Bobby_2021

So true.

@Hardkillnah he said you can be Enlightened and still shoot up a school. They are less likely to commit crime, not impossible though.

I thought you were a staunch leftist liberal.?

What you say makes sense, and I can't come with anything reasonable against it, even though it looks somewhat threatening since I identify with my masculinity so dearly and I love it. Maybe these are all just my concerns, just like my parents had stupid concerns about me. Maybe my kids will be smarter than me the way I am smarter than my boomer parents.? But still, I can't accept the biological men in women's competition & women's toilets. That's like a reasonable claim that conservatives have real depth in and most smart people will side with them, especially since women themselves already feel uncomfortable with it. 30% of the conservatives are impossible to convince. There are many smart conservatives who could have been swayed will still remain with the idiotic conservatives who are downright homophobic, because of fringe issues like this. In short, do you think there is anything that the current LBGTQ movement is doing it wrong, or are they right all the time? Do you have any sublte criticisms of the movement? Also instead of outright silencing them, I would recommend convincing the smart conservatives to change camps. Because there are some legitimacy to their claims as I have mentioned above. Such issues do need to be sorted out. You cannot be confused and still conduct sports and daily life, atleast that's my proposition.

I remember my teenage years as already being confused enough having to accomodate for 2 genders. Imagine growing up with n number of genders.

Exactly my point. And behaviour changes are not because someone went all the way to deconstruct something. There could be mass murder in the streets and we will still see people say, "muh constructions". Yeah I know, what are you going to do about it?

They do suffer an their body sends them hints. But they constantly run away from truth. They do not acknowledge it to themselves.

So what? Everyone here knows this.

All of these things are higher for men(people with balls) and lower for people without it, since balls make a lot of Testosterone during the formative years and that leads to higher muscle mass, height etc. That's why we created categories for people with balls and without it. If people are not even going to respect that you can forget about making things fair over subtle advantages like recent test levels, height etc. You can deconstruct whatever you want sitting inside your room. But forfeiting the benifits of constructions is insane unless you have something else in place. Constructions are made with a specific purpose in mind. @vladorion "If they're constructions then it should make no difference to you whom to have sex with, a man or a woman." That's also my point. You can deconstruct something and still enjoy the benifits of constructions. Plus the people allowing this madness haven't deconstructed anything. They are doing it for political reasons.

It's not complicated. Unsolicitedly pulling out dick infront of women was considered to be sexual harrasment. Now I don't even know if that has been deconstructed away. What's left now? I would like to see your "obvious" solution about sports.

We create categories for people with similar genetics to compete with. You don't see light weight boxers competing with heavy weights. We create categories to minimise the effects of genetics. Although we can't completely eliminate genetics factor, categories help in that a lot. To say "muh genetics all the way down" is a gross generalization and to undermine the purpose of categories in the first place.

Calling people a fraud/villian is your own projection or lack of knowledge. Valid criticism lol.

????

Does Sadhguru have any substance when he says it's better to stick with one sexual partner for Enlightenment purposes?

Democracy dosen't mean that the left should win all the time. If people elected Republicans, that's democracy too.

I have analysed this result long before you knew who Putin was.

Normal people are traumatized after doing spy work and cannot lead functional lives due to the high stress nature of the work. Psychopaths are generally chosen for spy work in the first place. Psychopaths have a fake charm that won't make them so easy to spot. He may not be a full blown psychopath, but he gas psychopathic traits. Many experts have claimed this. This is NOT a demonisation.

This is rather a neural reporting by an Indian Media. Must watch for all those who think that Putin is evil/crazy. You are blind sided by western agenda.

I recommend no one wear ear phones that has a bud sticking inside your ears. Instead wear head phones that doesn't have an ear plug that sticks inside your ear. Ears are very sensitive. @Roman25 Music may have contributed to your condition in some way. But I am sure that's not the only reason. So don't be too hard on yourself.

I think it's because they are trying to intellectually understand Solipsism.

I was watching some pics of naked women the other day and was not feeling aroused. I thought why? Then I realised the external stuff is just a trigger. It was my mind arousing myself. That was the case all the time. The women was just a decoy, a fooling mechanism, to prevent me from realising that I was arousing myself all the time. You just arouse yourself. And you can have higher orgasms and feel more like yourself. The universe is just God jerking off so that it can feel something.

Is there a thing like this or did you just made it up??

Agree with your sentiments. Perhaps someone sitting in a peaceful first world country can analyse the situation in a much more balanced way. There are many competing interests in this state and that's why no one can come up a clean solution. We are all with you. And no one is disregarding your situation.

They look like empty words to be honest. You cannot define anything except for absolute infinity. Any boundaries you define will inevitably lose grounding.

Understood. Agreed. I am slowly deconstructing the dream & I am making progress. It's a little difficult to deconstruct the idea of other, but I can easily do it in 5-10 years or so definitely. But my question was meant in a relativistic sense only. Got curious after watching your blog where you repeatedly said no one else is truly awake because there are so many degrees of awakening they haven't yet accessed. That's a big statement. That's why I asked. If someone in real life asks me: "How many truth realised beings have you met, online or offline?" what shall I say? I am not Enlightened of course. (Else I could have said, one).