Loveeee

Does anyone understand anything I said

@Leo Gura don't you agree ?

2:09:05 Leo explained here and many other times that Love is THE answer, the facet of all facets, so what's up with that blog post

I mean I see at least 3 valid perspectives 1 : The Absolute doesn't change and in that way reality couldn't be different 2 : This is the most intuitive way for reality to be (maximizing Love) 3 : Absolute Necessity

Yes the answer is beyond words and thought, here's how "Reality could be different" is just a thought, an idea in your mind, the concept of "possibility " What are "possibilities" really ? Are they just flying around ? No ! There is none Absolute Necessity

For example your shirt being blue instead of red

https://www.actualized.org/insights/actualized-quotes-108 I'll take that as an answer

All of them, kinda Last time I died, instead of snapping out of it like "that's it I died", I died more Like breaking through my breakthrough, like what I thought was a plane was actually a volume, a new dimension, it's ridiculous All this time I've only been scratching the surface, out of fear and ignorance, and design of course So yeah I've at least knocked at the door of every of these facets but there's so much more, even more facets I'm sure Breadth and depth

People say you can still choke on bile or whatever remains ? Also their argument is that you can stop breathing or trash around while being effectively unconscious of this reality ? Surely you know what you're talking about but it seems like there's a consensus that one shouldn't trip alone ? How common is it ?

You did 5meo ? What about vomit choke

What about breath stop and choking on your vomit ?

https://www.actualized.org/insights/leos-chess-games-04 @Leo Gura what's your elo, in what mode and what chess site ? Also can we know your pseudo ?

One of the most famous "fake artist" experiments is the case of Pierre Brassau, a chimpanzee whose paintings were exhibited and praised by art critics in 1964. This experiment became legendary for exposing biases in the art world. Here's the full story: The Pierre Brassau Experiment 1. Background In 1964, Swedish journalist Åke "Dacke" Axelsson decided to test the art world’s credibility and perception. He devised an elaborate hoax by presenting paintings created by a chimpanzee as the work of an avant-garde French artist. 2. Execution Axelsson worked with Peter, a chimpanzee living in a Swedish zoo, who was given brushes and paint. The chimp produced several abstract paintings with bold strokes and a unique style, which Axelsson carefully selected and framed. Axelsson created the fictional identity of “Pierre Brassau,” describing him as a French artist with a bold, experimental style. 3. Exhibition The paintings were displayed at an art gallery in Gothenburg, Sweden. They were marketed as works of a revolutionary artist breaking new ground in abstract expressionism. 4. Critical Reception Many critics praised the paintings. For example: One critic famously said, “Pierre Brassau paints with powerful strokes, but also with clear determination. His brushstrokes twist with a furious fastidiousness. Pierre is an artist who performs with the delicacy of a ballet dancer.” Only one critic doubted the work, describing it as “the kind of thing you’d expect from a monkey.” 5. Revelation When Axelsson revealed the truth—that Pierre Brassau was, in fact, a chimpanzee—the story caused a sensation. Critics and the public were embarrassed, but the experiment highlighted how much of art criticism is subjective and influenced by external narratives. Legacy and Impact Challenges to the Art World: The experiment exposed how critics and collectors could be influenced by presentation, language, and preconceptions. Pierre Brassau's Enduring Fame: Despite the revelation, one of Peter’s paintings was sold to a collector for a substantial sum at the time. Pierre Brassau became a symbol of how easily artistic value can be manipulated. Ongoing Relevance: The Pierre Brassau story is still referenced in debates about modern art, abstraction, and the subjectivity of art appreciation. Conclusion The Pierre Brassau experiment remains one of the most famous and effective "fake artist" experiments. It revealed how much of the art world relies on perception, context, and storytelling, rather than intrinsic artistic quality.

Every "orb" footage turns out to be planes .. Not saying there are none

You know you're hitting the simulation's computational limit when Leo gives you a generic NPC answer to evade your question Gun to your head, sum up reality in one word Leo

"The definitive answer for what reality is, there's only one word for it, and the word is love." "Reality is imaginary. That's the ultimate understanding." Translation "If I had to sum up reality in one word, it would be Love" "If I had to sum up reality in one word, it would be Imagination"

In the video I linked at 2:09:05 you say "the definitive answer for what reality is, there's only one word for it, and the word is love" So you no longer agree with that ? If not how would you rectify that statement ? If yes that is contradicting your blog post

So love is just another facet ? Are all facets created equal ?

You taught that the ultimate understanding is that reality is love, not that reality is imaginary, you're the one who made that distinction even though yes both are just facets and ultimately undistinguishable

I guess at some point the ego dissolves which means no resistance so no suffering but on the contrary infinite love

December 2023, Langley Air Force Base, incursions for 17 consecutive nights. According to Mark Kelly, commander at the base, up to “roughly 20 feet long and flying at more than 100 miles an hour, at an altitude of roughly 3,000 to 4,000 feet." Then throughout the year, "2 or 3 incursions a week across the U.S, senior defense official told a small group of reporters at the Pentagon." https://www.airandspaceforces.com/drone-swarms-new-threat-us-bases/ November 2024, 4 bases in the UK December 2024, 1 base in Germany, and many more bases in the US They don't know what these "drones" are, where they come from, where they go. They don't make sense when asked about it like here or here

Just heard men vote Trump more than women which reminds me of this question I ask myself sometimes

@Leo Gura Here's where you say that men are autistic versions of women, that women tend to be more intuitive than men and tap more easily into ESP (52:55)

That's my feeling as well

Here you talk about left brains at 38:30