Devin

Men do that for fun even to this day, even with grocery stores everywhere. Surely you see a difference between primal ancestors hunting for survival vs a man asking about how his woman feels about her brunch with her mother, basic survival is a lot more "natural" wouldn't you say? In the less willpower sort of way. https://www.graham.law/blog/no-fault-divorce-coming-soon-to-the-uk/ United Kingdom Debating No-Fault Divorce June 17, 2020 Better late than never? This is one of those “I can’t believe they don’t already have it” situations. A no-fault divorce bill is set for debate in the House of Commons this month that could radically change the way couples get divorced according to BBC. https://blackballad.co.uk/views-voices/twitter-says-that-black-british-men-are-the-least-romantic-but-is-it-true?listIds=5b86675d8ab6c5c66cb89dde According to psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman, who studied 6,500 women and men from every country, British men are among the least romantic. His findings exposed that they were one of the least likely to do simple tasks, such as giving breakfast in bed.Feb 14, 2022

Like consider pre 'no fault divorce' which started relatively recently, the big push was 1950s, do you think rich guys were ever swooning their women with romance? Why would they if it's something unnatural to men, if you have to "work at it" in the will power sense it's unnatural. https://daily.jstor.org/the-lost-history-of-no-fault-divorces/ The Lost History of No-Fault Divorces This all ended with the introduction of the “no-fault” divorce. And as Oren explains, one organization—the National Association of Women Lawyers (NAWL)—was instrumental in creating this change. Its work on no-fault divorce, which began in 1947, is little known, but Oren argues that it constitutes “a lost chapter well worth recovering.”

This guy is fairly new but I will guess he's going to get quite popular. This also fits perfectly with the blue pillers war cry that "men need to keep working for the relationship", like why isn't it just natural for men to be romantic all the time, or for women to just love natural men?

Starting my list now, good for communicating to your romantic partner!!

Why did the mass union exodus start in the 60s then? Why did everyone start going non union? Look at unionized european countries compared to the u.s., u.s. workers earn more. You can't compare profits to worker wages seriously, that's communism, it's irrelevant to worker conditions. U.S. wages "stagnated" if anything due to globalization, which was exacerbated by unions actually. And are you claiming the workers are working harder with your productivity statement? That's purely from capital investment from the profiteers. Look at your claim for instance, 40 years of union decline, working conditions have increased extraordinarily actually in that time period. Life expectancy has even increased 1983 74 2023 79 Socialists like to claim it's relatively worse these days but people back then weren't all buying beach houses, they all worked their life to payoff their mortgages. And no, before you go off on rent, apartments are not a frugal sacrifice, apartments are a luxury. https://apps.realtor.com/mUAZ/wm4kn4et $570 month for mortgage, and you could even rent out a room

So how does the union help the mcdonalds workers of the world? The best they can do is raise wages, which just raises inflation on the worker, but in my eyes the union pits employer vs employee with zero hope for any care for the worker, all while introducing what is effectively a tax to pay for the union.

How are unions a solution for that at all? I've experienced several awesome employers, I do contract work and have been an embedded contractor at many companies, which is where I developed my disdain for unions, the Union facilities were toxic, non-union was a family environment(usually the healthy kind). I've done work with a lot of industrial companies where unions are common, hands down I would choose non-union, night and day difference. Some were comparable same industry companies, Ford and Honda for example. And it's not just employer vs employee, the union leadership which is the older members, sellout the younger members interests for their own.

LOL, you ever had a friend with strict parents? Some families are like that. I agree many employers are toxic, but that doesn't mean unions solve that problem. Unions brought into that situation help that employer in a way, employees would otherwise naturally begin to leave for healthier employers, an evolution of employment, helping the better employers, hurting the worse offenders. Unions mask the underlying issue, a toxic leadership, muddying the waters, like an abused woman staying in a relationship because the husband increased her allowance.

The compassion isn't my qualm, it's the believing women are selfless. Of course be compassionate but that includes being compassionate to yourself, believing women are selfless leads to putting her wants in front of yours. You're both selfish, compromise and work together for what you BOTH want.

Actually my favorite recommendation is the classic "Men are from Mars Women are from Venus" but it needs supplementation if you're going to date postmodernists like I presume.

I recommend against Tate, the Psychologist in the video seems good though.

Women aren't "totally" transactional, the "transactional" aspect isn't the point of the video, it's about how what women want from relationships change more than mens, the transactional discussion was just related.

I worry about men like Zurew, he is obviously very compassionate, but these are the guys that get trampled on by women.

That article was from a lesbian group, of course they're going to spin it, I only posted that to show they admit they divorce twice as much as gay men. It's not a sociopathic level, that's you being reductionist, the fact that women aren't selfless does not make them sociopaths. And again this video is not speaking about resources and money.

They're a net negative, depending on how wide a perspective you want to take. Narrow; yes they're positive for most workers, they make more money, work less, better benefits. Wider; all of those things are relative, that raises consumer prices, it lowers productivity and morale in the workplace because it removes the incentive to work harder for more pay, it pits employer vs employee instead of having a family culture to a company.

These women aren't treating the relationship in a transactional way? Aren't they leaving because they're not getting what they want? That's transactional.

I really think you all too easily group people into green, a woman being a neo feminist isn't green, that's her own selfish interest not equality, same for minority or young progressives, that's their own selfish interests not equality.

It's a social awakening to the emptiness of individualism, combined with inept mental "health" professionals treating depression(which is a symptom not a disease) instead of addressing the issue. I sympathize for everyone struggling, but societally speaking this is growing pains.

Europe is a retirement community.

This guy is good, never heard of him before.