Xonas Pitfall

Also, it's extremely persuasive and good for clickbait. People love certainty, simplicity, and guarantees. Absolutes are amazing for delivering that effect, even if false. You can look at YouTube thumbnails or titles that garner a lot of attention: ' THE ONE THING MISSING FOR YOUR SUCCESS,' 'ONLY THE TOP 1% KNOW THIS,' 'ALL MEN DO THIS,' 'ALL WOMEN ARE...,' 'ALL SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE KNOW THIS ONE SECRET,' 'THE BEST METHOD TO WIN.'" "THIS IS WHY YOU'RE STILL FAILING" "THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE YOUR DREAMS" "THE TRUTH ABOUT SUCCESS THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW" "EVERYONE IS DOING THIS EXCEPT YOU" In a world where chaos and infinity are the truth, the ego thrives on any sense of certainty and control.

Sounds awesome, to be honest! I see nothing wrong with this. If you're happy and don't feel like it hinders you in any significant way, this sounds like an amazing life setup. Great job! Exactly!

The issue with infinity is that within it, there is an infinite hierarchy of sub-infinites (you can look up the mathematician Georg Cantor, who proved there are different orders of infinity within the absolute). To make it less abstract, consider how, within your own hand, you could keep zooming in infinitely; your hand itself is infinite in this sense. So, someone could attain a complete "omniscience" of a sub-infinity, and there would be more "sub-infinites" to grasp still, yet that awakening by itself would still be "whole." Of course, we're using language here, which is always bound to the dual, finite realm. So, if you're comparing that kind of awakening to the absolute awakening of all infinities, it wouldn't be "whole" in the absolute sense. However, if you're using "whole" in a relative sense, like grasping a full infinite aspect of infinity, such as love, omniscience, clarity, purity, truth, integrity, etc., then it could still be considered "whole." To be honest, the more I explore awakening, the more I see it as a study of "infinity." That should honestly be a new category of science: The Science of Infinity The Logic of Infinity The Math of Infinity The Physics of Infinity Yet all of them seem to avoid it like the plague…

I see it!

If Leo were in a grave, he'd be doing alien mouse hula-hoop skipping, cartwheeling, and rolling gymnastics, seeing that combination alongside him. For extra circus buffoonery, add Trump to the mix, too! In fact, I actually wonder if Jesus, and all other enlightened gurus, do the same inverted pretzeling, seeing how much their message has been misconstrued by ego...

If you were to untangle it forward instead of downward, wouldn’t you get eggplant and balls? And if you do it downward as shown, don't you technically get a peach and the womb? [REDACTED CENSORSHIP] Did I just crack the code of the universe here? Anyone..?

I think the issue here is that people often don't realize how "fluid" and "vaguely defined" these categories of femininity and masculinity really are. We all want to think "we KNOW intuitively" when someone is feminine or masculine and point out a "TRULY masculine" or "TRULY feminine" person, but that's just a fantasy or an archetype in our minds. Actual reality will always force you to embody both to truly get things done. For example, often these "red pill" people will define a feminine woman as submissive, extremely passive, and almost "child-like" with innocence and naivety. They won't value her intelligence or ability to strategize, organize, plan, or lead, since those are seen as more "masculine" traits. But then, at the same time, you'd expect her to be a wonderfully caring and intelligent mother, taking care of your children, organizing the house, being an intelligent homemaker, and in a way, a "leader" of the house (at least in terms of homemaking and child-raising). So which is it? Or, for example, they might define men as stoic, non-movable, and the penetrative force of masculinity and strength. But in an actual relationship, you need emotional intelligence, the ability to gently guide your woman and children, knowing when to soften up and be vulnerable if you want your relationship to have depth and connection. Or perhaps they'd say you need to "emotionally move" women when you're courting them, by playing with them and giving them a fun experience. These traits are much more akin to a social, extroverted, playful woman who "doesn't think" than to a stone-hearted warrior. To be able to do silly, meaningless, funny things with your family, to play, have fun, joke around, and be expressive, those are highly emotional and social traits, which you'd classify as feminine. Yet, they're often now considered "masculine" if a guy does the same thing and has "rizz/charisma of a player Chad." So again, which is it? This is kind of what I mean: we all have these "ancient archetypes" of what femininity and masculinity are, but in reality, both of these traits will be played out, because that's what reality requires from you. It's kind of a meme that when a man is intelligent, he's seen as a 'logical/pragmatic/strategic thinker,' but when a woman does the same, it's considered 'intuitive.'

Gochu. Thank you very much!

@Leo Gura What would "chronically" mean here, haha? Every day, once a week, a couple of times per month? I’d ideally like to have a period where I do a high volume of psychedelics eventually (similar to a 30-day retreat). I’m curious what might be best for those purposes, but I’m also interested in general, especially affordable options!

Is THC mostly safe? I’ve definitely heard people comment on its bad effects, but maybe that was something else related to vaping in general. (And obviously, when I say safe, I acknowledge the general precautions with psychedelics, mental effects, etc.) I’m more so wondering if it has any actual damaging properties for itself uniquely (comparing, like, you don’t want to try cocaine or heroin compared to DMT, LSD, etc.). Sorry if this is a super newbie question, I’ve never really heard THC used in this manner, so I’m curious.

@Leo Gura What would you say is a good lifetime supply for 5-MeO?

Aww, cute!

Also, in case anyone knows, which of these would you say has the most 'sedating/numbing of movements' effect? One problem I tend to notice on most of my trips is unwanted movement and actions, which is why I've been more hesitant to try out Salvia and Salvia-alikes, at least not yet.

@Leo Gura I’m not sure if you've mentioned or revealed this yet, but what was the compound you used when you reached Alien Awakening? I’d be curious to know!

and... The Ultimate Hero, The Ultimate Mastermind, The Ultimate Trickster, The Ultimate Child, The Ultimate Mother, The Ultimate Father, The Ultimate Warrior, The Ultimate Sage, The Ultimate Rebel, The Ultimate Mentor, The Ultimate Seeker, The Ultimate Survivor, The Ultimate Guardian, The Ultimate Ruler, The Ultimate Innovator, The Ultimate Outcast, The Ultimate Leader, The Ultimate Dreamer, The Ultimate Explorer, The Ultimate Betrayer, The Ultimate Defender, The Ultimate Thief, The Ultimate Genius, The Ultimate Mystic, The Ultimate Avenger! The most vile, selfish, utterly disgusting, beautiful, gorgeous, mysterious, mesmerizing, confusing, daunting, captivating, repulsive, alluring, terrifying, enchanting, horrific, breathtaking, puzzling, unsettling, magnificent, grotesque, fascinating, despicable, irresistible, terrifyingly graceful, charmingly hideous, unnervingly elegant, revoltingly majestic, hauntingly exquisite, painfully entrancing, disturbingly graceful, irresistibly terrifying, wonderfully appalling, dreadfully magnificent.

@Natasha Tori Maru Hey, would you mind making a forum post about this? I'd love to ask a ton of questions, but of course, absolutely no pressure if it's very personal and you don't want to share. This sounds extremely interesting. Thank you so much for your vulnerability and openness!

Eh... this is very biased, to be honest. If someone invented a magical potion today with no side effects to restore your health, youth, and longevity, you'd probably take it. It’s the same argument people make comparing drugs and meditation: "Oh, that’s not real enlightenment, you’re supposed to struggle for 30+ years, and maybe then you’ll reach God! Drugs don't count!" ... "Oh, that's not true living, you’re meant to get 80 years and that’s it. Don’t ask for more, don't try to outplay reality!" Back in the days of the plague, the Dark Ages, or caveman times, you'd be saying, "You’ve got 20 years. Make it count. Don't ask for more. That's my attitude." Nothing wrong with trying to make the most of our time here and even extend it, while improving the quality of our experience.

@integral ExperienceMaxxing, StateMaxxing, ConsciousnessMaxxing, LoveMaxxing, TruthMaxxing, PurityMaxxing, GodMaxxing, 5-MeO-DMTMaxxing, EnlightenmentMaxxing, Actualized.orgMaxxers

I don't necessarily think any of this research is bad. I love it, actually. If the goal is to avoid dying, but in doing so, you end up prolonging good health, youth, and life, whether for 10, 20, 50, 100, or even 200 years, I see that as amazing. "Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." Humans used to live until 20, or even less. What we have now seems impossible to people from the caveman, plague, or war eras, so I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with it. You could say that avoiding death is really about wanting to love life and being able to experience it as fully as possible, remaining as healthy as possible for as long as possible. There's nothing wrong with that. I think the only issue with the marketing is the "against death" angle. Instead, it could just focus on improving health, youth, and longevity. But I understand that, for shock value and branding, it’s a more attention-grabbing and strategic business move. Although I'm not sure how beneficial it is for him in the long run, since it shifts the focus from the practical goal of improving lifespan (which I do think ironically most people will agree with) to more philosophical debates from people about "the meaning of life and death." And obviously, when people see a billionaire, especially without talking about how to solve financial issues with a longer lifespan or UBI, it’s easy to see how people might get worried or triggered. So, I think it might be more strategic for him to find common ground by saying something like, "I want to focus on health research and overall improvement, and I'm willing to guinea pig myself for it. I’ll try to pack the most efficient methods and make it as affordable as possible for the general public." And if he actually follows through on that message, then it’s awesome. No need to make it so sensational, like "Billionaire trying not to die." That kind of framing just breeds ragebait from people, haha.

^ ^ (O,O) ( ) -"-"----------------- There is no "want to be", that would be anthropomorphic. It’s simply what it is. God is all-encompassing, which includes both the observed and the observer, the being and the self-understanding. It’s like having a set of numbers from 1 to 10, and then asking, "Does 7 really need to be here?" Of course it does, because without 7, the set wouldn’t be a complete set of all 10 numbers; it would be something else entirely. For God to be fully God, He must be able to both be and observe. Otherwise, He would be limited by His inability to observe and would only exist, not fully experiencing himself. In fact, "observing" isn’t even the best word; perhaps a better term would be something like immersion, hypnosis, or entrancement, becoming so completely encapsulated in the object. You understand it in its entirety: how it came to be, its purpose, what it does, how it survives. Eventually, if you become so immersed in the object, the duality of observer and observed collapses, and it returns to just being. That’s what pure understanding would be, when self and other collapse into oneness. In other words, observing is simply a fragmented, dualistic version of complete being and union. Complete being and union is what God is. Once you fragment it into self and other, you get the duality of observed and observing.

A man can do what he wants, but he cannot want (choose) what he wants. You can only be yourself. God can only be God. The duality of free will and determinism ultimately collapses. There is nothing outside of God to control Him; He can be/do whatever, whenever, unrestricted by anyone. But there is nothing for God to be but God, so He is trapped by Himself. He can only be Himself. All dualities must ultimately collapse, and so does this one. You are a victim of yourself. You are controlled by yourself. Therefore, you are free, since the only thing controlling you is yourself, which is the definition of freedom. God is inherently paradoxical, so this is the only correct definition.

When would you say you noticed your energy and health depleting?

I think my point was more like... If you spend your life fixated on short-term, flashy opportunities like crypto or trendy business strategies, you never really give yourself a fair chance to build something sustainable. You miss out on creating a stable business (aka analogous to a relationship) that can offer lasting security and meaning if you keep jumping to the next big thing when things get less exciting or "beautiful/youthful", you never truly give the long-term dream a fair shot (even though you said you'd want it ultimately or it'd "be nice.") I’m sure Leo was tempted many times to pursue different business models or find ways to make Actualized.org a quick "money grab." At the very least, he was acutely and painfully aware of the financial losses and sacrifices he made in order to build something truly meaningful (I’m pretty sure he’s mentioned this in some of his videos). I see relationships in a similar light, which is why getting caught up in short-term traits feels a little silly to me. That said, it’s perfectly fine: you’re just following what excites you in the moment without worrying about long-term commitment!

Leodelics and psychadelics are Love 🖤💗🧡💛💚💙💜🤍