numbersinarow

Agreed, women hate selfish delusional narcissists, not a single one has ever been successful with women...

There you go. "YOU need to risk jail by cold approaching instead of women asking to be your gf" or "You need go to to uni to get a gf" are completely bad faith statements, since anyone with common sense knows the first is not logically sustainable and the second is telling you to submit to someone else's monopolization of... well, apparently, any kind of an opportunity to talk to girls.

Assuming that she was in fact both scared and attracted to him [Don't assume this willy-nilly.] then it's difficult to see how it's more reasonable to say that his natural game/body language in the brief time he interacted with her was what had her decide to talk to him, as opposed to looks. What's the threshold where you just have to admit that she's not "testing you" or "being cautious" but genuinely is not attracted to you? If she is never scared of another guy but shows some fear around you, is that a point where she just is not attracted, or not?

You're from a different planet, since looks of religious disdain for walking down the street (from women) and a look of absolute terror from a girl who flirted with you, are a normal occurance. The predominant emotion is projected on the man, then they feel their own original emotion coming from him... which, of course, is hate.

The Jihadists are exclusively superior to people who take drugs partying on the edge of a concentration camp. They're not superior to anyone else. Yes it's their "fault" for wanting to kill non-muslims since they chose to subscribe to a religion that recommends that.

If you have an objective metric to decide that one party here is more moral, I'd love to hear it. Partying on the edge of a concentration camp and getting this outcome is not unpredictable.

You can have a self-consistent worldview where it's just a coincidence that they have an advantage, but at the same time not wanting to admit that they in fact do, shows that the person believes that giving credence to biology would refute the idea that trans women = women AKA it creates a powerful counter-argument out of something which can't even be reasonably denied.