gengar

This dude actually mentioned Nahm

Yet Benjamin Netanyahu, the one who you claim is the one fighting terrorists, holds almost exactly the same definition: "systematic and deliberate attack—the murder, maiming, and menacing—of innocent civilians for political goals" - Benjamin Netanyahu Oct 7 was terrorism according to this definition, but so is bombing with drone strikes by the IDF. If you don't see this, you are genuinely impaired and have no business in calling out others for their childish views on politics, right as you may be. It's a not a good look for Awakening and un-biasing the mind if 200 awakenings lead to the same boomer 20th century worldview as ever before. Its also deep conformity to the most common mental model. There is nothing non-conforming about your politics, you're not a renegade in this regard at all. You could have chosen to use your intelligence to set free from the old and enjoin the thinkers leading the avant-garde of political and social development of the 21th century, but you instead chose to enjoin with the rotting generation of boomers and their chauvinist, liberal, anti-life bs, the same ones who have caused the mess we're now living in. And no, I'm not a socialist.

Can psychedelic use acutely or permanently release fears of death and other fears? In other words, can you use it to sever karmic chains that are keeping you shackled to certain earthly concerns?

You have random awakenings while watching movies? You'd say such distractions would only keep you in illusion.

It would've been proven in controlled studies by now, so no.

This is not the forum to call anyone "unc". Leave that worship of youth and disdain for the elderly behind in your degenerate tiktok and discord world. not here.

And how are you implying it works then, and how do you know that for sure?

You actually are. Being for zionism in one form or another is the unloving position.

Ofc it's cool. Leo's art takes are just a running sense of amazement for me in general, which I personally have trouble grokking with, since in my mind and experience, and I think objectively, art and metaphysics are deeply connected. And I often get offended and confused by Leo's takes and it reveals that he looks at the world in a different way, which confuses me because he is probably the person who changed my worldview the most metaphysically and made me appreciate art metaphysically in the first place. He often hates on amazing art and shares bad movies on his blog for example. It's not that deep in the end. Leo's videos from the 2016-2022 era are masterpieces of art in themselves that I'll be forever grateful for, even though they completely unraveled me. their beauty and truth in themselves are the worth. By the way it's beautiful that that metaphysical arc ended with the Poetic Description video. It all culminated into that one. Holy shit that one is Art.

Yeah it had about the same story. It baffled me as a child.

Why does it hurt so visceral when Leo drops his horrific takes? when a random tard on the internet would say this I wouldn't care but reading it from him is just really disturbing. I think it's because both pieces of art like Majora's Mask and Leo's videos cultivated a deep sense of appreciating beauty and mystery of life, the world and reality for me, and that made me always assume that Leo would just know this or something... Someone not liking Majora's is just missing a fundamental appreciation of mystery and art that goes beyond having different taste. Majora's is about a deep delve into the (dark) depths of the self - played out in an imaginary world, repeating over and over again... isn't this precisely what the Self is doing? It baffles me how Leo was able to see this in reality but not see it reflected in art pieces like Majora's. The fact that it was quickly developed with some asset recycling only makes it better. It took existing pieces and made art out of it, through sheer depth and creativity. Stories are not just about written narratives either, but about aesthetics and their connection to themes, like the masks in Majora's... I see them as representations of the Ego, the masks that God wears and how link struggles with them, hiding from his true self, until he retains mastery and becomes his true self, the Fierce Diety.

The best story in a game is unironically Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Sky. If you know you, but you most likely don't. True coming of age story with deep themes and characters of friendship, trust, betrayal, plot twists, hopelessness, and a deep sense of exploration and the vastness of the world.

At least that is something we can agree on.

Building charisma or other self-improvement I am not against. Self-improvement in itself can be used for used for good and bad. I am in favor for self-improvement for good. you can self-improve to become a criminal. You can self-improve to become a good citizen and husband. or you can self-improve to live a Hugh-Hefner type lifestyle. What "women want" is not a linear, rational thing. They want all sorts of things on different levels of their consciousness, some good and some evil. different women will cater more towards one side depending on many factors. In this they are not different from men. I have a side to me that wants to have 100s of women and live like Hugh Hefner, and this probably stems from biological instincts and also egoic traumas of feeling unworthy. But I also have a side that wants to have a marriage and children. My issue is that most men seem to realize this dichotomy and ultimately want marriages and families, but feminist women, both young and old (who are the majority of women in the west), see family as something inherently suspicious, maybe even oppressive, but in the least as something that is a burden to her that weighs down her other options. And we are living in a surface liberal culture that is deeply invested in the worldview of these women. If you tell a woman she is selfish for living out her bad girl/feminist agenda (fucking as many of the richest and hottest dudes while young and then getting the best husband possible and lie about your past), she and society will shun you. But if you tell a man he is selfish for wanting to live a life of debauchery, society and him (most likely) will agree. That is the joke we are living under today. Total gynocentricism. By studying the facts it has become clear to me that this worldview simply leads to the decline and collapse of society. "wanting children" for example is seen as an individual choice and only through the lens of what it brings and costs the individual(especially the woman). Never is it seen as a moral choice affecting the whole of collective society. It is a simple fact that younger people carry the old people's burdens. This used to be in a direct family system where children would literally take care of their parents and grandparents in their old age. Nowadays this is a welfare system; everyone's children take care of everyone's parents. A person who doesn't want children, who is more likely a woman, still wants to be taken care of by the state when she is old, effectively saying that someone else's children should take care of her. With the fertility rate at an abysmal level, this cannot hold. The only solution is migration, which we are seeing at a rapid rate here in Europe. European people are not having children and are replacing them with young migrant workers. I don't care about you choosing a life of chasing a multitude of women that much. Even though you're basically incentivizing those harlots to continue in their evil and doing evil yourself. I am not above it. I contemplate suicide every day because I can't get with women because of various acquired medical issues. In one way I would tell you to "live your best life", although I do realize I wouldn't be better than those harlots myself, who cheer on their fellow women in their 20s to ride the carousel, dishonor themselves and destroy society one bit at a time. And I'm not better. If I had the chance to be promiscuous I probably would be. Yet again, this is also incentivized by women's modern freedoms and their ways of handling it. Choosing to be monogamous when you see other women be hypergamous and polyamorous is a much harder choice to make than a society of chaste people. My problem with your rhetoric is that you are framing it through the lens that there is no consequence, that you should just chase your dreams no matter what. This is precisely the gynocentric, anti-truth, self-biased mindframe that I described. We are in a forum that is supposed to be about putting truth 1st. The truth is that a culture and implementation of healthy, monogamous marriages leads to a stable society while the opposite leads to it's collapse and ultimately famine, war and genocide. If you want to partake in that, sure, and i'm not being sarcastic. we are all human after all, and like I said, I couldn't tell you if I'd be any different. Just realize that liberalism is a lie and that the current sexual market is a direct incentivizing towards extreme forms of selfishness of both sexes and will lead to death and destruction. Don't justify it as generic self-improvement. Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law if you want it to be. I am calling out your bullshit, not your lack of morals, although that also frustrates me, but again, I'm not above that. I'm above bullshit and lies. PS: This culture shift has not been organic but quite orchestrated from institutions like the Frankfurt school and others with lots of money behind it. From bolsheviks wanting to end the family to give control to the state, to liberals like the actual Hugh Hefner who wanted sexual revolution and feminism so he could fuck 100s of girls. They all had power/ego-driven ideological reasons for incentivizing the breakdown of healthy marriages and this is all well documented. @yetineti The game-theoretical realities I described above. In essence; destroying marriage incentives endless competition, lack of morals and degeneration (because of women selecting for dysgenic traits) and both sexes becoming huge pieces of shit until society collapses due to frustration, lack of trust and moral character. Women choosing to be childless also makes society economically unbearable.

I'm not trying to change individuals, I'm just pointing out realities of our current situation and what it will lead to, albeit with some salty rhetoric since yes, I do believe that this is the destruction of society.

whats bad about OOT's story? it's a children's story. it was amazing as a child. i wouldn't enjoy it now but it's literally made for children

You actually represent the opposite of evolution; namely degeneration. "Cool" Is a 20th century term coined by decadent liberals and the keystone to the modern gynocentric hegemony. What is "cool" to you, other Tate-likes and the flock of young women your psyche centers around, can be described as extremes of reckless fun, lack of rationality, the showing of domination of other men, competitiveness, rebellion against society, emotional manipulation of women and low inhibition in and of itself. While some of those aspects should be present in healthy levels, they are not at all so in the context of what I am describing is defined to be "cool". what is "cool" to young women are the things that destroy society, and this has been repeatedly proven by science. Take for example the fact that the lower your IQ as a man; the more women are sexually interested in that man. Given the indefinitely progressing stranglehold women are having over the dating market, they are continuously selecting men to date and procreate with with these degenerative qualities. As a consequence, new children being born in the current generation will be of degenerative quality; except for the physical characteristics, for that is the only thing women have an aggressive eugenic selection bias for. We are heading towards newer generations of significantly lower IQ, more aggressiveness, but better physical strength, height and beauty. In other words, we're heading into the direction of the humanity of the stone-age, although I know for almost certain it will not get that far, although a lot of blood will be shed in the backlash. What you and the rest of your ilk deem as "cool" is thus wholeheartedly based upon the degenerative selection of young women. Becoming "cool" is only for the sake of entering "their temple"; and the use of this term for a woman's pussy reveals your actual worship of them. You worship them in the sense that their judgement defines what you are and deem to be good and cool. You honestly think that by getting with as many of these women as possible your actual status in the world increases and is better than others; what women deem "low-value males", you deem them also. Women are literally your goddesses; your look to them to define your objective status in the world. There are lots of educated, average-looking, well-earning men who are willing to provide for a wife and family who are deemed to be "low-value" by women because they are not "cool". "cool" is the bane of the west, and inherent in the word's etymology hides another type of worship that I should probably not get into if we want to keep this discussion from delving into deeper levels of division.

People like you are half the reason there are no women to find for marriage anymore.

@Cubbage @Natasha Tori Maru

It baffles me how you can say this while being serious. It's like saying Rembrandt is better than ancient Egyptian statues. The comparison itself is absurd, since their contexts are so immensely different. Ocarina came out in a time of the first 3d games and was absolutely revolutionary and is a masterpiece of a game. To pitch it against BOTW makes zero sense and I'm really not trying to be a dick here but you making this comparison is so baffling because it's so dumb coming from otherwise such an intelligent person. Ocarina paved the way for literally every game after it. dunking on it, besides it being a bad opinion, is literally nonsensical. Also, BOTW had horrible dungeons and 0 story. The world was amazing and one of the best ever in gaming but yeah it had gaping flaws IMO.

speaking from what you've learned from your experience, would you say suicide leads to a restart of the dream/release from maya or would it lead deeper into maya?

this is highly irresponsible considering the case of fire brakeouts or other emergencies. just dont trip in a highrise if you're afraid you'll jump.

Notice how he continues to blatantly lie and gaslight claiming that I am religious and muslim when I literally went as far in this thread to say that Islam has to cease to exist as a contemporary religion for society to progress to the next level. An astounding level of malice.

imagine slandering someone and then trying to say they have a lack of integrity. the depth of depravity.