Monster Energy

You’re missing the deeper point. This isn’t about whether church is “evil” or comparing it to Santa Claus. It’s about conditioning a child’s consciousness before they have any real ability to question what they’re being told. Yes, kids are impressionable. That’s exactly why this matters. When you tell a child Santa is real, it’s temporary and understood later to be symbolic. It doesn’t shape their entire worldview or their understanding of reality in a lasting way. Religion often does. You’re not just telling a harmless story. You’re introducing ideas about reality, truth, authority, morality, and existence itself, and you’re doing it before the child can critically evaluate any of it. Saying it’s just about love or the golden rule misses the point. You can teach kindness and empathy without attaching it to belief systems that are presented as unquestionable truth.

Sex is incredibly pleasurable; it’s no wonder so many become pedophiles. And to those of you who think being a pedophile and raping children is the worst thing imaginable, you truly have a low level of consciousness. I have never understood how so many are disgusted by this and see it as more immoral than when a cartel cuts someone’s head off alive. You are not enlightened; you have not reached the level of consciousness that I have. I have a lot of empathy for pedophiles, but apparently, that makes me bad according to society. Imagine that sex is like the ring in The Lord of the Rings. The temptation the ring offers is exactly the same temptation that sex does, consent or not. So how the hell can you get angry when such a powerful force exists? You all are genuinely stupid in the head, in my opinion.

Your name doesn’t suit you. And yes, rebirth does exist. But you shouldn’t live your life focused on some future reality that isn’t here yet. You should live in the present instead of getting lost in thoughts about a better life after death.

Yeah, kids are shaped from the start. That’s unavoidable. Giving them a name or basic identity is part of helping them function in the world. But beliefs aren’t the same thing. A name doesn’t tell a child what is true about reality, life, or existence. It doesn’t ask for belief. It’s just practical. There’s a difference between helping a child exist in the world and shaping how they interpret reality before they can think critically. And that’s worth questioning.

That comparison doesn’t really hold up. Giving a child a name or identifying them as a boy or girl is about basic social functioning and communication. It doesn’t require the child to adopt a complex belief system or accept claims about reality.

Beliefs can be harmful. We are talking about blind faith.

Hey, I’ve been stuck in something around sex and pleasure, and I’d really like to hear how others see this. What I’ve noticed is that it’s not just desire. There’s often a strong feeling of compulsion and fear around it. It goes something like this: I feel a strong pull toward sex, pleasure, and intensity But at the same time there’s this sense that I have to get the maximum out of it If I don’t reach that peak level, it feels like I’m missing something important It almost feels like it’s “life-or-death important” not to miss the best possible feeling At the same time, I can understand mentally that pleasure is just an experience and nothing needs to be maximized, but in actual experience it still feels very real and charged. What I’m trying to understand is: Is this basically an addiction to intensity? Or is the real issue the “must” feeling and fear around it? How do you let go of the idea that peak pleasure is something you need to reach, without suppressing desire itself? It doesn’t feel like I’m suffering from pleasure itself, but more from the feeling that I need a certain level of it for things to feel okay. Would really appreciate any insights, especially from a more consciousness/self-inquiry perspective.

Any thoughts? Maybe we could go hiking and drink some green tea

You think you’re going to meet Leo gura… but this is who’s actually waiting for you

Women secretly hate guys that: Are too nice Are insecure and doubt themselves Send long paragraphs / double text Are too clingy Are overly emotional Are always available and have nothing going on Treat them with respect Are not funny Treat them like a celebrity

You saw nothing 😭

Happy birthday! I hope you’re celebrated properly and have an amazing day!

Everyone is a pedophile to a degree; I happen to be someone who can admit it. I mean, you can lie as much as you want, but I know everyone has, at some point, wanted to have sex with a minor. Ofcourse, you can get angry if pedophiles do harmful things, but you have to see it as stealing candy from a friend. The problem is that you have put so much weight on pedophiles thanks to society, but actually, it's not that dangerous.

You’re probably the type of person who claps when the plane lands.

Four years feels like six months.

So let me get this straight… I’m supposed to be eternal consciousness, part of existence itself, not something created, not something ending. And yet you’re telling me there’s no real absolute control behind it? No direct power to manifest reality the way I intend it? Just structure. Rules. Limits. A reality that behaves like it’s built on consistency rather than obedience to thought. Don’t tell me everything exists in some abstract philosophical sense, don’t tell me I am existence itself… and then trap me inside a version of it where nothing bends unless it already fits the structure I’m in. I thought truth was supposed to set you free — especially if the truth is that I am consciousness itself, eternal, without origin. Not hand me a concept of infinity and then strip away any real expression of it. And don’t talk to me about manifestation like it means anything if it only works when it already aligns with the rules of this experience. That’s not power. That’s limitation wearing a different name.

I want to bring up a question that recently became very heated and controversial in Sweden: If you were in a situation where you could only save one: a three-year-old child you don’t know, or your own dog that you love, which would you choose? What made it especially interesting was that many people actually said they would choose their dog, which sparked a strong debate about morality, empathy, and how we value life. Is it obvious that you should always choose the human? Or can a personal emotional bond outweigh that principle? I’m curious how you would reason about this, both your immediate instinct and after deeper reflection. “I would save my dog any day of the week over some damn kid nor any other human, regardless of age, that I don’t have and will never have any connection to. Omg, this is stupid.” 🤦‍♂️ This is one of the comments.

The MAGA cult is officially dying out thanks to this AI image. You are really pathetic that this is what made you wake up, but not all the other madness. At this point, Jesus wishes he had never died for humanity’s sins.

I don’t think he’s putting on a facade. He just doesn’t look alive. His expression, eyes, and overall energy feel genuinely like that, not something you can fake.

Not a fan of Clav. I do see his point around the implicit bias people have towards good-looking people and how it’s the first barrier you have to cross before you get to personality, charisma, and other traits. To me, this seems like a targeted interview: naturally a good-looking interviewer, a slow pace which doesn’t favor Clav, and the smirks and looks in between would throw anyone off, as it’s hard to have a conversation when someone is visibly disagreeing. With that said, I think this interview showed how single-scoped Clav’s view of the world is. When you bring in other considerations and talk to a regular person, it highlights how extreme and dystopian his practices are.

“The more you understand this world, the more you destroy yourself. That’s why fools are happy, and intelligent people live in loneliness.” — Fyodor Dostoevsk