The video is excellent, but your text around it is a bit vague and can lead to assumptions and misunderstandings.
"What a great video, one of many examples of stage orange values corrupting stage green values"
Which stage orange is corrupting green values? WB for making the movie? McGraw who was a orange billionaire who invested huge amounts of money in the foundation. So in this case stage orange money with stage green intent. Also WB invested in the foundation, although I can't make out if this was from a stage orange or green perspective from them. (Orange, doing it for the publicity)
" Also a lesson in masculine and feminine love here too."
What do you mean with masculine love? Killing Keiko to reduce suffering? But could the notion of trying to rehabilitate Keiko not for the notion of saving him but for gathering data, and trying to take all the existing knowledge and putting it into practice regarding the outcome, so one day that knowledge and practical experience could be used into other research to prevent other animal suffering also be considered masculine love?
" Regardless, it was a good attempt, yet deep down, metaphysically and epistemically, there's a lot of bias with these decisions."
What do you mean with 'these' decisions?
From a stage yellow perspective, especially after so much time has passed, it also needs to be considered how big the ripple effect will be of killing Keiko to young children instead of saving him towards humans and their relationship with nature and animals. I don't know if there has been any research done into this.