The0Self

It’s the same with game. The problem is, without a working system, you won’t be able to play the whole game, you’ll keep failing on the first level. To at least make sure you’re playing on the second level from the start, you only need to keep 4 things in mind until they’re second nature, on the open: 1. Square up; feet facing her 2. Loud enough 3. Strong eye contact 4. Commanding vocal tonality (downward inflection) And eventually you’ll want to do the same with these 4, again, preferably starting on the open or just after: - Be physical - Realize that what you say does not matter — assume you already got the girl; don’t calibrate before anything you do or say (only calibrate after) - Deal with friends in the group as needed by simply being normal and introducing yourself, then go back to your girl - Use dominant body language If you just go in haphazardly without solidifying at least those first 4 into your psyche, you will continue to fail the first level and won’t get any practice with level 2+.

Game is more of an insight + calibration thing, rather than a “just do 1000 approaches” thing. Doing the latter may work but it is also likely to create bad habits that you have to unlearn. It shouldn’t take even 50 approaches before you get results… Just because many had to do that (or many times that) doesn’t mean they did it the most efficient way. Just plug and play with a system developed by an expert that has loads of clients with tons of proof of their own success (in accumulating lays with hot women, in this case), just like anything else… it’s that simple. Now go find who that is — but that’s easier said than done, and you have to navigate the effects of financial incentives in that space with a heart of stone, but it’s worth it. Follow the evidence where it leads and don’t get roped into thinking something is the holy grail. If a coach that you like seems to have a very unattractive gf, don’t cope and delude yourself into thinking “she must just have a great personality” — the dude simply doesn’t know game as well as he claims, so mourn the loss of that guru, and keep searching. Rest assured, if a dating coach could have a hot gf, he would have one — their ego would not be able to resist using that ability (for myriad reasons, including even product sales, and especially minimal cognitive dissonance), so if they don’t have one, obviously…move on.

^^^ Yep. And when you’re awkward around girls and get rejected, just realize it’s part of the process. Don’t let it get you down. I think some guys think that getting down on yourself as a result of rejections also has to be part of the process, but I strongly disagree. Realize that rejection will happen even when you’re advanced. Even when your game is 100% advanced, you can very roughly expect to successfully open half the girls you approach, get a number from half of those you opened, and fully close with 10% of the girls you get numbers from. So that’s an approach-to-close rate of 0.5*0.5*0.1 = 0.025, 2.5%, or 1 in 40. Get used to it. That’s from cold approach though. Social circle can be much, much higher. But I’d recommend gaining skill with cold approach (day and especially night) and also online (keep the profile bio relatively mysterious and simple and focus on very good pics with graffiti backgrounds etc).

This simply means you hit the very high threshold muscle fibers that only fire upon maximal effort. It actually isn’t necessary to push that hard, but it can and should be done from time to time, and eventually when very trained, your body won’t react that way nearly as easily.

^^^ ? !!

Get physical very soon. Be congruent -- if you want to be more than friends, do things that indicate that. Just do it, while assuming everything will go well. It gets easier over time. If she reacts negatively, first of all that may be token resistance anyway, just play it off as no big deal (you can even playfully say "why you being weird?" -- that works really well), vibe more, and try again later. Never calibrate before the fact, only after. Always assume that what you're doing is attractive. Perhaps most importantly, do not be too serious (or tight/rigid).

Yep. That automatically puts all the sub-communication (the most important part) in the optimal place.

Very likely can, but almost certainly not to anywhere near the same degree that would come from actually overloading the muscle with new fitness capabilities to the point of fatigue... And probably just a bit of strength due to increased motor efficiency, not the huge amount of strength that comes with increased muscle size.

Extremely bad brain fog with the trip. No good especially when ketamine is available.

Oh no I misread what you said. Thought you were literally saying you were on a stimulant. I wasn’t assuming you were on them, I thought you said you were on them, and so I politely responded something along the lines of like “yeah I can tell ” basically ? But I get what you meant now. Oftentimes when people online say they’re “writing books” and then they refer to their post as “this adderall (or whatever stimulant) post” it’s clear they mean “adderal/stim-fueled” but here the subject was literally armodafinil. My bad… ?

No. But y’all, seriously… It’s one thing to ask this in person, but assuming you’re on this site, you also have an internet connection and access to google / search engines / research. Jeez, guys… Google: “ncbi semen retention testosterone”

To start with, always assume the interaction will go well, is going well, and will continue to go well.

They don’t have scruples. They have emotions. But hugely decreased capacity for some, especially compassion and shame.

You have to kind of believe that she’d be crazy not to want to do exactly what you want. Moreover… Quickest way to get the correct vibe is perhaps to take this song to heart… ?

LSD is naturally quite a bit on the less visual side and more on the expansive side. Mushrooms are extremely visual given a matched trio intensity level, relative to LSD, which resembles “long-lasting ultra-mild 5-MeO-DMT with less expansion and more visual effect,” as a standard. Which is why LSD is so good for god realization — low fluff, kind of like 5meo.

Looks good. Good plan! ? Yeah the kind of decreases you’re talking about, if done for just a short period, are perfectly fine; insignificant, even. In all actuality, 3 hours is even cutting it a little close with ALA, so 2 hours during the day is definitely more optimal. Try not to exceed 3 hours at night though. If you wanted to be a bit haphazard with it for convenience purposes, the most reckless I would ever consider doing it is as follows: x mg every 2h during the entire day, except for 1 dose — the dose right before sleep — where one can take a double dose and then set the alarm to wake up in 4 hours to take the usual x mg and then set the alarm for 3.5 hours, for a total of 7.5 hours bed rest (I’d only do this if, for instance, 7.5 hours bed rest was an absolutely critical need; try to get away with less while on round, but only if you can) — and the pre-bed dose can be 3h after the previous one since it’ll be a double dose. Though it is highly recommended that you don’t do that. It is best to take ALA every 3 hours or more often. It’s just really hard to do that if your rounds are several weeks long. But for a 96 hour round? Yeah take it every 1.5-3 hours around the clock. I would not recommend 72 hour rounds as that’s the bare minimum but if you’re dosing every 2 hours for a 72h round, it’ll probably be just about as good as a 96h round. The only reason that is even remotely feasible is that the chelation load doesn’t increase linearly with dose. 50% increase in dose = 18% faster mercury excretion (chelation load). So the inverse is true with decreasing doses, and therefore, it is greatly more important to just make sure you have at least something in your system (though it would not be optimal to only think about that, just catastrophe-avoiding), never taking a break too much longer than the half life. You might think the half life is 3 hours right? It’s actually as little as 30 minutes (for a very significant portion of the metabolites). So it would be best if you took it every 30min, but as described in this paragraph, the main thing is that you don’t let it get anywhere near zero… which hopefully you can see is actually something you do need to worry about, considering a significant portion of its metabolites have an effective half life of only 30min, not anywhere near 3 hours. Its half life is actually similar to small doses of alcohol, for reference.

No Unless you have to

Yeah that definitely seems to happen. Becomes more God; solipsistic; consciousness-expanding. Apparently Leo never even went through the “visual phase,” iirc from my time here on the forum. For me over the years it was sort of like visuals -> insights -> past life experiences -> infinity / God / solipsism.

@nuwu Tapering UP at the beginning of the round, to get to a dose you can handle, is perfectly fine. Rising blood levels are fine. It's falling levels that cause damage. The last thing you quoted is too hard to explain. All you need to know is this: if using ALA+DMPS or ALA+DMSA, NEVER stop the DMPS or DMSA first. Stop either both at once, or the ALA first. ALA being elevated while one of the other 2 is dropping will result in accumulation of mercury INTO the brain.

Same. The subtle distinctions between them are still there, but they can all take me to infinite interconnection with a high enough dose -- all the classics/staples, anyway. And the "visual effects" of each have all but completely subsided. About 5-6 years ago, they all started to become "increasingly 5-MeO-DMT-like," until they maxed-out about 4-5 years ago... No "visuals" anymore.

@Egodeathrow Yeah it’s clear you’re on a stimulant ? My recommendation is to meditate for 10 minutes, and then go figure out what you should get done, so you don’t waste too much time ?

@Egodeathrow For the record, by LSD, I would only recommend LSD-25. WAY more insightful than 1P-LSD or AL-LAD or any other lysergamide that I've tried. idk why but it just has something the others don't

@BipolarGrowth Yeah, for instance (while I wouldn't claim it) I would not be surprised if Rob Burbea was "more advanced" than anyone who has used 5-MeO, but only in the specific way that he was advanced. And there are many like him that never even really used Buddhism (Angelo Dilullo MD comes to mind). If he never used 5-MeO, it's possible he was missing something, but perhaps only "missing" it as a peak experience, not as an abiding insight. Because, for a human... pretty sure he basically went "all the way." Not that there's necessarily an absolute end point that is arrived at by someone. The thing is, on some psychedelics (like 5-MeO-DMT), it's quite clear that you can temporarily transcend the human (and everything discernibly beyond) entirely... On the other hand, it's not like you're not doing the same thing (in its own way) with, for instance, the 8th jhana; that's quite obviously beyond-human as well. In the end this is all just words though. The more advanced one gets, the more it's obvious we can't really talk about the highest insights, if they even are "insights" at that point, lol. Looking great btw!

I like them. Wouldn't say they're in my top 5, but it's close. I like pretty much all fruits about the same. Except mangoes, which to me, when fresh, taste better than basically any food I've ever tasted. Some can be problematic for people though, health and allergen wise. I think the most common offenders, off the top of my head are: Peaches Bananas Mangoes Anything with seeds that can't be removed or bred-out (strawberries, idk about any others) (edit: oh yeah I guess kiwi, which I actually forgot to put in my top 5; they're probably my second favorite after mangoes)