kavaris

Nobodys afraid of not existing, cause nobody knows what it means to not exist. The question is what are you gonna do when its time. You know its time cause youve had enough of the game, physically, mentally. Death doesnt care. Your done. Whats it gonna feel like? its not gonna feel good. And we dont have a good plan besides not eating and hoping it just happens. Death is a sharp opportunity, its like a texture that is faster, and braver, one step ahead. Its the hated, the sadness, the destiny that awaited. Its the in-between, the unknown, and its always there. Its not realized, just misunderstood, staring at everyone, most patiently. Its like the top of the lid, containing the carbonated drink, right before its twisted. Once twisted, its all let loose, and from liquid we pull ourselves back to a solid. But how are you gonna get there? Let the cap loose, or its the most patient and retardly slow deaths ever.

Thank you for agreeing, as i wasnt expecting yous to go in a solid direction that was approving of my prioritizing Greek myth, and perhaps even any history that is sortve like, a story that you have to sortve go through and find reflection in. But to also see how like, life is a tragedy, and as such, we might say to ourselves, like —here are these people recognizing it, and sorting through like: A) how do we illustrate it, and B) what are we trying to say,.... is it the stories themselves, is it the emotional impact?... theres many components to it, and somehow, the stories are unbelievable, otherwordly. And so we have to askwhat thats about too, but its like, regardless of, they are real people in how they face dilemmas, and so its like, how do you solve things during critical points—thats one idea. how do you not lose hope. but even thats not the final message, cause its like, the heroic aspect shares a symbiotic relationship with our ability to discern anything, like, we arent just a newborn without any priors. we have roots, and lots of ideas about what reality is, and who we are. nd we are always trying to go back to our own mythology to work that out. We have like a buffer that returns to a very greek or norse myth place, as its trying to stay on the wagon.

Id recommend reading "The Greek Plays" or one of the ones that has the actual play -versions in them as thats like the quintessential way to see the artistic language used. Sophocles introduces morality in his and whatknot — and,alas i tried to find utube videos to be a kindve introduction to—but i dont know if there are any, atleast none that capture the artistry involved; still you could go into it from any point jus to get familiar w/

im thinking about the shutdown process. cause like, w/ consciousness you have the choice, like you can choose between how complex the dependencies are as they converge towards the act of shutting down, as thats like, as single-users (unless we get together in a death party somehow, or we imagined we are..) we just want the most processes shutting down, and as fast as possible. thats like normal runit init, but if for some reason you want to manage them dependencies then you want something that is then considering them. and then theres the fact like, say for instance all of us are like 80 years old and we all get together in a giant multi-user party, and that is another layer to it, where we are all informing each other of like, what all to lookout for as we are coming down from our trip, etc. and its like, we can make it simple on us by recognizing it as a kindve system in that way, atleast logically. but if for some reason we are all trippin out like crazy, and we can no longer keep track of up and down, then that is a kindve segment of the pi chart thats like hard to navigate, either as the crazy person, or observing said crazy person. iuno basically its like, im tryina say that it can have this understanding, such that it doesnt seem like a conflict, where u are like, "wait, how do those binary shutdowns happen to state and profile", instead its like, "oh, theyre happening,... and its like, our input on that is like, *consciousness gave us the choice on which program we were running*. Does that make sense?

Theres only a ring of infatuation, surrounded by other colored rings like a spectrum, and you can draw conclusions on the patterns from one ring to the next, but its gonna be very different between each person. so its like, a law of the point at which your own mind comes to conclude is a law (as your mind depends on laws, so its no fault of ur own)

The playwriter Aristophanes stuff is good stuff too... Lysistrata: "O Aphrodite, breathe down over our breasts and thighs, an attraction both melting and mighty." Lysistrata: "These gates we hold, and they’ll not be opened, except upon our terms." For context, this moment occurs as the women strategize (to end the Peloponnesian War) and to maximize their appeal, knowing the men are growing desperate. Lysistrata’s prayer to Aphrodite frames their bodies as divine instruments, flipping the script on the whole dominance game, and Upon our terms -shes talkin' bout their vaginas basically

~Oh wait, technically you should start w the "creation myth", which you could easily find online and read in like 5 minutes or watever it takes to.

Its kindve like, the literal nature of a time before us. I was hoping for it to be about, what its like for ppl to have to face consciousness at more repetitive, regular intervals, since reality is more defined on those terms—like if they do something wrong, it is the fault of a god—but then you have to wonder what that god really meant (what is "that god"), after graduating from your mother or fathers basis for it, or whoever is there peers—and to then have everything as the living embodiment of a consciousness-like instance, i mean... Theres only logical components that we later can say wouldve been correct, but thats the only thing you can say, like obviously ppl of history are gonna be weak in those regards, the interesting book is where their conscious strengths are, and thats in the nuances of who they are individually. I had GreekMythology in highschool,so maybe for me i just thought about it more.

Lets take a consciousness break lol, and look at terrence howards new ideas in regards to physics. i mean, if he has anything constructive in the areas of math, such as the stuff regarding chemistry and the periodic table and that whole thing, where he talks about the associated frequency — that then somehow crosses into geometry at the same time — then feel free to elaborate on that. However i think the other things are interesting—well... interesting from a polymath's perspective... That is to say that, hes got an obsession with curves (among other sorts of geometric shapes, that admittedly i dont quite understand the connection) so, in other words, its true that the universe does curve around, and so its like a repetitive motif. After doing some quick research on what he was saying, and what others already say, its lead me to wonder... Now, we should atleast preface w/ the fact that theres a hundred factors at play in regards to space, spacetime and physics and such, and alot of it is a math problem in regards to how you go about confirming things. Then theres the physical experiments one can do, although that has become increasingly harder given that—you are trying to capture the relationship between observer and the observed when doing measurements. Theres also the fact that the thing we are measuring is like a signal, or a field that has fluctuating points we decipher to be say... an electron, etc. Thats looking at it from the most general perspective. So when terrence howard comes along from an intuitive place, and says whatever it is he says, it makes sense because of how disconnected all of our current theories have been. The question then is, does it make sense actually, or does it make sense, adjoined w/ all his contemporaries in the field of science. I should note that, we havent really figured out anything new in a long time. That could be a bad thing or good thing, i dont know. Maybe we have as much as we are ever gonna have, or as much as we can control without destroying the Earth or breaking our brain. Lol, who knows. That is why i ask yous what your thoughts are on Terrence and his Terrence Science (hes admitted to 2=1x1 to be a metaphor), and whether or not theres even anything else we can achieve in physics (note: we could differentiate the physics of space in the universe (global) and the physics on Earth (local) to help eliminate some of the dark matter and such problems that dont pertain to our immediate application)

I'll start the list with just one component, without even describing any of the theories or people or anything, in case ppl wanna add to it or start a new thread, or anything else... ---- List of Everything for Physics - Time

i wish someone could make a list, like, not a thing thats tryina be a strange theory of everything, but a real life list on all the science/physics things that all inter related, like everything from claude shannon to like, iuno, all the physics-related... just so we can have like a list to look at, and so we can know how much stuff we are talking aboutwhen we even try to invoke physics and gravity and whatever else (like the base stuff that everything is either tryina build from, or like relativity, in that its being extended from or is tryina evolve in order to inter-op, kinda things...) i would add to the list once its established, i just dont know how much anyone really cares about physics, if anyones passionate about that sorta stuff.

lol, careful not to conflate death as an opposite of life, cause death is more a quality that you experience within life, before you ever experience new life.

Anyway, thats what i would say its for, or what the near-end game is — to boostrap other Ai models, or to launch new ideas of Ai, in all different areas around technicality, and then maybe eventually back into robotics. but first there the Ai drone, as drones already have alot of applications, so ideally there would be smart Ai drones flying around (which brings up an interesting question about airspace, and how many drones are allowed to be flyin around)

but dont get me wrong, Ai is great for findin information or getting a crazy img back and such. For programming, its not the right thing for that , but also what do we mean by programming, cause thats not a straightforward term. do we mean 'finding code' and reiterating programs, like it can do currently, or do we mean "building logic out of fundamental units", or do we mean like, "design thinking, and understanding programs holistically",... what we could mean by programming could mean any number of things. right now, it can reiterate things you probably couldve discovered on your own, however they obviously wanna push it to be stronger in that area of like, recalling things, and its really not meant for that level of, iuno wat youd call it. analysis? that requires... iuno, a human to look over it and understand it, as ai doesnt understand anything since it gets most of its meaning from us using it and directing it towards meaningful places in the moment, if that makes sense.

We have Ai backwards imo. That is, the current playbook is like (just to give an example w/ LLMs, though we could also demonstrate with the current CNNs or anything else): tokenization/text encoding->layering activation functions->Feedforward & Backpropagation (Learning)->decoding/inference, run it, pre train it, rely on the GPU, rinse and repeat sortve thing.... And then we are suppose to buy into this like its the skeleton towards Ai... Well, that is great and all, i mean... it produces weights, and other things we could pull out and reinterpret, such that we can bootstrap a new kind of model, and work outwards—that is to say, pre-training is like a separate step, and we can have a CPU or similarly-based model, that has a more dynamic DNA if that makes sense, and it changes the skeleton such that we are creating a modular form of the current Ai, and prioritizing constructs that build on the weighted attributes. Before this, we were thinkin like it was 1960, where we needed to have a multilayer perceptron, and to work in this Step1, Step2, where text comes first in the pipeline, then we have an input-dependent system. But... if we want to get away from the whole text and input paradigm, then the whole process has gotta be FLIPPED—>but then we have something very different that ppl would b thinkin' bout, instead of like, harping on this thing that is so annoying.

Yeah you gotta back way up and ask what you mean by technology. Theres devices like phones, then theres older things like radios that ppl start with to learn about electronics, and beginner components (going through and understanding *what makes a radio, physically*) p.s. radiowaves is another area to look up... Theres alot to get into just by going in that direction; Alas, theres also the nature of electricity and electrical frequency waves, and then the application of electricity within devices and such... This could get you into things like amplitude, frequency, wavelength, period — as well as voltage, current, power... watts... things like this. Its hard to know what you mean by the term physics behind how they work.. In the realm of modern components, they usually involve digital circuits, 0's and 1's (now and days its like liquid, in how tiny its getting) and that process of emulating tiny circuits requires many layers, semi conductor lithography for the fabrication process. Theres also the electrons, and the sub atomic reaction, and understanding that whole area of circuits. This term "circuit" and "transistor" have a symbiotic relationship now nd days, and so youd have to understand what both terms are referring to. Usually a transistor has 3 parts, and then the subsequent *circuit* is made up of that transistor... but a circuit can also include resistors, and other wires and such... that then gets into the architectural/design nature of these circuits in the context of electronical component(s)/devices... Now if you mean how devices are programmed, thats yet another road to learn about, and it gets into an area that rivals the complexity of the aforementioned areas. And so, you have all these different areas that you could mean just by asking a simple question, and it means writing down what exactly you want to learn, and consider that, to understand everything youd have to know a little about each area. But practically speaking, you wanna pick one to start w/, and then work your way up or down or both.

Im predicting a Trump / Elon disconnection, and a kinda "Elon lose my number". So Trump can try to gather whatever little favor he has left, focusing on the good friendships now w/ Russia/Ukraine, etc. assuming they dont pull out some crazy conspiracy or somethin'. Thats just something i could imagine happening, as I cannot imagine how that relationship can be mended/stay together. And it might be good for Elon, since he can take a step back and see what the bigger picture is, and possibly try to pick up those Tesla pieces that are crumbling each day. If that doesnt happen, theyll continue turning over cobol mainframes or wateverthefuck doges job is... but of course, if they are lucky theyll find some grand conspiracy, otherwise it was an unfortunate doge joke that never grew out of the meme it was made from.

i want more pics of like, how large these stones are, cause there are some that are like bigger than this, and it just makes you wonder what on earth is goin on ever since ever.

Im starting the stereotypical giza pyramids thread, as ppl likely wanna comment on the recent LIDAR revealings, that are making people believe that theres something below khafres pyramid (second largest) the middle one—that isnt the tomb for the birds, but i suppose something below that now? im guessing here, as i have to assume thats what they mean. as, we know that the tomb of the birds goes below or towards the middle pyramid, somewhere underneath, but nobody has taken a droid or something w/ a camera in there to see what else is under it. Its unclear what that tomb even is besides being some sortve strange fracture in the earth, and a perfect opening to walk through. Somebody of course created the initial opening/hole-in-the-wall to the adjoining cave, but its unclear if they did that like, knowing there was something there or what... Again its hard to say what thats about. Its unlikely that theres anything more below, as youd imagine that there would be a passage to it, and not just like a tiny cave system hovering above. we still dont even know how the pyramids were made, or how they hoisted up such heavy pieces, like the one in the kings chamber of i wanna say khufus pyramid (the largest one) closest to sphinx. khafres and khufus has always been quite unusual.

and theres 'Mysticism'. As mysticisim is the one i get in arguments w/ ppl tryina convince em that they should just consider spiritualism and mysticism as the same thing all together. no one was on board w/ it so far although i should add that, it was largely disagreed on what mysticism was too, which i dont understand how. i forget what it was i heard recently that gave the very best description, alas id have to go hunt for it again.

i think my thing is like, im neither for or against, yet so much content is already occupying the space of adoptions in me, that i cant make room for a new identity/relation with christian/catholic -or wat-have-you. Id enjoy just being reborn, literally and figuratively, born-again, frolicking in the fields and praising some idea of myself as a christian, possibly with images of christ in the manger, and the baby lambs goin 'Ba-ah-ah-ah'; alas i cant fit anything, BECAUSE of how deep that the natural waterwell & circumstances of consciousness awareness are.. in the same way, i cant fit satanism, or whatever else, theres just no room beyond sayin how i like that story, or i like that picture, or that idea is interesting -type've thing.

p.s. i should make the distinction between infinite regression moments, and nightmares that seem to circle around again and again, as try as we might to navigate a dream (as well as waking reality) you atleast want to avoid any kinds of nightmares. So i mean, in literal sleeping-dream Dreams, set your alarm such that it wakes you up every half hour or hour, and that acts as a hard fix for times where you want to avoid it. Otherwise the best way to preempt those notions is to have a dedicated time carved out every night where you are deliberately writing/painting a picture/story that you intend to tangle up w/ the dream you might be having that night. Those idea sortve apply to reality too, such that you have different imagined regions that draw/map connections to everything, e.g. int *pointer_to_variable1 = &blueberryforest.variable1; gumdropmountain.variable2 = &blueberryforest.variable1; Like you are navigating a mindmap of places and possibilities, and you want to have some way (like drawing an arc) that connects the experiences in blueberryforest (during your first pass) to the experiences in gumdropmountain (on the second...) That might sound off topic and looney tunes, alas thats what it makes me think of.

Actualizing and consciousness at the heart can be a simple, atleast to understand to some degrees, but then its always relative to all the stuff thats goin' on amidst the ruckess, and in the foreground we are like trying to make it as easy as we can to have it like, very much at the center, and leading the way. but we all must struggle, as its like very much compared to when you are dreaming, and the dream continues so long as there arent things like infinite regressions or glitches to give you some control, or clarity back, atleast. Alas its like something thats sortve intertwined w/ the other things you are doing, like a collage. And so shuffling things onto the foreground of the collage, are like those consciousness-related ideas that you **need** to remember, however since theres always things being added to the collage, it has to be recached and defragmented and, often times rewritten to have it more cleanly and clearer expressed in a way that fits into your newest regimen.

Trump too has so many things hes gotta focus on now too, so its really just a natural progression/result to focus on the real things now... and i think thats a great relief, as we want ppl who are like very confident and trump-like to be focusing on those types of things that require unusual confidence and abrasiveness at times, of course it could get us in trouble... alas, thats one of the great debates in life... that is, when to be bossy and confident, or when to be passive. thats probably an actualized episode

i shouldve used the words "stepping down from trumps assistant", as thats what i meant. And it seems to be the case. But it wasnt much of a prediction, he just was taking onwaaay too much