Keryo Koffa

👍🏻

I'm in a steelmanning mood, I will take @Javfly33's side & extract from his mind THIS: Huh?! Didn't expect this to pop up, damn Javfly's mind is freaky! Oh well, point made

Can you make a video on how to transcend being a mere devil and become the demon lord?

Understood

@gettoefl In that case, reading these threads: "Damn, am I deluded!"

Cool

B-but... isn't his game that we're all Leo together in this Solipsistic orgy, no? 😅 I'll see myself out...

Top 10 IMDB lol

@Schizophonia I have 3, the first two perfectly reasonable for my post-dissodelic cryptic mass-posting. The last one was a lame excuse, but it pointed me in the right direction & progressed me universally. @NoSelfSelf Hmm, I would think Game knows no grammar 😜 @Joshe My POV is Diminishing Returns. Intuitive Learning > "THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER" @Heaven Leo.AI coming soon to Actualized.org to fix you your Grammar

First, we need to evolve as a species. Currently, Aliens are looking at us like Ants, volatile non-sensical Ants.

Existence is Faith

@Xonas Pitfall ๛⦿𓏳⇡○ ⟳🧬🤖🧝 ヽ(•‿•)ノ → ¯\_(⊙︿⊙)_/¯ → ✌乁༼☯‿☯✿༽ㄏ✌

I cast Fusion: Leo Solipsistura!

@Kksd74628 I'd join this controversy gang of yours and share your sentiment but this feels like kicking puppies 😁

For many of these figures, their critical work was inseparable from their broader contributions. Jean-Paul Sartre, for instance, was both a philosopher and a literary critic, and his critiques were deeply tied to his existentialist views. In such cases, it's difficult to draw a hard line between their critical and non-critical achievements. In fact, many of their critiques redefined literary, philosophical, or cultural fields, making them influential as both creators and critics. Criticism itself can be viewed as a creative and intellectual act. Figures like Samuel Johnson or Matthew Arnold reshaped how their contemporaries and later generations understood literature and culture. The depth of their critiques created frameworks for thinking and engaging with art, much like a sculptor molds clay. The intellectual labor of critical analysis can shape society’s values, making it deserving of recognition in its own right. Many critics were awarded recognition because their critiques were transformative. Walter Benjamin's work, for example, influenced not just literary criticism but also media theory, aesthetics, and Marxist thought. His critiques didn’t merely supplement his other contributions—they were central to the intellectual revolutions that followed. Statues are typically awarded based on a person's overall impact on culture, society, or intellectual life. If the critiques of these individuals had significantly shaped their fields, then the statues, memorials, or accolades are not despite their critiques but because of the holistic impact their ideas—critical or otherwise—had on the world. The argument that statues are awarded “despite” critiques seems to overlook the broader, integrative role of criticism in the cultural, intellectual, and historical achievements of many notable figures. Criticism can be as transformative as creation, and when it is, it is a valid reason for commemoration.

We get it once we stop asking about it! 😁

Summary: Logical Postulate 1. There is only everything What I am = Everything because 1. My POV = All POV "Awesome, I'm God, WTF" There's only I because 1., so Solipsism Ha! It only took a Minute, suck it Leo! I am God, all you Dream Characters are screwed 😁 Next Post Suggestions: Leo from Walmart, McDonalds Leo, "We have (Leo) at home meme"

I see more serious replies to unserious threads.

Leo would say: You imagine someone colling you and construct their personality in real-time

Basic holofractology, takes much more than that to live up to Leo's Meta though 😜

Just my basic YouTube studies 😁

You raised a good point about "Slave Morality", but it's a negative or zero-sum paradigm lock

Wrong, that's what "other" religions do, we're at war with those

Is that a sin in your "my religion"? 😁

To ruin your fun & metaphoric sentiment with explicit analysis: "The phrase "No one ever made a statue of a critic" is often attributed to Elbert Hubbard and is meant to emphasize the idea that creators and doers are celebrated more than critics. However, this isn’t entirely true in history. There are several examples of statues or memorials dedicated to critics, although they are often also writers, philosophers, or significant cultural figures. Here are a few notable examples: 1. Jean-Paul Sartre – While known as a philosopher and existentialist writer, Sartre was also a prolific literary critic. His statues and busts are found in various parts of France. 2. Samuel Johnson – Famous for his dictionary, Johnson was also a prominent literary critic. He has a statue in Lichfield, England. 3. Matthew Arnold – A poet, cultural critic, and one of the most influential literary critics of the Victorian era, Arnold has statues and memorials dedicated to him, such as in Westminster Abbey. 4. Charles Baudelaire – The French poet and critic, often known for his critiques of art and literature, has several statues, including in Paris. 5. Edmund Burke – Although primarily known as a statesman and philosopher, Burke was also a significant cultural and literary critic, and there are multiple statues of him in London and Dublin. 6. Walter Benjamin – A critical theorist and literary critic, Benjamin has statues and memorials in Germany and elsewhere. So, while fewer statues are made for critics compared to artists, leaders, or inventors, several well-known critics have been commemorated in statue form. Their legacy often goes beyond criticism, as many of these figures played multifaceted roles in shaping intellectual and cultural history." - ChatGPT