kavaris

@ZeldaStar "Instead, reality only exists if I imagine it to be so" — So thats just the beginning of what is to be like, a release into a reality where imagining is second nature, because of the hell and reprogramming your gonna have to go through to even appreciate in the first place, like, what it all meant, as well as what it could mean, and how to even express it to yourself, to others, and in such a way that it doesnt conflict w/ anything or anyone; Like that is only like, what happens when you swing your body too fast and you get dizzy, or hit your hand against a brick wall too fast and it hurts, that is, its like the initial thing you felt was you moving too fast—And piercing through something, through an idea you didnt understand. And now, everything else is to be you understanding what you didnt understand.

i still like T'woh-nes As its that which has our attention , Like u might think i mean "attentiveness", but its a little different, as when you are attentive, theres a sortve *floating aer- And you have the option to change the flow of~Or follow attentiveness *with, or to think of it in terms of like say "Not-Attentive to" (in the next phase), or maybe "day dreaming... like the epitome of ^^^^ " But in the case of t'wohnes, you are locked into *That which draws your attention. Like, in other words it speaks to something as a constant in our lives, and those constants are hints at whats goin on—Almost like realizing "the hard rules of perception or psychology" (the deeply felt, and hard rules that hit you on lsd, is wat i meant to evoke. i guess it was more difficult to describe than i thought)

Hey, think of it as~Its all an experiment, right? So its all jus throwin things at the wall to see wat sticks. And we came out of a psychedelic era, or watever the 60s/70s would be~Then we had 80s to 2000s, whatever that was. And then we get to where we are at now, where its like "How do u differentiate yourself in {insert whatever year actualized dot org started}"and so, if we take actualized (the process/action) as a type of inclination of what it *is to be, then we sortve get the next obvious thing, which is where we are sortve like, in mid-conversation about god realization. And it makes it seem like it started there now. Though i myself am always writing about it from the perspective of Beingness first. I cant speak to others, if others are doing the same, but i can say, for myself, God realization is more of like an advanced lvl, or layer upon the more simpler layers that are antecedant (to me, that is—As i view it all as having a very distinct order to these things, but thats jus me maybe, iuno) (Or maybe not an order, but like, a distinct *sequence that we follow, that we later reorder to better suite the new download of things, nd things like this)

What i like about robots its the mechanical element. I did discover there are companies lookin at how to make non-electronic versions of like, mechanical ways of making logic gate sortve things, though wat i keep tryina get chatgpt to look up for me is like "*Windup* mechanical, straightforward cogs & gears" -but modernized, such that its not a *meta-material sortve idea, but a down-to-earth like, clockwork/syncopated cogs & gears~And any properties that can exist alongside, or within that context (so basically everything). And possibly used for application in the areas of things we would need: Trains, subway stations, or things like this.

^Also i should add, it all has to start in the oneness~beingness direction, cause if it starts at like in the direction of eternal god, the algorithm is crazy backwards. Not that it cant be re partitioned later in the mind, but i mean, because the threshold takes on different layers, different meanings as you progress, the emphasis should be placed (or thought of) on Ousia~that is, "the emphatic self" you could say. And again, if any of yous like this stuff, plz feel free to steal it, As im not tryina be a selfpublished writer on all things mind body soul~So im not really tryina lay claim to these ideas, they are for everyone to take and make better for themselves or whoever. I have too many things im wrkin on atm

You have a good eye for constructive criticism. Also, in regards to this thread, i thought of another way to add to wat op had said about introducing oneness, wherein we use my idea of The Liminal Threshold, but we also dont think of it purely as a spectrum where *exp.* lives in between, even though that is part of it too, its also like the Greek word *Lemniskos*, As the two ends of the spectrum are knotted together as such... Everything is just "that which is to be imagined": Oneness (Beingness/Ousia) v. Infinity~σε πιθανότητα (Light) (experience lives in between, as you need a sortve that threshold of things to come together... not to exclude other things) note: that little touch of Greek i wrote after Infinity says "in possibility", as i jus wanted to throw a little color on what felt had monochrome color template to it~somewhat.

i should prolly post that giza vid., that way, theres a ref. point between: *Giza (canon), up-close and personal, and then this introduction into what is to become... The... Uh hm wait, do the labyrinths have a name now? I guess just "labyrinth" is short and sweet. How many labyrinths are there in the world?

Siti antichi, tomba degli uccelli ed Erodoto Now, the other option (if we take out space from the equat., for a moment) is the deep, vast ocean exploration. Like, although i love the ocean, and i want ta be a mer'man in the oceans, i think its just like, "going on vacation", like its TOO enjoyable. However, there are things that are just at the coastlines, of say Spain and France that dont require deep sea vessles. Like you jus go scuba diving and say "Whas up". I suppose thats perfectly normal, accessible and can be explored. Bu then I guess, its really all the land things that we can see clearly already, that are most interesting, right? Like, seeing as theres like, clearly pits leading down into Giza for instance, or whatchamakalit, the labyrinth (several sites seem to denote another layer existing underneath). But anyway. What was i saying. Oh, thats it. Like, i never made the connection between the *pits of giza, and those radar shots that the italians did to get that viral thing bout like, pillars or whatever it shows, like i didnt make that connection. But also, ppl have refuted that italian teams radar results since it sortve skipped through all of the lines they had to wait in or something in order to get like, approved? iuno. I havent looked into that end of the story enough. I just know theres something called The Tomb of the Birds that corres. to these *Pits of the birds. And, when it comes to the Labyrinth, i remember Herodotus says, "its like a complex, multi passage halls connecting everything..."

That img @1:30 looks neat, i.e. And assoc., w/ it, it says "According to the 19th-century architect Luigi Canina, the Egyptian Labyrinth was a vast, two-level funerary complex; His reconstruction depicts a structure w/ twelve main, enclosed, interconnected courts, designed to disorient visitors?, And housing both a temple and thousands of rooms for royal, subterranean tombs"

ah i think i jus gotta declare it now impossible to figure out the name of it. Unless of course, someone whos in Arabia~surrounding areas happens to kno what it is and can clue us in. give us a hint.

Ha. Hey glad i got somethin u are interested in. Now, since ive incorporated this Arabic sound into the convo., parallel to egypt, its drivin me crazy now~tryina find what the name of this beat is in Arabic musik (that is, the beat in the music video) That sortve, *Back beat* feel, ive heard it in many arabic songs, and now i cant move off the topic til i find what its called, that is, the name of that specific rhythm in, what i wana say is this modern-take on a weird bongo beat thats been popularized and made even more weird... Like if we called it a weird triplet (one,two,three) where the "two, three" are considered like eighth notes, then we might say the "emphatic One" (thats the bassy drum *Hit i think we hear in the song) is stationary, but the proceeding eighth notes are like *wondering eighths, such that they wrap around to the emphatic One in a weird way... OR... It could jus be considered a weirdified triplet, like a military/marching band lead-in, staggered, and made into a beat. I tried describing it like that but i think it can only be found through the name(s) its been called.

For this next one, i couldve spend hours diggin n lookin for this typeve sound, but this atleast gets across the *authentically egyptian~arabic sound of the *Oud and various accompanying instru.,

Lol okay wait. i thought of somethin while watchin the video. Its missin either: Authentic egyptian folk music w/ an Oud/sitar element to it (jus personal pref.) or one of these like, modernized arabic rhythms that emphasize the *off-beat in such a way that its literally tryina be the weirdest thing u ever heard in ur life~which makes it sound cool imo

hey, thanks. its helpful to know when im judging my ownself under some incrediblely like, hard & impossible standard or not, as im like a tortured individual in that way /sense, so i dont really know when the threshold of self sabotage or self propelling has damaged myself. So that def helps me. thank you.

Ah. Yous are evoking the words of Dionysus to me or his followers... I can feel it. I can feel it COMING! What... is it?!... I just gotta- I just gotta- gotta, gotta... Gottle, glottles, bottiglie, gotta sayin it... "Life, Death, Life, Truth, Dionysus" Or "Life, Death, Life, Death, Life, Death, Truth, Death, Truth, Dionysus".

That is part of it? i guess? like... I mean, if you mean "alone in a room; A sudden realization of...", how is it possible to contrast "self" from "self" in that circumstance... ... I mean, its pretty hard. But hey, its hard even not from that perspective, so its not like you are *wrong. Its really hard to speak on. We struggle to *point within the right direction, the right path. That is technically what you feel so strongly about. I dont doubt that its one of, if not the strongest places TO point to, if that makes sense. Like, to say it any deeper is to go down a rabbit hole where everyone is likely gonna jus gonna be like "what on earth is this man talking about", like... ha. Its one of those things, where you cross an invisible line -typeve thing. But yes, the more simplified, down to earth, jus like, give-it-to-em rough-n-raw is somethin akin to "see oneness, everything one" (p.s. when i say "..ppl thinkin ur crazy", i meant to implicate myself as the crazy pers., as i am~no doubt, consistently and habitually, stepping over that line, habitually trying to describe the undescribable, going against everything and everyone. So i dont mean to point at any one person, except for myself; As well as anyone else who might want to be the bird's prey so to speak.)

*T'woh-nes. I like that, t'woh-nes (or "that which infatuates us or keeps our attention upon"... which is sortve everything, but it has utility to it.. or rather i mean to say, attentiveness has utility, but also the word identified as such could function/take on a meaningful utility)

4me personally I personally think of god as a cyclical apóspasma or tasting, or sipping of the sea of time, the sea of confusion that we are all actively remembering and misunderstanding (maybe theres a better word, but im fine w/ the word \*confusion, that is simply, "a sea of confusion" to be); And we are the witnessing of said tiny, flowing circle of sea-like dream, whilst its maximized~such that exp. can be on the outer ring and remembered as (or retained as such) Like, just to harp on the idea of a self now, say if we have~or want to reference our "soul", then we might go on to talk about how said *soul is "an immortal, eternal soul" (because notice, no one has ever said the soul dies ~ cause in some sense our use of the word "soul" carries with it the belief in something transcendent), not to mention its all as something we share as one. By that same coin we could say that we are god and god is just one, but god is also the godhead that exists as a person in some spectrum of the word, so its leaning or extending outward, like i feel like im stretching my arms out to touch something when we invoke a god. On the other hand, theres also a "spirit" which is more akin to "the spirit of the woods" or something pertaining to Earth (Gaia). That is, the spirit world, or the spirits of the deceased, or things of this nature. Like a spirit is animate, where as the "soul is guide", both to and from~what im calling "the sea of confusion": ἡ θάλασσα τῆς ταραχῆς (h[ee] thálassa t[ee]s tarach[ee]s) To me, everyone is to encounter "that which they didnt understand" in order to pass on, which is precisely what a sea of confusion would be—Ergo it is by default that one makes a proclamation about "life, generally" so we mine as well share what it is. So to again reiterate, ἡ θάλασσα τῆς ταραχῆς (h[ee] thálassa t[ee]s tarach[ee]s) To me, theres no equation where i can fit the notion of God in there, tho thats not to say it cant be in someone elses. I jus dont even frame it so~to make it a one-worded, conclusive ending, as i prefer to describe exactly what im feeling, seeing, touching, tasting or hearing, right in the moment. And, of which may sometimes take on apóspasma, thats sometimes the only way to introduce an idea, or to paint a picture in mind. p.s. feel free to steal this if u like it, as i hav too many ongoing projects, and i want to detach from some of them such as this

4 urself, In Egyptian belief, the god is Atum or adum who later becomes Amun, aka Amun Ra, aka Ammonia/ The Moon/ Mon (Reflection), and reflects the self? and will later go back to Atum because, hey, it always returning to the original&and thats just wat happens. So it makes more sense to refer to a person, otherwise we have a meaningless word, since these words like god, consciousness, et caetera, the point to an "all" like "the absence of light" like, its like trying to say "everything = one_word", which we already have a word for. That word is *everything*. Of course, these are like ques. asked repetitively, again and again, and even answering the question doesnt really get it thru or help. The real question you want to approach, hopefully speaking, you should be asking is about "the self" and your relationship within said self, and what you might go on to identify and understand about the (i) of the self. Alas, even that answer is insufficient and maybe further explored n' re·answered 4 urself down the royal road (i guess its kindve weird when you start from god. you have to start from self and then ask about god as an extension of the self, not the other way around)

I mean if/when they unearth that stuff stroon along Cadiz, Spain into France, that should really open up jus how crazy everything is, or how old it is atleast, cause this is like, essential knowledge - Starting from Spain, and then corkskrewing from egypt, and back to greece/europa again, as you have the Antikythera. Whys that important: because the missing idea in all of this is windup mechanism/clockwork, not that the egyptians had that, but its something the Greeks were playing w/, and that we played with, very briefly, and seldom now do we even think of these sorts of simple mechanisms cause we arent thinking like "large amounts of time ahead", like you want to start replacing stuff with mechanistic clockwork (not that the whole things couldnt utilize other principles inside said windup mechanism). Like. dont yous know about Ironforge in Warcraft, like thats a real place, if yous want it to be, like.

oh yeah. And i forgot there might be a spiral platform involved, as many ppl have mention this thing about using weight from one end, to exert and pull the other, for the heaviest manners to maneuver it into place from a sliding/base perspective. But then you still need to do a pulley-in-place sortve deal since its gotta be shimmied into position even after its been slide up spiral mountain (its more like a guide so that if when it falls it doesnt shatter, as everything is important, like you dont wanna have to redo everything) The other part of it is regarding how they made that initial pit system, cause that itself requires another mechanism to construct, which is older than the constructed construction. So you have, A) * constructed construction for said construction, that is this pit ordeal, tomb of the birds, whatever B) The construction being constructed, that should exist around the pyramid in conjunction w/ said pits and shits. C) its nowhere near it, cause then they are positioning it via pointing to celestial objects, and they cant have a person standing inside of the final construction unless they wanna be filled in with thousands of blocks, so there would have to be refernce points positioned high up, like bamboo shoots or something that are indicative of the precise direction, angle, etc., as when u go in there, you notice that its not ideal to look out of like a telescope, so that means its even more crazy, since they have some sortve other constructed reference to that precise constellation in their time. Anyway the constellation stuff is a whole other aspect, cause theres lots of that in the decisions. Also the pyramids sides @re slightly concave, like its not like its just a smooth side on all three sides, its precisely indented. I mean theres lots of weirdness like that, all which has a point, otherwise wats the point.

If yous wanna get into how they are built, i can break it down for yous very meticulously, but yous need to know about each area of egypt, as well as all the chemical analysis and evidence goin on there, as each pyramid is being shaped in a totally different way, and each generation gets more retarded than the last. First u have to know what wgypt even is, as theres more than jus pyramids, and each location make pictoral and symbolic references to the history of the last — (N) ^^^^(Mediterranean Sea)^^^^^^Canaan aka Israel ↗ Assyrian conquest ~722 BCE Aramaic becomes dominant in Israel region ↖ Alexandria | Nile (flows N to S) Land of Onias / East of Nile | Heliopolis ↙ ~30 km from Cairo Giza Plateau / Cairo ~110 km from the Red Sea (Pyramids & Sphinx & Memphis, old capital) | Hawara ~75 km ↖ (from Memphis) (Labyrinth / Faiyum) Akhenatens Cty ~200 km | ↓ 2,000 km ↑ | N to S ^^^(Nile, cont.)^^^ @ ^^^(Red Sea)^^^ | ← 250 km from river to sea @median → ~580 km | ~100 km from Abydos (Osireion) to Dendera Dendera (Oh'Hathor, Temple in Denderus) ~60 km \ Thebes (Luxor & Karnak) ~100 km | Edfu (Temple of Horus) ~160 km / Aswan ~75 km | Nubia (Sudan) ~ ``` (note: wen i get on my comp, ill turn that section into a codeblock) So in the temple of hathor, theres evidence of Spiritus salis or spirit of salt (aka hydrochloric acid) used, which melts granite, which is precesly wat we see on tge steps leadingo into said temple. This not only can and is used to make some of the pieces (the impossibly large, single piece ones) but also to do the hieroglyphs. Bee honey has to be used to prevent said acid from reacting outside of its target~Granted theres more complexity to it cause they are layering these things as if they have very deep and complex understanding of alchemy. And its not just Granite. Theres a harder stone than granite used for a couple statues, as well as the uber popular type of limestone they used, which can be quarred out from the kartoosh~however~the issue isnt about quarrying out stone, its how do you lift pieces of stone into place, as unless you wanna be one of the thousand fools to try breaking their arms at the other end of the rope and pulley system, then you arent going to get too far... So what you need is a machine, albeit a very primitive machine thats gonna lift everything and swing it into place. Now do we know what that machine is? Well we have these deep, deep pits in (see video, those pits w the birds). they can use those to exert force downwards, and so thats one piece of the puzzle yous can explore. So thats one. Two is we learn about the giza pyramids from i wana say its in Luxor, ... here rather than me try and explain what all the sites look like, lets show wat the giza site looks like, nd yous can jus watch the video. Yous can use that information to model it in ur head. But remember, they dont use *one way. And they dont need to push stones down the river, they have all the stones needed on site. watch this video (@12:30 around there) so you can see how incredible complex each shape of each stone is, as thatll start to open yous up to the kind of compkexity involved. This is super meticulous stuff, so this isnt like, get some of your workers to make random stones, like this is an intellectual undertaking. u have to have a lot of time and a lot of passion. p.s. always remember that everything at the site is there for a reason. And, that its precisely because they took for granted the gods~that they were able to specialize in al these language, engineering and alchemical feat/skills. Yous still havent even got to the language part, like yous have a long way to go.

Aare any of yous into like a blend of mysticism->spirituality and philo? the reason i ask is cause the other day i had thought of makin a thread / ques., tho its slipped my mind, i do kno it involved some mystical thing. When i say mystical, i wanna say it was either on astrology/astronomy or aalchemy or ancient greek symbols, like one of these, but i forget. Tell me whaat yous into. and also, hey, say anythin yous want... talk about biscuits and mashed potatoes, i dun care. p.s. i also thought of somethin regarding socrates but i forgot that too, as i been very busy.

Like, "the waking mind" is a state of shock, in contrast to the frequency of a sleeping mind, as one part of our ability to perceive entails like "does this feel....?" or rather "Does this thing match that other thing?" Like thats one of the most primal first questions before you get to like "Who am i or where am i", like first its about bringing things that are the same together, and trying to see what it means, or what even is a thing. Like we are talking about like, super primitives now, like waking up after an eternity in a place where reality has turned to rubble or something. Like theres no distance that our experience wont take us, and in all of that divergence, the most primal questions of like~before we are receptive to language nd all of that, we are like, trying to compare and contrast rocks, like.. The way it feels to do that is itself an example of what two frequencies matching might feel like~and hopefully it feels right~good and as if you are meant to be there studying rocks like archaeology-esque or watever. That is what it is to exp., or, an example of that which is necessary, if to understand how we first start out. we are never at a far distance from our first experience, but weve added confusion layers on top of it that make it seem like its at a distance. Like to die is to be at that beginning of matching up them rocks again, as if a prior had never happened. i could go on but let me stop there or well be here for an eternity talking.

(Warning: This is yet another long one, but its worth the journey) Theres something that i think we noticed that we may have not put enough attention towards the other day, which is like this thing, where if you sleep and put on (like a video) something that would be otherwise more engaging, or more enticing to you while awake, it is less perceptible and interpretable within a sleeping mind. But on that same token, if you have it where that same video is being recited in a form thats more focused/attentive to the consistency of the frequency or like the quality and properties of the sound~while still retaining the richness of the language, then the sleeping mind is interpreting it in a way where its like, sinking in, and in a way that compliments the overall story of the dream. its kindve like how "sex" and "violence" was used to get people attention in the realm of movie making. the consistent frequency is like that for dreams, as it goes beyonder just a meditative or questioning mind (?) 🧠 like it goes into a place where your mind goes beyond "grounding" or interpretations to justify what is happening. that is, the frequency of what is happening has more voice, or more *say in what the dream is tryina do, where its tryina go, like its like a second voice in the dream~or a companion. Or in other words, its not disturbing and destroying the entire 'quality' of the dream (that is assuming that youve found wat im calling a consistent frequency, which really could be anything) Like, even if you are in a somewat of a nightmare while asleep, notice that the idea of "nightmarish things" has a very different meaning while in a dream. And so, that is to say that you are not scared because scary things are happening, you are scared because the frequency either isnt complimentary or its not there at all, like being locked in a room of silence, like... You are scared when the frequencies dont match~so to speak. And so just to reiterate, the way we interpret in a dream is not that different from being awake, but the frequency or vibration is so different that we are sortve like, in a state of shock by those layers—sometimes subconscious layers, that enter into the dream layer. When, what we want, what we truly desire are consistent layers, which is what everything is in its most settled form is suppose to be like (not to conflate that with like, infinite peace or silence). The opposite is actually silence and peace, like the modern notions of meditation are confusing silence w/ a meditative mind, but silence and like, things that disrupt silence like loud BANGs, are ingredients towards staggering that natural frequency. So anyone thats into meditation, yas have to investigate "frequency" in general, as yous are missing an entire half of the story, which, without it, cripples meditation and dreaming, and everything else, as the quality of everything depends on deepening your understanding of the layered onion that is frequency (consider thay frequency doesnt imply a single note, as its made of harmonics, layers, and layers and layers of harmonics @ degress that we are not always perceiving or open to). Your daily food4 thought. Thank you for listening.