Cred

Imo the best theory about healthy breathing is Buteyko

April 5th 5.1 1 Integrate the four elements. 2 I want to improve my understanding of "potence". Chat on testosterone: "Increased competitiveness • Greater risk-taking • Increased energy and drive • Sometimes higher aggression when levels are high" 2.1 So this seems to fit to potence pretty well. So testosterone=potence? 2.2 estrogen: "Influences mood regulation • Supports memory and cognition • Often associated with emotional sensitivity and social bonding" 3 vocabs hunger 4 composites: 00 = Absolute 01 = Graspable 02 = Body 03 = Soul 04 = Mind 05 = Spirit 06 = Consciousness 07 = Idea 08 = Meaning 09 = Ungraspable 10 = Duality 90 = Unity 11 = Flesh 91 = Skin 12 = Stability 92 = Collapse 13 = Cohesion 93 = fragmentation 14 = Softness 94 = Rigidity 15 = positionless 95 = position 16 = directionless 96 = direction 17 = stillness 97 = velocity 18 = deceleration 98 = acceleration 19 = ceassation 99 = conflagration 20 = thaza = Simplicity 80 = svaza = complexity 21 = Repetition 81 = non-repetition 22 = = Reflection 82 = non-reflection 23 = Point 73 = non-point 24 = thachra = Mirror 74 = svachra = non-symbol 35 = thava = Sequence 75 = svava = non-sequence 36 = Dynamic 76 = non-dynamic 37 = thasva = masculine 77 = svasha = non-masculine 38 = thanga = Feminine 78 = svanga = non-feminine 39 = thagsha = Intelligence 79 = svagha = non-intelligence 30 = Granularity 70 = self-similarity 31 = Entity 71 = Multiplicity 22 = Interaction 32 = Coexistence 23 = Order 33 = Chaos 24 = system 34 = Part 35 = Individual 75 = alienation 36 = Family 86 = stranger 37 = Tribe 87 = Outcast 38 = Society 88 = Foreign 39 = Whole 79 = Fragment 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 61 = Attribute 42 = Complement 62 = Contradiction 43 = Symbiosis 63 = Exploit 44 = Life 64 = Death 45 = Consonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 66 = Disharmony 47 = Beauty 67 = Doubt 48 = Projectivity 68 = Receptability 49 = Immortality 69 = the now 50 = Transcendence 28 = non-Concept 88 = Concept 27 = Awareness 87 = Unawareness 29 = Truth 82 = Illusion 54 = Dissolution 56 = Substance 55 = fava = Emptiness 0 = ts eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = tr ui th iu 4 = chr oa r ao 5 = f ai v ia 6 = s ie sh ei 7 = sv äa shv aä 8 = k äi gsh iä 9 = g ae ng ea April 6th 1 vocab pillow Stability-body-thing 13-02-41 nuizuefan stability-thing 13-41 nuifan ~ soft-thing scarecity 60 setso Instrument consonance-thing Playing (an instrument) "an action that produces consonance in a thing" consonance-thing-potence Exitability body-reflectiveness sensitivity body-reflecitiveness-receptability projection (psychology) self-reflection 2 Does potence and passivity come from the five axioms or are they separate? 3 Calculate the amount of combinations of a two composite word with only one bit active in each digit. 3.1 If per digit it's four possibilities plus four additional vowels for the consonants, for a 2 two composit, 4 digit word, that's 8^4=4096 possibilities. I think that should suffice. 3.1.1 So the number of two letter words is 100x100x4096=40.960.000? 4 Relearn about PCA and compression. I feel like this is what I'm doing intuitively. 5 Transitive vs intransitive verbs 6 "A morpheme is the smallest meaningful, indivisible unit of a language" holy shit okay it seems the composites are morphemes. 7 you need to contemplate the term "semantics". 7.1 "In logic or philosophy: It deals with how symbols and statements relate to what they represent in the real world." 8 Remember to use ~ from mathematics roughtly meaning "they are related"

April 4th 4.1 1 composites: 00 = Absolute 01 = Graspable 02 = Body 03 = Soul 04 = Mind 05 = Spirit 06 = Consciousness 07 = Idea 08 = Meaning 09 = Ungraspable 10 = Polarity 90 = Singularity 11 = Duality 91 = Unity 12 = Skin 98 = Flesh 91 = Fragmentation 11 = Cohesion 92 = Stability 12 = Collapse 15 = positionless 95 = position 16 = directionless 96 = direction 17 = stillness 97 = velocity 18 = deceleration 98 = acceleration 19 = ceassation 99 = conflagration 20 = self-similarity 80 = granularity 21 = Entity 81 = Multiplicity 22 = Interaction 82 = Coexistence 23 = Order 83 = Chaos 24 = system 84 = Part 25 = Individual 85 = self-alienation 26 = Family 86 = stranger 27 = Tribe 87 = Outcast 28 = Society 88 = Foreign 29 = Whole 89 = Fragment 30 = thaza = Simplicity 70 = svaza = complexity 31 = Repetition 71 = non-repetition 32 = thata = Reflection 72 = svada = non-reflection 33 = thasha = Point 73 = svasha = non-point 34 = thachra = Mirror 74 = svachra = non-symbol 35 = thava = Sequence 75 = svava = non-sequence 36 = thasa = Dynamic 76 = svasa = non-dynamic 37 = thasva = masculine 77 = svasha = non-masculine 38 = thanga = Feminine 78 = svanga = non-feminine 39 = thagsha = Intelligence 79 = svagha = non-intelligence 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 61 = Attribute 42 = Complement 62 = Contradiction 43 = Symbiosis 63 = Exploit 44 = Life 64 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 66 = Disharmony 47 = rashva = Beauty 67 = sashva = Doubt 48 = Potence 68 = Passivity 49 = Immortality 69 = Irreparable damage 50 = Transcendence 28 = non-Concept 88 = Concept 27 = Awareness 87 = Unawareness 29 = Truth 82 = Illusion 54 = Dissolution 56 = Substance 55 = fava = Emptiness Phonemes: 0 = ts eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = tr uae th aeu 4 = chr oa r ao 5 = f ai v ia 6 = s ie sh ei 7 = sv aea shv eae 8 = k aei gsh iea 9 = g ae ng ea 2 I've realized that it is a good idea to switch the speed etc one from 50 to 20 scince it seems that 00 is substance 10 is emergence 20 are forces 30 is geometry 40 is dialectics 50 is transcendence It makes a lot of sense to switch awareness, concept, truth to trancendence and position, speed acceleration to forces. This seems to make a lot more sense now. 2.1 Problem: I feel like the ordering could also be substance forces emergence geometry dialectics transcendence 2.1.1 If I make 10 unity instead of duality it checks put again actually. Also it makes sense to think of emergence as an extension of duality. 3 First post under the pseudonym Creddilles Branaris! It's on! 4 Every villain is also a visionary 5 an HSP is an echo chamber

April 3rd 3.1 1 composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Graspable 02 = Body 03 = Soul 04 = Mind 05 = Spirit 06 = Consciousness 07 = Idea 08 = Meaning 09 = Ungraspable 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = Entity 91 = Multiplicity 12 = Order 92 = Chaos 13 = Interaction 93 = coexistence 14 = system 94 = Part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 96 = strange 17 = Tribe 97 = foreign 18 = Society 98 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 99 = Fragment 20 = Duality 80 = Unity 23 = Cohesion 83 = Fragmentation 24 = Stability 84 = Collapse 25 = Substance 85 = Dissolution 26 = softness 86 = rigidity 27 = Awareness 87 = Unawareness 28 = non-Concept 88 = Concept 29 = Truth 82 = Illusion 30 = thaza = Complexity 70 = svaza = Simplicity 31 = thana = Repetition 71 = svana = non-repetition 32 = thata = Reflection 72 = svada = non-reflection 33 = thasha = Point 73 = svasha = non-point 34 = thachra = Mirror 74 = svachra = non-symbol 35 = thava = Sequence 75 = svava = non-sequence 36 = thasa = Dynamic 76 = svasa = non-dynamic 37 = thasva = masculine 77 = svasha = non-masculine 38 = thanga = Feminine 78 = svanga = non-feminine 39 = thagsha = Intelligence 79 = svagha = non-intelligence 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 61 = Attribute 42 = Complement 62 = Contradiction 43 = Symbiosis 63 = Exploit 44 = Life 64 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 66 = Disharmony 47 = rashva = Beauty 67 = sashva = Doubt 48 = Potence 68 = Passivity 49 = Immortality 69 = Irreperable damage 50 = Transcendence 56 = direction 54 = position 57 = velocity 53 = stillness 58 = acceleration 52 = Decelaration 59 = conflagration 51 = ceassation 55 = fava = Emptiness Phonemes: 0 = ts eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = tr uae th aeu 4 = chr oa r ao 5 = f ai v ia 6 = s ie sh ei 7 = sv aea shv eae 8 = k aei gsh iea 9 = g ae ng ea 2 Vocab ressentiment constant-fragmentation-potence 57-83-48 forgiveness bug chaser true culture false culture caricature capitalist Time repeated-space 31-20 thuotuzo 3 Remember: 15000 Particles, 2000x1000 world size particle life 4 I've removed unity-duality and flesh-skin since it seems to me to lead to redundancies.

https://sandbox-science.com/particle-life It's so fascinating, I can't stop looking at and playing with it. It seems to be some advanced form of the game of life. I believe that it can teach us about the deepest secrets of life and consciousness.

That life seems to be a lot more trivial than I thought. The rules of particle life are more complex than in the game of life but still pretty basic. And yet what it produces seems to be a big chunk of different modes of being. What usually happens is that these particles start clustering in some ways, and it is usually the case that the most stable configurations start dominating. This already feels a lot like natural selection arising just from a bunch of particles with simple rules. What's interesting is that each of these species has unique properties. Some are going superfast, some are just sitting still, some oscillate in some way, rarely, some even start reproducing. All of this seems really lifelike and also mind like and human like. They all seem to have some state of consciousness. Some seem nervous, some seem calm, some seem majestic, some seem zen, some seem aggressive, some seem excentric and creative. Also, they interact in interesting ways. I have found a configuration where one species tracks the other one down to repeatedly thrust into them. I've called this preset "the molesters". I think the biggest thing I've learned is to ask myself: "What is the best case scenario?". What I've realized is that in the most beautiful configuration, there is some mix of stability and chaos. Usually most configurations end up in either some kind of stagnation where nothing is moving or some kind of chaos where one creature dominates and just flies around and sabotages any other lifeforms from forming. So what gives the most beautiful results is when there are some species that destroy structures that are too rigid with that species being able to be destroyed too.

2 2.1 1 composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Graspable 02 = Body 03 = Soul 04 = Mind 05 = Spirit 06 = Consciousness 07 = Idea 08 = Meaning 09 = Ungraspable 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = Entity 91 = Multiplicity 12 = Order 92 = Chaos 13 = Interaction 93 = coexistence 14 = system 94 = Part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 96 = strange 17 = Tribe 97 = foreign 18 = Society 98 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 99 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = non-polarity 21 = Unity 82 = Duality 22 = Flesh 82 = Skin 23 = Cohesion 83 = Fragmentation 24 = Stability 84 = Collapse 25 = Substance 85 = Dissolution 26 = Awareness 86 = Unawareness 27 = non-concept 87 = Concept 28 = Yin 88 = Yang 29 = Truth 82 = Illusion 30 = thaza = Complexity 70 = svaza = Simplicity 31 = thana = Repetition 71 = svana = non-repetition 32 = thata = Reflection 72 = svada = non-reflection 33 = thasha = Point 73 = svasha = non-point 34 = thachra = Mirror 74 = svachra = non-symbol 35 = thava = Sequence 75 = svava = non-sequence 36 = thasa = Dynamic 76 = svasa = non-dynamic 37 = Masculine 77 = non-masculine 38 = Feminine 78 = non-feminine 39 = Intelligence 79 = non-intelligence 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 61 = Attribute 42 = Complement 62 = Contradiction 43 = Symbiosis 63 = Exploit 44 = Life 64 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 66 = Disharmony 47 = rashva = Beauty 67 = sashva = Doubt 48 = Potence 68 = Passivity 49 = Hero 69 = Anti-hero 50 = Transcendence 51 = ceasation 59 = conflagration 52 = decelaration 58 = acceleration 53 = stillnes 57 = velocity 54 = position 56 = direction 56 = direction 54 = position 57 = velocity 53 = stillness 58 = acceleration 52 = Dedcelaration 59 = conflagration 51 = ceassation 55 = fava = Emptiness Phonemes: 0 = ts eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = tr uae th aeu 4 = chr oa r ao 5 = f ai v ia 6 = s ie sh ei 7 = sv aea shv eae 8 = k aei gh iea 9 = g ae ng ea 2 rememver pidgin 3 Silex is the principles, Silexism is the worldview, Silexology is the study of Silex? 4 Idea: There is resonance-dissonace but also konsonace-interference 5 Vocab Pocket contain human absolute-reflection building verb sequence-graspable-flesh 35-01-23 building noun sequence-graspable 35-01 power law monumental-acceleration-idea 19-51-07 average simplicity-complexity-polarity-balance-position 30-70-20-46-54 30-70 the norm hegemonic exploitative-norm Konsistency repetition sensitivity reflection integrity point Empathy mirror Rationality sequence Ingenuity dynamic testosterone estrogen 6 idea for element video: show time lapse of you painting the characters 7 Internet slang vocab aura potence-reflection aura farming repeated-potence-reflection larp slop accelerated-simplicity 8 Idea: Potence = 48 is aggression and power, passivity = 68 is 9 remember Taijitu. Remember the utmost extremes.

April 1 1.1 1 "The person sees the animal" 51 05 88-32-22 51 70-11-62 fuo zai giashtuod fuo äezouniet 2 composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Spirit 09 = Consciousness 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = Entity 91 = Multiplicity 12 = Order 92 = Chaos 13 = Interaction 93 = coexistence 14 = system 94 = Part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 96 = strange 17 = Tribe 97 = foreign 18 = Society 98 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 99 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = non-polarity 21 = Unity 81 = Duality 22 = Flesh 82 = Container 37 = Aware-self 77 = Unaware-self 38 = True-self 78 = Conceptual-self 26 = Cohesion 86 = Fragmentation 27 = Stability 87 = Collapse 28 = Substance 88 = Dissolution ?? = Authenticity ?? = Alienation 23 = Love 87 = Fear 30 = Complexity 70 = Simplicity 31 = thana = Repetition 71 = svana = non-repetition 32 = thada = Reflection 72 = svada = non-reflection 33 = thasha = Point 73 = svasha = non-point 34 = Mirror 74 = non-symbol 35 = thafa = Sequence 75 = svafa = non-sequence 36 = Dynamic 76 = non-dynamic 37 = thashva = 31, non-34 77 = svata = 34, non-31 38 = thaghei = 32, non-35 78 = svadu = 35, non-32 39 = thaenga = 33, non-36 79 = svanga = 36, non-33 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 61 = Attribute 42 = Complement 62 = Contradiction 43 = Symbiosis 63 = Exploit 44 = Life 64 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 66 = Disharmony 47 = rashva = Beauty 67 = Doubt 48 = Potence 68 = Passivity 49 = Heroism 69 = False heroism 50 = Transcendence 51 = acceleration 59 = deceleration 52 = speed 58 = stillness 53 = direction 57 = directionless 54 = position 56 = positionless 55 = Emptiness Future/anticipation, giving/recieving, outward/inward, Phonemes: 0 = ts eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = th uae sh aeu 4 = chr oa r ao 5 = f ai v ia 6 = s ie ps ei 7 = sv aea shv eae 8 = k aei gh iea 9 = g ae ng ea 3 Problem: If I combine consonants, the meaning becomes obscured but that's not that relevant I think. 4 Idea: Create spreadsheet with all composits where you define the meaning of each phoneme combination. 5 Vocabs up unity-direction 22-53 tuevath down duality-direction 23-53 tashvath ground upright 22-23-53 tuetashvath forward path-direction 40-53 chreovath backward right left future past new old good bad open close emergence complexity-path-essence complexity-path-meaning optimal Superposition multiplicity-position 99-57 work breath body-oscillation body-graspability "dialectical opposites" complement-conflict-polarity 42-68-20 oatosukuezo transforming path-embodying 40-23 oazotusho brutality fragmenting-potence psychopath non-reflection 78 Psychoanalysis mind-path-analysis mind-path-sequence 07-40-35 zaeechrotsu Computer sequence-thing Existence grasping-space Ignorace un-aware-mind 77-07 Morality meaning-path Bridge polarity-path-thing 20-40-41 Silex polarity-path-idea 20-40-01 dialectics resolution-idea 20-01 6 control problem wild concept. You def. have to dig deeper into emergent complexity theory. 6.1 remember the website particle life 8 I just realized something incredibly stupid that's also super cool and I think easily fixable. I realise that it doesn't make sense to invert both digits. If I just invert the first digit, then the last digit is the same in both composites and then they can be made sound related, which is useful. 9 Beauty = 47 = rashva includes acceptence of human imperfection.

@croonprince Thanks!

30 30.1 1 I could do the rule, that a digit encodes additional meaning if it is a local maximum or a local minimum 2 "So topology is the most general framework for describing “closeness”." Holy shit????? So 24=topology???? 2.1 23 = flesh. 23 24 = 04 = body. 2.1.1 if 04 is the body of christ, what is the blood? I think it's a combination of 02 = meaning and 12 = essence. So it's 02 12. I wonder if a theologan would agree with this. 3 "turkish has a linguistic feature called evidentiality" 3.1 I could maybe do evidentiality with point/diffusion but it's kinda hacky. Yeah wait I could add it at the end. No this would totally work I think. 31 31.1 1 If I want to care for my survival and popularize the Silexian worldview, I might need to find the most populist version of the Silex to make accessible to the masses. I think 2 simplicity = 70 is unconditional love 3 Possible gameplan: 3.1 Experiment with and polish Silex 3.2 Finish it 3.3 Make pdfs describing it 3.4 Build up Dictionary 3.5 Build Silexian Canon 3.6 Popularize it trough the internet 3.7 become a Messiah, make Silex the new world language and take over the world mwuhahah 4 composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Spirit 09 = Consciousness 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = Thing 99 = Plurality 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = foreign 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 91 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Duality 22 = Flesh 88 = topology 37 = Aware-self 73 = Unaware-self 38 = True-self 72 = Conceptual-self 26 = Cohesion 84 = Fragmentation 27 = Stability 83 = Collapse 28 = Substance 82 = Dissolution ??=?? 23 = Love 87 = Fear 30 = Complexity 70 = Simplicity 31 = Repetition 79 = non-repetition 32 = Reflection 78 = non-reflection 33 = Point 77 = non-point 34 = Mirror 76 = non-symbol 35 = Sequence 75 = non-sequence 36 = Dynamic 74 = non-dynamic 37 = 31, non-34 38 = 32, non- 72 = 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Matter 69 = Being 42 = Complement 68 = incompatibility 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Exploit 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 64 = Disharmony 47 = Beauty 65 = Alienation 48 = Potence 62 = Passivity 49 = Heroism 61 = Anti-hero 50 = Transcendence 53 = direction 1 57 = direction 2 54 = High 56 = Low 52 = right 58 = left 51 = That 59 = not 55 = Emptiness Future/anticipation, Phonemes: 0 = ts eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = th ui sh iu 4 = ch oa r ao 5 = f ai v ia 6 = s ie ps ei 7 = sv äe shv eä 8 = g ei x ie 9 = gn ae ng ea 5 Silexian Terms 5.3 Silexist: Person who studies Silexism 5.3.1 Silexism: Scientific study of the Silex. 5.3.1 Silexology: Broader Study of Silex, also esoteric. 5.4 Silexis: Silexian Language (Lexis greek for speech and word) 5.4.1 Silexicon: Silexian dictionary 5.5 Silex: The Silexian ontology/worldview/teaching/ideology/dogma 8 Marxist-Silexist Terms 8.1 "That part of society that upholds the culture through embodiment" point-part-noun 33-96-11 Thiungienomu 8.2 "That part of society that is non-point and alientated by the thiungieza" non-point-part-noun 77-96-0 Sveängienomu 8.3 "people who struggle to embody something because they lack complexity and exeggarate these insensitivities to compensate" 30.2 1 Idea: There exists the convention that The less phonems of one digit are used, the more important or common the word. 2 Problem: Potentially not enough grammar. Idea: Option to extend the last digit to one more to encode more grammar. Problem: Then I need the convention, that when there is an even number of digits, the last two are always grammar-digits. 2.1 Here is the thing I don't think it makes sense to do grammar properly without having contemplated it enough 3 Ontology of grammar 3.1 noun thing 11 nou verb embodying flesh 22 due adjective Essence 12 nue Pronoun self Name Individual 15 uoia Subject Potence 48 fie Object passive 62 Predicate 20 3.2 Yeah this is great. What's cool about this is that it kinda makes grammar optional in some sense. Also it's just way more consistent and it doesn't need any additional rules. This is fantastic. 3.3 Whoah what's crazy is that aince I have defined subject, predicate, object, the sentence structure suddenly doesn't matter. Also since I ditched that encoding bullshit, the language can now kinda be understood in it's numeric form. The crazy thing about this is, that this means every culture could use it's own sentence structure and phonems that are closer to the original language and the language could still be communicated through the numbers. I can imagine though that a centralized approach is still the best. But it's good to have the added flexibility and security. 4 Countries 4.1 India Soul-country-name 05-19-15 zaiuonguoha China Path-country-name 20-19-15 Tezuonguoha 5 Rembemer TAM

Thanks for the recommendation! I happen to be working on a conlang, so I'm kinda into grammar and linguistics rn

I'm encouraging you to have relationships with neurotypicals but don't expect that it's easy. It requires work, and it is hard not to alienate each other but it's possible and necessary as you say. If it is done right, there is nothing more powerful than a partnership between a neurodivergent and a neurotypical. They are meant to live in symbiosis together.

29 29.1 1 19=infinite, 91=finite 2 I went to the drawing board and had an idea. My idea is to codify the Lexcal category. and the mode of continuum, etc., in single digits. The rule is: if a digit is codifying grammar information, the digit before it and the digit after it can't do so too. To signify that a digit is codifying grammatical information, the digit that is before in the digit that is after both have to be of lower complexity than the digit that is codifying. So it is a local maximum. This makes two to the power of four equals 16 (minus 5 = 11, because the bare minimum complexity has to be two to be able to be a local maximum?) ways of codifying grammar in one digit. 2.1 the idea now is that the first local maximum codefies the Lexar categories, so noun, verb, adjective, etc., the second local maximum codifies the place in the continuum. One idea of the third local maximum would be to qualify, unity, duality, repetition, reflection point, resodence, harmony, beauty, potence, hero. 2.2 it seems like I really need all 15 variations. So I have an idea there's another code for zero complexity, which is just the first vowel of the first double vowel this way a digit with singer complexity can be a local maximum. 2.3 so the new rule now is: the 15 variations of the first maximum codify lexical categories and might even include things like cases. 2.3 the second one is the continuum plus the five axioms. The third one is resonance, dissonance, harmony, disharmony, cohesion, fragmentation, stability, collapse, Intimacy, isolation, tranquility, Obsession, Authenticity, Dissolution, transcendence 2.4 idea: if I have a word with an odd number of digits, then the first digit is only codifying grammar. Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait, if I require every word to have an odd number of digits, then this solves the problem how to separate words from each other. (context: I want a text that is written with the characters to be a perfect grid. The problem with that is that I can't use spacing to signify words if I require every word to have even length.) 2.4.1 what I need to do is to build a rabbit hole for people to dive into with a ton of different PDFs and videos and courses, etc., and then lure them with the utter beauty of written text in those characters. Context: I'm optimizing the shit out of the beauty of the geometry of the characters. There are nested golden ratios in between golden ratios with golden ratios. i'm trying to find the perfect balance between order and chaos. I want this to be as beautiful as Chinese, Japanese, etc. Right now it's actually also you're looking pretty unique. what's brilliant about this characters is that there are extremely expressive, but they are actually only 10 and there are easy to learn because they reference the digits from 0 to 9. All of the extra information about grammar, etc. is stored in combinatorics with different elements of the characters being activated or deactivated. 2.5 I think I might have to change the order that my continuum is encoded with. I need the more mundane things like body soul mind graspable, repetition reflection point to be encoded with less complexity than this lofty terms like ungraspable, absolute consciousness, etc. I need to find some structure that is easy to remember and apply. I need to experiment more with the language to learn which ones of the 15 are the most used and the most relevant and try to find an order of complexity then. What's really cool is that if the absolute for example, is the most complex one, then it's symbol is also the most complex one and the most beautiful one, which checks out because if you are talking about the absolute, you would also want to honor it by dwelling on it for longer by pronouncing more phone names, and by drawing a more complex symbol. 3 what is "long"? 4 I think personifying might actually be a better word than embodying 5 I think one idea to come up with the vocabulary is to create a sub-reddit and recruit linguist ontologists to build a dictionary to be canon. 6 a nice word for 40 is "direction" 7 composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Spirit 09 = Consciousness 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = singular 99 = multiple 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = alien 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 91 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 70 = Simplicity 31 = Repetition 79 = Stagnation 32 = Reflection 78 = Absorbing 33 = Point 77 = Diffusion 34 = Sequence 76 = Parallel 35 = Dynamic 75 = stillness 36 = Symbol 74 = Concrete 37 = Aware-self 73 = Unaware-self 38 = True-self 72 = Conceptual-self 39 = Intelligence 71 = non-intelligence 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 69 = Being 42 = Complement 68 = Incopatability 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Exploit 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 64 = Disharmony 47 = Beauty 65 = Inauthenticity 48 = Potence 62 = Impotence 49 = Heroism 61 = Anti-hero 50 = Transcendence 53 = direction 1 57 = direction 2 54 = High 56 = Low 52 = right 58 = left 51 = That 59 = not 55 = Emptiness 8 I could use 53 direction, 157 direction 22 mean and down in combination with continuum, right and left in combination with complexity, and forward backward in combination with resolution 40 9 omg I totally forgot singulplural. Wait I have 11 and 99. I could instead of noun, codify singular-plural+ cases? 29.2 1 "Encode features as combinations Example: Let each variant encode a binary vector: • noun vs verb • subject vs object • animate vs inanimate • definite vs indefinite" 1.1 "Split your 15 variants into feature bits Example: • 3 bits → role (8 possibilities) • 1 bit → number (singular/plural) • remaining bits → word class" 1.2 Idea: Encode word class with 3 bits, number with remaining bit, roles (subject, predicate, object) with words order. (do I also do cases? I cound maybe just allow for cases but only with composites) 1.3 idea: if for example, one of the composites is of continuum, then the continuum code is skipped. In the same way, if the singular composite is chosen, then the code for codifying categories is expanded to cases? 1.3.1 the thing composite is a noun, the function composite is a verb. what is adjective? 2 the intelligence system has the ability to be safe alienated if it's structure and it's complex complexity is not affirmed and respected 3 I kinda need to contemplate the roles, cases and classes. 4 wait wait wait wait wait wait wait I just realize something. If the first digit is only four grammar, then it's value can also be used to encode grammar information! OK so idea: the value of that digit code Elias the word class and the code code defies the cases? 5 idea. What I could also do is allow for a single digit to stand by itself so to take up the space of one composite that is in the middle of the two spaces to signal it is separate, and use it for either, etc. and in that way, save the need to encode pronouns and whatever I'm encoding in the single digit. 6 Silexian analysis: More broad and integral than psychoanalysis 29.3 1 I could also call this type of project a paradigm. It might be better than "formal ontology". What is the precise difference? 2 I could use the first digit of a word with an off number of digits for the ten lexical categories. now the question is, what do I codify with that digit? I could codify: 11 = singular 99 = multiple 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = alien 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary But for a lot of them I don't know how to put them into grammar. 2.1 If I do this I have the most insane grammar. 2.2 Damn the language is complete for now I think. I will need to start translaating and see if I run into issues. 3 For every digit, I might need a special vocal to signify that it has "zero complexity". 4 inbetweem the words is space for emojis!😊🫨 5 omg I just had the craziest idea. Since the language is both digital and alphabetical, I think one could type letters and digits at the same time and I could write a program that interprets them in real time in theory making typing extremely fast. I don't know if that's too crazy of a thing to master though. 5.1 like for every two digit number you could with the left hand, write the first digit and with the right hand on the number pad write the digital code. 5.1.1 For example: n#m: n is the digit and m is the flexation (0-15) zeo(0#3)1#4(uo) could without a problem be written with both hands typing at the same time as z1e#o4. This could be interpreted in real time and converted into the symbol or the written version 5.2 I think this language allows for way more crazy hacks that are unimaginable rn. 5.1.1.1 I like this 6#12 notation. So one word could be like 7#8:9#2:6#15 or 7.8:9.2:6.15 or 7•8-9•2-6•15. That's crazy. So it seems there is the alphabetical, the numerical and the symbolic way of writing the language. That's so cool. I really hope this isn't trash 6 Individual+noun is name so 0•8=oe? Damn. jaw drop. I could do 0•14=god=zoetzu this would be fun lmao 7 The Kant quote: "Intuitions without concepts are blind" is a perfect summary of the motivation of this project. 8 Can I make the rule, that after a consonant, ANY single vowel can follow without destroying any meaning? This would increase the amount of possibilities to name different things drastically.

rationality and irrationality are dialectical opposites. If you don't act rationally, you become vulnerable ti the things you don't undersand. But if you cling too much to rationality, it will turn into irrationality. If you swing back-and-forth between a conscious, dynamic harmonious way, you can harness the benefits of both

This idea that you need to change is only going to make you less charismatic. Seek out and socialize with other neurodivergent people. They will like you more than neurotypicals

I'm here

@WonderSeeker is it necessary to speak one of these asian languages to be able to teach english?

28 28.1 1 dude I need to somehow relate the phonems with the english words for the numbers as a mnemonic device 2 0 = p ae b ea 1 = ř ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au ğ ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo Mnomonic version: 0 = tz eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ui d iu 3 = th oi sh io 4 = f oa v ao 5 = pf ai pl ia 6 = s ie ps ei 7 = sw ae shw ea 8 = g ei x ie 9 = gn äi ng iä zero, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine AA, AE, AI, AO, AU EA, EE, EI, EO, EU IA, IE, II, IO, IU OA, OE, OI, OO, OU UA, UE, UI, UO, UU 3 Make it such that it can be typed on an english (and chinesekeyboard 4 Idea for convention: The more complex the composite, the more abstract/lofty/devine/metaphysical/ontological it is. I could rank actually from profane to devine with respect to how many phonems are active in a given composite. On every level of loftiness, there is wiggle room for the different lexical categories. 4.1 These level could mirror the 01-09 sequence actual 4.2 numbers are the simplest in writing but the most complex in speech, symboloizing the wrap around from spirit back to id 4.3 Completely different idea: I could also just end nouns with "thing" for example. Maximize flexibility I guess. 4.4 That's crazy is just works out. so from zero full names being active to eight phones that's nine and total and there are nine stages in the continuum. So when there are no phones active in the symbol, this this means that actually all of the phones are active, which means that then the most lofty concepts that relate to spirit are pronounced the same as abstract mathematical ideas, which makes perfect sense because the continuum web wraps around. 4.5 what's so fantastic about this is that it can be signified when the word is about something material or for example, something of the body. Suddenly describing something regarding the bodies way easier now. 4.6 the only problem is that there are more ways to arrange the phonemes when there's half of the full names active versus when all of them are none of them are active. 4.6.1 when one phoneme is inactive, then I still have eight ways to rearrange them, which is already enough. But it is kind of a quirk of this language. Maybe I can solve this with these marks on top for example. 4.6.2 I just realized I think I could actually use the markers in a creative way that are different depending on where on the continuum the word is 4.7 the flexibility of this language is absolutely wild. It's possible to signal the Lex category by just adding another composite like thing and it's also possible to sign the leather on the continue by adding just that composite of the continuum and then just have freedom with how you want to build the word. 5 the 10 with the idea mode are very, a little, a lot, the most, etc. 6 I do need to signal when I'm using an idea without referring to a number. I can just use the top bar or something for that. 7 at some point I need to make like a super small PDF that's printable in like a din-a 6 format that summarizes all of the rules. 8 I could also use multiple phoneme tables that are similar but optimized for different native language speakers, that are similar enough that different people can still understand each other, but it sounds like a dialect or something. composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Spirit 09 = Consciousness 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = singular 99 = multiple 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = alien 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 91 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Intelligence 70 = Simplicity 31 = Reflection 79 = Absorbing 32 = Point 78 = Diffusion 33 = Repetition 77 = Stagnation 34 = Dynamic 76 = stillness 35 = Sequence 75 = Parallel 36 = Symbol 74 = Concrete 37 = Hidden-self 73 = Rational-self 38 = Imagined-self 72 = Identity-loss 39 = True-self 71 = Ego 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 69 = Being 42 = Complement 68 = Incopatability 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Exploit 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 64 = Disharmony 47 = Beauty 65 = Inauthenticity 48 = Potence 62 = Impotence 49 = Heroism 61 = Anti-hero 50 = Transcendence 53 = Future 57 = Past 54 = High 56 = Low 52 = right 58 = left 51 = That 59 = not 55 = Emptiness Idea: Senses1, senses2 Future/past, and/or, that/not, warm/cold, bright/dark, high/low, right/left 28.2 1 International phonetic alphabet 2 My language is a formal system 3 Mnemonic phonons I'm really happy with: 0 = tz eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = th ui sh iu 4 = f oa v ao 5 = pf ai psh ia 6 = s ie ps ei 7 = sw äe shw eä 8 = g ei x ie 9 = gn ae ng ea 28.3 1 "The ship on the sea" to "thing on-top sea" to 40 high-relation huge-low-time-flow to 40 54-20 18-56-11-33-46 to fozeo pshiafo-toe Idea: Use different punctuation etc encode whether morphology is aestetic, used for lexical categories or for the continuum 2 I'm kinda fucked regarding the senses I think 3 I could somehow use 40 for high and 60 for low. Also i could use ida, pingala for left right. Left brain right brain 4 I could also encode the level on the continuum at the beginning of a word and the lexical category at the end. 4 choose 1 + 4 choose 2 = 10. So I could encode the continuum with the first digit. Also ten lexical categories might also be enough. The Rest is artistic expression?

27 27.1 1 nominative, accusative, instrumental, dative, ablative, genitive, locative, vocative. 1.1 now that you have more flexibility, maybe integrate those?😅😭 2 How much do I want to rely on sentence order? 3 -i -1 i +1 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = bl ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au x ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo abcdefghijklmnop 3.1 I could do it that half of the double-vowels are spoken sequencially and the other half are spoken together. 27.2 1 "I see you" = 15:pron [see]:verb 16:pron see = Reflection:noun containment: 1.1 Observation: A lot of pronouns seem to be part of 10s. And since pronouns have the same steucture, I could maybe get rid of the first digit. Have to think about it. 2 Idea: What if, for each type of lexical category, I create sub categories? These could be noun cases but also just inspired by the cases. 3 It's maths time! 3.1 j = 0 1 2 3 \phi(j)= -i -1 i +1 c(0) b a c e c(1) d i f o phn(0,j)= p ae b ea phn(1,j)= sk ai shk ia phn(2,j)= ksh ao x oa phn(3,j)= g au ğ ua phn(4,j)= f ei v ie phn(5,j)= k eo ng oe phn(6,j)= bl eu l ue phn(7,j)= s io ş oi phn(8,j)= t iu d ui phn(9,j)= tsh ou dsh uo 3.2 Phase \phi(j) = -exp(2\pi i \frac{j}{4}) 3.2.1 Silexian Alphabet A := {(j,\varphi), j\in{0,...,9}, \varphi\in\phi({0,...,3}) 3.2.1.1 Letter:= l\in A 3.2.1.1.1 The Silex ontology is the set of axioms O Silex set of composites C := {(a,b)|a,b\inA} c \in C 3.? phase set \phi is the codomain of f_\phi. \phi := {f_\phi(j)|j\in{0,...,3}} 3.? The Silexian characteristica C := { C \subset 3.? An instance c\in C is a 3.? What is (A,•)? Let a,b\in A. a_{i,\alpha}•b_{j,\beta} = (i, \alpha)•(j, \beta) = 3.12 There is this weird thing that the nth root of unity seems to be relevant for both the decimals and the phase. (10th root for decimals and 4th root for phase) 3.12.1 The question is: can I combine them into one? 3.12.1 What are the attributes of f(l_{j,\alpha)) = (g(l_{j,\alpha)), h(l_{j,\alpha))) -\phi(\alpha)exp(2\pi frac{j}{10}i) 3.12.2 \phi(j, n) = -exp(2\pi i \frac{j}{n}) f(l_{j,\alpha)) = () 3.3 Definition 1 An ontology has anthromodal completeness if its characteristica spans the entire human existence space. 3.3.1 Fragment 1.1 An ontology has anthromodal completeness if its characteristica has the same cardinality as a natural language. 4 Idea: Epilepsy only occurs in extremely sensitive people. Elilepsy is a kind of resonance catastrophy. Epilepsy = "implosion due to contained reflection" = noun(84)-adj(containment)-noun(reflection) 5 lexical categories word: bace•difo noun: bd verb: ai adjective: cf pronoun: adverb: names: cifo numbers: Abstract/neutral (-ism) preposition: cef articles: bo conjunctions: interjections: 5.1 I could order these by how frequent they are and then just cycle through the possible combinations. Problem: Too much similarity. 5.2 I need to find an elegant way to order these lexical categories and relate that order to the composite combinatorics. 6 when I describe my language as a mathematical object, I need to include embodiment inspiration as a means of translation. 7 I can make words that end a sentence have specific phase too. 8 Idea: When none of the vowels are active, then all consonants and some combination of single vowels that is distinct from just both consonants active. This means that number. The other one in the composite also becomes interpreted as a number? 27.3 1 "Sanskrit phonemes are arranged by: • place of articulation (velar, palatal, retroflex, dental, labial) • manner of articulation (voiced, voiceless, aspirated, etc.)" 1.1 "Sanskrit was used in philosophy, logic, and ritual: • Terms are often precisely defined • Compounds can encode complex concepts" 1.2 "Vowels Short: • a, i, u, ṛ, ḷ Long: • ā, ī, ū, ṝ Diphthongs: • e, ai, o, au 👉 Total: ~13 vowels (depending on analysis)" 1.3 "Inflectional morphology is a subfield of morphology that studies how words change their form to express grammatical information, without changing their core meaning or word class." 1.4 "Inflectional morphology is different from derivational morphology: • inflectional → grammatical variation • run → runs → ran • derivational → creates new words • run → runner (new meaning, new word class)" 2 Okay let's try to integrate this Sanskrit stuff 0 1 2 3 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = ř ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au ğ ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo 3 I'm tending tk say: If there is no vowel of the same letter after a consonant, it can be any single vowel that but the most obvious choice is the first vowel of the next double vowel in the table. So for example after a b tends to come a e but it doesn't matter.

26 26.1 1 0 = chap 1 = deb 2 = git 3 = yokk 4 = ğūm 5 = dsāng 6 = skoas 7 = fial 8 = tschöx 9 = rung 6273 is joa gi fia yo is oagiao or jifo or oagiay 1.1 I can do the convention, that a word must alternate between consonant and vowel. 1.2 Idea: These choices can be used to make different words related to each other. 1.3 Idea: Just draw 2 What's with nouns, plural, adjectives, etc. 3 orthography 4 Idea: Conventions like "nouns always start with consonant that is the second one of the syllable", "verbs always end with vowel" etc. 4.1 a fun Implication would be that a noun could always be turned into a verb for example by making it end with a vowel for example. So when somebody is asking what one is doing one can say "I'm autisming" or something without it sounding weird. 4.2 heroism, hero, heoroically, heroing 4.3 lexical categories: noun verb adjective preposition adverb pronoun determiners conjunctions interjections numbers names 4.3.1 Yeah this is a lot. I feel like I can archieve a lot with grammar though. "this category when it's in this context, that when it's in that context" 4.3.2 how many combinations do I have for one composit? cvccvv := xyzabc {valid} = {all} \{words including } \{ 5 Damn it's crazy it seems like this language is extremely powerful and flexible. It seems to allow for just pulling words out of thin air when needed. 5.1 less flexible (see 4.2) but more powerful. 6 state of composits: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Consciousness 09 = Spirit 10 = Granularity 11 = unit 12 = function 13 = interaction 14 = system 15 = Individual 16 = Family 17 = Tribe 18 = Society 19 = Whole 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 31 = Reflection 79 = Absorbing 32 = Point 78 = Diffusion 33 = Repetition 77 = Stagnation 34 = Dynamic 76 = stillness 35 = Sequence 75 = Parallel 36 = Symbol 74 = Concrete 37 = Hidden-self 73 = Rational-self 38 = Imagined-self 72 = Identity-loss 39 = True-self 71 = Ego 40 = Resolution 41 = Thing 69 = being 42 = Complement 68 = Incopatability 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Parasite 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Transcendence 51 = That 59 = Not 52 = Order 58 = Chaos 53 = Absolute 57 = Relativity 54 = Infinite 56 = Finite 55 = Emptiness High/low Idea 50: 6 Notation. Let X \in {0-9} X := just vocal, X' := just first consonant, X, := just last consonant, X" := first consonant and vocal X. := vocal and last consonant X| := all 7 composites -i +-1 i 0 = sh ae p 1 = ş ē b 2 = ğ i m 3 = y oa š 4 = c ue k 5 = x a ng 6 = dj o d 7 = f ia l 8 = m io t 9 = r u ġ Unused: vocals: ū, ao, ī consonants: dsch, tsch, sk, ß, ř, ġ, ksh, gx 7.1 word: abcxyz-abcxyz-abcxyz word: fumbar-fumbar-fumbar lexical categories: Abstract/neutral (-ism) abcyz-abcyz-abcyz fumar-fumar-fumar numbers: abc-xyz-abc-xyz fumbar-fumbar-fumbar noun: ay-ay-ay, fa-fa-fa names: cy-cy-cy, ma-ma-ma pronoun: cyz-cyz-cyz, mar-mar-mar verb: bx-bx-bx, ub-ub-ub adverb: bxy-bxy-bxy, uba-uba-uba adjective: bz-bz-bz, ur-ur-ur preposition: determiners: conjunctions: interjections: by-by-by, ua-ua-ua 7.2 This is crazy it seems a lot like different wave functions. 7.3 b :=-IC (-i) a := IZ (+-1) r :=+IC (i) Okay hold on, maths??? 8 Damn how do I do tenses? I will find a way. 8.1 I could make the pattern of the verbs dependent on the time etc. (so verbs are not bx-bx-bx but more dynamic dependent on the context) 9 This will likely be the biggest challenge: I'm trying to make the phonems obey to the strucure and not the other way around. 26.2 1 Idea for composites: Make all negative phonems sound similar and all positive pound similar -i +-1 i 0 = p ae sh 1 = b ē ş 2 = ġ i m 3 = ts oa r 4 = c ue ß 5 = k a ng 6 = d o dj 7 = f ia l 8 = t io m 9 = schb u ğ Unused: vocals: ū, ao, ī consonants: dsch, tsch, sk, ß, ř , ksh, x, š, sp, pf 2 Idea: Make composits with a value smaller then 50 tend to use positive consonants and complement composites tend to use negative consonants. 2.1 If you do this, you could signal lexical categories with endings and beginnings only. 3 Idea: When It's just a vocal, there is a circle in the symbol and when It's a number it's just raw but pronounced with everything. 4 rearrange the composites in such a way, that the positives "feel" like soft consonants and the negatives "feel" like hard consonants. 4.1 Introduce another 10 vowels so that the vowels also have positive and negative polarity? Also seperate them between long for posituve and short for negative? -i -1 i +1 0 = p ē f ae 1 = b ş ē 2 = ġ i m 3 = ts r oa 4 = c ß ue 5 = k a ng ao 6 = d o dj 7 = sh l ia 8 = t m io 9 = schb u ğ 4.1.1 This is hard. One possibility would also be to copy these vowels over to +1 but stretch them. -i -1 i +1 0 = h ai f aī 1 = b e p ē 2 = ġ i ğ ī 3 = tsch oa dsch oā 4 = ß ue ş sh uē 5 = k a ng ā 6 = d o dj ō 7 = kl ia l iā 8 = t io d iō 9 = br u r ū 4.1.1.1 yeah this is great I think. 4.2 remember ordering them alphabetically to make memorizing easier. Maybe create mose logic on how they arise. 5 positive,negative vowels 5.1 make negative vowels staccato, posituve legato 5.2 wait I just realized that negatice numbers are now also included technically. Yeah let's just ignore actually. Take absolute value. 5.3 I could also say that the intonation changes if the letter is positive, negative or neutral. positive: Up to nuetral. negative: Up the below neutral. neutral: Monotone question: Upwards 6 frederic = 73 16 13 24 = rational-family-interaction-contained 6.1 Yeah I just realized EVERYTHING is a word in this language. 26.3 1 Idea: Fuck long vowels, do: Different single vowels one number or: Reverse Order of two vowels. -i -1 i +1 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = bl ai r ia 2 = d ao dj(œ) oa 3 = g au x(œ) ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl(ě) ī l ē 7 = s io ş(ě) oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh(ǒ) ū dsh(ě) ō a e i o u All combinations two vowels: AA, AE, AI, AO, AU EA, EE, EI, EO, EU IA, IE, II, IO, IU OA, OE, OI, OO, OU UA, UE, UI, UO, UU Ununused: vowels: eu, consonants: dsch, tsch, sk, ß, ř , ksh, š, st , scht, dj, rh, schb, n, m, sh, w, Blacklist h(not audible sometimes) 1.1 That's cool. Let's order them alphabetically so they are easier to remember 2 An autistic person is ontologically not very different from a bookshelf 3 Okay lets try to translate "I have a chair" -> 15 41-04 41 20-15-24-32 -> blaungua vi•bao pē•pāing•djao•gū I = "pronoun: Individual" = pronoun:15 = bi:15 = brau have = availability-ing = graspability-Relation-ing = thing-grasping = 41-04-ing = vipao a = article: thing = 41 = pē Chair = sit-ter = sit-thing = djae-vir-xiang-dūvgūdjo-braung -vir = djae vir xiang dūvgū djo braung vir = "relating thing to location individual thing" -> "relating individual location thing" -> djae braung dūvgūdjo -> "relation individual location" -> 20-15-24-32:noun -> dā-ing-djao-gū -> dāingdjaogū sit = upright-still = low-upright = mind-location-infinite-body-location- finite-body = putting-individual = putting-15:noun-thing Yields djae-vir-xiang-dūvgūdjo -braungua Individual:noun = 15:noun = 15:bif yields braung put = relating-thing-to-location = relating:verb -thing:noun -to:prep -location:noun = 20:ci-41:bif-to-location = djae-vir-xiang-dūvgūjo location > contained-point > 24:adj-32:noun > 24:bad-32:bif yields dūv-gūdjo to > sequence:prep > 35:cef yields xiang 4 To have it here: word: bace•difo lexical categories: noun: ci pronoun: names: cifo numbers: Abstract/neutral (-ism) verb: ci adverb: adjective: bad preposition: cef articles: bo conjunctions: interjections: by-by-by, ua-ua-ua 4 I think the ordering of the vowels make sense. Change the ordering of the consonants after a heuristic that is not alphabetical order. 5 Idea: For every word, the beginning doesn't matter, make it so that it sounds good, but the endongs matter for lexical categories. 6 Idea: examples: vaofoa turns into vaofo vaooa turns into vaoa 7 idea: make the phonems even more structured -i -1 i +1 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = bl ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au x ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo 7.1 Wait this is crazy that that just works like that. Okay can I order the consonants like this too is the question. 7.2 Wait now that I don't have single vowels anymore I can solve a problem which is akwardness with words that end on consonants. I can just add the next vowel easy without giving false signals since single vowels normally don't exist. Holy shit also I can now combine two consonants, since they can now have single vowel sounds between them without chnaging the lexical category.

25 25.1 1 Experimentation with 20 20 = Polarity 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 23 = Field 24 = Space ?? = cohesion/Fragmentation ?? = stability/Collapse ?? = authenticity/Dissolution ?? = Intimacy/isolation ?? = Tranquility/obsession ?? = internal ?? = Anticipation ?? = absolute ?? = Infinite ?? = Order ?? = future (redundant with path) 25 = affect 26 = anticipation (redundant with path) 27 = cognition 28 = valence 29 = Tranquility 04-20-26-08-52-32-00 = cell-polarity-duality-tribe-impotence-point-granularity 2 I think I kinda get why continental philosophers didn't try to define everything they said. It's because if every word is clearly defined, language looses some of it's magic. 2.1 I think to prevent this perversion, I need to use less "=" and "is". 2.1.1 I could do "it traces". 2.2 I realized something interesting: The meaning of a word also spans a space with it's suggested trace. 2.3 I could imply that these are not equations but rather "transformations". So I could do xyz 1 then "xyz xyz xyz xyz" 2 then xyz-xyz = xxxx That kinda makes sense. Transformation is also works with trace. 2.3.1 I really want to know how all of this relates to early and late Wittgenstein. I feel like it should be an elegant reconciliation. 3 Reconciliation into "duality followed by unity and resonance" then into loving-duality-unity-path = 46242340 3.1 I like how this process is a kind of "molding". Mold Ontology yeah this sounds ass. 3.1.1 The sequence of moldings makes the trace. Omg I love this. I think it has enough precision and clarity but respects and upholds the diffuse nature of meaning in language. 3.1.1.1 I we expand on the metaphor, then 46242340 seems to be the cast. 3.1.2 The sequence of moldings (Formungen) makes the trace (Entwurf, Zeichnung, Skizze) and the result is the cast (Guss, Wurf, Setzung). 3.2.1 I have a feeling professional philosophers would love this. I might be naive but it doesn't matter I have all the time in the world to perfect it. 3.1.2.1 A collection of tracings is a curation (Zusammenstellung, Kuration) 3.3 It seems it makes sense to introduce the convention: "If sequence is the first letter of the word, the following letters of the word might be read sequencially". A convention is not a rule of course. 4 How do I ensure that my language is not too rigid, so it can potentially be developed by the collective? Mybe if's fine if the alphabet is rigid since it's rigid in most languages anyways. The curation of the words and the interpretation of each letter is very individual though and can be influenced by herd intelligence. I just need to get the alphabet right. 4.1 I like the idea that my role in this world is similar to that of satoshi nakamoto. I'm building something that potentially spreads around the world and develops a life of its own. I must study those mechanics though. The spread mechanics of my language are very different from that of bitcoin. 5 Language 5.1 What is logographic? Will my language be logographic? 5.2 I think that each two digit number is going to be a syllable (Silbe). The sound and the act of pronounciation should somehow mirror the meaning. 5.3 Okay it seems my language could become both logographic and syllabic but I'm not sure. 5.1.1 Google Ai: "A logographic writing system uses signs or characters (logograms) to represent entire words or morphemes (units of meaning) rather than individual sounds. Modern examples include Chinese characters and Japanese Kanji, while historical examples include Egyptian hieroglyphs, Maya script, and cuneiform. They differ from alphabets by requiring memory of thousands of symbols" 5.1.1.1 Does my language have the ability to be by far the most compact logographic language of all time? Maybe I understand logographic wrong. 5.1.1.2 I need to study hieroglyphs. 6 Hieroglyphs 6.1 It means "sacred carvings". I feel like this also applies to my language. I think it's an interesting coincedence that "carving" is so similar to "tracing". 7 Dialectics relates to path = 40 so "the phenomenology of spirit" becomes spirit-path = 1940. Dude this language mogs. 8 The broad meaning of I is Individual = 06. but there are also the precise syllables which are imagined-self = 37, hidden-self = 38 and true-self = 39. So there are at least four ways to say "I" with one syllable. 9 What is tension? 10 anti-path is 60 is "increasing tension". So path = 40 also relates to "resolving". "resolve" interestingly strongly relates to potence = 48 which makes perfect sense. 10.1 it is important to note that sometimes it is necessary to increase tension first to create true resolving. 10.2 resolving vs resolution 10.3 unconscious-destruction = 8160 has a strong relation to evil. It's nihilism without awareness of its own nihilism. So liberalism, fascism, libertarianism, zionism, americanism, capitalism, imperialism, colonialism, white-supremacy, Ayn Rand, Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, Trump, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson and the list goes on. 11 Is 20 = Polarity related to "relation"? Yeah relation is fantastic actually. Polarity is too physicalist. 25.2 1 Once I have syllables I can make matras. This is hype. Also I can show how to construct an individual mantra for each specific life situation. 2 What is energy? Potence = 48? Makes sense. 3 I just realized I'm so freaking stupid. I should just switch the 00 with the 10. That makes so much sense. I had a big problem with granularity being 00. 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 99 = matter 02 = Meaning 98 = meaningless 03 = Ungraspable 97 = rational 04 = Graspable 96 = magical 05 = Body 95 = bodyless 06 = Soul 94 = soulless 07 = Mind 93 = mindless 08 = Consciousness 92 = unconscious 09 = Spirit 10 = Granularity 11 = unit 12 = function 13 = interaction 14 = system 15 = Individual 16 = Family 17 = Tribe 18 = Society 19 = Whole 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 31 = Reflection 32 = Point 33 = Repetition 34 = Cycle 35 = Sequence 36 = Symbol 37 = Hidden-self 38 = Imagined-self 39 = True-self 40 = Resolution 41 = Thing 42 = Complement 43 = Symbiosis 44 = Life 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Transcendence 51 = Light 59 = Dark 52 = Order 58 = Chaos 53 = Absolute 57 = Relativity 54 = Infinite 56 = Finite 55 = Emptiness past/future 3.1 Omfg I can't believe how elegant this is. Of course continuity is 0 since it's a FUCKING CIRCLE. (spirit->idea). I could also do 00 = absolute that's crazy. Yeah now it checks out again. 4 I think 23 is field and 02 is manifold in the physicalist translation. 5 wait I just realized that calculating with a carry makes no sense. So the complement of 42 for example is 68 which makes more sense since 60 is non-40. That makes finding the complement much easier. 5.1 I wonder what the attributes of a numbersystem with no carry are. I can def. define the properties mathematically. 5.2 Idea: Polynomial arithmetic modulo 10. 5.3 Experiment: 0363 + 9383 = 0646 \iff vaccilation-beauty + non-tribe-isolation = soul-love 5.3.1 It reads a bit like a yogi that was inspired to leave the tribe and focus on doing yoga alone. Of couse I realize that it is very unlikely that the maths made a lot of sense. But this is not a bad thing necessarily. This unpredictability enhances his creativity. I'm happy with it. 5.4 I need to compare this trace arithmetic with tarot, astrology, dream analysis, I Ging, etc. It seems to be a powerful variation of these kinds of oracles. 5.4.1 I feel like I need more unique names for this project then just trace, cast, etc. Maybe when I have my syllables, I can make my own lol. 5.4.2 I feel like whatever these existing oracle traditions do, trace arithmetic can do 100 times better. But maybe I'm arrogant. 6 Name idea: silex 6.1 this is the name that I came up with in an earlier draft of my theory. 7 Transcendent-repetition is related to eternity. 8 Characterize different time periods. What characterizes the rennaissance? 9 Oracle traditions 9.1 Tarot has 78 cards. That's quite much. I could make my own deck actually. 10 Wait I just realized that if every word in silex is a polynomial, then every word can be plotted lol. 10.1 This is especially interesting since the wave has itself a central role in my theory. 10.2 Wait isn't the sine function some infinite polynomial? 10.3 I wonder if I can somehow replace the modulo 10 with something with i that somehow wraps around automatically. 25.3 1 T_1 is the set of all one-syllable words. T_n is the set of all n-syllable words. |T_2|=10.000. 2 idea: Just come up with ten consonants and ten vowels and string them like the numbers. 2.1 use four different for terresrial, four for human, one for transcendent and six for colors. Ten more trancendents? 3 when it's done do poetry with it 4 Seeing to grasping-reflection = 0431 4.1 I = 15 = individual, you = 16 = family, he/she/it = 17 = tribe them = 18 = society us = 19 = whole convention: When it's alone then it's usually the former, when it's within a word, it's usually the latter or somthing else 5 what is a conlang? Is Silex a conlang? 5.1 Esperanto, Lojban, Klingon 5.2 Leibniz characteristica universalis. 5.2.1 Okay damn it seems like I'm trying to build a characteristica universalis! 25.4 1 Syllable = (consonant)vocal(consonant) 2 Idea for Alphabet. I'm using the digits as placeholders for now 2.1 Ten digits 0123456789 2.2 There exists the potential for variations of some of these letters to signal shifts in meaning. 2.3 Idea. If a letter is at the beginning of a syllable it is a consonant. 2.4 Idea: different meanings come from: V, Cv, VC, CVC. Every letter comes with a vocal and potentially a consonant after and before. I don't know yet how I wnat to use this morphology but it's nice to have added flexibility. I could also just say "doesn't matter, just do what sounds good" 2.5 Let's run with a simple way and see what happens 0 = bac 1 = def 2 = gih 3 = jok 4 = lum 5 = nap 6 = qer 7 = sit 8 = vow 9 = yuz 2.5.1 I did absolutely not plan for this to work out so well. I have used every vocal exactly two times and every consonant exactly one time. What the hell. Wait I forgot x. 2.5.2 Examples: 49 = heroism = lumyuz = umyu 20 = relation = gibac 04 = system = baclum = acum 2.5.2.1 A syllable is unique if it contains at least one consonant of each letter. 2.6 This is def. way easier than I thought. This is just a throwaway example an I'm already pretty happy with it so far. 2.7 okay what I'm doing is I'm creating the composites and choosing the nicest ones while upholding uniqueness. 2.8 How many ways are there to uphold the uniqueness of one composite? abcd, bcd, acd, abc, abd, ad, bc, ac, bd okay that's more than I thought. It's 9. That's a lot of potential variation damn. Yeah I'm good what the hell this language can definitely work. Literally how is it so easy to create a language. 2.9 Okay what I could do is make each letter have two dots or something signalling which consonant is spoken. 3 more examples 7397 = guideless-rationalism = sijokyuzit sijok yuzit 4 some more tinkering. Switching things around 0 = chap 1 = deb 2 = git 3 = yokk 4 = ğūm 5 = dsāng 6 = skoas 7 = fial 8 = tschöx 9 = rung 4.1 Problem: some consonants don't do much or sound the same. Wait I forgot I have ch and sk, ng, sch. 356889 is sequence-complement-unity is jok-tsap-sker-fog-fog-sun is yotsaskefogfosun is japskegfun is jokk-tsäng-skeos-tschöx-tschöx-rüng is jotseotschörr is jāsötschu 4.2 I think there has to be the convention that only one of the three parts of a syllable can be chosen to avoid ambiguity. 4.3 So it seems like I need 20 consonants and 10 vowels. Wait since I can only choose one component of a composite, it would be simpler if one composite would only contain one vowel and one consonant. 4.4 more tinkering 0 = sha 1 = de 2 = gi 3 = yo 4 = ğue 5 = dsā 6 = joa 7 = fia 8 = mio 9 = ru 6273 is joa gi fia yo is oagiao 4.4.1 Okay it seems like the language is too ambiguous right now. I need to make the phonemes one letter each I think

24 24.1 1 Updating the 100 traces. 00 = Granularity 01 = Particle 02 = Atom 03 = Molecule 04 = Cell 05 = Organism 06 = Individual 07 = Family 08 = Tribe 09 = Ecosystem 10 = Continuity 11 = Idea 12 = Meaning 13 = Ungraspable 14 = Graspable 15 = Body 16 = Soul 17 = Mind 18 = Consciousness 19 = Spirit 20 = Polarity 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 23 = Field 24 = Space 25 = Inner boundary 26 = Outer boundary 27 = Separation 28 = Collapse 29 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 31 = Repetition 32 = Reflection 33 = Point 34 = Sequence 35 = Cycle 36 = Symbol 37 = Hidden-self 38 = Imagined-self 39 = True-self 40 = Progress 41 = Thing 42 = Complement 43 = Symbiosis 44 = Life 45 = Resonance 46 = Love 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Emptiness 1.1 There are two subtle problems with path=40. Health doesn't seem to fit in perfectly, and it breaks the symmetry between the two sets of four, since complement doesn't fit with resonance. I have a pretty elegant solution, which makes it actually more in line with this old version. I remembered I had a concept before the compliment which is "thing". I'm kind of using it in a Wittgensteinian way I think. The idea is, that this is an abstract concept to denote "something with a purpose". For example, a container is a thing, because it can contain. If it then does contain, it and that which is contained make a complement which is the next stage (42). Damn kind of a bummer, that 42 is nothing super central. Not really a fan anyways. 1.2 I removed matter=15 because it is kind of redundant if I already have graspable=14 and thing=41 (wait the fact that the number of thing is the reflection of the number of graspable is fun). also, I didn't like the fact that I have eight stages of granularity, which creates some falls association with the other even categories. Now I have cool prime numbers containing the seven, which is pretty deep in ancient numerology, for consciousness=17 and intelligence=37 which is extremely neat. Also 37 is kind of a weirdly special number for some reason: https://youtu.be/d6iQrh2TK98?is=I6UeUIK8Q_6WGQqM I will watch this now I guess. 1.2.1 I just changed intelligence heavy-heartedly. 2 What the actual hell of a wikipedia article did I stumble upon? "Due to the superstitious significance of the numbers it contains, the palindromic prime 1000000000000066600000000000001 is known as Belphegor's Prime, named after Belphegor, one of the seven princes of Hell" 2.1 Numerology is cool 3 I just realized something: Doing arithmetic (modulo 100) with those numbers kinda makes no sense. 3.1 But "not making sense" doesn't have to be bad. I think it's actually perfect for like oracle tarot type shit. 3.2 no this is actually really fun lmao. 3.3 Also one can shuffle digits, square them etc. Yeah really fun. Haha one can take one concept, do operations on it and see what happens lol. 4 I just realized I could somehow mirror the main categories in the 01-09 in some meaningful way. 4.1 Also I could use them as something like an intensity scale. Omg this is great actually. 0130 is "not very complex" and 0930 is "extremely complex" 4.1.1 Okay what is "infinitely complex" then? Yeah what is infinity in my model at all? 5 49=kleos (homeric) 6 There is a ton of room for different dualities in 23-29. I kind of need to actually since having 100 pronciples makes for good optics. 7 These packets of four in the 40s seem arbitrary but their not. I used these concepts in old versions of the theory: 41424344=Terrestrial, 45464748=Human, 49=Immortal. 24.3 1 Alternative Polarities. What I used to have: 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 23 = Order 24 = Chaos 25 = Infinity 26 = Finite 27 = Absolute 28 = Relative 29 = Space 1.1 There is a bit of redundancy here. I feel like I need both Unity and Duality in the 20s there are very central. But The rest I can reduce. Yeah this is better. 2 Haki simply 48. Also 4815. Also 481506≈06-15-48=individual-body-potence. 3 Integrate fermion boson duality. 3.1 Pauli exclusion principle 3.2 Dirac equation 4 Dharma ≈ kleos ≈ duty ≈ responsibility ≈ stepping-up ≈ 49 5 If I have 100 traces, how does what I do relate to Martin Luther with his 95 theses historically? Interesting connection to think about since I'm also some kind of reformer. 6 What is artifact? An Artifact is a thing that conserves history. 24.4 1 tranquility≈harmony=46 2 fascist, tracing alienated-hero = 7749 2.1 Fun coincidence: 7711 = alienation-idea and 77+11=88=non-field≈"soulless in the deepest sense" more fitting: "Fake soul" 2.2 pride, tracing alienated-potence = 7748 2.3 I've started using the term "tracing" since I thibk often, "is" is too absolute. I want to find an elegant equivalent of "≈" in natural language. 2.3.1 I could also just say "relates to" which would be super broad. I like it. It would mean that that tracing would be a suggestion, and the reader can accept it if it resonates and else just reject it. 2.3.1.1 I could use "broadly relates to", "narrowly relates to" and just "relates to". 3 reason is grasping-self = 1439 4 I had an interesting thought. Their exists the set of all one trace words, the set of all two trace words, the set of all three trace words and so on. I could write it down in set-notation. Interesting thought. 4.1 it seems that if physics is math applied to empiricism, then what I seem to do is math applied to ontology. 5 Object is thing-in-time is repeated-thing = 3141 6 Channelling is when the author is not the authority over the interpretation of that which has been written by them. 7 Cult is institution-with-obsessive-unity is perverted-ecosystem is "dissonance from loss of unity leading to building obsessive unity institution" is duality-collapse-ecosytem = 7807 8 In this system, enlightenment is seperate from non-duality=78=perversion. Enlightenment is neither unity nor duality (?) 8.1 hm it's kinda tricky. Alienation from collapse of space only happens when it's preceded by identification with the space. 8.1.1 I think "cult" is just one of these terms that's complex like schizophrenia. 8.2 Wait I think alienation is non-understanding-dissonance = actually 9 It would be interesting to describe what a tracing is abstractly. Like all the tracings can be chosen differently and a different number system with a different base can be chosen. 9.1 It seems the I Ging is a kind of trace ontology with base of 2 not 100 9.2 how does one evaluate a "good" trace ontology? 9.2.1 "a good tracing is integral. It relates to as many facets of being as possible". It includes as many other existing tracings as possible or addresses deviations. 24.5 1 A huge amount of alienation comes from non-knowledge about the self. 1.1 What is knowledge? Knowlegde in its most simple sense is sequence = 34 1.2 So self-knowledge is 3934 2 A good german word for trace is "Spur". Spur actually means trail not trace. Yeah I need to differentiate between trail=spur and trace=zeichnung. So trace ontology is seinsskizze or seinszeichnung. 2.1 Zeichnung vs Bezeichnung. 2.2 The image is: "being leaves a trail that can be traced". The trail is the rizhome? 3 I have an idea how to solve the fact that granularity doesn't have a complement. It does and it's 100 which is singularity. Since 100 is the only three digit number it is actually not problematic. So for example 7252661002837 is read as 72 52 66 100 28 37. And 37310087 is read as 37 31 00 87. If a number has an odd number of digits like 7272637 and doesn't contain 100, a zero is added at the beginning or end it doesn't matter yeah I guess then it just has two meanings (which is an interesting mechanic actually). 4 my birthdate is 09072001 = cosmic-ecosystem-polarity-quantum. Sounds epic but doesn't really make any sense to me. 4.1 Hold on let's play with it a bit 09072001 = cosmic-ecosystem-polarity-quantum ≈ "cosmic system of dual particles" ≈ "the cosmic system arises from particle-wave-duality" I can't belive I somehow made it make sense😂 4.2 Sounds a lot like dialectical materialism actually. 4.2.1 I realize that I projected dialectical materialism onto it to some extend, but that is kind of the point of this kind of game. I have made a post about the value of projection before. 4.2.1.1 It's a double projection since the trace is itself my projection. 5 I need to translate this tracing into different cultures and languages. Daoism, Buddhism, Hunduism, Greek, christianity, Judaism, physicism, maths, philosophy, psychoanalysis 5.1 what are the most important ones? 5.1.1 Philosophy, Natural sciences, Eastern traditions, western traditions. 6 what's interesting is that heroism is actually a kind of ideal. So my tracing is not actually anti-ideal, which I thought initially it would be. But what I'm learning is that the ideal itself is not problematic, the problem is putting the cart before the horse and pursuing the ideal before embodying the earlier stages. So the path=40 is a kind of holarchy. 6.1 It is different from spiral dynamics. It seems to be more precise. I need to contemplate more about the similarities and the differences. 7 Meaning actually seems to be more broad than I thought. What is meaning? 7.1 Symbol = meaning-reflecting-point. 7.1.1 reflecting-point=mirror 7.2 Idea: Meaning=being-in-relation. So meaning=field??????????????????!!!!?!?!!?!?! That would be bonkers. I think it is. 7.3 Meaning is significance which preceeds substance (graspability). "Coherence, mattering, purpose". 24.6 1 "Curation" is also a good name for the trace. 2 Translucent = 6732 = Diffuse-Reflection 3 Nihilism = anti-meaning = anti-field = 88 3.1 Challenge: Construct a satisfying way to describe fascism just with dog whistles. 4 Determination vs point. I feel like fixation is determination. A point-being is dependent on determination to be. A non-point being is independent but can also experience and value determination. 4.1 "one can be determined without having made a choice" 4.2 It's hard 5 What is "lie"? 6 What is Marxism-Leninism? 7 Brilliant slogan, aphorism and title for a book: "If we know what we are, we may know what we may be" 8 what is the meaning of Anjali mudra prayer mudra? 8.1 Anjali-mudra=stale-personal-soace=harmony=love 9 Inspiration is meaning-reflection = 1232 10 Telos=path=progrssion=40 24.7 1 I just realized that complex tracecomposites also has an inversion. Wait are there multiple ways to get the inversion? Dude this is kinda wild. This unpredictability potentially makes this such a powerful tool for creativity. 2 89 ≈ confusion? 3 Insights: 00, 10, 20, 40 seem to be ordered in something like "pre human" "human" and "transhuman" or something. This is neat. 4 I have an idea for a revision: Make the mirrored traces somehow relate to each other 00 = Granularity 01 = Particle 02 = Atom 03 = Molecule 04 = Cell 05 = Organism 06 = Individual 07 = Family 08 = Tribe 09 = Ecosystem 10 = Continuity 11 = Idea 12 = Meaning 13 = Ungraspable 14 = Graspable 15 = Body 16 = Soul 17 = Mind 18 = Consciousness 19 = Spirit 20 = Polarity 21 = Field 22 = Space 23 = Unity 24 = Duality 25 = Inner boundary 26 = Outer boundary 27 = 28 = 29 = 30 = Complexity 31 = Reflection 32 = Point 33 = Repetition 34 = Cycle 35 = Sequence 36 = Symbol 37 = Hidden-self 38 = Imagined-self 39 = True-self 40 = Progress 41 = Thing 42 = Complement 43 = Symbiosis 44 = Life 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Emptiness 5 Smiling in face of death is radical acceptence (one piece)

@Carl-RichardThis is Vervaeke right? I agree that purpose, coherence, significance, connectedness are crutial to meaning, but I'm describing and ordering these terms in a very perculiar and extremely precise and specific way. I am currently experimenting with numerology by assigning numbers to different aspects of being with the goal of using these as building blocks to build more complex aspects of being. I'm trying to find 101 (100 + 0) of these building blocks which right now I call "traces". If you are interested to know which they are, follow the development of my journal where I post most of my thought process every day: Entry March.23.3.5 is most relevant. Meaning, purpose, coherence, significance, connectedness in the trace ontology. Meaning = 12 = "second manifestation of the continuum" 11 = Idea Continuum = 10 Purpose = dharma = path = telos = 40 Fun fact: Kleos = "last step of the path" = 49 Fun fact nr. 2: 50 = sunyata. Coherence might be complexity-resonance = 30-45 = 3045 Significance might be 49 actually could also be 48 = potenciality. 49 is "manifested potence" so weather significance is 48 or 49 depends on weather it is implies manifestation or not. Connectedness is spacial-resonance = 2345 Connection requires seperation but not fragmentation nor unity. That's why space = 212246 = unity-duality-harmony = 23 is an important part.

Yes arbitrary movement causes destructive interference and with that, non-existence. Both on the wave and on the macro scale. Therefore, coherence on every level of granularity is a necessary condition for existence. What is that? Meaning. It's interesting that you used the term "mattering". If you think about it, mattering is the necessary condition for matter. What is matter? Particles. What are particles? Wave. What is the necessary condition for the existence of the wave? The field. What is field? Meaning. This is of course one way to look at reality but in my head it is COHERENT

you just made me realize something very important. Yes I used the word meaning differently than you and I used it wrong and this is important to me. In an earlier version of my theory, I said that ADHD means being insensitive to symbol. I was not quite happy with symbol so I abstracted it down to meaning. Eventually, I realized that ADHD is actually about non-commitment. It's about not sticking to your choice. The way I'm phrasing it now in an abstract way is with "point". So having ADHD is non-point being which is diffusion-being. so people with ADHD are comfortable with not making a choice. Thinking back, I realize that my mistake was that symbol=meaning-reflecting-point and I mistook meaning to be fundamental to ADHD and not point (reflection is HSP). In a nutshell I agree with you completely and thank you a lot for making me realize I had a wrong understanding of meaning. Meaning seems to be way more broad than I thought it seems to be that what which allows for reaonance. Wait this means I'm not a nihilist anymore. Also It resolves conflict between my model and the field of sense theory which is huge. I need to integrate my new understanding of meaning asap. Edit: I think it's field! Field=meaning. I was missing a non-physicalist term for field. Damn that is very satisfying. Especially since this field=meaning ontology exists and is respected (fields of sense). Also the guy who came up with it happens to teach in my city.