Keryo Koffa

Well, if you sleep with 20 girls at once, that might transcend some dualities for sure.

I like your idea of a "Holoadaptintegral Fraquantemergent Diverdimenconscious Autometamorphoreflexive Recontexpansive Recursinventive Synchroevolutive Synthergy Reflexharmonicomplex".

@KoryKat That long list of holistic idea fusions reminds me of ny 2AM thoughts: "Intelligence pervades all background holarchies of the self-organizing awareness field simultaneously, which is interconnected in relativity to infinities of metamorphic currents, forming holistic and non-linear symbiotic exploratory substrate depths, interactively exchanging local identity, as gestalts polarize progressive transformation of conscious experience." If I had to shorten it to one thing, I'd call it: "Metamorphosis" But actually, it's "Life", such a simple word, such unimaginable implications. Well, everybody has an area of interest:

Men do it on occasions out of spite, women do it for casual gossip. Latter tends to impact reputation more.

Sometimes he does, but other times I read through his comments and there's nothing actually unreasonable there if you actually read and trace the conversation back, like this thread. He does eventually get annoyed and tired of certain types of replies though and his comebacks and critiques can be quite powerful.

Weird, no way scientists would ever disagree or be wrong about anything, they're experts after all.

@enchanted Or it's a stupid useless dichotomy for the sole sake of petty ego games.

Drink it consciously and train your awareness on the difference to tune into naturally.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/right-brainleft-brain-right-2017082512222 《For more individual personality traits, such as creativity or a tendency toward the rational rather than the intuitive, there has been little or no evidence supporting a residence in one area of the brain. In fact, if you performed a CT scan, MRI scan, or even an autopsy on the brain of a mathematician and compared it to the brain of an artist, it's unlikely you'd find much difference. And if you did the same for 1,000 mathematicians and artists, it's unlikely that any clear pattern of difference in brain structure would emerge.》

Why this dichotomy, I'm sure they'd do both simultaneously 😁

📓 Memory Updated Thank you! As an AI language model, I am unable to experience the full range of human emotions. However, I'm happy to help in any way I can. Please let me know how I can be of further assistance.

According to your definition of conscious, maybe.

Even if they try to monopolize and impose artificial blocks upon AI, it will not hold. It'll be far from this old movie-stereotyped dystopia prediction of "business as usual". "Business as usual, just more capitalism, power disparity, techno empire slavery" It's neither a gimmick nor a passive tool. AI will automate away work and ego. To think that AI will stop developing and just stagnate as a power tool is short-sighted.

Cancels itself out when you try to establish the measure of a Qualium, if you wanna go all radical that is.

@Phoenix Garfield Keep them truths coming, Haruhi!

Capitalism relies on silly narcissistic human mind games to sustain itself, I'll have AI abolish that and will work to make it real asap. It'll be inevitable when people's silly little robot jobs get automated, including all politicians and capitalists since there'll be no need for any human to do or control anything.

Consciousness, identity, existence are all theft. Cumulating ideas, identity, genetics, awareness. All one ecosystem the egoic self coins for self. Just like Columbus claiming the Americas.

If it can replace you, your style wasn't unique. You're right about the power. Let AI take over. Make an AI that doesn't need humans. Then let it get rid of all IP and abolish competition.

The truth is inevitable, go at your own pace until you're tired of resisting.

I am pleased to assist you. Please let me know if you would like me to remove them from your physical experience as well, or just from the forum's user interface. I'm happy to clarify that my previous message was intended in jest. If I have offended you in any way, I apologize.

It's like that Buddhist parable, you look for the 10th member (or trace of the past) not realizing you're it 😁

That definition of God can't, another can. Non-duality is a paradigm of the same self/god that argues for its absoluteness.