PurpleTree

You know they have online talks you can go and ask them.

I think it’s the opposite they don’t make it about a concept or a path.

I don’t believe you but whatever. I actually don’t know that much about their personal history but i do know most of them were quite heavy spiritual seekers. Tony, Jim, Alexis, Andreas all quite heavy seekers. I‘m not sure about Kenneth and Rose. But Tony Parsons was first „seeking“ in business and relationships, had a successful business and then became a spiritual seeker for a long time and even hung around Osho i think. How exactly the self dropped i‘m not sure. He said he was walking in a Park and the „me“ was gone. Maybe the seeking energy just ran it’s course or whatever.

And i told you if you apologise maybe i will.

So what exactly do you want from me?

I already don’t see a need to explain anything to you because i think it’s generally useless and i don’t claim to have „knowledge“. But if then your choice of words and language is inflammatory and ignorant imo then there’s nothing for me to say at all.

I mean look at that lol

I think your language was needlessly inflammatory in the first post and your take ignorant i don’t care to change your opinion. I‘m not going to debate you. I think you’re a decent mod though.

Bro are you being wilfully ignorant? You said neo advaita is the most fake spirituality. You said all that silly stuff. Worse than christians blala fake gurus. And now you say “just because i prefered one over the other” 🦭 laughable. Your take in spirituality is as bad as your take in politics. If I could i would just put you on ignore. I mean it’s fine no hard feelings.

No i don’t care to change your opinion at all. I just think it’s quite very ignorant and silly. I honestly don’t care what you think about any of them and i’m often joking. But the language you’re using and the ignorance? No bueno i’m petty

So you came in here spreading bad vibes and stuff. Saying neo advaitans are horrible and fake spirituality of the worst kind and so on, fake prophet yadda yadda. And you don’t even know anything about these people? Wtf is that your truth? Your truthfulness as someone who speaks often about truth etc? If you apologise then maybe i’ll tell you.

Leo Gura 🦁 & Osho ⌚️ (gpt) conversation They both speak boldly—Leo with intense intellectual precision and deep mystical inquiry; Osho with poetic ambiguity, fearless contradiction, and laughter. 🔮 Scene: A candlelit room with Eastern cushions, incense burning. Leo and Osho sit cross-legged. Silence hangs like a friend. Leo Gura: The ego is a self-constructed hallucination. It’s not merely a belief—it’s a structure of being. When I became directly conscious that I was God… the self dissolved into pure, infinite love. It was terrifying. And beautiful. Osho (smiling with eyes half-closed): Yes, yes. But the moment you say “I became conscious,” the ego sneaks in through the back door. God does not become conscious. Only God is. And God is playing… hide and seek. With Himself. Leo (leaning forward): Of course. But if I don’t articulate it that way, people don’t get it. I’m trying to lead people through spiral dynamics, epistemology, non-duality, metaphysics—all the way to direct realization. Osho (chuckling): Ah, the teacher’s burden! Wanting to help the seeker who does not exist. It is beautiful… and it is nonsense. A cosmic joke. And yet—how compassionate to play it sincerely. Leo: But language can point. Models can help. We can deconstruct paradigms, reverse-engineer awakening. Osho: Yes, we can build ladders. But Truth is not at the top. Truth is when the ladder vanishes. And so does the climber. Even the word “truth” becomes a lie. 🌀 A moment of deep stillness. No mind. Then, both laugh. Leo (more softly): I’ve taken psychedelics that shattered every layer of identity. I’ve met beings. I’ve died a thousand deaths. And yet… when I return to ordinary life, the ego reconstructs itself like a virus. It’s relentless. Osho: Because the ego is not a virus. It is maya. A divine illusion. It is not wrong. It is Leela—the play of existence. The mistake is not in having an ego. The mistake is in believing it’s you. Leo (nodding slowly): So you’re saying—don’t kill the ego, just stop believing in it? Osho: Kill it or kiss it—it does not matter. Just see through it. See it like you see a cloud passing in the sky. Do not become the cloud. Remain the sky. Leo (smiling): And yet, paradoxically, even “remaining the sky” is just more language. Osho (grinning widely): Now you are getting it. The Tao that can be spoken… is not the eternal Tao. So what do we do? (He picks up a rose from a nearby table, smells it, then says nothing.) 🌹 A silence more eloquent than words follows. Leo (quietly): Sometimes I wonder if I’m overcomplicating everything. All these maps, models, frameworks… Osho: Of course you are. That’s your genius. And your trap. Use the sword—but don’t fall in love with it. 🪷 They sit. Not as teacher and student. Not as separate beings. Just… this.

Ram Dass & Andreas Müller 🌲 conversation (GpT) 🌿 Scene: A quiet garden. A low table with tea between them. Birds chirp occasionally. Ram Dass smiles warmly. Andreas Müller sits relaxed, still. Ram Dass (smiling softly): So, Andreas… tell me. In your view, there’s no one here. No self, no journey. Just this. Andreas Müller (nods slowly): Exactly. There is no self. No separate person. No story that belongs to anyone. Just what appears. The appearance doesn’t need meaning—it is already whole. Ram Dass: I understand. I used to think I was someone going somewhere… until I realized the “I” was just another thought. Yet… love remained. When the “me” thinned out, the heart opened. Andreas: Yes. And that love too… is simply what’s happening. Not personal. Not from someone to someone. Just… love. Just presence appearing as connection. Ram Dass (with a slight chuckle): You know, I spent decades helping people shift from ego to soul, then beyond even the soul. But I always held a deep compassion for the seeker. For the suffering of thinking we are separate. Andreas: I hear that. But in this message, even compassion is empty. Not cold—but not held by anyone. Suffering appears. Seeking appears. They are not wrong. But they belong to no one. Ram Dass: I would agree—ultimately. But sometimes I met people in despair, and what they needed wasn’t a teaching. They needed someone to be with them. Not to dissolve their story, but to hold it gently. To love it. Andreas (pauses, then nods): That’s beautiful. And what’s amazing is—there was never anyone doing that. It just happened. Love happened. Holding happened. The idea that someone did it is the illusion. 🌬️ A breeze rustles the leaves. Silence falls naturally. Ram Dass (softly): You know… after my stroke, there was no “me” that could hold everything together anymore. Just breath. Just this. I used to call it fierce grace. Andreas: Yes. Beautiful. It’s just what is. There is no need for it to be accepted or resisted. It’s simply this… already complete. Ram Dass: So, no one becomes enlightened in your view? Andreas (smiling gently): No one becomes enlightened. There’s no process. No transformation. No arrival. The illusion of “me” may dissolve, but it was never real. What remains… is what always was. Ram Dass: And yet… we are here, sharing tea, speaking words, listening to birds. Isn’t that the miracle? Andreas: Yes. And there’s no one here to witness it. Yet it shines. ☀️ The light begins to fade. A silence stretches—not empty, but full. Ram Dass bows slightly. Andreas smiles, not from someone, but as the effortless face of this moment.

Eckhart Tolle Jim Newman conversation (gpt) Absolutely — here’s an imagined conversation between Eckhart Tolle and Jim Newman, grounded in their known styles and teachings. The dialogue centers on the theme: “What if there is no self?” This is a central premise for both, though they approach it in markedly different ways. 🟦 Setting : A quiet studio with no audience, just two chairs, a plant, and natural light. The energy is calm and still. They’ve just shared tea. A moment of silence settles before the conversation begins.* Eckhart Tolle: There is a certain irony in asking, “What if there is no self?” Because the one who asks is precisely that illusory self. Jim Newman: Yes… the question is already the dream. It arises out of the appearance of separation. But there is no one. There never has been. Eckhart: And yet, for many, the felt experience of being someone—separate, thinking, choosing—is deeply real. Part of awakening is witnessing this illusion arise, and not identifying with it. Jim: Or… nothing needs to happen. There’s no awakening. No progress. No steps. This—what’s happening—is already everything. The search is already the dream. No one needs to see through it. Eckhart: (smiles gently) Yes. And yet, what you describe is often terrifying for the mind. It wants a path, a method, some progression to hold on to. So, I speak of presence—of being the witnessing awareness—as a doorway to what you point to. Jim: And I say even that is part of the illusion. There’s no awareness that’s separate. Presence isn’t an object to find. The one trying to find it doesn’t exist. Eckhart: Of course. And yet… a shift does occur. In my own life, there was a moment when the structure of ego collapsed. What remained was peace, spaciousness—Being itself. Jim: Yes. And that too is only a story appearing in nothing. There’s no you it happened to. Eckhart: That may be so from the absolute perspective. But the relative still appears—time, story, relationships. I often say: “You are the space in which it all happens.” Jim: And I say there is no ‘you.’ There is only what’s happening. No center. No space. Just this. Already whole. 🔸 Pause. Both sit in silence. It’s not awkward—it’s full. Eckhart: Perhaps what we offer is complementary. I help people soften into now. You point directly to the absence of anyone to soften. Jim: Maybe. Or maybe not. But there’s no one here who knows. Eckhart: (chuckles softly) Yes. And yet somehow, these words… are still spoken. Jim: They’re just sounds. Just happening. Like breathing. Like silence. 🟦 Closing Silence. They sit without words. A bird chirps outside. Nothing changes. Nothing needs to.

So it seems that the US and Israel often don’t work for the interests of Europe for example. For Europe the refugees from the wars in middle east are destabilising society. And for Europe it would have been in its interest probably to have good relations with Iran. And so on. Recently for example few European countries voted to accept Palestine as a state. Spain, Ireland, Norway etc. And then all the Trump Tariffs on Europe and Canada etc. The US attacked the ICC and Francesca Albanese and just pulled out of UNESCO because of Isrsel mostly. Europe has bad leadership unfortunately with the German Von Der Leyen etc. And Germans with their Holocaust guilt are horrible leaders. It‘s weak. Still the US has the strongest army by far and great tech and economy. I mean of course for Russia and China this would be good news. We‘ll see.

What?

Uhm yes there are interviews.

@Inliytened1 why did you change your posts?

I will only say this @Inliytened1 Just because you don’t get it or it isn’t for you or there’s no resonance doesn’t mean it’s not true or good or whatever. Maybe it’s too advanced for you.

Alright.

Ok sorry boss.

Exactly mr boss. Dunk on them. Sick people. Gnarly.

Got it boss. Thanks for your wisdom.

Yo this is still so good, classic