Consept

Bidens winning Michigan with 99% counted

Just take the upcoming L, nothing worse than a bad loser, ask Deontay Wilder

Is it that much of a surprise? Hes been sowing seeds of distrust in mail in ballots for weeks, Sanders called it exactly that he would do this. Not only is there the speech but numerous tweets alluding to it - "How come every time they count Mail-In ballot dumps they are so devastating in their percentage and power of destruction?" "They are finding Biden votes all over the place — in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So bad for our Country!" "Wow! It looks like Michigan has now found the ballots necessary to keep a wonderful young man, John James, out of the U.S. Senate. What a terrible thing is happening!" "We are winning Pennsylvania big, but the PA Secretary of State just announced that there are “Millions of ballots left to be counted.”" No mention of fake ballots or fraud, hes literally pissed that people are allowed to mail in votes

Youre making excuses and justifications, he didnt say anything about fake ballots, he also claimed theyd won which even Ben Shapiro called him out on. So it follows that he literally means that he doesnt want to count any ballots past election day. Youre right it isnt a crime hes saying that because he knows theyre more likely to be Democrats, if it was the case that more Republicans voted by mail in, im pretty sure he wouldnt be against them being counted.

Hes saying that votes shouldnt be counted after election day, so essentially any voters that voted by mail in on the day or a day or 2 before shouldnt be counted.

Sources?

Been keeping an eye on the bookies (betting websites) in the UK they hve Biden at 1.2 and Trump at 4.5 which means if you put £1 on Biden you get £1.20 back if you put £1 on Trump you get £4.50 back, this is the longest its been for Trump he was on 2.0 this morning. So if thats any indication the bookies are going with Biden. I also heard Nigel Farage, who was beating the drum for Brexit and partly the reason it happened, bet £10k on Trump winning

I think Trumps tone indicates he thinks hes going to lose

I mean he seemed pretty happy about the deal. But yeah im sure theres something you can fire back no matter whats said. I honestly cant see how hes even blue let alone turquoise or yellow. I would urge you to really get a firmer grip on either spiral dynamics or reading and seeing through people

Its crazy that Trumps manipulations have to be taken account for in a democratic election

Selling arms to Saudi Arabia doesnt seem a way to achieve peace in the middle east but maybe thats turquoise level that i dont understand - "On May 20, 2017, U.S. President Trump and Saudi Arabia's Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud signed a series of letters of intent for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to purchase arms from the United States totaling US$110 billion immediately, and $350 billion over 10 years." (from wikipedia)

What facts would show that hes turquoise? If you cant judge him by surface behavior which is the only thing weve got to go on really, as well as analysis from other professionals, then what are you using to judge that hes tier 2?

Why would switching parties indicate transferring through spiral levels? Can you point to anything 'green' that hes done previously, considering hes shut down many green initiatives? Take these few Turquoise traits Unity, Deeper & deeper levels of interconnectedness, Selfless living, Sacrifice self for greater consciousness, Meditation, yoga, contemplation, self-inquiry, Not-knowing. Do you think he has shown any of these? I think you should really try and understand spiral dynamics a bit more. Appreciate that you may not have a firm grip on the different levels and how to categorise into them. If you look at other potential turquoise people ie Sadhguru, Mooji etc they do not seem in anyway similar to Trump, its actually laughable to imagine them together. They also dont need to do elaborate game playing to manipulate people. Can you point to any others you consider turquoise?

You can predict he will win but how do you get that hes turquoise? These are turquoise values taken from the mega thread as a reminder - Consciousness Elevating mankind’s consciousness Truth Deep metaphysical insight Wisdom, the wisdom of nature Mysticism, spirituality, nonduality God, divinity Holism, integration, synthesis vs analysis Integrating all religions & science Left & right brain synthesis Honesty, transparency, authenticity Being vs knowing, doing, having Simplicity, flowing with nature Minimalist sustainable living Collaborative synergy Human wellness Healing at all levels: physical, emotional, spiritual Exploring altered states of consciousness Intuition Channeling: direct downloads from infinite intelligence Supernatural creativity Spiritual purification Awakening, transcendence, liberation Unconditional love, compassion for all Emotional mastery Presence, mindfulness Paradox Esoteric teachings Gratitude Unity Deeper & deeper levels of interconnectedness Selfless living Sacrifice self for greater consciousness Meditation, yoga, contemplation, self-inquiry Not-knowing Humility Spontaneity, playfulness, self-amusement The really big picture

huh?

Yes thats fair, i can see how marriages with age differences are more likely to be unsuccessful, but in general most relationships dont end in marriage. So if its not inherently weird and wrong for age gap relationships to occur then i dont see the problem, assuming theres no manipulation etc which can also happen in relationships with closer age gaps.

No worries

Exactly my point though any relationship can be manipulative or have a toxic dynamic, i dont think thats something thats exclusive to age gap relationships. Age gap relationships can also be healthy as youve also mentioned. So i dont think automatically its a bad thing or its an indication of creepiness or abuse of power. Its easy to look at it on the surface like that but i think its really each individual case has to be judged on its own merit.

Everything ok? If ive caused offence it definitely wasnt intentional, hope your day gets better

You said sexual harassment so i was following that up, you can clarify your point if you like maybe i missed what you were saying

It can be seen as predatory and in some cases that might completely be the case but i dont think its enough to just say it is because of the difference in power and influence. I would call a double standard as well because there are countless examples of older women going out with much younger men in the public eye (Madonna, J.Lo, Joan Collins, Lisa Bonet etc etc) but these are never even considered to be predatory, although they could be. Also if the older man is attractive then its not really seen as predatory, a good example is Jonny Depp or Leo Di Caprio. In fact in Jonny Depps case it could be argued, and is being argued in court, that the younger woman was actually an abuser. Giuliani shouldve known better considering his status but i dont think its inherently wrong for an older man to flirt with a younger woman, its maybe not advisable though.

Im not sure, i mean if the girls obviously flirting would and the Rudy doesnt respond, would that be sexual harassment against the girl? Or because hes responded postively to her advances is it then sexual harassment against Rudy? Also what if the ages were different, like she was interviewing someone who was 28 and they liked each other? I dont really see the sexual harassment in it, furthermore she invited him into the hotel room. Seedy yes, but a legal thing im not so sure. Trump couldnt wait to get out of there

There was a lot more stuff in SBC's series 'This Is America' where it was actually quite damning for the people he 'tricked', the Giuliani clip is really just a honey trap, I dont think theres much to it, conservatives might not be happy with it but its just a biological fact that most men would flirt back if someone they find attractive is flirting with them, i dont really see a way around that. If the girl wasnt flirting and Rudy was being creepy then maybe thered be some kind of moral issue. Anyway heres the Trump/SBC clip, Trump is claiming he knew all along, he is a coral genius so maybe he did -

The point with Drew is that he was completely dogmatic about beliefs that were provably wrong, not only that he thought everyone who was not aligned with his way of thinking was a sheep and ignorant. Even enlightened masters wouldnt have that type of arrogance thay would accept that they dont know everything. Also if someone was religious and had the same mindset as Drew and was on here saying that no one gets it and theyre sheep because the mainstream doesnt want you to know about God. It would provide 0 benefit for the forum. So that could of locked in mindset will always be a distraction for people on the forum and i understand why he was banned. On a person to person level i feel sorry for him as im sure hes not a bad guy hes just a bit lost and in a sense, if he could actually use the forum as a learning tool rather than trying to reinforce his beliefs, he could get a lot of benefit from it.

Yeah saying you're smart is another way of saying that other people are not as smart as you. Thing is there are so many different types of intelligence, emotional, creative, physical, to just blanketly say you're smart is very limited. It's an ego trick of trying to always be better in some way than others