AerisVahnEphelia

You can make 10 million on the stock market over ten years, convince yourself that you’re a genius at prediction, and then lose everything because you built your entire theory around the idea that you had the right tactics and strategy, when it may simply have been luck repeated a hundred times. You end up even poorer, with your entire theory proven wrong. Science doesn’t exist, but whatever fantasy leads you to discover what actually works for you, I suppose. Your belief that measurement is an objective way of capturing reality, or anything at all, is just another false conceptual understanding of what reality is. You’re trapped in a mind game played by billions of people, but it is still only a mind game. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox

You are science, so yes I suppose.

when do you know you observed enough and collected enough observations ?

nothing is repeatable consistently. you can't prove anything. You're stuck in symbolic systems. What turned something to exist was direct practices, maybe your symbolic system created an effect, maybe it didn't, you will never be able to know that. your understanding of science is fixated and forget to consider floating in midair as the real next constant possibility of all things.

- concepts aren't a "real thing" - langage is inherently paradoxical - Science is complete bullshit fantasy like Jesus christ - we can't prove causality, even less results - consistency & statistic isn't real - none of what I m saying you're going to understand, because you're making up & generating what is being said from your own data training, words do not bring real experiences beyond the experience of words.

any fundamental belief in a fixed truth is religion.

Does it work if you know the truth ?

We all happy where we are or we would move somewhere else There is no others

It can be tricky too much and you get to only have yourself stuck in it.

When you're at the peak of death and see a crocodile still trying to eat you. Honestly sometimes you wish this piece of shit would be strong enough to get me . . before I break his face and send him into hell hahaha Don't try me Crocs I m God champion 🏆

More self responsability. shall focus more on generating better realities.

Here is the truth buddy. Everyone and everything is whatever you want.

I m self aware, but I like the idea of making things entirely generated for now. It's like playing around until the tech allow to do better things with it. I barely use dialog in my videos for the reason that it feels way "too hollow".

When you reach a state of having no problem at all, it does become a problem.

Yeh the last 2 iterations made a punch in llms. I builded a website with 3 free prompt on Claude better that if I asked someone. I just need to host it, but I'll also ask gpt. In and all it's a lot of work I'll not pay anyone for it. From 3000$ to 20$ of economy ( let's count 100$ for my time and energy )

all religious people are stupid atheist included.

That's more nuanced. I always feel like it's a final output which need to be judged on that in the case of ai. Explicitly deceiving people is always bad. And honestly there is some people having result that already exist, without them self aware. In an ideal world if you removed the economical side ( space abundance star trek ) no one would mind about what the current ai does, quite the contrary. Hating ai theft is a low fruit of the tree problem, hate the system who enable this dynamic more. --- @Andrey Thanks to you for taking time to watch !

If your mind is making relative categories that would be an objective claim.

0. I m fully pragmatic I don't believe in relativism otherwise I wouldn't try to explain why something is a stupid distinction.

Coming back ; maybe observation are finite. But still some label are very "unscientific" and do not bring a proper distinction. Like narcissist or egoist or selfless. . . Like yeh there is behavior. And you think you got the proper ruler ? Depending your assumptions on what any of those are supposed to look like. Very suspicious that us being of light can really grasp the numerous possibilities.

the whole anti IP thing is anti real art at the end of the day, art is about sharing.

Right, run away from reality

You cannot learn about a particular situation, drop the desire for it. meta argumentation doesn't exist in a meaningful way, your division is futile and another ego plot twist to stay in lalaland.

AI can do certain things a hundred times faster, but you need practice to understand which things, in which domains, and how to direct it properly. People see AI as some kind of magical machine that is supposed to produce magical results. To me, that is as fucking retarded as holding a pen and expecting it to create a masterpiece by itself. You have to use the pen every day to learn how to draw and understand its limitations. A good programmer might increase their productivity by 300% because they know when to code manually, when to use AI, which words to use, and which data to provide in order to guide it toward a specific goal. A bad programmer does not know what to ask or how to ask it. The study is stupid as fuck. And geniuses are probably one in a hundred across every domains. There is a few study done on geniuses/high iq/whatever you want to call a high performer.

overdose of japan is lethal