Nemra

@Leo Gura, before vaping THC, have you tried smoking cannabis flower? If so, was the quality of the experience similar to when vaping only THC? Have you also tried edibles? If so, was the experience different than vaping or smoking?

@Human Mint, ok. Now I understand. You are right.

Perhaps external factors? How would epistemic responsibility be related to stable people having a psychosis?

I haven't smoked for about a year. I don't quite remember how I felt, but overall I was alert.

DMT entity incarnate.

Yeah, after a few seconds, you know that you will forget stuff and won't care what you were thinking. But it started to fuck with my mind after a few tries when I wasn't smoking. I started having sudden thoughts that maybe I have been smoking weed and just forgot about it a few seconds ago, and then maybe I will forget what's currently happening. So, I stopped testing it. Interestingly enough, I wasn't worried about that kind of forgetfulness after orally consuming a cannabis gummy, although I knew which cannabinoids were present and how much I consumed.

Interesting. Mine was as well profound through that ROA. Although, once, when smoking weed, dried cannabis flower, my visual field was just like a newly captured photo every few seconds, and I didn't have a sense of time. Another time, I was fully disassociated from my experience and there were some triangular-shaped visuals. After a while, I started melting through a hole.

I just checked the pictures and it's real. Wikipedia: Monreale Cathedral

From my area, I know people use weed, but one of them I've heard of had an existential crisis saying that he was dying. But the other's, who are relatively healthy, just have some experience that makes them creative or is fun.

I don't think you can care about epistemic responsibility if your cognition is impaired.

And then typical religious people are proudly against psychedelics. Twisted. Even meditation and yoga are a sin if they don't validate Christian beliefs. The retardedness is profound.

Interesting. I didn't know about him until now. The trip was overall violet-colored. Frankly, I love the color violet. I think the entities were sort of preparing me for what was to come: an explosion of absolute love.

Although it wasn't THC, while tripping, at some point there were violet-colored entities that were transmitting love to me by communicating with me. I don't know how, but I was understanding them even though they would sound gibberish at a normal state.

Now, the blog post "Ontological Relativity" is a work of art.

I'm glad you liked it.

The fact that one can visualize stuff, for example, an apple out of nothing, even at a small scale with limited stability, is crazy. I think that that ability is an indication that reality must be capable of visualizing everything however it wants.

It's most likely THC. He's mentioned it a lot. Also, he has mentioned long ago that he would make a new psychedelic, as I remember correctly. Perhaps it's ready. Why does it matter whether it's novel or not? If people want, they can find plenty of different psychedelics.

Great post!

I think we can say treating the content of thoughts as truth during psychosis is primarily a result of the loss of metacognition. In my ordinary life, I can pretend that the contents of my thoughts are true regardless of whether they are true or not, although they don't literally become reality. However, when I was having psychosis, the ability to monitor my thoughts was gone.

I tried to say that reality can't always be limited to human experience, however, it is limited to human experience at the time being, because human experience is actual.

I think if anyone thinks that reality only prefers human experience, they are limiting reality. However, wouldn't it be wrong for you to say that other human experiences are actual if you know that only your human experience has ever been actual?

@Carl-Richard, isn't the human experience actual? I agree that the human experience is limited in the sense that it will end someday and it has a structure. When people say that this experience is all there is, I think they are trying to say that whatever exists is. It would be false to say otherwise. Do you know what they mean by "mind".

@Carl-Richard, if the absolute is beyond death, doesn't that make it the only thing that has ever been, thus making the absolute solipsistic?

That's meant to say that whatever is there is there. To claim that things that aren't there are there would be false. I don't think this is complicated. This post is true if it exists, even if it referred to falsehood. If I didn't post, then to claim that the post exists would be false. Non-existent stuff doesn't exist, so anything that exists does exist.

Terrifying. It happened to me some time ago due to a gastrointestinal infection. Literally, my paranoid thoughts were becoming true! And at that time, it really breaks you when you think that psychosis might be your new normal.