Sugarcoat

OMG the biases here☠️ You guys are so "heady" that you think all that is just "head stuff" (psychology), thats your own projection.

Very good word choice there, because thats exactly what I've been thinking, but I just haven't written it out, but the patterns are very familiar in a way, almost as if you unintentionally hinted at something there in your response.... hmmm

No, I cant come up with anything in partiuclar in that regard, im not so good at remembering words unless it really stands out. He does focus on relevant important things tho in general it seems, not like those "rational" people that obsess over what I sometimes call "non-issues" in society such as "oh this one feminist (extreme minority that almost nobody in society agrees with anyways) said this one thing!!!!!" *30 min analysis*. Maybe you could get a sense of what I mean, maybe not.

Idk what you consider "advanced guys" because if he "just switches it up" it could be in a shallow fake way where he is not much independent in how he is, so theres still significant portion of women who could smell that shallowness. In my comment I meant what i've most commonly heard in regards to "pick up", meanwhile advanced is rare.

You can have psychic experiences that you don’t control or chose, so that’s one reason it’s very difficult to “capture”, mine have been like that. But you said @Carl-Richard was trying to seem “innocent and egoless” or something when he said “it’s not my doing”. But I guess he meant what I said. The spontaneous ones are the most common, I’m convinced, although still rare, and being able to control is even more rare, exceptionally so And perhaps someone out there who can control it, or intentionally trigger them, maybe it’s limited in the way it can only happen with regards to “important things”. Because psychic abilities, those few who have control (I believe they exist), I bet they are highly developed somehow or have gone deep into spirituality so it’s not gonna be just used “for whatever”, maybe they couldn’t even do it ”unnecessarily” if they wanted to (but they wouldn’t even want to is my guess). Showing it to the world can be considered “important” yes I get that, but maybe it comes with significant risks. If someone showed the world super obvious psychic abilities that were captured, maybe they’d be put at risk as I said. Also people are very “sensationalist” not so deep, showing them to the world doesn’t mean it will help people get in touch with that dimension themselves, or in any way for that matter. Also, maybe there is already such evidence out there but it’s still not believed (I don’t have exact memory, just vague remembrances of seeing different clips and tv shows of people trying to prove such things, you are probably familiar with some too). But yes I’m also suprised why there it hasn’t come to the public eye so convincingly yet! Spiritual awakening is quite hard to describe yes, so “all encompassing” it is. So that is a huge topic in itself. I’ll let it that be

When I said “obvious” psychic phenomena I meant obvious in a way that if you told someone else (assuming they don’t think you’re making it up) they would also see it as obvious, simply based on the description of it. So I didn’t make claims about Carl’s experiences (I haven’t read through all his replies), and I don’t know what other kinds of stories you’ve heard. But maybe you’ve never heard an “obvious” one, or if you have, maybe you didn’t believe it because someone only described it rather than it also being captured scientifically, in experiment or something of the like. Imo someone could have an ambiguous sounding experience (from outside perspective) that from their pov is obviously psychic, becuase of the quality of the experience not just the content of it. But it’s difficult to argue that. If that’s some known model of the mind, it’s not what I referred to because I didn’t write based on any particular conceptual framework. I believe that we do have a local mind (on personal level, I’m speaking from dual perspective), but that it’s possible for connection between two minds and thus certain psychic phenomena, or that information from outside can enter your mind (clairvoyance perhaps), or you can perceive someone in deeper way where you can pick up on “inner world activity” that you couldn’t perceive based on just body language, tone etc (the typical non verbal communication), or even online, beyond just the writing. Mysterious? Yes but aren’t a lot of things… Maybe you agree that it’s possible to feel other people’s energies, more or less strongly, now that’s perceiving beyond the normal sense perception right? But when it comes to thoughts/mind or even worldly happenings etc, then maybe as I said before you need the more obvious evidence, from some source or maybe if it would happen to you. Maybe it did happen to you at some point but wasn’t obvious enough, and you also saw your self deception which was more obvious, so that’s partly why you hold the view you do now, just guessing a little. That’s great you are able to feel that “magical-ness” of life, we all want that I think, and I agree the physical is not exception from it. Why would it be? We feel like we exist in the physical world, and it’s also mysterious if we are honest. But you can call technology mediated communication something else than psychic phenomena because you’re just taking a term and changing the definition because you’re not convinced the “regular” psychic stuff is true ehehe. What science has done is amazing ofc but we could call it something else as I said… Speaking of psychic phenomena in the way I do doesn’t down-value science necessarily . But it happens here on this forum that people do, so I see the value in uplifting science too, just don’t steal words like that lol I just realized I’m guilty of the opposite actually, because sometimes when I use technology and its frustrating I will describe the experience as feeling “laggy” or even “hacky” in my brain, so I stole those words from the tech bros, so maybe I shouldn’t accuse you…. I don’t understand exactly what you mean by emotional sensitivity because people use the word emotion differently. I’m not super clear in these ideas myself but I think of sensitivity in very general way, related to perception. So if you for example feel someone else’s energy it can mean there is openness in your being and clearer perception that allows for it, and perhaps connection, so that’s a form of “sensitivity” meaning it’s able to be felt rather than someone being closed to it that is not able to feel it (not sensitive). Kind of. Maybe I’m vague in this reply overall but I want to be improve at explaining myself overall without needing explicit examples. Especially these less tangible things.

Sounds like increased sensitivity nowadays because of much less dense self in daily life maybe. I find that correlation being true for myself Ok maybe it's just difference in experience/awareness then because I tend to call it "impulse", don´t feel its much of a choice, choice makes me think of something else. "Drive of what you are" makes sense to me though, but I see it as your entire entity, if wiring etc is very strong then the self can feel quite passive ime I tried 10 mg vaporized. But just to try, I dont know what's usual for that amount, but yes I did experience mild effect as in significant thinning of the border between me and world, kind of "melting into environment" but not fully. Also a bit discomfort overall I guess it just comes with a state like that. Didnt quite like it. My guess at the time and now also is that id need it many many times to have strong long lasting effect, similar to you maybe I didnt start off "low density" but yes over the years it unravelled more and more and more, crazy how something still survived. Those who dont experience that, depending on the person, I wonder how much they suffer, some seem happier in proportion to the heaviness im percieving That last part about 5 meo makes sense to me, because my experience was very simple and clean like that, not fancy, so if you do higher doses and many times then it makes sense it could lead down the part you describe. Ive had this intuition for a long time "no matter how self aware I am, there is always something I cant see", I just cant because im "inside" somehow, so Id say I can agree with you there

Right, sounds like pov of rock on the ground otherwise

You mean it would’ve been proven by science and showcased to the public? I am also shocked at how little it seems acknowledged, I don’t even know how common it is. You could say the same about spiritual awakening or could you not? Maybe you or someone would say something along the lines of “but that’s different because it’s about undoing the real” but that’s more so what full blown enlightenment entails (my guess), they are different.

Thanks you too Yes I want psychic phenomena that are true. Emphasis: true That last part I highlighted in your response basically implies the assumption that obvious psychic phenomena don’t occur, or at least not to us here that you’re responding to. As if they all are these “ambiguous” ones that need analysis and attempts at “putting the pieces together”. Psychic phenomena have to do with your mind, or what I like to call “inner landscape” (encompasses more than just mind in conventional sense). If you experience them, it’s something about the state of your mind that allowed for it, and that state is one from which you interact with the world. So your experience of technology too will be different because of this state. (Doesn’t have to be like that for everyone, but talking from this perspective now) I don’t use the word “psychic” in this strict conventional way as in distinct psychic experiences, textbook definition telepathy, clairvoyance etc. It encompasses more than that for me. It’s not so limited, the “psychic” quality can fuse into many types of experiences. It is precisely an increase in the sensitivity you talk about. Yes what you said applies, I bet some people do that, and yes “lack of sensitivity” is massive fundamental problem for humanity, but even open minded ones like you underestimate how deep this “sensitivity” can go.

Ok good very straight forward there I will stfu

I can’t tell if you thought I disagreed with something you said here or not, we’re saying similar things I also wanted to mention that there are people in society that have very bad states of health but they still somehow have raging libidos, looking at all kinds of stuff irl and online and smexualizing so much. Almost as if it can be something else at play here (you said your “problem” started at young age even before the ED so that’s one reason I mention this)

Why you talk as if being drawn to look at women is what reveals your level of libido? Maybe other men can be drawn to just ass, but maybe you need ass + something deeper, in order to be drawn to it. I’m not denying your health issues, it’s one of my top priorities for myself also to improve on, but perhaps you think that when they improve you’ll start to be more like those other men, but maybe you discover your sexuality works differently…

I think he is quite strong in his masculinity for his age. Also he is quite rational but doesn’t come off as too close minded. He is lone-wolf type which is something I can relate to and probably one of the reasons I dig him as a social media profile. He had a video title “I have lived more in my head than real life”, and something else about having no friends or something at some point, basically what I based it on (otherwise I maybe would’ve assumed him to be more typically extrovert and socially involved). So him being able to convey himself in way that attracts audience in a genuine way not simply “click baity/rage-baity”, while being isolated a lot in his life, shows some depth there that he is able to perceive society while not necessarily having to be super involved. I wrote “convey himself” because that’s what people do it’s not just about what they say, but he is well articulated still and has shared points I’ve agreed with. I clicked on the video you shared after so that adds to my point about “lone wolf type” Idk how much he has been “out there” but he does challenge the idea that some have that you have to have been “out there” a lot in order to have valid enough, accurate or deep enough observations of society, “tendencies” etc (can be quite the opposite sometimes) Just some thoughts for now. I don’t think you need to watch someone that much to get impression that is still valid enough to share, imo

Yea i find it’s very open and accepting overall. But they still value rationality and critical thinking, I find they can be bit too “careful” in that regard, too much focus on intellectual nuance rather than combining it with intuitively feeling things (especially news and related media and institutions give this impression) It makes sense to me there’s not much “spiritual community” in Sweden despite being so highly developed, because they are still somehow stuck in this intellectualism (my guess is millennials are more so like this than Gen Z) but not so heavily egoic like what I’ve seen on media from USA. It’s hard to pin point exactly why USA seems so different, but the atmosphere comes off as much more ~intense~ Regarding difference in dating culture and dynamics, I don’t notice that much approaching in Sweden by Swedish guys or just Swedish-born guys in general, it’s more through social network. Also, I find if someone would express (or even admit to themselves) they desire strong masculine/feminine polarity, it could be perceived as giving a “conservative” vibe (lol) so people are not so deeply in touch with that (talking about Swedes and in particular what seems like the “Swedish mentality”, which a non-Swede could adopt too)

I bet there are soo many other things they are not reacting to that other people are🙂(talking about humanity as a whole now)

You’re talking as if you’re perceiving that belief is the main basis + some experience, rather than the opposite where experience is the basis then belief, interpretations etc build upon them, and also changes with more experiences, hence not so “fixed”. I feel like your comparison is only valuable if someone would try to use telepathy as main communication or something, we’re using technology every day, psychic stuff, more or less obvious, only adds to it rather than subtract Im not trying to drag this much longer, Ive also felt sometimes I should be even more mindful when I write, so I understand you don’t wanna excessively discuss it here, as you said, but wanted to make some statements

You are referring to specific resources? I haven’t looked into it that much no I like the wording “non local awareness” it does make sense to call it that in a way imo. “Perception” is accurate too but it’s tricky in that for me awareness and perception overlap in their meanings

Maybe you’re joking by the comparison there, but if you genuinely think they are like that then I think you should revaluate your intuitive abilities a bit 🙂‍↔️🤚🏻 (discovered some new emoji combo)

🤷🏻‍♀️

@Carl-Richard Damn no country is truly safe anymore… I see what you’re saying. I have also had experiences where certain details can seem to diminish their obviousness, but you said “I can feel when a dream is more of the dramatic kind and not just a normal dream” - if you mean what I mean, in that you can begin to sense when something is “psychic” vs “normal”. Then the experiences don’t need to be text definition psychic and there can be ambiguity but you still sense they’re of psychic nature. Science says dreams are for processing, and I’ve started to experience that on a deep level. I had a dream recently where my mind envisioned the inside of my body, sort of dark tissue (not literally but figuratively), and the exact moment before I woke up, my subconscious said in the dream “it is gluten!”. I interpreted it as the dream processing giving me insights into my health, in this case suggesting gluten is problematic for me, I’m not sure if it’s actually true but it was not just random dream. If we can have bad dreams about someone who feels off in our life and then being right, why not health stuff too. It’s not precisely psychic phenomena, but still, out of the ordinary ig.

“Floor is lava” game

What is meant by increasing baseline consciousness?

I feel you’re one of few that can write that without it sounding weird ☠️

Who doesn’t here 😄