K Ghoul

I don’t see any feminine sides open in there, do you?

Lol and at 2:47 he’s an amphibian man

(put him in stage Red because there was no stage Stupid)

new Russians aka «новые русские»

I wasn’t able to locate Sv3rige’s flat earth videos but looks like I wasn’t the only one who found his super sheep presentation spectacular- someone saved Sv3rige old content and we now have this:

Satanic pedophiles

@Roy No. But I’ll willingly drop the man who thinks that I will be working with him as an equal partner AND will be giving birth to his children. Unless, of course, we can negotiate the deal that he is giving birth to our second child, for a example.

@diamondpenguin will hurry up and get it to you real soon. In the meantime, while you’re waiting, start practicing the art of expressing your position without putting words in other people’s mouths.

@Husseinisdoingfine The fabulous Hitler, of course

@Carl-Richard Righteous

@Carl-Richard Please try staying within the subject of this argument and not take things out of context - this isn’t about whether ritualistic torture is righteous or not, the argument is about whether the fact that he engaged in that activity was the right thing to do, or not.

@Carl-Richard would have gone for 18 if the lawyer didn’t work out the deal to instead increase to amount he’d have to pay the victim, so they severity is equivalent to 18 months. I must have missed the entire point. I thought the argument was about righteousness, not glorification.

@Carl-Richard I’ll add this: Gaahl could have just thrown that guy in jail for trespassing with harassment, case closed. He instead chose to turn that situation into an experience that could potentially influence that person and help him become a better human being. So he extended himself and did that, and all he gets is him being portrayed as some immoral, violence glorifying villain? This is so outrageous. What a disgrace this world has become.

@Carl-Richard And not upholding your own values/principles is committing violence/crime against oneself, the lesser of two evils principles comes to mind. And given that he was never the initiator, he literally did nothing wrong.

@Carl-Richard Gaahl abhors violence. It was unfortunate that he had to resort to such measures but some people are being so misguided that someone has to throw a hammer in their face, so to speak, in order to wake them up out of their unconscious ways of being.

@John Doe I looked up stage Orange, "Personal freedom, self-reliance, independence" definitely applies to him. @Carl-Richard What are you showing me this link for I know about Gaahl probably more than I know about myself. He is fair and just - that poor soul that trespassed on his property should just have had more respect for other people and not violate their privacy. Gaahl was just feeling generous and taught him a vital lesson on humbleness and decency, I don't see a problem in there other than that uninvited guest being ungrateful and not appreciating the lesson that was bestowed upon him.

@John Doe Was about to complain about what Gorgoroth video doing in the stage red thread then noticed it’s Hoest on vocals, not Gaahl.

@Gesundheit No, no win yet We first need to define what changes we are talking about - if someone is having massive paradigm shifts that change their whole set of values 180, one day he's a buddhist sitting somewhere meditating next day he's Charles Manson and it goes back and forth, then that's one thing, and I'm pretty sure I'd notice that someone is a freak while I was still dating them. On the other hand, If you are on the path of refining yourself and gradually becoming the best version of yourself, then that's something completely different, and it's a great thing (the right woman will only inspire you more through her trust, love and support).

@Gesundheit And honestly I can’t say I fully believe that people can just change, 180, just like that out of nowhere. People generally don’t change, it’s not that easy. At least not in my experience, haven’t encounter anyone who would just change 180, just like that. I feel like you’re just saying things for the sake of winning the argument.

@Gesundheit Then he will no longer be married to me. Simple as that.

@Gesundheit “The reality is that you can never guarantee that your husband will turn out to be a good person.” - yes you can. This is called dating, and is the time that a woman should spend on figuring out who he is, and not sleeping with him. If she pays attention she will know exactly who she’s marrying, so there will be no surprises. If he proved himself as not a good person, then she should not marry him. Simple

@Jacob Morres I don't know what stage orange (or red) you're referring to, I'm not familiar with these stages classifications, what colors they have, etc. all I know is what you described (and what most modern relationships are) is some form of symbiosis founded entirely on exploitation of one another. If a test needs to be performed to see if someone meets your sexual needs it simply means that you are looking for someone whose primary role will be to satisfy you sexually. It's that simple. Given that men are initially looking for just sex when they start dating a woman, it falls onto a woman to set the dynamic of how their relationship will develop. If she doesn't start test-driving him and doesn't allow him test-driving her, I have a suspicion that such a relationship will have a chance to mature and evolve into something more than just fucking each other.

@Roy "If most everyone in this day and age got married as virgins the divorce rate would be near 100%." The divorce is staggering right now already, somewhere around 80% I think of marriages end in divorces, so this test-driving is clearly not helping with the issue of marriages failing. And yes, if virgins built their relationships the same way we currently do and didn't even have the sex part figured out before they got married then yes, that would definitely be a 100% fail (at least when people test-drive themselves they have SEX, something to stand on in their otherwise non-working completely non-functional relationships) This is a very interesting topic. I'll go in depth into it some time

@Roy says "Gotta test drive the car before you buy it.", and you conclude that I am the one who thinks women are cars?