Cred

I had to google😂. Saying no would undermine my point so yes absolutely lol. A crinkler is the endboss daoist I guess 😂😂😂 Would beat Andrew Tate in a fist fight 100% of the time When I experimented with this I pretended I am a child. It takes a little getting used to, but it is really effective. It also feels like recharging your power. It feels nice, actually.

I have watched it and disagree. The whole premise of the video can be summarized with this: What Leo fails to realize is that only neurodivergent people obsess so much about truth. I'm saying this as someone who obsesses about truth.

@Majed Thank you! I'm trying to improve my writing slowly. @kavaris I love alchemy! I think it's extremely underrated and misunderstood. How did this thread remind you of alchemy though?

I had this thought yesterday: Being a furry is genius form the perspective of the dao. According to Laozi, weakness is power and power is weakness. If you think about is it's true. The most alpha males you see are actually always the most fragile people. Dressing up as a cute furry animal that goes around and hugs people is incredibly powerful bc it is so simple. If you have the furrsona of some animal that just exists to be cute and nothing else, that you can just switch on once in a while, is extremely grounding. What this means paradoxically is that you can strive to even more power than any alpha male since you have this regular grounding mechanism in your life that makes you routinely detach from your power and therefore prevents attachment to this power. This matches with experience. Furries are often people with very high salaries. I want you to look up the price of a furry suit (they are almost always custom-made).

I agree 100% with this statement. However, does this mean that truth is the most meaningful thing period?

@LambdaDelta I acknowledge the value of ambivalence, however living life requires choices.

I think "alien" is an interesting concept. Novelty implies something graspable. Something that completes you and extends your existence. Alien however is so utterly separate from you that its existence negates your existence rather than completes it. I think the thing that comes very close to an alien for us is someone who's whole existence is conformity. In order to exist, they need to sync themselves up to some identity from outside. Everything they do is a symbolic action with the purpose of signalling something to others so that they can sync up to that. A bit like in a beehive or a swarm or something. When you tell them they should analyze one of their thoughts, they become confused because they don't have any thoughts. When you tell them to analyze an object, they become confused because analysis does not have symbolic meaning. All they ever do is sync up and signal. Ironically, I think that this stereotypical alien with super advanced technology and knowledge about everything would be way less alien to us than this human I just described.

This idea is not that radical. The daoists have the same concept, they just call the absolute the Wuji and the fragment the Taiji. But instead of 8 poles, they have two: The yin and the yang. The advantage of my theory is that my 8 poles are way more analytical and precise. So precise that I believe they are the basis of all of maths and all of physics

I had to ask chatgpt what analytical idealism is. Yes it seems that my theory is a kind of analytical idealism. But it doesn't just explain what reality is. That's just the cherry on top. The power of the theory comes from how much it explains, how many unsolved questions it can answer, how many other theories it is integrating. Since there is no knowledge outside of the fragment, the 8+ modes of existence are present always anywhere at all granularities, in conceptual science, in psychological science, in natural science, in social science, everywhere, it can also be applied anywhere and show how everything is connected and show how to unify everything. This is of course a long process and I can't do it alone, but I see the potential.

I believe this compulsive self critcism, judgement and escapism all comes from neurodivergent people who don't know they are neurodivergent. The more I live in accordance to my neurodivergence, the more I'm able to accept matter reality.

I think the daoists have understood it. They also have the concept of emptiness, but they don't case it. Being in the dao means to just let things happen and when this means engaging with material reality so be it and when that means going into meditative states and reaching emptiness so be it. Don't cling to anything, don't reject anything. Just let yourself go without judgement. I think this is true freedom. Way more free than compulsively trying to escape the matrix.

When talking about "loosening up patterns" it is important to understand autism. Autism is the love of the repetitive. When the life of an autistic person is chaotic, they suffer and cope with excessive repetitive behavior. This is why you need to be careful of assessing patterns as harmful. This is just like with depression, mania and paranoia and other "pathologies". They have a purpose and the underlying problem does not go away when you try to remove them. When you fight them, they will get worse. When you have autism you cannot exist peacefully without a certain amount of repetition. So you need to really ask yourself if you want repetition in your life and if the answer is yes, allow yourself the amount of repetition that you need. When you do that, the things that you do repetitively will become more and more authentic, less harmful and less compulsive.

I was posting, I am posting, and I will be posting a ton on the topic of neurodivergency. Here is the biggest thread so far:

Yes I had the same thought. When you become too obsessed with escaping all dogmas, then the avoidance of dogmas becomes itself a dogma

@James123 How do you make decisions with your philosophy?

Speaking of explanatory power, let's tackle this objection. I completely agree with the first sentence. What I don't agree with is the claim that the Fragment does not help in analyzing immediate reality. It might have been a rhetorical question but let's actually analyze the computer. My claim is that there are infinite ways to engage with a computer and all of them are manifestations of the Fragment. You could ask: "What am I sensing?". You are only able to even ask this question bc of Sensibility of being (former name: Interaction) Without Sen' you don't have sensation You could ask: "What does it weigh?". This is Differentiality of being bc weight is a way of differentiating. You could ask: "What do I want to do with it?". This is Impulsivity of being bc an action requires an impulse. You could ask: "What can I do with it?". This is Potentiality of being bc seeing potential requires potentiality. You could ask: "How does this object fill space? How tall is it? How wide is it?". This implies Spaciality of being bc filling space requires spaciality You could see it as a whole that is made out of multiple parts. This requires Wholeness and Differentiality of being. You can just see it as the symbol "computer" which you've learned from other people. When you do this you are syncing up with the narrative of the computer and this requires Simultaneity of being. You can ask multiple different questions in a sequence, but this requires Sequenciality of being Any way you can see it results from one or a combination of these. You are welcome to try to give me exceptions. There is actually one exception which is when you see it as emptiness sunyata. This requires you to shut off all of the fragments of being. I say this is easier to do if you know about all the different fragments.

No I don't think so. One example would be "toughness" or "hardness". You can't say that the attribute hardness is necessary for the universe to exist because a universe where no hardness exists would be imaginable. It would just be a universe that only contains gas or something. Yes of course you can summarize all 8 aspects into one but than you would just have another useless abstract metaphysical theory with empty concepts that has no actual explanatory power.

For those who are skeptical whether the Fragment has applications, I used the model to analyze sadhus:

This is a really cool observation. Let's unpack this with the theory of the Fragment. Stimming is something that people do who are non-Simultaneity of Spirit. My current definition of autism is: low Simultaneity of Spirit and high Sequenciality of Spirit. But it's also something that HSPs do and my definiton is: low Simultaneity of Spirit and high Sensibility of Spirit. So when you see someone stimming they are either autistic, HSP, or a hybrid. Spoiler: I suspect most people on this forum to be hybrids. When you have high Simultaneity, you are really good at processing a lot of information at the same time. This is done through the symbol and conformity. If a Simultaneity-being is in a stadium for example, there is a shit ton of stimulus. Yet the being knows exactly what do without processing every stimulus individually, bc they just do what everyone does and "sync up" (conformity). When you have low Simultaneity, you don't have this efficient way of processing and struggle in environments with a lot of parallel stimulus. This is why you prefer simple singular stimuli which is what stimming is. Your advantage is that you are very honest and uncorruptible, since corruption requires conformity. Also, only low-Simultaneity-beings have the ability to critique culture and go against the norms, which is what a sadhu does. Sequentiality- and Sensibility-beings feel affirmed in their existence through stimming like humming, but for different reasons. This is where it gets super subtle. Seq's hum because a hum is a sound and a sound is a wave and a wave is Spaciousness+Sequenciality. Sen's hum because a hum is the change of pressure of molecules which causes these molecules to interact and therefore sense each other. More simply: a hum is a sensation. The reason why the Spirit (Atman) needs to engage in it's fragments is because there is no existence beyond the fragment. Boyond the Fragment, there is only emptiness (Anatman) non-existence. If the Atman and the Anatman are not in balance with each other, it leads to death and suffering.

Anticipating possibilities is not autism, it is what I call "Potentiality of Spirit". I've laid out my theory of the Fragment here: It's more closely related to the neurodivergency called "Schizotypy". I've written about it here: You need potentiality of spirit in order to be motivated to chase enlightenment bc enlightenment is something that might potentially happen to you in the future and non-Potentiality of spirit people don't chase visions in the future like this.

You make a logical error when you say this. You have a wrong assumption which is that it requires an endless amount of socializing to find a mate. I've written about this here:

Hi! It fills me with joy every time I'm hearing that someone awakes to their nerodivergency. I have written extensively about the topic on this forum, and I'm currently working on an Ontology of neurodivergency that I call the Fragment. Based on how you write and the fact that you don't seem very active in the personal development section of the forum, I assume that you came to the conclusion of Yourself. This is a big and important step in your development. I came to the same conclusion and made a post about it:

I would rather live in North Korea than in South Korea

It feels to me, you are attacking me more than my theory. Have I attacked you? If so I would like to know when I did that. I feel hurt by your rhetoric

I was working on a moral system the other day, and it turned out that it is hard to define what evil is. I'm a satanist and I don't believe that cruelty or selfishness are evil and love and altruism are good for example. I came to the conclusion, that morality might not be absolute, but a historical process and different levels of scarcity necessitate different moral systems. I came to the conclusion, that self-hatred is the "last of the evils" so to say. However, self-hatred is only a symptom. I believe that the cause of self-hatred is virtue and the "good vs bad" dichotomy itself. If you think about it, it makes complete sense from a mythological standpoint. Lucifer is the most sneaky force in the universe, wouldn't it make sense for it to win the war of good vs evil by embodying the war itself? Any time you affirm virtue, goodness, beauty, ability, competence, etc. you participate in the war against the respective opposite and therefore are evil, if it does not come from a place of scarcity. The alternative that needs to be put forward to replace virtue is authenticity. Don't ask: Is it good? Ask instead: Is it authentic? Only if one replaces virtue with authenticity, radical self-acceptance is possible, since virtue is too restrictive. Think about it. If you engage in a restrictive (moral) system, how do you expect to be able to breathe freely? Since I ditched virtuousness I feel so alive and have never been this productive.