bebotalk

A Christian is anybody who accepts Christ as Lord and Saviour. However, this doesn't mean one is a good Christian. I suspect this applies to Trump. And most likely to many of his followers.

not always. not all situations are as clean cut as that.

Moreover, you might be better understood if you used better English, and then you'll condemn others for being flighty and trite. i'm sorry my existence offends you, but then healthy people can mentally dodge. i don't care if your temple says different. they're obviously uneducated people.

Unless you can read my mind, you cannot presuppose anything here. We just have different definitions of hypocrisy.

Some of her points are ill-grounded, but she's good overall. Not all urban regeneration is about gentrification. It can be turning derelict brownfield lands into housing or low-end/mid-range retail. This is an example in her own city - https://www.barnet.gov.uk/brent-cross-cricklewood-regeneration-programme. But then apparently, according to you, there is only one view of anyting in life. and its good to lie about peolpe having rights to opinions based on thoughts one developed as a child/teen.

My "monologue" wasn't edgy. I said I was amused by both of your reactions. There are different views other than your own. Maybe don't view the world through your own prism. Moreover, I don't see the edginess. I'm not you, so I cannot see your perspectives or prism. That's my opinion. stop lying and saying you tolerate all opinions. Either way, I'm glad me stating a fact that most people are cisgender and that many trans people have no overarching issue with cisgender people and realise that's a reality. funny how spiritualist people create artificial rules in their head that others are expected to follow.

I'm surprised that this is being permitted medically. It undermines trans people.

no, it's not. I said most people are cis. and? do you dispute this? his reply amused me, since I stated some facts. I'm notreally bothered if it didn't match his narrative or not. maybe he and you should use your intelligence to argue or debate better or not assume your view is correct. or you can, if you're really smarter than me, demonstrate why my view is wrong. You amuse me that me merely stating an opinion triggers both of you. why can't i say what i want? when youb BOTH say "aaawwwww!! ok!!!" to all others?? funny asf.

what is a life assignment?

i didn't mention blacks. In my country, there are white inner cities that are rough. hence why I said it's not a matter of race. it's that some people are conditioned into side behaviours or lifestyles.

I've heard these explanations but then both of them imho are weak. I've often thought that it's about having insider knowledge, or just ego. that some peole want to appear smart.

i said nothing absolutist. I'm amused i'[ve triggered you, since my persepective doesn't match with yours. i love it also that scientific fact doesn't jive with you since it violates your worldview. I'm also entitled to state my opinions. your subjective inner brain cannot stop me, nor anybody else. funny how "smart and spiritual" people as yourself often worm your inner thoughts into objective realities. I'll continue to "offend" you, when a wise and smart person as yourself can just ignore what others do. but you won't, since it's not how you've been taught. yes, everybody has to fear you. i know a host of fellow adults who'd laugh at you literally. not everything in life is or has been dictated by your temple. yes, most people are cis. just basic biology, bruh. i'll let that offend you since it undermines your edgelord inner monologue. I just thought your initial sentence was too esoteric - in that who can say what people are "meant" to be or do? but you will dismiss anything that isn't in your spiritual purview. lol.

It's a not a race thing either. Most poor areas in various countries tend to be rougher. I'm not sure the exact sociological reasons for it. But it's a direct connection between their rough enviroment. We're all shaped by our environment in various forms.

This presumes some kind of entity is causing this. Seems very esoteric. Whilst trans people have every right to be who they are, most people are cis. as are most people straight and not gay or bi. the biological default is that most people are or possibly will be cisgender. Whilst sex is largely binary (as in it is a bimodal distribution and not literally two poles apart), gender is relative. Most gender roles are arbitrary. There is no reason why men wear suits and women wear dresses.

People from poorer environments often live more stressful lives. Aggression is probably the norm in their environments. If they live in an area where they have to be on guard oftne, then it leads to more aggression.

Spiritualism is just one side of life. Moreover, he made an observation from his personal experience. Wise people, as you purport, surely must get sound communication.

Life is about complexities and exceptions.

That's an extreme scenario, and one can go down a rabbit hole of hypotheticals. not all stores would be on the brink of collapse. The fact is many would say not all theft is wrong. Not all killing is wrong either. And there is a difference between hypocrisy and inconsistency. that's my view and it's pretty common, despite your internal mental blindedness. I'd still say that inconsistency isn't the same as hypocrisy.

porn is fine if used responsibly, or if as a way to explore one's sexuality.

imho, inconsistency doesn't have to have a negative connotation. the two imho aren't the same.

Modifying a rule is normal. That's not hypocrisy. One can say theft is wrong but support it in the case of a starving person.

They have a point. Cannabis can be unhealthy in some circumstances, though it's not a gateway drug. even still, pople shou;d have the choice to use it or not.

Not everywhere in the USA has legalised weed, or let alone decriminalised it. As I understand, your federal government still outlaws it. So it's not really that much more open on weed. Just your point is inaccurate, and it's a false "dunk" on Europe.

Why lament colonialism? This is common amongst people from countries that were once ruled by European powers. Yes, it had bad effects that linger to this day. But then humans conquer. Unfortunately, humans are aggressive and we see this in the world right now. If one looks at the histories of various ex-European colonies, they were often conquered by other powers. India was ruled by the Mughals and the British essentially took over from them. The Zulus expanded in eastern South Africa, before the Boer Wars and the unification of the Boer Republics and the British Cape Colony into South Africa. Native Americans must have had wars and conflicts long before Columbus or Vespucci got there. And in Europe itself, there has been endless conquest. There is one going on right now, in Ukraine. Colonialism was just a bigger version of what we've seen throughout human history, and sadly appears to be human nature. Take the history of France. It was founded in large part by conquest. Caesar invaded the Gauls. Then when Rome fell, the Franks came in, leading to Charlemagne conquering the Saxons and other peoples. Then duchies under the French king such as the Normans conquered England, which led to future English kings seizing large parts of France. They were pushed out in the Hundred Years War, and then France over centuries fought Britain, Spain, and others for global dominance. Germany was founded in its backyard, essentially, after they lost the Franco-Prussian War, and whilst it held off the Germans in WWI it lost out to the Nazis in WW2. This isn't to justify colonialism and the many barbaric acts that happened. But it seems to me just an extension of what happened for centuries and millennia prior to the voyages of Prince Henry and Vasco da Gama.

But your USA has banned abortion in half of its states. And isn't that more progressive on drugs as it stands. And also bans prostitution in most of the country, and said states that have outlawed abortion want to also curb trans rights. Regressive?