Arthogaan

Butt On!

Personality type: 50% INFJ 50% INFP - the results depend on what test I take, and differs between days. The general description makes me more INFP, but some common stereotypes INFJ. I do not know the model enough to decide wheter infj vs infp, so I say 50/50 Appearance - tall, blonde, blue eyes, I have gold circular glasses and ofc handsome I would like to receive general advice about current energy, whatever comes up, also whether I should focus more on spiritual side and let go the material survival stuff or the other way around: pause the spiritual impulse and focus on material stuff first in the next couple of months. Welcome to forum <3

Without you particular life God wouldn't be infinite, so your very life is very important and special.

@Maka @Batman Wheter he makes someone moan by talking with him or not is irrelevant for his awakening. But the fact is for some people with psychic talent weird shit starts to happen when they awaken. So it is ignorant for you to assume wheter he is awakened or not by his external world story. Because awakening is felt inside. And you don't know his direct experience. So it would be cool to raise your openmindedness for a newcomer of the forum and do not assume he is lying when you simply do not know.

I think you will like that video from Ben:

In the next year should I focus more on the material, survival side of things and let go the pull towards spiritual or should I focus on spiritual practives more and let go of fear of material survival side of things?

Good luck, waiting for the story after you come back!

When you do not want anything and are 100% available to the present moment the child-like joy reappears.: 48:00 - 60:00 - Here there was a really cute moment of a older women feeling like a child again on 52:00:

@Michael569 thank you for that guy. Nice resource. How did you get to know him?

@Preety_India I understand and respect that. Sending digital hug.

I too had my first major awakening at 19 lol. I was in deep existential crisis then and thanks to huge psychological suffering and victimhood I had this one year of strong motivation of digging and digging. Then synchronistically "Power of Now" by Eckhart showed up and half year later Jed Mckenna. And of course daily meditation before and after high school. And then one day the universe went silent for 5 minutes and disappeared. But I still had rigid atheistic, logical, materialist mind so after that began the Spiritual transformation of the character that is taking place to this date. Really only after 2 years after that glimpse and after taking 5g of shrooms I really viscerally believed in God (as I). So I would say that this existential dread comes in waves, and it is different for each person. But the end of high school, end of your twenties, mid-life crisis all seem potent to create suffering deep enough to have the motivation to strip away the ego.

Thats like saying "I don't care what is true if it does not benefit me" - and again there is some wisdom to that, and that's good insight but you gotta be hones that you do not care about love or truth, but about your benefit. Which is GOOD. With that logic even if Buddha and Jesus came to you to say "We love you daughter, you are perfect" and maybe it is exact same thing as your abusive ex said and it bring bad memories back, and then you can say that Jesus and Buddha are not loving because they made you feel bad. That is dangerous way of thinking.

If we meet in India someday and I will give you an ice-cream with best intentions of being loving to you, you still may interpret it as "why did you give me ice-cream? do you think I am too skinny? Do you want me to eat some refined sugar poison? Is that your love? I am insulted by that and it is not love." It is important to look on intentions. To try to see love in people's actions.

What did I do? You said that you experience something happening on the forum, and then I commented that I subjectively do not experience that phenomenon on the forum. You said we should be loving and that text does not matter, and I just commented that I agree and that we also should try to love even the ones with long texts. What did I do wrong? I genuinely want to understand. Should I not have commented at all if I had a different perspective? I love you the way you are. I watched the video. I do not want you to follow my agenda. I just share my perspective and you can do what you want with it. Just like parents should not force child to be a lawyer. But they can explain to them why they subjectively think that it is a good carrier and why it would be a wise move maybe. Still with love.

I have no idea if this is legit, but I'll leave it here:

Yeah, me too. Dude, I once experienced during DMT trip that my Higher Self is literally a cute dog called "waf waf" and that he is a cute genius. You made a post, we commented to offer you some perspective. Isn't it cool? Isn't it love? We love you. That's why we responded. No one judged you. Well, I like to channel the vibe of a Saint/Yogi. I like that taste and it is my choice let's say. Do not judge me for being like that. Try to see the love in it. You can not agree, but I promise you that what I responded was with the best intentions for you, because I want the best for you. And yes, emotions are important. But discipline and sometimes seeing through them is also important. And it just so happens that at some level the spirituality demands from you to be sometimes disciplined with your reactions. So yes, there is some bias. But that too is done with the best intentions.

I don't experience that. For example Leo writes very shortly most of the times. Some of the best users (in my opinion) write very concisely. And it is often the case in my experience that if someone write long walls of text he actually gets accused of mental masturbation on the forum. Yes. Also love the ones that write long texts.

Yes! Sort of. Christians have no concept of formlessness unfortunately. But I think thats is close enough.

I can only approximate with my intuition because I do not follow their model for years now, but I was raised in catholic house, so as I've written earlier : "There is one God. It can have many forms. You. Me. Cat. Tree. But for christians the most important forms/facets of God are God himself (the masculine, fatherly principle), Jesus and the Holy Spirit. But it is known that they are just forms of the one. How is Jesus a God? How is Atman the Brahman?" So there is indeed a paradox that 1+1+1 = 3 = 1. And as Leo would say "it's not a bug it's a feature"

How is posting a funny video with two words comment paranoic?

The essence of Christianity and what Jesus (and other christian mystics) intended to teach is one thing. And what average Joe with no spiritual acumen believes Christianity is is other thing. So I would suggest to focus on one or the other because if you mix these things up it gets confusing.

300 000 $ -> I live in Poland when to cover my monthly expenses I need a maximum of 1000 $. That means that 4% percent withdrawal rate of investments (which according to "4% withdrawal rate rule" is probable to be a safe assumption) is enough to cover my living expenses. And then I will bask for some time in the knowingness that I do not have to do anything to survive, meditate for 2 years straight and then we will see what life purpose will show on my radar.

I would consider it. All things like: adopting, vasectomy, donating sperm - ale this ideas give off some sort off energy of freedom from societal structure of things and also they blur the line between me and other even more.

God has not a surprised Pikachu face when he sees that we act selfishly. He intended it that way, and it is perfect. He has this face: