Nemra

@Someone here Go live with muslims if you don't want to leave out anything. Actually, if you do that, you'll break out of your fantasies about religion/spirituality in the first week. As a fantasy, it can be magical, but you can't differentiate that from "reality" right now because you believe you'll be closer to reality than ever. But it's a different thing if you do it to understand it.

@Vrubel Being blinded by nationalism is different than seeing a beautiful sunset. Nationalists love to put nationalism before nature and not after.

He deceives you by screaming here and there to show his "will power".

@Husseinisdoingfine Imagine if you didn't know English. What could have been different? Brainwashing is somewhat necessary at the beginning.

I was sick for a week recently and noticed that I couldn't get aroused by anything. It was freeing moment and saw masturbating as a boring thing to do. This proved me that in which state you're in, you have to be honest to yourself. But, then when I got well, I was rejuvenated and got more deeply aroused. Also, when masturbating, contemplate about the process.

Entertaining, braindead conversation. The host is always on the brink of breaking out of character.

@Rafael Thundercat In this case, I think no one, or at least the ones I'm aware of, can think the way he does. Imagine telling a man to imagine himself as a woman; his little ego won't handle it.

@Yimpa Balance is key. 😁

@MsNobody A section of one of his recent posts. "To understand the consciousness of a woman you'd have to stop being a man and become a woman. And if you actually did that, your understanding of consciousness would grow."

@Yimpa clever ad. It made me want to eat shawarma.

I don't understand why he speaks like he wants to hypnotize with his eyes. The crowd's sudden laughs are funny.

Then you don't know what hell means. 😁

@Salvijus I don't think you understand what I mean.

@Salvijus 1 = b^0 ≡ b^0 = 1

b^m = b^m * b^0, b^m/b^m = b^0, 1 = b^0, You can always multiply a number by 1 because it can't change the values of two sides of the equation. The number 1 is omitted because, when multiplied by some x, the x stays x. You can have an infinite number of x^0 on both sides of the equation, as they result in 1. You can make x^0 as much as complicated.

@Salvijus https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation Read the sections "Zero rule" and "Negative exponents". I understand that you want to find it at 0 without using known operations and thinking of it as meaning nothing.

@Salvijus They didn't define for that case. They defined x^n for n>0, n ∈ N, N - set of natural numbers, at first.

I don't know. I think it'll make sense when you accept all of the contradictions.

It won't make sense when you only focus on how things are written.

The problem is that you want to avoid contradiction by making everything sound logical to you.

For 0, make it logically sound to you, and you'll see the effects. No one is telling you not to do it. Logically unsound things will always pop up.

@zurew 😁 People don't know that hell is waiting for them when they get introduced to what a matrix is and how it works. 🥲

@Salvijus When you approach 0 using the negative numbers, it's -infinity. When you approach 0 using the positive numbers, it's +infinity.

@Salvijus What is the limit of 1/x as x approaches 0? Does that make sense?

No, I literally showed you how to discover it. You are the one who is changing the representation without knowing that it'll affect the operations.