Nemra

Member
  • Content count

    4,335
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nemra

  1. Sure.
  2. But you live in France. It seems they don't track down, fine, or put you in jail in France for those kinds of chemicals.
  3. Don't be so sure. Maybe not in the US. It could depend on the country. But it's safer to assume that they could be checked. Even to think that yours could be the <1% is concerning.
  4. That's too risky. Although, if the seller is a local, then that's less risky.
  5. @r0ckyreed, also, you can search for legitimate clearnet RC vendors that can ship to your country. If you think that's too risky for you and you don't want to extract or grow (by the way, DMT and mushrooms will be your choices), then the next best option is to plan to travel and get the psychedelic there. Order the psychedelic with your place's address in that country, but also contact the vendor to understand when you'll likely get your order so that you don't miss it. But don't forget your test kits.
  6. I think the vendors sell their products only for microscopy use and not cultivation. However, I don't know if in the US the people can convince the customs that easily. I'm not from the US, and the customs contacted me to provide documentation and understand what's in it. And there's nothing mentioned about the legality of using spores in my country. Although, it doesn't contain any illegal chemicals. So, I don't know how it will end.
  7. The other options either would require a lot of time and preparation or would be very risky. For me, the following are the case: The first option doesn't exist. The second option is too risky. Although I can travel to another country and order them without getting in trouble. The third option is generally safe compared to the second option; however, I can't guarantee that the methods will be safe. There are a lot of factors that need to be considered depending on the country.
  8. No. Your will argument doesn't change anything here, because it depends on whether that person has an inner experience, which, as I said in various ways, is imaginary.
  9. It's relevant because when we think of others, we think that they are experiencing stuff like we are experiencing, be it whatever. And I said that you are projecting your sense of experience onto them and forgot about it. If you go back a few pages, you would see that I have explained to @Breakingthewall how it's imaginary.
  10. Again, it doesn't. It appears that we are unlikely to reach an agreement. It's pointless to continue.
  11. No, it's not. I have told you in various ways.
  12. That's your mistake of not understanding that it is relevant. Instead of responding to me to appear that you are right, I would recommend that you understand how understanding your experience would imply what I said.
  13. You used the will argument without really countering what I said. Check your memory sometimes. I even said I don't really know about it; however, if inner experience is imaginary, then there isn't the will of others. So, your "argument" was irrelevant.
  14. Not so fast. Your counterarguments were false from the start. And I have responded to you a lot. So, no.
  15. You believe they have, which is not the case. So, it's relevant.
  16. No. Try again. You don't understand that I'm not talking about forms behaving without my control. I'm talking about those forms having inner experiences, which is impossible because of what experience is. That difference is lost on you.
  17. You cannot even prove others' inner experience, as it's impossible, and yet you believe others have will. You make some huge leaps in faith. Don't jump too far, because you might fall. I'm also matching your energy. Don't blame me.
  18. That is what I was telling you. No, you didn't. But good luck believing you did.
  19. Said a person who can't understand that it doesn't have to do anything with what I was saying. It doesn't hurt to know the truth. Or maybe it does for you.
  20. I don't know that yet. If my experience is all there is, then I would have to understand what that actually points to. I haven't contemplated that yet. However, you just haven't bothered to understand your experience. It's that simple.
  21. You will be lost in beliefs if you deem direct experience as false.
  22. I'm not claiming that I can will anything in my experience. I don't know that. However, it doesn't prove anything here. First of all, recognize that your experience is all there is. Then understand that others cannot be experiencing things with you because of what it means to be experiencing things.