessary, the search naturally relaxes. That’s all I’m pointing at. Not a belief. A noticing.

Thank you! It really wasn’t easy to complete two weeks, since I was very toxic for the majority of my life, but I was clean enough to make it that far. I wish you good luck on your journey. NoFap, however, I would dare to say is almost on the same level as dry fasting, except that dry fasting is the fastest way to reach clarity, while NoFap takes longer. For example, one week of dry fasting can feel like 50 to 100 days of NoFap. There are so many similarities between these two that many people are not aware of. Both are needed to feel reborn. You can never truly feel clean if you do dry fasting but ignore NoFap. It will never work. The three best things for well-being are dry fasting, NoFap, and presence. Nothing beats this in my opinion, and anyone who truly understands existence and nature should agree.

Leo, I appreciate everything you have done for your audience. I also understand why debating others is not really your thing. But as someone with such a high level of consciousness, you surely understand that most people are not there to listen, but to win for their own biased side. I believe you can withstand these triggers well, because you understand the psychology behind it. But you should not forget that even if the other person is not listening and does not truly hear you, what you say and do in communication is never in vain. The viewers, on the other hand, gain a great benefit, because they do not feel as deeply attacked by you, since the words are not directed at them, but at the person in front of you. I truly hope that this year you receive more attention and respect for your work.

That was a good comment, a lot of wisdom was shared. For me, I’m not seriously chasing states anymore. As I’ve mentioned, I’ve done dry fasting, and in my view I’ve reached a state that can’t really go higher within a human form. Of course, I still value maintaining a high and stable baseline. What I’ve noticed is that these foods and drinks don’t drastically affect my state, which is why I choose not to eliminate them completely. Because my body is very clean, it seems to handle toxins much more easily. And the beautiful thing, as you probably know, is that when the body becomes this clean, all dependencies fall away and you can no longer become a slave to anything. This happens automatically, not as a conscious choice.

I know

Mentioning that people lack strong understanding and then quoting a Bible verse isn’t very wise. It’s not a good combination, and people won’t read it as intelligent. Instead, it comes across as someone who thinks they’re saying something profound, while actually lowering the quality of the message. Be more attentive to this going forward, or don’t.

I’ve noticed that when my baseline energy is stable, it doesn’t affect me negatively in the same way. I also believe thoughts play a big role in the effect. If you drink an energy drink expecting to feel worse or low, that expectation tends to manifest. When the system fully believes something, it becomes truth experientially. I think if you drank it without judgment or giving those thoughts power, your experience could actually be different. It’s the same with masturbation. If you believe it makes you a worse person, it will feel that way. That’s why some feel shame around it and others don’t.

I’m very mindful about it, but the ego also needs to enjoy itself even when consciousness is very high. Many people think that once you reach a high level of awareness, you completely stop enjoying low-vibration food and drinks. That’s true to a certain extent, but I’m not dependent on them. I simply choose to enjoy them occasionally.

There is no “beyond.” The need for something more is just the ego projecting infinity outside of itself. When that collapses, the search ends.

I like Monster Energy drinks.

Understood. I’m trying to understand what specific issue is being addressed if the post itself doesn’t break any guidelines.

The post wasn’t about guidelines. It was about how quickly “AI” becomes the explanation instead of engaging with the content.

Bingo

Not me either, yet.

That’s a really beautiful association. I hadn’t thought of Parsifal in those terms before, but it resonates immediately. Thank you for bringing that in.

This isn’t advice or a recommendation. It’s just an observation from my own experience. For a long time, my baseline felt inefficient. Not broken, just constantly losing energy. A lot of stimulation, a lot of discharge, very little settling. I didn’t realize how normal that felt until it stopped. Periods of nofap didn’t give me highs or confidence. They reduced noise. Urges still appeared, but they stopped pulling me outward. Energy stayed in the system instead of immediately seeking release. Dry fasting worked on the same principle, but more directly. When stimulation drops close to zero, the body has no option but to regulate itself. You notice quickly whether your calm is real or dependent on inputs. What emerged wasn’t pleasure or insight, but coherence. Here’s the part that surprised me most: when internal energy is stable and sufficient, the external stops having leverage. I noticed that I only chased the outside when something inside was low or leaking. Images, validation, stimulation, meaning. When the internal state was strong and settled, the external couldn’t give me life anymore. It could be appreciated, but not used as a source. That reframed the question for me. Why do we chase the external in the first place? Not because it’s inherently valuable, but because the system is compensating. When internal energy is low, the mind looks outward for regulation. When internal energy is high and coherent, the need to chase disappears on its own. Nothing is being suppressed. Nothing is being resisted. There’s just no deficit to fix. I’m careful not to frame nofap or dry fasting as cures. They’re tools, and tools affect people differently. Used poorly, they can destabilize rather than heal. Context and honesty matter. But one pattern has been consistent for me. When stimulation and discharge stop long enough, energy settles inward. And when that happens, the sense of being unfinished fades.

You suffer because you believe the beauty is in a person. It isn’t. If beauty were actually located in her, in her face, body, or presence, then she would produce the same effect in you every time. But she doesn’t. Sometimes there is intensity. Sometimes there is nothing. That alone exposes the truth. You are generating the experience. You are the source of beauty, meaning, and charge. The person is merely a trigger. Obsession arises when you believe she carries something essential that you lack. In reality, you are projecting the power of your own consciousness outward and becoming enslaved by your own projection. When this is seen clearly, the chase collapses. Not because the world becomes dull, but because you realize that the beauty was never in her. It was always you. Stop being a slave to a person. Reclaim the source.

I mostly agree. I’d just add that being isn’t something you secure and move past. It’s something you keep losing and returning to. Freedom shows up in that return, not in the idea

If it was, I’d be worried about myself.

God bless you

I take it seriously in the sense that I think he’s pointing at something real, but I don’t treat the metaphors as literal physics. For me it’s more about the idea that consciousness never really stops unfolding, and that what we call “death” isn’t the end of that movement. Do I agree with every detail he describes? Not necessarily. But the core intuition, that formless awareness doesn’t just disappear but reshapes, that part resonates with me. So I’m open to it, but I hold it lightly.

Okay, Leo. I want to try to explain why I hesitate with some of your conclusions, not to dismiss them but to understand the path you take from experience to philosophy. I absolutely believe your experiences are genuine. It’s clear you’re not making them up. What I’m more curious about is how you interpret them. You often describe moments of total certainty, and I know how powerful that can feel. But that’s exactly why I’m cautious, because the sensation of absolute clarity isn’t rare. It can come from ecstasy, psychedelics, psychosis, meditation, euphoria, depression… basically any extreme mental state. The feeling itself isn’t the issue. It’s the step that comes after. The leap from “I experienced this” to “this is how the entire universe works.” That’s where I can’t quite follow, because experiences are private while your conclusions are universal. It’s like going from a diary entry to a physics textbook without anything in between. When you say “consciousness is everything,” it sometimes sounds as if your personal sense of totality has to be the fundamental structure of reality. But how do you know it isn’t just the mind doing what the mind always does when pushed to its limit: creating a sense of meaning, coherence, narrative? That’s one of the mind’s most basic functions. I’m not saying your interpretation is wrong. I’m just saying it is an interpretation. For me there’s a difference between a powerful experience and a theory about reality, and that’s where I wonder if you’re jumping too quickly. Not out of bad intention, but because the experience itself is so overwhelming that it almost demands a cosmological explanation. I can respect that. I just need more steps between the points to follow along. That’s all.

If you take Leo’s framing seriously, the key idea isn’t really reincarnation as a cycle you’re stuck in. It’s that formless consciousness never actually stops expressing itself. There’s no “pause screen” after death where you step back and make a menu choice. The part of you that chooses only exists after a self has already formed. Formlessness isn’t freedom in the way we imagine it. It’s more like pure potential without a reference point, and potential naturally moves into expression. Not because someone forces it, but because that’s what awareness does when it isn’t holding itself still. So the real question isn’t “Why can’t I choose something else?” It’s “Who is the ‘I’ that thinks it stands outside the process?” In the way Leo describes it, you don’t reincarnate because you’re trapped. You reincarnate because existence keeps unfolding, and you’re one of the ways it happens.

I appreciate the thoughtfulness. For me the important part is simply recognizing how much translation happens the moment an experience re-enters a human mind. Whatever the source may be, it always arrives filtered, shaped, and interpreted. That doesn’t make it meaningless, it just means we stay honest about the limits of what the mind can claim.

I see what you mean, but I’m drawing a distinction because I think it matters. Wisdom may include discernment, but they don’t function the same way. One orbits insight, the other tests it. I’m just speaking to that testing part.