koops

Yeah, is sad... I was creating content in my mid twenties in the fitness space. I wanted to change the world. Publish books, go on tv... and make millions of people eat healthy and enjoy food. haha fool of me. I realized in Spiral Dynamis series that change in humankind is SLOOOW. We can help people, definitely, but on a very small scale. Which is fine but frustrating...

Should be simple most of the time. But some fights/arguments/though times will occur. You should be able to handle those and learn how to use it to grow as a couple.

Don't do it

All that work and is not enough to get people awake. Imagine putting all that work and still tons of people throwing shit at you. Even the 'biggest fans' not taking action seriously. How many people who follow Actualized are actually awake? 1? 2? 10? From a pool of 1 MILLION SUSCRIBERS. I remember watching Brian Rose Ayahuasca documentary. He was frustrated because he wanted to change the world and only a couple hundred people attended his big conference. And even those people, in a few weeks 99% of them are going to forget about the conference and change nothing in their lives. As a content creator you can help a few people here and there, but BIG changes... almost imposible. Is never enough.

Who is more pleasure driven than Tate? Fast cars, cigars, vodka, 100s girls, sex, likes, fame, approval from strangers... - You guys are linking masculine with good. Tate is masculine, cool. Look at Gandhi, you would say he has more feminine energy. lol Who cares? Is about who has higher levels of development / better role model. Have you ever seem a more grounded guy than Gandhi? A guy that rejected most of pleasures and fought for a higher cause, even going to jail several times or fasting for WEEKS.

Well haha speaking of Mona Lisa. I saw it 2 times. You know what? Is the MOST overrated piece of art in the history of human kind. Almost every other painting in the Louvre is more beautiful. There are 1000 people lining up for Mona Lisa, meanwhile in the next room you have a huge brilliant painting that will bring your eyes to tears, and people just pass by looking at their phone. Thats a perfect metaphor for Tates example. The problem is that nobody question 'why?' Why should I do this? Why should I follow this person? People just go blind for what ticks their lower emotions/desires (cheap food, cheap music...) or for what has social status and approval (like Mona Lisa). If you truly think he can help you, ok, go for it (I used to like his old videos, when he had less that 10k views on youtube), but enough was enough. The problem from my POV is just people going at it blindly, without any judgment, just because is the big thing now.

I get it, and I half-agree. But you think most people, specially teenagers are able to separate the 'good' from the 'bad'? You think you can improve (charisma, game, money), and then move into 'higher' enveavours, not getting attached to your 'successes'? Getting more girls or more money could be viewed as improvement. Right. But getting them through manipulation, is that real improvement? Thats the question. Is there not a better way to get girls/money/motivation/fighting skills? Can people get that from a healthier perspective?

Taylor Swift & Bad Bunny get the most views in Spotify/Youtube. McDonalds & Coca Cola lead the food industry. 50 Shades of Grey is one of the best selling books of all time. Everything that goes mainstream has a flavour of mediocrity to it. That is why it resonates with most. Most people live in a low level of consciousness. They don't want to think. Just to feel good. Tate satisfy that. He is operating in the levels of desire and pride (and fear in his marketing). He makes you feel good and gives you a sense of purpose. But you are not going to replicate his ''success''. And even you achieve 10% of it, you still won't be happy. Is like drinking salt water when you are thirsty. It can make you feel great in the moment, but is going to lead you astray.

This Perrion guy is great. Young guys should read his stuff/interviews before going into the 'game tactics', otherwise they'll become robotic, mechanical, and probably resentful of women when they get rejected or get their heart broken.

Holy shit! One of the best rants I've have ever read You should have posted it on the comment section on youtube. Everyone was commenting how cool the guy was lol - 15) "Who or what breathes fire into the equation?" YOU! GOD! You're dreaming your stupid fucking equations! There are no equations outside your mind! There is nothing outside your mind — you scientist rat! LOL

Reminds me of Jokic. Wins and doesn't give a fuck nor he follows the American narrative of hustle culture. Just chill with your family and dog.

Here you go:

I was thinking at what is happening in Europe. Birth rates are declining, and immigration is rising. Local people are not having kids or 1-2 max, and immigrants are having +2 kids. For example. Spain is losing 140 local people per day, and gaining 1661 foreigns DAILY. France and Germany are probably in similar numbers. Maybe Im biased, but a lot of people are starting to take this seriously. More political figures in power are muslims now. Governments are greeting ramadan, but not christmas. When some non-white person commits a crime and get cover in the news, they almost never mention the ethnicity and is almost never condemn by the politicians on a big scale. I feel is a case when 'the left goes to far', like Leo mentions in the video. People in the right agree with this, but is interesting what you feel about this, since I feel most people here tend to the left 50 years from now... where is this leading? Is it posible that in 50-100 years the main religion in Europe is Islam? Is it posible that feminism swung the pendulum too much and in the near future is going to backfire? Or maybe Islam is going to evolve and develop? As Im writing this guess it may seem hateful or biased. It can be. But even people from the left when they go to cities like Barcelona, Marseille, Lyon, Paris realize that some things are clearly changing. Curious to know your perspective on this, although I get if you live in the US is not easy to judge the situation.

Im reading a lot of bad stuff about the WEF. Im suspicious. Seems a bit demonic to me. But maybe is a more holistic way of dealing with the problems of the world on a bigger scale, in stead of doing it each country on its own (which is still important). What are your thoughts on this?

Love that scene. And ofc the 1st one. The second film is ok. Loved this scene:

Bro come on

I ment as a society. As I said, local population are declining, while islamic population are increasing and getting into power political positions. In 50-100 years can some woman/gay/trans rights go back as western values decline and islamic go up? That was my concern.

@Hatfort As I said earlier. Immigrants, who are generally less wealthy, living in this 'orange' countries, are having more babies than local people. Is not just about the money/living conditions. Green values are a significant factor for people not wanting children. Can people in red/blue adapt to an orange/green society? I highly doubt it. The immigrants that adapt better are the ones more developed (blue-orange) and the ones who speak the language.

She has a point. But a lot of guys are blowing this out of proportion. Jealousy (even from the past) is real. Is hardwired in our system. A women with high body count, and a woman who lost her virginity at early age is not ideal for a great marriage. Don't mean is 100% impossible. There is some wisdom in tradition. But times change. And we have to balance sexual liberation with building healthy families. Tough to do with the narrative that sleeping around is empowering for women. LOL Just ask women if they enjoy having casual sex. Most of them would say no. I heard a few stories of women that stop having sex for months after a bad experience in a ONS. Most women complain about how guys don't know how to satisfy a woman (especially in ONS). Most women need connection to let go and have better sex. So they usually prefer sex with a partner they know (even for men this is true). Sexual liberation was a good thing, probably 95% of men didn't even know what the clitoris is before the 2000s lol Sex was probably crap for women in the past. But is going overboard. Is something to ponder, and parents should talk about it with their kids. About the good and the ugly aspects of casual sex, so they can have the full picture, not just the short term one.

@ZenAlex Check out the graph I posted. The poorest people, countries, and continents are having the higher number of children.

I also prefer a green society rather than a orange one (yellow + really, but I guess it won't happen in our lifetimes). I won't say I'm threatened, but yes, I have a preference on one culture over another. I consider western culture more evolved than most muslim and latin cultures. I don't really care which god you like, which holy book you have besides your bed, if you do ramadan, if you pray 0 times a day or 5 or the color of your skin. I care that you are a good human being and respect the rules and laws of the country you are in. I care about the decreasing level of development of a country. And a lot of people coming in Europe are against women rights, gay rights, trans rights... not all, but is obvious that this is happening. Is like some green ideas (full open borders, accept everyone) are against green values (lgtb/women rights, more crime). It sounds good. And I hope that could be done. But is not realistic in this day and age. And in some countries and some cities, is becoming a problem. I agree that were are not green enough. The problem is that a lot of people feel that because the toxic green is very loud.

You are confusing the relative and the absolute level. In the relative and survival level you are an Homo sapiens fighting for resources in competition against other homo sapiens who also want to survive.

mmm people are not having kids because is too expensive? I don't think that is 100% false. I think is a half truth. And culture influences a lot. It seems like having kids and having a family is a thing of the past for a lot of stage green people. If the main reason is economic: How immigrants (And gipsys for example) in western countries are having 4+ kids when, on average, they are earning significantly less money than the standard western couple? How the birthrates are higher in less developed continents like Hispanic America and Africa? There are more reasons than economic problems or being to expensive. Culture has a lot to do with it.

That sounds like a real problem. Watching porn even in a relationship is not that weird. But paying women is another thing. Don't pay for sex. And is not even sex! Is a bunch of pixels scamming you. Imagine that girl laughing at you. And his pimp too. Imagine Tate laughing at you for paying for that shit! 'Look at that poor little guy, he is paying for my new Ferrari and he's not even having sex; good work girl' Keep the porn. Don't pay a single dollar of your hard earn money to a bitch that is laughing at you. Use that money to take your girlfriend to a nice dinner and fuck the shit out of her.

Feminism is stage green. And a lot of women in developed countries don't want to have kids in their 20s because they want to sleep around and focus on their careers. To later regret in their 30s. I have friends that don't want to have kids because of the carbon footprint... Also family is not as valued as before, at least in Europe. Is almost seen as a negative thing. This trend started just 5-10 years ago. Thats pure green. Ofc economic growth (orange) is part of the deal. Is not black and white, but half a century ago (stage orange with almost no green) people were having more kids. Maybe I didn't express it clearly. I meant that we are trying to evolve to healthy green (with good things like women rights), but some green policies can backfire (lots of immigration from stage blue-red countries that are against this advancements). Or for example, stage green women are so open minded, that in the name of tolerance, can't speak against muslims beliefs even if the totally disrespect women. I don't have the data, but I not sure about that. The number of people of lowers stage of development are increasing. Thats an undeniable fact. And thats my concern. Are we so openminded that can backfire if a few decades?