Lord of Darkness

Oh no you are all wrong, final truth is but eternal void from which all forms sing into existence

Am I Happy thee asks? Oh yes very happy... World as it is... yes... verry happy...

Follow the darkness and void you shall find...

"You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity" I think I'm gonna adapt it as my daily mantra bespoken to my obsidian mirror

Free Software, Free Society of Richard Stallman TedTalk It is the first TEDx talk of the founder of Free Software movement, Stallman describes how nonfree programs give companies control of their users and what users can do in order to recover control over their computing. https://youtu.be/Ag1AKIl_2GM?si=naCdzOYOk_jX6sIV

Slavish Ship of Sheep I hate apps i hate phones. Not inherently, but the way its made and idiotically broadly accepted. The data use is so disguisting and unclear and it seems provider can include anything they want in it and there is no realistic oversight. Its just so deeply unnerving cos if you dont use it you dont have A reach to ppl... this is all so fucked on so many levels simultaneously and you can proove me wrong if you can. The way it's normalized, like "just accept the terms and scroll," while providers sneak in trackers for everything from your location to your keystrokes? , it's deeply fucked, and it traps you in this catch-22: opt out, and you're cut off from friends, work, or that audience you're trying to build Take recent scandals: Samsung's been catching heat for pre-installing an unremovable app from IronSource that hoovers up device IDs, IPs, and location data, raising surveillance red flags with no easy opt-out. Or the UK's GOV ID Check app, which logs way more than needed—user behavior, device ads, session tracking—despite claims of minimalism, all encrypted in ways that dodge oversight. And Lifeprint printer app leaking millions of user photos and sensitive info just this year. Providers can (and do) cram in whatever trackers they want, often buried in fine print, and enforcement? Spotty at best. Even "privacy-first" apps like the NHS one stitch together third-party services that force you to hand over data rights just to book a doc. It makes me hate ppl sometimes. Even otherwise intelligent guys and even it engeneers shrug the shoulders and overlook it even if pointed out . Its so unbelievable how slavish bulk of ppl are for exchange of intoxicating social convinience. How much % of global ppl is just completely oblivious about it IN PRACTICAL TERMS? Its not even that difficult to solve technically. Here: you can scrutinize my practical aproach// ditch phones. Use linux. Use minds or bluesky. Use websites not apps. Its still not perfect but its available to use but like i said im deeply puzzeled how deeply unconcious and impulsive and just.... how you can be such mass slavish hooked up zombies but its like Clarice from silence of the lambs trying to free the sheep and they just stand there and puzzeled by the disturbance coused to their established social order. It's the stuff of nightmares—intelligent engineers, sharp minds, all glazing over at the mention of trackers because the scroll feels too good to quit. It's not just laziness; it's engineered addiction, a collective trance where the convenience high overrides the creeping dread. And yeah, pointing it out often lands like shouting into fog: "But it's fine," they mutter, as if trading soul-bits for likes is a fair swap. Im not using apps more then necessary from now on. I ll use phone minimally. I will opt out for community and open-source soft. Maybe ill start campaign for other ppl to get more aware and apply few simple solutions. Its terrible on some level cos apps have bilions of user and most of them on the phones and its a seemingly perfect for content sharing and starting up as artist... BUT its so terrible for me and others that i would rather jump off on some little lifeboat then participate in rat race to the top on sinking titanic.... or is it not titanic... its "progress" and i am deluded and sociopath?

People have diffrent characters and temperament. Many of Leo advice is good just not good for me and in round about way I had to forge 95% of my own solutions based on 5% principles included in some video of his... so whats the point of even watching it? Well.. it gives you somewhere to start, then forge thy own destiny!

@Yimpa Thanks. I hope to live up to the manance of thy expectations...

Hi. I'm new here though had seen some amount of actualized videos over the years. I've read through the guidilines and I base the presumed allowence under point 2 in "what is allowed" , being "strong opinions.." Many places on the internet thrive on convinient and emotionally ticking content. And its hard to be at university today without subscribing to mass bias. Some of the mass stupidity can be only adressed via satire... or so myself find myself beliving... Some of the questioning of widely accepted norms can rise the eyebrows however they had been blindly accepted in the first place thus when questioned people in question can scarcely provide arguments for their faith. Thus I would like to humbly enquire to what extent parody, satire and questioning of established mainstream narrative is here allowed... or shall I say... even welcome? Thy humble servant His unholiness Lord of Darkness

@Basman thanks. I think im gonna start about apps and data user concerns. Its so dark it deserves a spark. Dont you think? Various things. I can write political parody. I can unfold a relationship of perfect male and female pathology as they meet and make kaboom. I can explore antropological stanpoint for certain dynamics to be naturally emerging however not set in stone. I'm not one sided, its more like taking diffrent test tubes in the lab of ideas and see what happens when you put things to various arrangements...

Various things. I can write political parody. I can unfold a relationship of perfect male and female pathology as they meet and make kaboom. I can explore antropological stanpoint for certain dynamics to be naturally emerging however not set in stone. I'm not one sided, its more like taking diffrent test tubes in the lab of ideas and see what happens when you put things to various arrangements...

??? ... %%% It being contemplative as to the natural philosophy and emerging dynamics. In your episode on "how society makes you stupid" you make various points that out of context perhaps would be considered contoversial or could tick off some people. But in my view its a dive into subject that is important but taken shortly becomes vulgar calling of names but in some extent it just frames the conversation in broader consideration. Yes I might be diving in some primal things. "Low consciousness" , "regressive", "Anti-woke trolling" ... these could be considered negative conotation terms. And I could perhaps write a whole post just about breaking down those terms and offer more neutral ones instead. But these requires bit of context. Doing comedy or satire can be walking a tight rope and diffrent people can recive it differently. I would call it: geking out on philosophy with satirical twist or "voltaireing it", cos... as to paraphrase Nietzsche "one must have chaos within to give a birth to dancing star" I guess we'll see how it goes... as you put it...

Poor are poor cos they are poor, they undermine themselves and each other at every step, oh besides game is rigged... oh dear... you have library of alexandia and more at thy fingertips... art thou truely so poor?

Babyfood