Elliott

That's really good. What AI?

I'm not okay with having children with a woman that doesn't fit those things. A child could easily have a tormenting life otherwise. I think you'd be predisposing a child to suffering, like smoking while pregnant. I think I can find a woman like that, so I have decided this line, which may mean not having kids.

Someone that won't pass their issues to the kids. Will be open to and supportive of the kids exploring their interests. Intelligent, compassionate, good communicator. Common issues could be materialism, anxiety, insecurity, fear, ego, selfishness, ... they can have these things to a degree, but be able to not pass them on, it takes awareness and work. Happy 30th!

No, no one needs kids. Maybe if you find an amazing woman that would be a great mother, reconsider. But you shouldn't sweat it. I do want kids, but I would only do it with a woman I thought was what I was looking for, which isn't super common. I have no problem with me winding up not having kids. I like helping people, that alone would be a fulfilling life for me. Trying to improve the world. Raising amazing kids to improve the world. Raising kids to give them a nice life. I don't see them as a hindrance, but I don't live a mainstream lifestyle. Having kids would be an insurmountable hindrance if I did.

The people don't have to revolt though. It's not poverty that's the overwhelming problem, it's just inflation, corruption, and abuse. It seems to me to be Israeli agitators, and then the overreaction by the regime.

Practice conceptualuzing products for any little area you see a possible need. This will condition your mind to watch for potential areas for new products and it will broaden your capabilities and 'wheelhouse'. Even if you think it won't go anywhere, if you have the time and interest, explore random concepts you get. I think exploring any types of interests you have that might have products you could deliver, broadens your field as well, any hobby or even jobs for example. Don't pass over boring simple things.

How do sanctions directly lead to bloodbath, north Korea is sanctioned, Russia, Venezuela. If the u.s. was going to war, it would've/should've been the moment the strike group pulled up. That's been a week, Iran probably has a swarm of missiles, air defense, and drones moved into position and locked on them now.

Looks maxing or personality maxing. Emphatic-obvious-yes Start with low hanging fruit like haircut, clothing, weightloss, being healthy, maybe invisalign. I think getting jacked-big is an oversaturated market and a diminishing return, just be fit. Girlfriend vs getting laid are 2 different lanes. You don't need to max for a girlfriend, just don't be a jerk or perve and you're in.

I'm interested in what you're talking about.

I think they're called co-living apartments in u.s.. We have them. Normal apartment but gym, shared-workspace, socials. They're fairly new in my city.

Ya, just keep up pressure internally and ask for pressure externally. It will happen.

Ah, yes, your word is God! Louisiana the Democratic stronghold! LOL Then what strongholds are you expecting democrats to lose(what this thread is about)? No. We would do even BETTER with her learning basic definitions! You're actually the one trying to use your argument both ways. I'm saying you're holding us back. I'm not saying we can't win with AOC stupidity, YOU are the one saying we can't continue with the sane approach. I'm saying we're fine, but you're the ones holding us back from doing even better. I remember all the Biden merch! Ol' Berntards. LOLz, saying we're a cult for Biden! Who was the 2024 Democrat again, big Raze? Socialist amnesia, or something. This conversa..... is obviously going no where. I didn't mean it to just sling insults. Toodles 🍻 I'm out.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/state/4450463/democrats-upset-trump-districts-louisiana-special-election/ Democrats continue upset streak in Louisiana special election 6 hours ago — Chasity Verret Martinez's win represents a 37-point shift to the left after Trump won the Louisiana House 60 District by 13 points in 2024 Here's our media disadvantage for you I do admit mainstream news is corrupted against us, but it's not a silver bullet. I think you guys are terminally online. Consider 2020 Texas was 52% trump 46% Biden, 3% of the electorate turning blue ties TEXAS Florida was 51 and 48, a 1.5% of voters changing to blue ties it If either of these states go blue, republucans have zero chance. Now, look at north carolina, wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, all Dem governors, trump barely won. Georgia is in swing territory, .....

AOC is about half of what conservatives talk about in conversation on Democrats. People tend to look at the worst example of something. She's the Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Bobert equivalent for how we view the conservative positions. Just as YOU say, she's very vocal and gets out there. I guarantee not one republican voter could tell you kamalas position on anything. People vote for partys. Liberals are decentralized, you're treating Democrats like we're a cult following a single leader like Republicans and Socialists do, we're different.

@Revolutionary Think BEAUTIFUL!!! 👊

Republicans have the internet, Raze. You think they don't know who AOC is? It's their 3rd favorite acronym, and 4th favorite meme.

I never suggested that they did, I was referring to rhetoric from people like you and AOC. You characteristically, take no responsibility for your actions.

Never been on Twitter, I was referring to this forum.

The patriarchy was so good to women, how can they be such fools! Think about the incels you're killing, ladies!! U.S. News & World Report https://www.usnews.com States With the Highest Divorce Rates Feb 13, 2024 — year per 1,000 women age 15 and over: Arkansas (11.85) Wyoming (11.01) Kentucky (9.92) West Virginia (9.66) Oklahoma (9.34) Idaho (9.24) Alabama (9.09) Delaware (9.08) Tennessee (9.06) These are the states with the lowest divorce rates in the U.S., measured as the number of women divorced within the last year per 1,000 women age 15 and over: Vermont (4.65) New Jersey (5.16) Alaska (5.46) Minnesota (5.67) New York (5.71) Illinois (5.71) California (5.88) Pennsylvania (5.93) Massachusetts (5.93) Wisconsin (5.94)

Watch Deon Sanders' cousin Bernie, juke and pivot over the years on "Socialism"

Your source "his Dictionary of Socialism (1924), Angelo S. Rappoport analysed forty definitions of socialism to conclude that common elements of socialism include general criticism of the social effects of private ownership and control of capital—as being the cause of poverty, low wages, unemployment, economic and social inequality and a lack of economic security; a general view that the solution to these problems is a form of collective control over the means of production, distribution and exchange (the degree and means of control vary among socialist movements);" If nothing has a definition, then your words literally mean nothing. "eVEryThinG gOod iS SoCialIsm. bAd, cApiTaLisM!" source- our fWeeLingS "Egalitarianism (from French égal 'equal'; also equalitarianism) is a school of thought within political philosophy that builds on the concept of social equality, prioritizing it for all people.[1] Egalitarian doctrines are generally characterized by the idea that all humans are equal in fundamental worth or moral status.[2] As such, all people should be accorded equal rights and treatment under the law.[3][4] Egalitarian doctrines have been important in many modern political philosophies and social movements, including the Enlightenment, classical liberalism, libertarianism, feminism, civil rights, and international human rights.[5] Egalitarianism is a major principle of both classical liberalism with its equality of rights, and redistributive left-wing politics with its stress on equality of outcome.[6" "Progressivism is a left-leaning political philosophy and reform movement that seeks to advance the human condition through social reform.[1] Adherents hold that progressivism has universal application and endeavor to spread this idea to human societies everywhere. Progressivism arose during the Age of Enlightenment out of the belief that civility in Europe was improving due to the application of new empirical knowledge.[2]"

Ask a MAGAT if they oppose social security, then ask if they oppose socialism. Federation of American Hospitals https://fah.org Poll After Poll Shows Overwhelming Voter Opposition to Medicaid Cuts | FAH May 9, 2025 — 77% of voters view Medicaid favorably, including 70% of Republicans and 66% of Independents. 75% of voters oppose Medicaid cuts, including 53% American Federation of School Administrators https://www.theschoolleader.org Public Wants More Education Funding Apr 1, 2023 — Some 65% of Americans think the federal government spends too little on education programs, according to a new poll by AP-NORC conducted at . Food Business News https://www.foodbusinessnews.net FMI poll shows Americans strongly support SNAP May 13, 2025 — Of 1,000 registered voters surveyed in late April on behalf of FMI, 64% said they hold a favorable opinion of SNAP.

Socialism is having no private ownership of the means of production, no private farm, no private construction company. What I was referring to earlier as socialist rhetoric, is the stuff you read on this forum, "we need more socialism.". It's calling government programs socialist, like single payer healthcare or social security,.... they're not. socialism-websters " collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods" cap·i·tal·ism, Oxford dictionary "an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit." History of modern socialism- wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_socialism 1800 "While Fourier and Owen sought to build socialism on the foundations of small, planned, utopian communities, Saint-Simon desired to enact change through a large scale initiative that put industrialists and experts in charge of society.[53][54] " Saint-Simon 1800 "Abandoning economic liberalism, he instead propounded a system which would replace the traditional state with a brotherhood of man that incorporated industry and society into a single centralized organization. " Socialism can be done at the local community level, or at the global/federal level. The federal level is what politicians talk about. They tend to conflate Socialism and Egalitarianism, Conservatives understand the difference and rightly oppose socialism. "Progressives" continue their pseudo-intellectual crusade redefining terms based only on their feelings. Social Security, welfare, single payer healthcare; are egalitarian, 'progressive', but not socialist, related terms but not the same. Socialism is egalitarian, that does not mean everything egalitarian/progressive is socialist. These programs are no different than taxes paying for roads, welfare nor roads are socialist, every system has roads and welfare, they have welfare in Iran, in Saudi Arabia, in Argentina, they did in the Roman empire and Egyptian, Persian and British. Actual socialists know this too, they are not about welfare, they consider that to be part of liberalism. When they say revolution, they mean an actual total revolution, they don't believe in these politics, they mean no more private business. They're not Bernie or Mamdahni supporters, they see them being the same as Democrats. Meanwhile, conservatives see the "Yay Socialism!" from Bernie and Mamdahni and see Stahlin. NOT ONE of these programs we have in the u.s. was voted for in congress by a socialist. "Egalitarianism (from French égal 'equal'; also equalitarianism) is a school of thought within political philosophy that builds on the concept of social equality, prioritizing it for all people.[1]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism "Ancient Rome: The Cura Annonae provided free or subsidized grain to over 200,000 male citizens, ensuring a basic diet for the poor. The Alimenta, initiated under Emperor Nerva and expanded by Trajan, offered funding for orphaned children in Italy." People like to point at how dumb conservatives are, but the onus is on us the 'reformers' to be the more intelligent, and intelligent in our communication, let alone being total imbeciles. People want to totally change an operating system, yet they cannot even grasp basic terms in the political discourse about the change. Why would conservatives listen to, let alone trust, obvious idiots. It's like morons think that since they can identify a problem, that they then should be acknowledged by everyone with magically intrinsically obviously knowing the solution, even though they wouldn't be able to pass a 4th grade social studies quiz (knowing the definition of socialism).

Centralization. It's more efficient, productive, but costs autonomy. Decentralize! ✊️

Oh us girls 🤭. I suppose I should go use the little girls room then and check my tampon, you know how it is. -She/Her (Bearded vagina lady)