Majed

@Spiral is there a way for me to verify it without having sex, or do i need to have sex to really see the difference ?

@Tudo i mean your experience is subjective, lol in your experience the earth is flat

Alright guys let's start giving examples about sociopaths, narcissists and psychopaths.

yall guys should be posting more examples

@Leo Gura leo how can you get laid more than you already do ? from my limited experience with pick up, i had access to any girl i want basically once i got some skills in it. if you've done thousands of approaches you should be able to fuck any girl you want basically.

@charlie cho does tate really believe what he says ? because he keeps lying all the time, and he keeps contradicting himself.

@Tanz can you share the link ?

i noticed a lot of time we get into personal development and we do a lot of stuff wrong just because of self discipline. like for example you can go on a very restrictive diet that is actually damaging your health but you think you're doing good because you're being hyper disciplined. or you can start doing nofap and repressing your sexuality which is unhealthy, but you think it's good because you're being disciplined. or you can start working 12 hours a day thinking it's good just because you're being disciplined, when in fact it's not. what's the solution to this prejudice of just because we can be disciplined to do something that it is good when in fact it isn't. because on the one hand you don't want to not have discipline at all, but on the other hand you need to be wise about how you apply your discipline. religion has this problem of setting unrealistic standards and expecting to meet them through discipline when in fact most of the time it just doesn't work that way. and also self help: nofap, workaholism... also spirituality like not having sex.

@Danioover9000 i don't think andrew tate and patrick bet david are stage red. i think they're more orange. at the opportunist stage you can't use reason, and at the conformist stage you can't have strong personal opinions on things. so this indicate that if they had this interview they're both at least somewhat at the expert stage. tate is i would say blue/toxic orange. patrick orange

@Leo Gura alright but this means even if we get society towards stage turquoise there will still be psychopaths, narcissists and sociopaths running around since it's genetic. or can we solve this problem with genetic engineering ?

@Leo Gura in third world countries where there's way more criminality and corruption, are people more psychopathic generally speaking ?

noam chomsky on trump

mussolini is a great example

@docs20 here you go

@Danioover9000 thanks for your enthusiasm but i wanted more examples of well known figures like andrew tate, stalin, trump. if you can find more of those it will be great

https://www.sevenoaksschool.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Academic/General_Academic/DOMINIC_WILLIAMS-_A_History_of_Psychopaths.pptx here's a really nice presentation about major historical figures who were psychopaths, we find people like stalin, mao, ivan the terrible, nero...

@Leo Gura what about alex jones and kanye west btw are the people who support andrew tate and trump psychopaths too ?

here are three psychopaths for you : gaddafi, idi amin and stalin.

@Husseinisdoingfine i mean i don't understand what's the point, you don't need to work 100 hours a week to earn a living. 35 or 40 hours is enough

@Leo Gura leo when are you gonna release the episode on how to distinguish good from bad character ? i've been thinking about it a lot and i think that ego development as well as spiral dynamics are a great way to help with that, basically anyone below orange is automatically a bad character, simply because below orange there's no notion of human rights and people tend to be very irrational. also have to take into account the dark tetrad: sadism, narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism. sociopathy as well. also levels of education, wisdom and maturity count. how open minded is the person. also maslow's hierachy of needs can be helpful. is the person only interested in money and sex or is it spiritual, artistic and philosophical.

If we think in terms of genetics, many people, a minority but a significant number of humans, are naturally born spiritual and contemplative. People who have mystical experiences without having done any spiritual practice. I remember my first mystical experiences and heart chakras connections, started without doing spiritual work, just by watching leo’s content. Now maybe let’s say 1 to 5% of the population is like that, are we an oppressed minority since spirituality isn’t taught in our culture as a scientific field, and we’re not taught about it unless we do independent research. Plus when people have spiritual talents they generally tend to not have many opportunities in terms of traditional jobs, and also spiritual people aren’t very effective under the current capitalist system that promotes careers as a means to an end and not the end in itself. A lot of spiritual people might want to not work, just because they’re concerned with other stuff. In a sense society is designed for materialistic people, we have a materialistic normative society. And people with spiritual talents are excluded and not even acknowledged as legitimately different and deserving of special consideration. Consider what i’m saying as for the heterosexuality, homosexuality dichotomy. It’s like materialistic people are analogically the heterosexual people oppressing and not acknowledging the validity of the homosexual minority, in this case spiritual people. Should we have a sort of life orientation guidance, in the sense that the same way we teach sexual orientation, we should teach life orientation whether it’s materialistic or spiritual and create a society where both these categories even though different have equal empathy and place, same way with men and women for example, different but equally deserving of empathy and place in society, and not having the men, patriarchy, oppressing women, misogyny. Maybe we should have a similar name for our materialistic society, same way as patriarchy in the case of the genders, but for the life orientations, something like materialarchy.

@Leo Gura consciousness is fascinating