-
Content count
1,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Anton Rogachevski
-
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Breakingthewall "Change" is an idea within experience. I'm afraid you are a bit lost in concepts. There is change in the physical realm I presume, but that I leave for physicists to study. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to cistanche_enjoyer's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
We didn't yet find a way for a computer to even have experience, or to even understand how the brain is doing it. It's the hard problem essentially. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to cistanche_enjoyer's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
You just found a new way for it propel itself Your ego is good, it's valuable. You can only love it to death : ) The trouble is not with a strong ego, but it's the weak and inflated one that causes the bad behaviour. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Breakingthewall Change is a relative notion. First in order for there to be change you decide the thing you are comparing it to. Phenomenologically, purely in experience surprisingly there is no change! you can only register it due to your memory's ability to record experience, but if there was no memory no change would register. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The movement of experience or of physical objects? What dimensions? Where are they? Separation and Unity are yet again a dual idea, but reality is neither united nor is it divided. It simply Is. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Duality is the ability of the sane experience to differentiate your "body" from the "world" in order for you preserve it out there outside the simulation of you mind. It's an evolved mechanism shaped over millions of years, and it functions with a kind of adaptive intelligence. Hypothetically, if you weren't under the illusion of duality in a war scenario, you wouldn't be able to tell apart your enemy that's about to kill you from yourself, you would just love it all and die in peace. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
When you are in a fog, it seems endless from within, because you can't see the edge. It doesn't mean it's infinite, but it sure looks like it. This is an idea, a thought experientially is pure ineffable sensory data. -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
What do you mean by that? The mind is completely self aware, where exactly may it rise to? Only it exists for itself, phenomenologically. Other things outside it may exist or may not, but our study here is what's actually in direct experience. Anyway, I don't recommend taking anything I say, or anyone else sais without a grain of salt. It's good to be able to reach these insights on your own, through plenty of contemplation. It's like learning algebra: you can go to the end of the book and all the answers are there, but it's not the point. You need learn to go through all the steps to be able to solve it on your own. What do you mean? -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@kbone I was just talking theoretically what could take the place of magic, but I'm in a good place myself : ) -
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@kbone There can be lots of things: obsessive thoughts, boredom, brain fog, being "busy", obsessive doing, mindless stimulation, low value relationships, substance abuse. -
You can guide God back to itself? That would be something : ) Leo, I really hope you didn't take offence. I'm an avid follower and a huge fan of your work for over 10 years. I write these things out of deep care. I truly hope you're doing well—and that others continue to find in your work the same deep inspiration that I have. So thank you for all the work and the dedication. For a long time I have struggled with just simple sanity, and now I've come to really appreciate it, so I'm focused on getting to the highest possible sanity. I'm afraid Enlightenment work is possibly entangled with some insanity, so I just want people to be more cautious.
-
@Nemra Do numbers exist? What does it mean for them to exist? Where do they exist?
-
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
No such thing. -
@Nemra "Division" is an idea you can't actually do that, only imagine you are doing it. Leo's explaining it thoroughly in the last video about proving God.
-
In order for there to be "steps" you need to imagine them first.
-
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@kbone Thank you for the feedback : ) Your journey sounds magical! It takes me a couple of days of all day meditation and quiet to really get in touch with the magic of experience again. -
I hope you can see that both of these Ontological claims are very bold. And both carry almost the same burden of proof. Although to claim infinity is more bold i think, but can't say it's more than an intuition. A scientist might give a better explanation of why infinity would be very hard to have. To even prove there are "things" in existence or to even define "existence" in the first place are a very serious philosophical questions. The limit of the speed of light is showing a finite aspect of the physical dimension.
-
In what way?
-
@Leo Gura I hope you don't think of me as just a critic for criticism's sake. I really do care about Truth very much. It's true that we imagine our birth and death, and so within experience we seem immortal, but our body that is facilitating that experience was born, and will die for sure. These two truths can co exist, it just takes humility and meta vision to see. I don't deny that mystical experiences are cool and should be studied to some degree, but we should always take even direct experience with a just a pinch of salt. So dance away, but just don't throw reason completely out the window 💫
-
@samijiben The mainstream will do as mainstream does, it will take a simple idea like take 5meo to get truth and will propel it in a simplistic and easily marketable way.
-
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@samijiben תודה רבה גבר! אקח בחשבון : ) -
I know that logic trick, it's neat I must admit, but this is exactly how "infinite" things occur when you try to use logic to derive ontology. Logic is a great abstract tool of the brain, but it's only abstract. A good example is Zeno's race of halves: We all know that the race must be finite, but if you pose it as halving the distance you set yourself up for imagining an infinite race.
-
Anton Rogachevski replied to Anton Rogachevski's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@kavaris Unknowing is stable in that you simply don't know and can't ever : ) -
The fact that people say something for a long time doesn't make it right. I'm hope you are right. My intuition is telling me there can't be an infinite object. It just doesn't make sense for something to be physically endless. Your intuition is skewed by insanely high states which had just shattered your ability to reason in a sane way unfortunately. I'm sorry.
-
I don't think that you take it seriously enough that a lot of people do follow you and take it very seriously, just look at this forum how much your message of "just take 5meo and you will know truth" is repeated. Are you sure your aren't leading them astray?
