@Leo Gura
Thankyou so much for your latest video.
I have a quick question about something you mentioned and a paradox that I myself have been struggling with.
Within the context of the analogy of the vase and our perfect omniscient infinite singularity being at the center of a field, with the non-omniscient aspects being around the periphery.... does this imply that in all aspects (both omniscient and non-omniscient) we are subject to some degree of geo-spatiality? I'm familiar with the concept of Dimension Zero as a good way to reference non-duality, but how would that fit into a dimensional model with a center and a periphery? Or is this just a limitation of the analogy?
Another thing I've struggled with is a similar paradox of the omniscient infinite God seemingly existing under the authority of a time dimension. For example, we know that infinite consciousness is timeless consciousness, yet the process of moving between the various states of non-omniscience up into the unified non-dualistic state would imply a certain animation.
Assuming God cycles between omniscience and non-omniscience as a kinda of eternal game, how does God do this without being under the authority of some kind of higher time dimension? (i.e Does God get bored of infinity and occasionally go on vacation into duality? If so, how long does it take for God to get bored?)
Aside that I've recently joined the forum and am really enjoying it.
Thanks.