gengar

"exceptional genetics" lol lol. you'd say that shit about top level athletes not some pretty boy. he has genetics to be pretty thats it.

From now on, stop the overuse of capitalization of words, especially the all caps "GOD". It's pretentious, misleading and doesn't do justice to the seriousness of this work here.

This is where you are losing intelligence again and making incorrect findings based on your adherence to spiral dynamics. new age hippieism is so often not green but tied to far-right stuff oh so often, especially in Europe. He's not an anomaly in this, there is a pattern behind this that you can not see through spiral dynamics because it is flawed in this way. SD does not understand stages above orange and the linear pattern starts to break down above it. "green" is not understood at all by SD, only a strawman of it.

@Leo Gura Not to sound like a total party pooper, but for you to support watching this crap is contradicting your stance against conformity. Its not only conformity but the glorification of the biggest narcissist idiots of our time. It's literally moving society in a direction against consciousness on a mass scale. The ego of people like Memphis Depay is on the level of Trump.

"France" "Netherlands" What a joke of a time we're living in

Leo is right, anyone who has a problem with the word God hasn't realized why denying the application of that word is utter falsehood. For people who have had even glimpses of God like myself, where you are shocked to awe, tears and terror upon seeing the infinite power of Consciousness, its invincibility, its all encompassing nature, that all is created within it, by it, but it is totally One, it is a Being, it is alive, it is life itself. Yet no kudos to Leo for worsening the case by weird antics like without explanation capitalizing the entire word GOD, almost to further separate himself from the "dumb crowds", like the word God doesn't do justice in itself. Not good for the cause.

And yes, these concerns as well OP, you sound very non-careful There are ghouls in these streets

Dude, just make it absolutely clear to them via contract that they cant use your voice or name, just your story Also make sure you can't get doxxed through the forum Tate and his ghouls might go after you if you're not careful They are horrible people And those documentary makers dont give a fuck, they just want to make their doc Don't thread lightly on these manners, only do it if you're safe There are doxxed people who have their lives ruined Think before you act

This is a question that troubles me a lot as well. I know that the answer lies in the deepest ontological levels, concerning what suffering is on a metaphysical level. Suffering comes in many forms, and in that way it is irrelevant whether it is suffering in the form of a child in Gaza or any other form of suffering; In the end it boils down to Consciousness having an experience of suffering. All experiences of suffering, all have in common that they are Consciousness having the experience of suffering, since all beings are ultimately that: an experience in Consciousness. The question then becomes; what are the limits of suffering? Is there an end to it, or none at all? If consciousness is limitless in its imagination of experiences, much deeper suffering is possible than any human situation on earth. And if consciousness is eternal/immortal, is it bound to loop over massive amounts of suffering? Or can it permanently cease suffering for itself by ceasing imagination forever? Would that not contradict the attribute of eternality/immortality of Consciousness? One of the hardest questions. At times it makes me curse Consciousness for being immortal. Why did it dream up all this shit in the first place if there is so much suffering that may never end? At times it makes me want to escape through death, although I have seen the indestructibility of Consciousness, there is no true death. The question is religious, and many religions have tried to answer it. But I can't figure out the answer myself. All these Neo-advaitist answers in this thread don't take into account that the "illusion" of suffering is reality through Consciousness dreaming it up. Whatever illusion is dreamt up is real. The suffering lies in the delusion of a world and body, but while in the delusion, it is a real experience, that is the definition of delusion. I struggle with living my life knowing I am simply Consciousness and all endeavors of trying to not suffer by going after my ego's needs are simply useless. I am the homeless man dying on the street, I am the child having its family blown apart by bombs. I am that same consciousness and will experience the same things - if there is no escape from the eternal cycle of Samsara and dreaming, that is. I pray to God but get no answers.

How can a distinct entity like "Seth" be non-physical, if the non-physical is without form, and any distinct entity postulates form, since there is no distinction in formlessness?

What drugs are people pushing for lucid dreaming?

Very high quality documentary about the insane corruption of Trump and his cronies' crypto grifts.

Except you have continuously called intelligence absolutely real and morality absolutely unreal, so don't make the claim that higher and lower morality is as objective as intelligence. that is how you are phrasing this claim no doubt.

I didn't say he breaks it completely, I just think you use it far more liberally(not only in this particular case) than it can be used for. SD is highly accurate when it comes to collective memetics but on an individual level things are much more nebulous and inaccurate. there exists a much wider and intertwined palate of psychological complexes and pathologies on an individual level than on a collective level where things are simpler, especially in modern society.

Or just realize that the spiral dynamics model is far more limited than you previously assumed.

How has your heavy metal chelation journey helped with this if at all? How long have you chelated for, and do you still do?

Maybe you are on the nose with that. I will reflect.

You can recommend their books or free videos if you want.

You implicitly accused me of defending murdering women. you're a sicko.

You did so from a materialist's perspective, which is ironic coming from you. Man has both a beastly nature of flesh and a loving nature of consciousness. Both are of his nature, and his sex-drive is not merely from the beastly side. What is even your issue dude? I am saying women are more vulnerable because they are less physically strong and its much more of a crime to kill someone like that just like its more of a crime to kill a child. And then you proceed to post another article about femicide, again implying that I am in the favour of such wretched things. Who the fuck do you think you are to imply these things about me? If I were with you right now I'd knock your teeth out straight. You haven't even defined what you mean by patriarchy, although I know what your mean; the comical neo-marxists definition of it. A system where good men are the protectors of women against evil men is good and would cause less femicide. Liberal society causes more of it.

Because a woman is more vulnerable to a man. Great argument. Where did you understand that masculine qualities = women can't do it? men can and should learn feminine qualities, and women should and can learn masculine qualities, for when they are needed for their own spiritual growth and the growth of society. but only secondarily. Your liberal worldview has distorted your intelligence so much that you can't even recognize obvious realities anymore. If nazi germany attacks us tomorrow, the men will be responsible to defend the women and the children. This is so obvious to anyone except liberal epistemic perverts. This was too harsh and I take it back, my apologies.

Let's take a minute to contemplate on how an intelligent mind like Leo could write something so appalling as the following: (https://www.actualized.org/insights/art-with-a-capital-a) I think it has to do with his American nature. We Europeans are deeply entrenched and connected to art and its link to traditions of philosophy, sociology and metaphysics. And if you deeply study these traditions, you'd see that most of what Leo is talking about is already in there, albeit spread out and less direct. Nothing Leo is saying is essentially new; it is the way that he brings it in a direct, condensed and confrontational manner that is his genius. Even though I think Leo's work is absolutely life changing, genius and among the best of the last 100 years, and the most direct confrontation with reality of anything in modern times, to see this level of unintelligence from him is honestly repulsive. He does not respect art and unironically places his art above the art of all others, literally stating that one of his videos surpasses the entire corpus of Blow. the metaphysics of Blow's work are found and appreciated in the manner of aesthetics linked with meaning, no matter how simple. To expect other's people's art to also be as philosophical as his stream-of-consciousness philosophy lectures is laughably stupid and showcases a profound unawareness of fundamental facets of art, philosophy and their interactions with each other the world. The idea that Leo really thinks that you can even compare different forms and corpi of art in this way, is mind blowing.

Leo saying that men always view women as sexual object is also wrong. He is a superficial, quintessentially 21st century nihilist mind in this regard - akin to the likes of Michel Houellebecq. He doesn't even want to have a wife. In this regard, I agree with the feminists - People like Leo do not appreciate women much. Their superficial liberal mind is at the core of the rot of society. Most men want to have a wife and to actually love her, because they love the feminine. Of course sex is a big part but the love for her is a lot deeper than any merely sexual, platonic or other love. A love of deep trust and symbiosis between the feminine and the masculine. The feminist and gynocratic mating market and society of today is actually the thing causing men to be more animal-like, since their chances of marrying a chaste, men-respecting woman are basically zero. They are starved of love and sex and see that the only game being played is "dating" and "fucking", where the best looking and most narcissist men have the most success. Out of poverty, they conform to this market as their mind gets further corrupted by each passing year. Respect for women is disincentivized by means of a sick bro-culture on the one hand and a sick feminist culture on the other hand. All trust is lost between the genders and there are no winners. I am not saying the gynocratic mating market is caused by women; no, it has been enacted by evil men. Cheating and fornication are the destroyers of society and bonds between women. Reservation and chastity are not something bad or oppressive, but a contract of trust between all the people of a society.

Mechanical thinking, shutting off your emotions to protect others, violence, honor are big ones. Some can be extremely toxic and need to be held in healthy forms, like having a code for when to enact violence and when not.