gengar

@Leo Gura You mentioned that, in Consciousness, sanity is an island inside insanity. Could you elaborate on this? Is there a relationship between the duality of sanity/insanity and the duality of ego/death? The ego is usually described as an insanity instead of a sanity. But is it also a form of sanity to keep itself together and not fall into insanity? Upon physical death, do you think you are released into sanity, or instead plunged into insanity? Sadhguru also mentioned something like this. I am having huge spiritual trouble with accepting God as the totality and that all things are good, and reconciling this with the fact that Consciousness is everlasting. It feels too disgusting to be true, yet it is also the only thing that doesn't contradict the thesis that everything is imaginary and thus is totally Good.

How do you know they're not infected? Hint: you don't. I wouldn't take advice from Leo on cybersecurity stuff. I remember him saying all security updates are bs or something. A bizarre statement coming from him, because it is factually and clearly false.

What mind are you talking about that you have total sovereignity over? The human mind or, the actual mind which according to you is the only thing in existence? If you have total sovereignity over that why can't you cure your diseases, if all that is imagined by the one mind anyway?

Why did you still give him a privileged position of being "awake" compared to other teachers then, if he didn't even realize this relatively basic insight?

My "gripe" is in genuinely trying to understand why a skeptical and critical person like you is so lax with the police and sees the corruption of the police as merely incidental and not systematic. Mind you I come from a bit of a lefty-conspiracy type of environment and I'm trying to correct course on that with proper epistemology and research. You work has been an amazing resource for this, and your epistemology is very clean; that's why it surprised me that you are not as skeptical of the police as you are on Israel and the finance world for example. I was raised to be skeptical of the police because they have a monopoly on violence, meaning the public should have an inherent distrust of them from the get go. I don't really see how this logic is wrong since we have seen many examples of police abusing their power en masse. But like I said I'm trying to find truth and that's why I asked you why you think what you think.

May I ask why you have such a non-skeptical stance about the police? I never see you point out the deep issues with the police, almost exclusively defend them. Them having a monopoly over violence should make us very distrustful over them (when critizing and analysing their behaviour). The way you currently post about police makes it seem like you're perfectly fine with how the current usa police operates. We as citizens should be focusing on surveilling their behaviour skeptically. We are not the ones killing police.

https://x.com/MenchOsint/status/1870807385243025659?t=71kDGXfGVja5NX5uTFF5Kw&s=19

Elon musk deleted the perpetrators twitter account, and later reinstated it but with all the pro-zionist and pro-afd tweets removed. We're entering a new era of foolery imo

It's so sneaky how Rogan steadily convinced himself of more and more bullshit. He used to be open minded and way less biased. It's all about him slowly catering to the people around him who all started becoming pious MAGA followers. I know how this works from experience. It feels like you're raping your own mind but you're turning a blind eye to it. Before you know it it feels impossible to be truthful even to yourself and you have to drag yourself out of the swamp. Truth is not really a generous God nowadays it seems. Being faithful to truth has a high cost.