numbersinarow

That's because all your psychedelic trips were reliant on a cheat code AKA drugs. Thinking about some tragedy that doesn't affect me directly and thinking about how god allowed it is not related to my baggage. "But your mind is wired by the baggage to think that way." Well no, all human minds are wired that way in some way, outside of mental illnesses, which is to say, to be more moral than a god that allows suffering.

Humanity is a failed idea. If you think someone who defends police shooting a suspect for running away is "human" and you are also "human" then you are detached from reality. (This doesn't mean to dehumanize them, just to forget about silly ideas). 100% applies to obsessed terrorist apologists.

That's the only thing you needed to admit to see your worldview is deeply flawed. International law is biased and not applied to every party in the world, even if it's for pragmatic reasons, so you're further confirming what I've said. What should they have done? Not bomb anyone, when opposing a force which has literally admitted to pushing the buttons of the mainstream, and this being the weapon they are most dedicated to using? It's easy to portray Israel has the bad guy when you aren't going to say what they actually should have done instead and aren't going to acknowledge the most obvious truth, which is that Hamas is allowed to make Israel look immoral only through double standards, which again, are not applied to the US or Britain. Therefore, are applied due to racist or xenophobic reasons.

0.2% of the world's population and demonized beyond comprehension by the mainstream for xenophobic or racist reasons. Of course it's the truth. If they are not allowed to defend themselves and are hounded by the UN for it, they are oppressed. That simple. They are issuing warnings and doing many pre-cautions which the US wouldn't do, yet both the US and Russia get to demonize them. This argument doesn't hold up since the people in the open air prison can be oppressed too.

Because they would be displacing North Korea in my example.

Go to North Korea, get put into a torture camp, then I'll happily be the guard working there raping and slaughtering your entire bloodline, and see if you wish for an evolved, democratic, alien civilization to come and save you. How inclined would you be to demonize this alien civilization? Literally level 0.

There isn't a middle ground. The entire stage blue left mainstream chants "From the riivveeeer to the sweeeaeeeeaaaeea poolestine will be freeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!" and 70%+ of gazans support the extermination of Israel, even tho they can't understand that Israel has it's own self-interests, all they see is their own. That's not how an adult acts. Is it any surprise that Israel is also playing the extermination game, albeit even still not to the same degree?

The most depressing thing is only watching 28+ year old guys being ripped. Unless you have insane genetics or perfect dietary habits from your parents, you have to wait until your late 20s to have a muscular, low bodyfat body. The best case scenario is that you start seriously working out at age 18, in that case you will need to wait until 25~ to look like anything impressive, assuming you don't slip up during those years.

"Actually, people at any stage, with sufficient brainwashing, can think a minority group should not do the regular military response to an attack, based on either xenophobia or racism." Well yes that's what I've been saying.

Those problems can easily be fixed. There are people who have been on nofap who haven't experienced anything like that. Basically, it's a skill issue.

Okay...? You're free to make an argument. Or request a debate with Ask Yourself or Avi Bitterman (who's biased sample fallacies I will not defend, ever).

It's clear that canada got away with it and that they CAN displace the savages who want to kill LGBTQ people and who you need to be low consciousness (OR above green in very certain circumstance) to sympathize with.

Because there are supernatural... nevermind, you can put it into google translate if English isn't your first language.

Suffering is the very metaphysical core of existence, pleasure is a construct within that. Even suicide is impossible, if you kill yourself you will live in some other form, perpetually floating around and suffering. Not even Christ and Buddha could save you or themselves for that matter, they are constructs of suffering. I caught a glimpse of how evil the supernatural forces/God are. Even 0.0001% of the evil malice required to let human tragedies occur when you have the unbiased universal perspective at your core and every aspect of your mind, is so great that the human mind can't comprehend it. I won't ever bother trying to describe the feeling of seeing that. The only thing for a human to do is surrender to the suffering, knowing there will be no shields, and infinite involuntary attachment.

Could you become enlightened within less than a second if talented enough?

https://x.com/Gus63933654/status/1682833230905372672 https://x.com/revenant_MMXX/status/1814481119037084076 https://x.com/SaintGreenPact/status/1803890772661436650/photo/1 https://looksmax.org/threads/one-day-i-will-get-my-revenge-against-women.1098312/

First get to some solid level where every day involves you doing a good amount of working out + progress + planning. Then go from being solid for 2 weeks or so to superhuman. Forums are destroying your mental health. Junk food is destroying your mental clarity. Anxiety is also draining your brain points. If you don't do the most important thing first thing in the morning or close to it, then you're going to feel really bad when you're working out AKA running and you're craving doing the actual work, or you're doing some other thing and can't get to the actual work and you're feeling bad. You want to avoid that. If that important work is done at the start of the day, then you avoid the enormous/paralyzing guilt about not starting. How do you get to the solid level? You ask yourself if you did the work today when it comes to working out, meditation etc. and just say yes or no. Objectively. No "well I somewhat tried but maybe tomorrow." since that's a simple no in the system you should be thinking under.

Ken Levine was very predictive. These days people think it's incredibly impressive to cry about how difficult being a parent is and how children are useless parasites, e.g. recent kurzgesagt video.

I'm not talking about it in the way I used to when I was stage orange. In a chess game, there can always be CORRECT ACTIONS which lead to winning, recommended by the strongest engine, and there can be bad moves. Imagine an artificial intelligence which could guide you like this but through life. You can currently take actions which align with what it would hypothetically recommend, or you can not, regardless of other people's unhealthy obsessions or society's false ideas. It is also good not to lose sight of how a productive person could solve actual problems of which there are many, not just small scale invented problems.

It is extremely interesting. However I don't think you know just how demonic the presence was. I mean what I said in my comment in this thread 100%. That couldn't have been a negative perception of another human by someone else. This was other-worldly.

You replied twice after saying that and will reply twice more. You have done nothing with this except completely concede that you have no moral argument.

Law is subjective and not enforced. That isn't objective morality. You are in favor of laws that have been proven, thousands of times, to be self-serving and subjective as well as not applied evenly. But you are calling me the biased one. But at least it claims to be objective. Then why aren't you talking about this law making it so that the settler colony known as america has to be disbanded?

There is no oppression olympics. You are quoting a conversation in which that's a valid point due to discussing who stage green would side with. It's nonsensical to say "You didn't respond to me talking about Israel further taking land." when you skipped straight to that yourself without addressing the issue of the land already taken by Israel. I literally said they aren't entitled to Israel's homeland, so I did discuss it. There is no objective morality to discuss and Israel is winning so make an argument for why Israel is immoral, and if you want to justify the double standards, then your argument needs to prove Israel is sufficiently immoral to justify those as rightful.

Reddit and parts of quora are sort of the best examples of people being unable to think logically or question the status quo. That isn't what you said/meant at all, so I am totally confused now. There is no way to interpret what you said except "You think oppressed minorities should take back their band? Then palestinians should." which I responded to. The history is literally directly relevant to them taking Israel. And they are oppressed currently because of the mainstream's and UN's double standards against them. These double standards, which say they can't respond to terrorists while being 10x more moral than most other countries, are based on their country and their race. Even if they aren't based on race, they are based on country. Making them an oppressed minority right now. Trying to use sophistry to get around this is cringey. + I will never truly believe that you can't understand what I said about double standards. Just look around you, the whole mainstream stage blue narrative is anti-israel. This isn't even a topic, this is the most obvious given of all.