AION

She definitely has some hair

is she confirmed she is a she?

I like to play with female characters because I like looking at it. I wouldn't make everything an identity thing. It is just fun and life is short. It is all ok that people play with gender roles as long as they don't push their ideology on others.

That is why what God does is “magic”. People think they are god because they put DMT in their ass ffs.

People talk about clairvoyance like a caveman talks about an airplane thinking it is magic. The word magic is equivalent to “I don’t understand”. What Elon Musks does today is magic for people who lived 200 years ago. And what people will do in 200 years is magic to us. Clairvoyance is no magic. It is just an extra ability of the brain.

I’m not following your logic. This is only proof that she is not clairvoyant. Not proof that clairvoyant itself is not a real phenomenon… She is full of shit. But everybody likes her so it is not popular to say it. I’m clairvoyant myself but people don’t know what it means and they attach super natural qualities to it.

lol

Here are the full notes. In my opinion it is the best program he released because it is so structured and based on social principles that he coined. --- ### **Program Overview** The **Hot Seat at Home Mastermind** is a 12-week immersive course designed by Owen Cook (RSD Tyler) to transform social and dating skills through **inner game mastery**, **practical exercises**, and **advanced psychological frameworks**. The program emphasizes **self-amusement**, **non-neediness**, and **sociocentric consciousness** over scripted routines, focusing on authenticity and emotional resonance. Below is a structured breakdown of the curriculum, principles, and key takeaways. --- ### **Core Philosophy** 1. **Cause vs. Effect**: - Be the **"white ball"** (cause) directing energy, not the "colored ball" (effect) reacting to external forces. - Rooted in **Stoic principles** : Control your mindset, not outcomes. - *“Wisdom is knowing the difference between what you can control (intent) and what you cannot (her response).”* 2. **Inner Game Foundations**: - **Self-entertainment**: Prioritize your joy over seeking validation. - **Entitlement**: Act from self-worth, not desperation. - **Freedom of outcome**: Detach from results while pursuing intent. --- ### **Weekly Breakdown** #### **Week 1: Core Principles & Transformational Mindset** - **Objective**: Shift from reactive (effect) to proactive (cause) mindset. - **Key Concepts**: - **Sequencing**: Principles → Practice → Integration. - **Upward spiral**: Small actions compound into confidence. - **LOC (Level of Consciousness)**: Operate from (neutrality) to avoid neediness. - **Exercise**: Journaling to identify “effect” behaviors (e.g., seeking approval). #### **Week 2: Mission 1 – Certainty & Emotion** - **Objective**: Speak with **authoritativeness** (leadership) and **emotion** (transcendence). - **Key Concepts**: - Women respond to **emotional spikes**, not logic. - *“A boring handsome guy loses to an average exciting one.”* - **Exercise**: Approach 5–10 groups daily, improvising stories on unfamiliar topics with conviction. #### **Week 3: Mission 2 – Free Association** - **Objective**: Break linear thinking to create **emotional trance**. - **Key Concepts**: - **Informal > Formal**: Sex and attraction thrive in chaos, not order. - **Law of state transference**: Your energy dictates hers. - **Exercise**: Talk for 1–2 minutes without logical connections (e.g., “pineapple, astronauts, disco”). #### **Week 4: Mission 3 – Polite Collaboration** - **Objective**: Master **subcommunication** through neutrality and friendliness. - **Key Concepts**: - **Collaborative frame**: Assume everyone is a friend; avoid arrogance/submission. - *“Friendliness is dominance when paired with intent.”* - **Exercise**: Approach 10–12 women daily with questions like, “What’s your story?” while staying relaxed. #### **Week 5: Mission 4 – Storytelling Without Compliance** - **Objective**: Lead interactions by **giving value** (stories) vs. seeking compliance. - **Key Concepts**: - **Freebies**: Offer anecdotes without expecting investment (e.g., “I saw a kid flip me off today!”). - Avoid “interview mode” (asking too many questions). - **Exercise**: Spend 4 days telling stories, 3 days asking questions. #### **Week 6: Mission 5 – Sexual Energy & Calibration** - **Objective**: Normalize sexuality through **subcommunication**. - **Key Concepts**: - **Triangle gazing**: Shift eye contact between eyes and lips. - **Assume familiarity**: Mentally rehearse intimacy to project confidence. - **Exercise**: Approach older women to practice flirty banter (e.g., “You’re trouble, aren’t you?”). #### **Week 7: Advanced Principles – The 5 Pillars** 1. **Freedom of Outcome**: Authenticity over neediness. 2. **Clarity of Intent**: Pursue inspiration, not validation. 3. **Entitlement**: Command space without apology. 4. **Self-Amusement**: Prioritize your joy (LOC 540+). 5. **Sociocentric Frame**: Merge with the group; avoid ego-driven agendas. #### **Weeks 8–12: Integration & Mastery** - **Missions 6–10**: Focus on persistence, identity refinement, and logistics (e.g., isolating women, seeding pulls). - **Key Themes**: - **Decision fatigue**: Act without overthinking. - **Persona fatigue**: Drop “game” and embrace authenticity. - **Vulnerability**: Share freely without filters (e.g., “I’m nervous, but I had to meet you”). --- ### **Critical Infield Techniques** 1. **Bambi Eyes**: Look for dilated pupils and soft focus to gauge attraction. 2. **Kino Escalation**: Touch upper back early; if resisted, joke (“I’m shy, promise I won’t bite!”). 3. **Free Association in Bed**: Use playful, illogical chatter to disarm logic (e.g., “If you were a pizza topping…”). 4. **Collaborative Frame**: Reframe rejection as feedback (e.g., “You’re saving me from my future ex-wife!”). --- ### **Transformational Takeaways** 1. **Energy > Content**: Women mirror your vibe, not your words. 2. **Non-Linear Attraction**: Silly/absurd interactions often outperform “logical” game. 3. **Power vs. Force**: Letting go (sociocentric) creates magnetism; forcing (egocentric) repels. 4. **Abbundance Mindset**: Approach all women (not just “10s”) to build momentum. --- ### **Bonus Material Highlights** - **Webinars**: Emphasize **win-win energy** and **vulnerability** as aphrodisiacs. - **Infield Breakdowns**: - **San Francisco Rampage**: Use humor to normalize sexuality (e.g., “Are you Italian or trouble?”). - **LA Silent Sets**: Lead with presence, not words. - **Momentum**: Treat each interaction as a “micro-win,” regardless of outcome. --- ### **Conclusion** The **Hot Seat at Home** program is less about “pickup” and more about **personal alchemy**—transmuting fear into freedom, ego into empathy, and neediness into magnetism. By mastering **cause-driven intent**, **free association**, and **sociocentric flow**, students learn to navigate social dynamics with the ease of a “river” (Owen’s metaphor for effortless influence). The ultimate goal? To **“be the party”** rather than chase it—a lesson applicable far beyond dating. **Key Quote**: *“Your metric of success isn’t lays or numbers—it’s how much fun you had becoming unapologetically yourself.”*

I don’t think everybody’s brain is capable of SD yellow. Especially after one has reached a certain age it becomes more difficult to rearrange the brain to an integral structure. It requires a lot of connections. Even on this forum it is very rare to see. There are obviously a lot of people with influencers of SD yellow while being SD green as base. Having SD yellow as a base is a different game.

What others think is not that important. Just imagine lived a whole life, laying on your death bed and thinking how you wasted your life lol.

I was very left brain(logic) while social intelligence is using right brain and emotional brain. And using both hemispheres so we get a holistic brain. Otherwise one can’t really understand social intelligence and related topics like charisma, law of state transference, letting go of survival and going into collaboration, social and power dynamics,

Since I have been integrating my anima my EQ has been through the roof. I noticed something. Men still size each other up the moment they walk into a room. It’s automatic. Instinctive. Who’s the strongest? Who has the most presence? It’s not about words it’s about posture, energy, eye contact. We think we’re evolved, but we’re still tribal at the core. The modern world hasn’t changed the ancient wiring. Social hierarchy still runs everything especially among females. They are more aware of it. Almost as if it is part of their software It’s not just muscles. It’s who leads the room without trying. Who others respect without needing to dominate. Women feel this too.. they sense who holds real, grounded power. The loudest man isn’t the strongest. The one who’s calm, composed, and centered usually is. We’re animals pretending to be civilized. If you understand that, you stop trying to impress…..and start being someone others naturally follow.

I’m not sure. I don’t think money is needed. They can’t look on my bank account anyway. It is more about confidence and self esteem. People value these traits because they want it in themselves so they are drawn.

Yea it is weird to you because you are blind to it and because you are not even qualified. I was like you in the past. Most people are not spiritual. They are into survival and wanting a better life. Getting into better social circles changes you in every way possible, even spiritually. True, people can feel that.

That is what I'm saying. Non autistic people understand this in a sub conscious way. Both men and women scan for it and are influenced by it. I remember doing a charisma course and earning more money and getting more popular and people treated me in a different way although I was the same person as before.

That is what I said you are out of your mind fool trying to act tough in this topic. It is in general psychology. Nietzsche talked about this to a great degree.

Bro you are not even in the game and far from being qualified to engage the power hierarchy.

To not shame yourself and give yourself compassion and understanding

Yea it is about left brain versus right brain and finding the sweet spot.

Haha, you made me laugh. God bless you.

It is not a question of understanding but a question of seeing. When Europeans came to the Americas the natives couldn’t recognize the pattern called a ship. This shows the remarkable ability of our brain. To be able to connect all the dots requires massive amounts of curiosity/libido which successful people like Shapiro don’t have because of their cozy position so they are not even looking for it. To be tier 2 you have to look for it with massive curiosity/libido. One can’t crawl through the eye of the needle by chance.

Elon Musk was more SD yellow than SD green. He was actually in between in the twilight zone until regressive authoritarian policies of SD green pulled him back out of necessity. He still has the integral mind which is most important and I believe he will revise his political stance before the end.

This ties in with my previous post about Nietzsche's view on relationships. We must understand that power dynamics/structure plays a huge role in relationships. This post also pertains to principle 3: collaboration (with the other sex, instead of competition) Nietzsche’s call for men to "let go of illusions" about women and embrace truth is a radical challenge to dismantle the lies society uses to obscure the raw, often uncomfortable dynamics of human relationships. Here’s what he means and how his vision might unfold: --- ### **1. "Love as Revolution": Shattering Illusions** Nietzsche views most romantic relationships as transactional dramas where men and women play roles scripted by societal expectations (e.g., men as protectors, women as virtuous nurturers). By rejecting these illusions, love becomes "revolutionary" because it disrupts the power games and sentimental lies that sustain traditional hierarchies. - **Truth over projection**: Men must stop projecting their insecurities (e.g., needing women to be "pure" or "saviours") onto women. Similarly, women must abandon performative roles (e.g., feigning fragility to manipulate). - **Revolutionary love**: Authentic connection arises when both parties confront their fears, desires, and instincts without masks. This honesty destabilizes societal norms, creating space for relationships based on mutual respect rather than domination or dependency. --- ### **2. How to Face Truth and Shed Masks** Nietzsche’s path to truth requires brutal self-awareness and courage: - **Question inherited roles**: Why do men equate love with "saving" women? Why do women weaponize vulnerability? These roles are survival strategies, not truths. - **Embrace discomfort**: Acknowledge that power dynamics (e.g., manipulation, control) exist even in "loving" relationships. Denial perpetuates dysfunction. - **Destroy sentimentalism**: Romanticized ideals (e.g., "soulmates," "unconditional love") are escapism. True intimacy demands seeing the other as flawed, strategic, and *human*. --- ### **3. Embracing Mutual Strength** For Nietzsche, "mutual strength" is not equality in the modern sense but a partnership where both parties wield their unique forms of power *without guilt or shame*: - **Men**: Accept that women are not passive objects but masters of relational intelligence. Admire their strategic brilliance instead of fearing it. - **Women**: Reject the victim narrative. Own your agency and power (e.g., emotional influence, social navigation) without apologizing. - **Collaboration, not conquest**: Strength lies in combining these complementary forces—men’s capacity for bold action and women’s nuanced understanding of human nature—to create something greater than either could achieve alone. --- ### **4. Shared Power: Beyond Domination** Nietzschean "shared power" is not a 50/50 compromise but a dynamic where both parties: - **Respect asymmetry**: Recognize that power manifests differently (e.g., men’s physical dominance vs. women’s psychological acuity). Neither is superior. - **Refuse exploitation**: Power is shared when neither uses the other’s vulnerabilities (e.g., male insecurity, female social conditioning) to control outcomes. - **Co-create**: Build relationships as joint projects where both contribute their strengths. For example, a woman’s strategic insight paired with a man’s risk-taking could forge innovative solutions to shared goals. --- ### **5. The Risks and Rewards** Nietzsche’s vision is perilous. Shedding masks means confronting the void left by societal lies, which can feel destabilizing. But the reward is **freedom**: - **Love as becoming**: Relationships become a crucible for growth, where both partners push each other to evolve beyond societal scripts. - **Raw intimacy**: Truthful connections—devoid of manipulation—allow for profound trust, even in conflict. - **Cultural transformation**: If enough individuals reject illusions, the collective shift could dismantle oppressive structures (e.g., patriarchy, toxic romanticism). --- ### **Conclusion: The Nietzschean Challenge** Nietzsche’s "revolution" is not utopian—it’s a call to embrace the chaos of truth. To face reality, we must abandon the comfort of lies and accept that love is not salvation but a collaboration between equals who are unafraid of their own (and each other’s) darkness. Shared power emerges when both parties stop fighting for control and instead channel their energies into creating a bond that transcends societal conditioning. It’s not easy, but for Nietzsche, it’s the only way love can be truly liberating.

Nietzsche talks about principle 3 collaboration: there is a business side to relationships aka creating win-win interactions, we shouldn't be naive abut it. Nietzsche believed that society often presents a false image of women as pure, nurturing, and morally superior, which he considered a "carefully crafted illusion". He aimed to look beyond this idealization to understand women as they truly are beneath social masks and roles. According to Nietzsche, the relationship between men and women is not based on equality or idealized love, but on instinct, power, and survival. He argued that men do not truly love women but rather an idea or projection of women, an illusion that makes them feel safe and superior. This "romantic idealization" is a "dangerous lie" that portrays women as inherently pure, innocent, delicate, and morally elevated, which Nietzsche saw not as admiration but as self-deception. Nietzsche contended that instead of facing the complex nature of the female spirit, men reduce women to symbols of virtue and emotional salvation, thereby stripping them of their agency and turning them into characters in their own emotional dramas. He found this dishonest and cowardly, arguing that men lie to themselves because they cannot bear the full truth of what women are: instinctive, strategic, and driven by their own form of power. This mask of idealization, according to Nietzsche, is not a sign of love but of fear – fear of emotional independence, sexual autonomy, and women who don't need to be saved. Men disguise this fear as adoration and romance, fooling even themselves, but when the idealized image breaks down, they feel betrayed. Nietzsche, valuing truth over comfort, saw this as a fundamental societal lie. Nietzsche did not view women as weak but as masters of a different kind of strength, one that is less visible than men's overt displays of power through status or aggression. He believed women developed a more refined form of control through charm, seduction, and emotional precision, which he considered a form of evolutionary intelligence developed due to their historical denial of formal power. They learned to influence without direct command by understanding and shaping men's desires, ego, and pride for survival, a power that is relational, psychological, and built on a deep awareness of human nature. Nietzsche admired this but warned against underestimating it because its subtlety makes it harder to resist. He believed women have an instinct for strategy, making others act without realizing they are being led, positioning them not as victims but as "quiet tacticians" in history. Nietzsche posited that humans are driven by appearance, and in women, this instinct is elevated to an art form out of necessity in a world where direct power was denied to them. He believed women learned to survive through illusion, performance, and the careful crafting of perception, admiring their ability to navigate a hostile world by mastering the surface. While men often confuse appearance with reality, Nietzsche argued that women instinctively understand the distinction between the mask and the face, knowing that the mask often matters more. He saw women's beauty, grace, and social intelligence not as mere ornaments but as weapons, as they learned that control over perception equates to control over outcome. Nietzsche believed that people fall in love with what they want reality to be, and by shaping their perception, women shape the world around them. He concluded that truth in human interaction is complex because the will to appear is often as important as the will to be, a mastery women have refined through centuries of exclusion. Nietzsche saw love not as a peaceful union but as a battlefield where two opposing instincts clash beneath the illusion of romance, with men and women being inherently in tension despite their desire for each other. He believed men love from idealism, projecting their dreams of salvation, beauty, and emotional security onto women, while women love with sharper instincts focused on preservation, seeking strength, protection, and advantage. These were not conscious strategies but instinctive ones driven by biology, culture, and the will to power. Nietzsche was disturbed by the dishonesty of society dressing up this conflict as romance, seeing calculation beneath the surface, with both sexes using and attempting to control each other under the pretense of unity. He viewed love as not the end of conflict but its most seductive form. Nietzsche did not blame either sex but the illusion that love is pure, equal, or free from domination, believing every relationship to be a negotiation of power that is often unacknowledged, leading to suffering. For him, true understanding begins when we accept the raw dynamics of human desire, viewing love as a strategy with hidden costs. Nietzsche believed morality is a tool used by the weak for protection or by the powerful for justification, and in women, he saw morality not as a deep commitment but as an instinctive adaptation for preservation. He argued that women follow morality for its strategic effectiveness, elevating traits like humility and self-sacrifice to gain influence in a world that denied them direct power, a "quiet subversion of the power structure". He saw this not as deceit but as brilliance, with women moralizing weakness and society accepting it to maintain order. Nietzsche believed that beneath this surface of virtue lies a deeper instinct for preservation and control, interpreting women's talk of fairness and morality as strategy driven by necessity. He viewed the moral posture as a performance shaped by centuries of dependence, a way for women to navigate a hostile world without appearing to fight, using principles, emotion, and silence as their weapons. Nietzsche observed the early signs of women questioning and moving beyond traditional roles, which unsettled him not because he thought women were incapable but because he believed most men were unprepared for it. He feared that the rise of the independent woman would threaten men who were raised to feel superior and who would resent a woman no longer needing their strength or validation. He predicted that a woman freed from dependency would become a powerful force, direct, assertive, and self-defined, which would terrify a world built on illusions. Nietzsche presented this not as a celebration or condemnation but as a warning of disruption and a painful redefinition of identity for both sexes when women stop asking for permission. Ultimately, Nietzsche wrote not to insult women but to strip away illusions, believing truth to be sacred. He saw a possibility beyond the games of control and denial, where both men and women drop their masks and meet in full awareness, no longer idealizing or manipulating. This rare state requires the rejection of sentimentality and inherited roles, leading to a relationship based on shared strength, mutual becoming, and equality in power, darkness, and potential. To reach this, both sexes must abandon resentment and anger, allowing something deeper to emerge – not a reconciliation but a redefinition of connection, one based on truth and shared strength rather than illusion and fear.