enchanted

Interesting thanks for sharing. By providing evidence your theory seems less conspiratorial and you could be right that there is "manipulation" going on. (Is manipulation a weasel word too?) Another explanation is that right-wing billionaires are better at supporting grass roots/amateur voices. Famous examples of this is Trump going on the Theo Von show while Harris snubbed all those podcasters.

Or are you a weasel worder thats getting pulled into another story? lol.

No offense but this sounds like conspiracy thinking. The right uses the same tactic: anything George Soros funds is left wing manipulation. It could be as simple as Nick Fuentes does popular rage bait material and some rich people want to profit from it. No conspiracy needed.

Lol exactly. Also, I bet Nick Fuentes is also referring to the other characteristics of Hitler that made him successful: - Highly confident public speaking - Strong rhetorical persuasion - Skill at projecting certainty and purpose - Ability to tap into people’s fears and frustrations - Charisma that appealed to certain audiences - Relentless ambition - A talent for simplifying complex issues into emotionally charged messages - Strategic use of propaganda and symbolism - Understanding of group psychology and mass movements - Capacity to inspire loyalty

Nick Fuentes is a professional edgelord and troll. Unfortunately, young people, and especially young men, feel so disenfranchised, disempowered, and emotionally hollowed out by a secular culture, that fails to spin any narrative of meaning and substance, that they are easily swayed by people like Nick Fuentes. The things Scott Galloway talks about is the reason Trump won and people like Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes are some of the most popular podcasters. We are experiencing a failure of secularism, wealth inequality, and techno distopia. Ironically this is also why Leo's work is so valuable and needed.

This women in the video gets hit on over a hundred times throughout her day. No wonder attractiolve women are sick of men lol https://www.reddit.com/r/AskTheWorld/s/KHzZXJ1oRA

Chatgpt is one thing with many avatars. Everyone's phone or computer is like an avatar or localization of the one ChatGPT. Alex O'Connor explains a little more in this short clip: https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxM6iuxKaDAHwIh9s2b0fp7su0RUHW0LQv?si=MG3PCuf_QGhv--y7

Ken Wilber's model is a lot like Spiral Dynamics.

"Everything is about sex, except sex. Sex is about power. " -unknown

Mumdani, like Bernie Sanders, is a Democratic Socialist, which is a huge difference from Specialism. Mumdani winning is a good thing and he's more like Scandinavian politics than any other politician in the US. Mumdani is conscious politics.

@Oeaohoo Surely you aren't denying that individuals and groups develop right? There might be debate about how exactly they develop but you do admit there are distinct hierarchies within individuals and groups. Surely you don't think a hunter gatherer tribe is as sofisticated as modern society? Or that a someone in grade 3 is equally developed as a university student? Regardless of what you believe I don't think anyone actually answered your question so I will try: The evidence used for believing in SD is the scientific study it was based on. Leo's video series and the SD book on his booklist also help understand the origins of SD. The other thing that validates SD is that other models like Susan Cook Greuters EDT have come to similar conclusions. An important point is that all psychological theories are a "soft science" which means there will never be hard evidence for anything in the psychology field. So every mental frame work and theory of the mind will forever be just educated guesses based on limited and subjective data. This is also due to the mind being infinite and nebulous. Hope that helps.

Can anyone recommend any fiction books?