Mellowmarsh

All world views are sourced from the same place. A seer can’t view everywhere. A seer can only view what’s in its own viewfinder.

That’s the nature of business. No one’s business. Parrot droppings will drop. It’s the gravity of love.

Well you can’t con a con.

That’s the nature of the mind, it always wants what it doesn’t want. Flip Flop. Meanwhile Art is natural. The natural is just shagging itself. That self is its nature.

This topic thread in my opinion is an open invitation for both immature or mature conversation always. Feel free to discuss the topic…(you cannot know Awareness ) any time bro 😎

As stated earlier. One is free to enter or leave here at will. Nothing is holding you here against your will. If your true desire is to be left out of it, then it’s probably wise not to get in what you don’t want to be in. Namely, nothing is forcing you to want what you don’t want.

Nothing is keeping you here. You are always free to enter or leave at will. Intention is the rider of the will. “The wild geese do not intend to cast their reflection, the water has no mind to receive their image”

State dependency is contingent upon nothing which is everything.

Art is Natural. ( Stateless) The nature of which is ARTificial. ( State)

❤️

Ralston is a concept known. Known by the only knowing there is. Is this”one knowing”confused or a falsehood? Can this one not know a concept it knows. Can this one experience the absence of its own knowing, and know its own absent knowing ? What would an absent knowing know, exactly?

That’s a category error. “Spirituality” is a concept known. One cannot describe a concept known such as “spirituality” as anything other than this immediate knowing, that cannot be not known conceptually. Name one thing that cannot be named. Show one thing that is not that thing.

“Not You” cannot exist, still exists as a concept known by the only knowing there is here now, which can never not be here. “cannot exist” is nonsensical in the sense “cannot exist” cannot not exist clearly as the concept is known. Just my two sense Leo, I’m not suggesting your two sense is irrelevant or wrong for you there, I’m just stating from here, how I am personally reading this.

Yes, “you” is simply a concept known, concepts are many. Many of the One. A concept knows nothing because a concept is already known to the only knowing there is, One with the knowing, always absolutely itself, without a second. No other is the One. The One that cannot be conceived or conceptualised because that which is known conceptually, knows nothing.

Balance is the centre of truth.

Beautifully put. 😊

I would hazard a guess that absolute is referring linguistically to immediate non descriptive consciousness without doubt or error, irrefutably. To answer your question.

That’s nice. I relate. 🙂

I agree with Rupert that being is knowing. I’d like to expand on this by saying the only absolute truth you can say for certain is that you are conscious, and that everything else is just linguistics.

Believe wat u want. We dont have to continue, in fact I would prefer if we didnt.

Good for you. Good luck finding a sparring partner to discuss ontological to scientific reality. But discussing BS is not my style.

Believe or not, I’m here for my own entertainment purposes only. I’m completely self loving and completely selfish to the core. Byeee, and thanks for swinging by with your opinion which you are entitled to have, of course. I’m in no frame of mind to deny you your own truth.

Do you honestly think I have a need to be convinced of what I already understand. I only know my own mind and how it works, no one will convince me otherwise of what I already know. There is only my frame here that I have to refer to. I’m not someone else, and nobody else is me.

I still don’t know what you mean by those statements. For me, awareness is the simple immediate observing of changing thoughts, and feeling's. Not that awareness changes.

I don’t turn it into belief, I turn it into clarity.