Cred

This is false

Avoidance of falsehood leads to falsehood No but this is only the case bc I'm autistic. Non-autistic people don't care about truth, they care about narrative

Yes I'm obsessed. This is because it is one of the most powerful and liberating concepts. It has never once led me to delusion. I'm not saying this lightly

There exists a massive trap in spirituality for neurodivergent individuals. Being neurodivergent means wanting to engage with the world in ways that society deems "lazy", "unproductive", "weird". The danger now is to internalize this critique, which leads to self-hatred. The big trap now is to long for some lofty ideal with the promise of removing oneself from this cruel earth and allow oneself to finally reach absolute self-acceptance. This is a false dream. Reaching Truth will never give one an ounce of self-acceptance back. It has to be reached through deconstructing society through the lens of neurodivergency.

When you devalue the ladder, you are being unknowingly discriminatory against autistic people. (I'm not making a haha gotcha political correctness argument, it is much deeper) Being autistic means theory crafting is existence.

Doesn't this make one unfree if one does not allow themselves to climb ladders forever?

I agree But you can be critical of why you seek Truth in the first place

I like the writing style of Nietzsche. He is humorous and ambiguous and he grasps the bigger picture. Also his texts are packes with radical ideas and insights.

@LambdaDelta Ahhhh this makes so much sense! Improving writing does not necessarily mean to write less ambiguoisly though. I do want to be precise, but I also want to communicate a lot of information at once sometimes and be holistic. For that it is sometimes necessary to leave some of the details unspoken.

"Identify the 12 year old" this is Epstein academy!

@Yimpa Hahah @Basman Wait it seems we are talking about two dualities now: Being restrained vs being unrestrained Being powerful vs being weak I think both need balance and both balances can be archieved by impersonating an animal like for example a grey cat with a blue bucket on it's head (totally random and unrelated example)

@LambdaDelta I think there is a misunderstanding. I agree with most of what you are saying. Splitting hairs over things like this is not much fun to me. I think this 20% statistic is really interesting, and it supports my current theory of reality. I'm thankful that you posted it.

Do you think that a sample from the whole population is comparable with a sample from this community? I'm not saying we're all geniuses. But what I am saying is that not anybody can end up here.

This is alchemy. If you want to gain power, you don't achieve it by trying to force it. If you try to force it your power will be fragile. You will only be able to become powerful if you alchemize it from a spot of weakness.

Leo has not integrated neurodivergency enough. Leo has not integrated the left-hand path enough. Leo has not integrated Marxist-Leninist critique enough. There is obviously a lot that Leo understands that I don't understand. But there are also things that Leo doesn't understand

Yes this is exactly the point. If you cling too much to the idea of power, virtue, excellence and truth, it will make you weak and more dogmatic, not more powerful. Hobbies like furry are a perfect counterbalance to archive harmony and freedom.

I had to google😂. Saying no would undermine my point so yes absolutely lol. A crinkler is the endboss daoist I guess 😂😂😂 Would beat Andrew Tate in a fist fight 100% of the time When I experimented with this I pretended I am a child. It takes a little getting used to, but it is really effective. It also feels like recharging your power. It feels nice, actually.

I have watched it and disagree. The whole premise of the video can be summarized with this: What Leo fails to realize is that only neurodivergent people obsess so much about truth. I'm saying this as someone who obsesses about truth.

@Majed Thank you! I'm trying to improve my writing slowly. @kavaris I love alchemy! I think it's extremely underrated and misunderstood. How did this thread remind you of alchemy though?

I had this thought yesterday: Being a furry is genius form the perspective of the dao. According to Laozi, weakness is power and power is weakness. If you think about is it's true. The most alpha males you see are actually always the most fragile people. Dressing up as a cute furry animal that goes around and hugs people is incredibly powerful bc it is so simple. If you have the furrsona of some animal that just exists to be cute and nothing else, that you can just switch on once in a while, is extremely grounding. What this means paradoxically is that you can strive to even more power than any alpha male since you have this regular grounding mechanism in your life that makes you routinely detach from your power and therefore prevents attachment to this power. This matches with experience. Furries are often people with very high salaries. I want you to look up the price of a furry suit (they are almost always custom-made).

I agree 100% with this statement. However, does this mean that truth is the most meaningful thing period?

@LambdaDelta I acknowledge the value of ambivalence, however living life requires choices.

I think "alien" is an interesting concept. Novelty implies something graspable. Something that completes you and extends your existence. Alien however is so utterly separate from you that its existence negates your existence rather than completes it. I think the thing that comes very close to an alien for us is someone who's whole existence is conformity. In order to exist, they need to sync themselves up to some identity from outside. Everything they do is a symbolic action with the purpose of signalling something to others so that they can sync up to that. A bit like in a beehive or a swarm or something. When you tell them they should analyze one of their thoughts, they become confused because they don't have any thoughts. When you tell them to analyze an object, they become confused because analysis does not have symbolic meaning. All they ever do is sync up and signal. Ironically, I think that this stereotypical alien with super advanced technology and knowledge about everything would be way less alien to us than this human I just described.

This idea is not that radical. The daoists have the same concept, they just call the absolute the Wuji and the fragment the Taiji. But instead of 8 poles, they have two: The yin and the yang. The advantage of my theory is that my 8 poles are way more analytical and precise. So precise that I believe they are the basis of all of maths and all of physics

I had to ask chatgpt what analytical idealism is. Yes it seems that my theory is a kind of analytical idealism. But it doesn't just explain what reality is. That's just the cherry on top. The power of the theory comes from how much it explains, how many unsolved questions it can answer, how many other theories it is integrating. Since there is no knowledge outside of the fragment, the 8+ modes of existence are present always anywhere at all granularities, in conceptual science, in psychological science, in natural science, in social science, everywhere, it can also be applied anywhere and show how everything is connected and show how to unify everything. This is of course a long process and I can't do it alone, but I see the potential.