Mellowmarsh

The paradox of the one and only God. The belief in an all-knowing one and only God requires believing in solipsism. But an all-knowing one and only God is an impossibility anyway, because even a one and only God cannot know whether or not that solipsism is actually true. There’s just no arriving at the other side of infinity. Infinity has no horizon that can be crossed.

The good news is that a “Somebody” knows they are God. That’s a good feeling, nothing compares. This is home. Here, I’m always home with the beloved, my self.

Can infinity of God’s be as simple as infinite You’s? You are God and so are you and you and you etc…..

@SOUL 😂

AI Hey I-I get by with a little help from my imaginary friends! 😂 Shallow love focuses on superficial aspects, such as appearance or convenience, and lacks depth, emotional connection, and commitment, often leading to disappointment.Deep love, conversely, involves a strong, enduring bond built on loyalty, trust, vulnerability, and a choice to accept and forgive the partner's true self, even through difficulties. This enduring love is resilient, grows over time, and uplifts both individuals, fostering a connection that feels like home rather than a source of constant compromise or harm. Shallow Love: Focus on the Superficial: Centers on external factors like appearance, status, or convenience rather than deep emotional connection. Lack of Depth: Avoids serious conversations and focuses on trivial matters, leading to superficial interactions. Eroding Intensity: Initial infatuation or fascination fades as reality sets in, revealing a lack of substance in the relationship. Compromising Self: Involves diminishing one's light or losing oneself to please another, rather than being fully seen and heard. Temporary and Frail: Easily broken by difficulties, misunderstandings, or emotional strain, lacking the resilience to endure. Deep Love: Built on True Connection: Characterized by a profound emotional connection, quiet understanding, and unwavering support. Commitment and Choice: A conscious decision to care for and forgive each other, especially when it's difficult, and a commitment to being there through messy times. Vulnerability and Acceptance: Involves a willingness to be vulnerable and to accept the person, including their flaws and scars, with grace and mercy. Uplifting and Enduring: Doesn't ask you to shrink or dim your light but helps you become more fully yourself and brings you back to your true essence. Resilience and Healing: It endures storms, heals wounds, and restores broken relationships by choosing grace over bitterness and compassion over resentment. In essence, deep love is a journey of consistent effort, mutual commitment, and acceptance of imperfection, creating a sustainable and enriching bond. Shallow love, on the other hand, often proves inadequate when faced with life's challenges, highlighting a critical difference in connection and character.

If you’re going to love. Love deeply on the unconditional level only. It’s the only real and true love.

No tale on me…

Okay Leo. I believe you.

The echo chamber has spoken and in full force today. 😂

@Mellowmarsh Preaching to the choir is likened to a still wind that’s full of wind. 😂 Speak for yourself, try to refrain from projection, those illusory characters you’ve invented that you’ve called Joseph.

This has to be serious play, you cannot be not serious. If this play wasn’t serious then we’d simply walk out, stop being it’s audience. Seriousness is what keeps us glued to the screen on which the movie is playing. James just picks and chooses his movies, preferring one part to another. The parts he doesn’t like he walks out on. 😂 Its just fun to watch him leave his own show, or even funnier, to watch him show up to his own show.

Well all I can say my beloved sister, is that you must by far, be the most interesting you, you’ve ever met. You really can’t see past yourself can you, rejoice and embrace that feeling. It’s all you dude, daddy O.

What the heck is your problem with suffering? You still haven’t answered the question. Why is it brutal for ego person to die?

It’s not arguing, it’s arguing. 😂 Oneness has no argument with itself, so it imagines one, or two, or three add infinitum.

You did your best for a you that in your opinion does not exist. And you call this resistance to non existing suffering? Oh my are you the confused one. You believe you are talking to someone who is suffering and that you tried your best to remove the suffering of someone you claim to not exist. Okay, all inside your own head be that, suffering is your own creation, now own it, not project it onto the non existent.

Nothing can own what you already are. Your just simply repeating nondual BS as if it is actually useful, meaningful or relevant. The denial of self is still the attempt to own the no self ship. How silly is that. The concepts known as solipsism, enlightenment, ownership non ownership, are fully relevant within the dream story. Fine, have no story then, that too is a dream story. It’s your dream story, you are experiencing, no one else’s.

@James123 Nondual speak is a stupid and dumb way to speak, or express the reality of God. It’s so overcooked and outdated now, and well overdue for some real actual authentic not fake, relevance.

@James123 Either now or on your deathbed you will recognise that final solipsistic awakening, or you’ll pass away in total ignorance.And nothing will change, because it was all your dream any which way it appeared to you, you imagined it all, nothing excluding, especially nothing. God is all inclusive, never not here, never absent. Even pretending to be absent is all inclusiveness.

There’s no echo in absence, because absence is never not here.

Why don’t you make up your own mind about God? Instead of believing what others are saying? The Osho saying is selling spiritual bamboozle in exchange for money. Selling water by the river to confuse you into believing this is for sale, and some buy it hook line and sinker. In reality nothing is ever absent, nothing is never not here. NEVER NOT HERE

To create a false distinction simultaneously creates a true distinction by the sheer act of distinction. The human mind has no other frame of reference in which to refer itself to, so of course it’s only going to refer itself to its own self created conceptual narrative. Which of course is an integral part of reality, why dismiss false in favour of not false. When all distinction is equal to God anyway since God alone is? This is the madness of the nondual speakers, they only prefer one part of the dream in favour of the other. It’s just mind blowing nonsense, a futile attempt to put God back inside the genie lamp, in the vain attempt to show God off to the whole world and to declare look what I’ve caught, as if the rest of the world hasn’t seen anything like it before in their entire life. Everyone knows God can’t be caught, or put back in the genie lamp to show others.When one thing knows God then everything knows God. The human mind already knows it’s not in charge, it already knows it’s not beating it’s heart or breathing it’s breath. There’s no dream without a dream body to carry out the function of autonomous action or agency. That’s why this conception is conceived in the first place. Inconceivable this conception comes out of the genie lamp eventually, and once it’s out the expansion is so huge that there’s just no return to the genie lamp. The conception is forever. And everyone knows it, because God is everyone. This is Gods Solipsistic nature.

How would a mind / ego person fall away, if God is all, Alone.

This feeling brutal is a distinction. Why does it in your opinion have to be conclusively brutal? Are you concluding there’s no other way to feel?