gengar

Member
  • Content count

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by gengar

  1. Tulsi is so evil but she turns me on because of it. It feels so wrong, I think I have some shadow issues to face
  2. Whats corrupt and devilish about it? I'm literally talking about a chatbot that has access to the catalogue of actualized content and Leo forum posts so you can ask the chatbot questions and have it find and catalog actualized.org content for you. I just mean a database with public Actualized.org content and feeding that to chatbot and have a cool frontend. If it's not appreciated then I won't, I just thought it might be a cool contribution.
  3. Horrible song to wake up to.
  4. No, you said you can code, you should be spending all your free time fulfilling our requests for all the weeks you haven't uploaded any videos. The app should have an AI agent who can go through all your content, and also have AI witch girlfriends that want to spill pussy juice on our jeans. Aside from the jokes, such an AI would actually be quite a cool idea. Am I allowed to make a scraper to scrape all your forum posts and blog content, so I can make an Actualized AI chatbot? It'd be open source and posted on GitHub.
  5. I love how he is a true skeptic, and not a fake one like the New Atheists, who are dogmatic materialistic dogmatics. Great to see that wave is dying out, although it's also a sign of a decrease in rationality which is not a good thing. The Joe Rogan wave made people open their minds to interesting perspectives, but also to devilish horsehit like maga and conspiracies which Rogan eventually officially sold out to.
  6. Interesting. I was always under the impression that Shiva was destruction and that means destruction of worldliness, Maya, separation and therefore is the same as awakening. I'm a huge fan of the dualistic theology of Shiva/Shakti with Shiva as the primordial absolute formless godhead and Shakti being the infinite dreamfield, consciousness manifested as the universe. Father Time and Mother Earth in an eternal marriage, forever one. I'm not sure what branch of Hinduism thats from though.
  7. No, remembering is by definition not a dualistic state, because unity of being is the thing you are remembering. And you are remembering that you are God and not a creation apart from him.
  8. Dark vendors can fake reviews a lot easier though.
  9. So according to you, God can only be in forgetfulness when it is imagining itself to be a limited being, and since all limited beings must die, remembrance will always resurface at the moment of death of the limited Jiva. But how do you know that God can only be in a state of forgetfulness as a limited Jiva? Consider this possibility: Sadhguru claims that the death of the body turns the mind from a discriminatory mind to an undiscriminatory one that can be of any quality. Interesting to contemplate.
  10. I agree, but my question is whether that blocking can be permanent since God has infinite possibilities. Have you ever done Salvia? It can block truth and clarity to an absolutely insane degree.
  11. And why is that so hard to know, while other aspects of Consciousness such as Love and Invincibility are easier to verify? If it can happen, shouldn't it have happened by now, considering consciousness has existed for an infinite amount of time already? Doesn't the possibility of infinite forgetfulness throw out all of your conceptions of Goodness and Consciousness, since it means God can permanently lose aspects of itself? That means those aspects are impermanent, and isn't an impermanent attribute of God not an attribute at all? How can you claim that God holds/is attributes like Goodness, Love, Omniscience etc. but also simultaneously claim the possibility of God losing these attributes forever?
  12. Then what function of consciousness cause God to always remember itself eventually, and not spiral into infinite forgetfulness forever?
  13. You can tell if you yourself are awake
  14. I'd like to share these two videos with you, both salvia experiences. One is a state of complete love and nothingness and the other of hell. My point is, both could be true in the afterlife. But both are the same since both is consciousness. In the grand scheme, all will be experienced yet nothing eternal, because only consciousness itself is eternal. Is karma real, meaning do your actions have influence on your next life or is it completely random? We can't know. That's my 2 cents on it.
  15. Weird that god is basically just making infinite duplicate accounts and thats what we all are.
  16. I do feel for Preety though, seems like she was mentally unstable and this forum was her way of socializing. But the idea that her "husband" Marcel was actually her is insane as fuck. Respect for Leo and the mod team for handling this forum very maturely.
  17. The most important failure of that post is that you put up a premise, namely the blackpill nature of society and life, but don't resolve this premise with actions to conquer this, such as accumulating good karma or something. All religions and traditions respond to this premise, but you don't. When reading your post it gives zero reason to not either become a devil yourself or kill yourself since it's all so blackpilled anyway. The premise is not resolved by any means. Just giving the premise in such a callous way is dangerous to your audience, but most are half asleep so they probably don't care, but I for once recognize the cosmic significance of the ultimate darkly premise that you snuck in to your audience so sneakily, like shoving a candle in a passed out drunk girls p*****. Sorry I have to be so harsh but it's literally the only way to level with your level of harshness and blackpilling and make an argument against it.
  18. "these differences are not minor, they are massive." What is your proof that the difference are massive and not minor? We all know there are genius and retarded outliers but to say the entire bell curve has massive differences does not follow out of this. What research have you done to know this?
  19. (First of all I would like to apologize for my previous posts. It was way too crazy and I was not in a good state.) That is not at all the tone of how you had described it in your blog post. The worst part about it is how you described it as a justification of elite corruption and oppression of the weak. Now you're suddenly painting a picture of some utopia where the strong elites take care of the weak and therefore are in the elite position to run the society for the sake of goodness. This is a 180 from how the elites have used their position and gifts in the past and present. So much torture has been going on and you justify it by saying it is the reality of life. This intellectual giving in to the "reality of life", is despicable IMO. No matter how empirically true it is, it is not "the reality of life". We are still in the dark ages and what is the reality of life can be changed tomorrow or in ten thousand years. Calling it reality and justifying the elites (because in that post you ranted against revolutionary ideology) is siding with the elites. Imagine if we were stuck in a cosmic salvia prison being tortured by aliens. After a few thousand years you would be the one to call it reality and call all hopes of goodness and peace a hippy fantasy. This is exactly what you are doing here. Notice your lowkey edgelord persona of being a knight of truth, callously slicing through the cope of people's fantasies because "truth is above all". and denouncing them as unreachable and not worth fighting for, because you as the warrior have empirically found blackpilled truths that you think no one else has found. Of course everyone knows that disabled and gifted people exist and that this is unfair. But you are justifying the current system of exploitation by calling all calls to change the system, fantasies, simply because the exploitative system has worked for so long. But calling it the reality of life in your position is deeply wrong, precisely because reality can change from a salvian prison to a heavenly utopia, because consciousness has the potential to be both. In your post you completely denounce this possibility and call it fantasy. I hate your intellectual hatred for hippies, because they are the only ones pulling us towards utopia, although ever so slowly. Their fantasy is not simply a fantasy. Jesus was such an anarchist hippie raging against the machine, and his followers actualized his hippieness into stage blue from stage red. Although still corrupt, we can all agree that Christianity is better than Roman paganism, where darwinism was embraced as "the way of the world" just like you are doing in that post. Jesus realized the cruel nature of the world but raged against it, while your post reeks of a subtle perverse enjoyment (evident in your explicit mention of traits like physical attractiveness) of the fact that the dumb non elites are inferior and therefore deserve their oppression because they are not wise and not thinking. Jesus realized that the non elites were sheep, but loved and guided them while you see them as unredeemable. It is truly wrong in my opinion. Just because you are pissed off and disappointed by the dumb nature of the non elites, does not mean. You can make Randian points like this and call it Truth. It is only true in the sense that it has been for past human development and evolution. There is so much potential which when reading your post you do not recognize. You have to admit you are not thinking about such possibilities, true good for humanity, when writing such posts. You are simply bitter about Trumps win and the like and have denounced the non elites forever, to not ever be released from the elites grasp. That is what I make out of your post. There is zero talk about a vision to lead the non elites towards truth. You see them as evil, stupid and unredeemable, like fish in a tank, always to be exploited by the elite. And everything else is fantasy. It made me so angry because you do it under the name of radical truth, but this is wrong, because even though (in Jesus' words) Satan is the god of this world (the gargantuan nature of human ignorance and selfishness) this should never be accepted in the name of radical truth. Satan is gargantuan, but Love is Infinite. Imagine a utopian that we can reach in a million years, lasting a billion. That is radical truth and spirituality, and by leaving this out of your narrative, you are siding with the devil. No matter how much evil there is and has been, you cannot leave the real truth out when discussing the nature of the world in name of the ultimate truth. It's extremely sneaky and unspiritual fo you to do this. Why can't you just drop your blackpills but also give a message of hope at the same time, even if it will take a million years? I can't believe you did not think of this but instead just drop a blackpill without any counter narrative of redemption, even if it is only found in death. That a spiritual leader like you would not think of this, never giving a sidenote of hope when dropping your blackpills. What hope is there for a disabled person reading a post like that? Will he ever be elite or redeemed? (According to you he will in some lifetime, but he can't find that in your post). You callously drop blackpills in the most aggressive way possible. It's also wrong in an intellectual level because why is God putting people through being nonelite? What is the other side of the coin? No hope or spiritual guidance from you, that we all have to figure out ourselves, if we ask it from you. But for a hearty dose of blackpills you are happy to deal them out. It truly hurts me that you are like this, you are the most spiritual person on earth, having unearthed for many people the deepest guidance towards Shiva, yet about worldly life/Shakti give no hope. If I were to believe you, life is one big blackpill and that's it. You used to give life motivation in your older videos like the motivational speeches, but now it seems such lives are only meant for certain people. Even if that's true, you should side that dark truth with practical advice for people undergoing inferiority. If we were stuck in a salvia prison together, in the worst corner of infinity, being tortured by aliens, what hope could you give me, with all the spiritual knowledge you have right now, what hope could you give? What is a wheelchaired person to do in his life? Is there any sense in doing good karma for the next life? Should he just kill himself? now that is something serious for a spiritual leader to contemplate. Why are you keen on sharing blackpills, but when we ask for hope it is all fantasy and we have to figure it out ourselves? imo its an obvious flaw in your whole persona. Sorry to dish it out so harshly. This is literally the only dark thing about you imo. For the rest you are already extremely caring and christlike, like how much you care about that dudes dog etc. but when it comes to your truth dealing it is way too dark and you don't want to give us spiritual hope and a vision for redemption for humankind. I don't understand how you don't see that that blog post is the most offensive thing you have ever written. It could be true, but what makes it so offensive is that you don't side it with the things that could redeem such a dark reality, even if its at the other side of the universe and time. Radical darkness and survival needs radical light and hippieness to fight it, always. This leaving out and dropping such an absolutely cosmically atomic blackpill without any solution is so wrong and unspiritual. That is why I think you partly wrote that post with a gripe against the littlefolk and their inferiority.
  20. Biden is horrible (had internal polling at the time of the horrendous debate, indicating a trump landslide even bigger than we got, still didn't want to leave the race) , Dems are horrible, but Trump literally does not give a fuck about anything at all whatsoever except fucking shit up. It's a big difference, although I understand your frustration with the Dems and their corruption. But the republican corruption is so much more vile and deeper. Dems basically handed trump his victory. They are entirely soulless and people trust an evil soul more than a soulless person.
  21. Claiming the true existence of genetic superiority is absolutely a huge thing.
  22. One thing I hate about Liberal woke people in Europe is how they love to preach extremist postmodernist things like gender-neutral raising of children, and a true despising of traditional gender roles, while they have no qualms about the fact that the people dying in Ukraine are mostly men that are forced to join the army while the women get too flee. They somehow don't see that this is the material reason of traditional gender roles in the first place. They literally don't see the hypocrisy in it. They are embodiments of millennial woke liberal memes of soy milk drinking people with strongly explicated subversive ideas about society, and they have an intense hatred for Putin. But they don't see that raising your sons that they can wear dresses and all that stuff means less defensive power against a potential enemy like the Russians. I wish I was exaggerating but I'm not, I empirically found that this is the level of left leaning liberals in western Europe, they are living memes. This is why I have more respect for true socialist types like the Black Panthers where women also have to fight the same way as men. They were true egalitarians and not some elitarian twisted "woke" shit like the libs. But they came with their own universe of bullshit but it's more ideologically bullshit and not hypocritical like liberals are and also don't even exist anymore.
  23. This was one of the best and most profound episodes yet, although subtly so. It was a sophisticated and nuanced exposition of what proper sense making and epistemology entails in the worldly/Shakti sense, which is a lot more messy, detailed and twisted than in the realm of Godhead/Shiva. A contrast to this episode would be the "what is reality episode" which is entirely in the realm of Shiva. Although that episode was extremely profound of course, it is basically about one truth, since the realm of Shiva is absolute oneness and therefore simpleness; the entire video was about the one radical truth of infinite imagination in this very moment. Very abstract and spiritual. And actually a lot easier in a sense to make than this video. In this video Leo really went into the nitty gritty of sense making of the world and you could see him struggling because so many points are so nuanced and complex, and hard to explicate properly, in contrast to saying "everything is fucking imaginary and there is no past or future, you are imagining everything right now". This video really went deep into the structure of our fractal worldly consciousness and not the ultimate structure of Shiva consciousness which is ultimate radicalness, oneness and transcendence. No one has done this so far. This video has profound implications and is a piece of art imo. But its subtly this way because it seems less radical than the "Shiva" videos. It's hard for me to explain why it's so good but this one is a huge one. The person complaining about some style mistakes or repetition imo does not really get how advanced this vid is and how much it integrates his previous vids with the real world. My critique is that instead of making the distinction between 1st order truth and 2nd order truth, this naming is not accurate because it implies that there can be more orders of truth above level 2. It's not about orders of truth, it is not an increasing hierarchy, but actually a binary between Shiva and Shakti, or Godhead and world, whatever you want to call it. Shiva is absolute truth while Shakti is infinite relativity and worldliness. The postmodernist recognizes Shakti's nature but not Shivas. The naming of 1st/2nd order truth implies an ordinal sequence which is imo not correct. What still baffles me is that in this Video there is such a loving Leo with very positive energy, talking about spiritual values like sovereignty of all consciousnesses, etc. while on the blog and forum he talks about things like genetic superiority and empirical justification of worldly elites and devilry. We would never hear about such stances in his videos and there is something deeply sinister about that.
  24. "genetically inferior". You should have a 10 hour long video to even begin to try to justify this stance but you just stuck it in so sneakily.
  25. calling it nonsense when my points are so deep, exposing the Saruman bullshit you've been spouting to your gullible audience. Horrible.