IAmReallyImportant

I only realize if I was wrong at a point. Matter of perspective If I was a fool, I would feel great about it, because I feel great.

Exactly. To execute that and be successful would be a smart move. Because then you have to consider more details and come up with strategies that require real brain power. If a model or system has a part that doesn't fit, it's useless and just talk.

It's all quite nice what he does and he certainly contributes something to humanity. Certainly better than opening a fast food restaurant chain. A lot of people are probably smart, that doesn't mean much. When judging people, I want to stay neutral anyway, because personally that always seems presumptuous to me. Whether "positive" or "negative." The way he argues and thinks does not look extraordinary to me. Sometimes simple facts are unnecessarily inflated so that they sound smarter than they actually are. These are all nice concepts, but is it smart to talk a lot and not really get anything done? I mean significantly, so that's what this is apparently supposed to look like. So how are you supposed to know it's going to work at all? Some of the arguments struck me as poorly reasoned and contradictory.

You can only tell if someone is smart by what emotional/feeling state that person is in at any given moment. Not by how or what someone talks about. You cannot see whether someone is intelligent by the state that person is in, nor by how or what someone talks about.

#wageslavery I think there is no difference what you want to study. If one follows the standard path results will be standard and one will work with average people. At least in Germany high school degrees are thrown after. It's very easy to get an A and be accepted to a medical University. Unless you are at top 1-3 universities world wide. That's why it is even more necessary to think out of the box. The dumbest thing I ever did is getting a university master's degree. The work is not that attractive as it looks like. Because of the mindset of people working there, the culture etc. . It's not recommended for people with bigger dreams than just a family, dog, house and an annoying neighbour.

I think its a stream you can download using the chrome console and vlc player or other tools. Just take a look into the network tab of the chrome console.

I believe your intentions are good and appreciate it. However, were you present in WWII? I don't think just taking psychedelics in a controlled environment makes someone tough. There weren't just some standards met, that's why it was boring. It is the same as you would say "fuck every random girl out there so you have something to fuck. Because in the stone age, girls had also bad breath and deformed heads." If something is not well written, there can also be better materials so one has not to unnecessary struggle with it.

What's the purpose of responding that way? Why is this mature and does this really come from a place of love or humility? It's strange how you treat the audience which helps you make a living. In addition, you want the forum to be more qualitative, but others have to pay the price for it. Like we are your employees.

I would forget her, because it doesn't matter. Females often overreact, because they actually interpret more into interactions than there actually is. Key is to learn to be more sensitive of how things could be interpreted.

Nobody is adult. I worked with narcissists and people who had relationship problems with them. The reason why people spend much time on understanding socially toxic pathologies or disorders like narcism or sociopathy is less of pure intellectual reasons but more because they try to protect themselves. From themselves. Actually, they can't handle the relationship emotionally, because they think the behaviour of a socially non-coherent person has something to do with themselves. The truth is this is just an emotional pattern they are not familiar with. An ego is a conceptualization, as well as an 'super ego' or other connotation. In reality, an ego is an ego. Like most people have unconcioussly. The interesting thing on this whole discussion is: People who blame narcist for being the problem obviously project their emotions on the narcists while narcisists do the same thing. Now who is right? Who is better? Nobody. Everybody is responsible for their emotions and decisions. Giving someone the responsibility of the problem other then oneself does not solve anything. By the way: Teal Swan was analyzed by many pathologists and the majority of them says that she is probably narcisistic. Example And that's ok. I like her teachings as well.

At this IQ level the score gets very uncertain.

Because you are insecure in your behaviour. You feel ashamed, I understand. But you don't have to. You are the only one who feels it. Your thoughts are just expressions of the shame you were conditioned towards. Feel how great it is to be ashamed and let the thoughts go. One solution would be to become more quick-witted. Also put yourself in socially uncomfortable situations and act extra awkward. Train to let it go and to forget it. Start with weird anonymous calls. Ask if they can put gumball on the pizza or something.

I suppose you mean my life story born out of inspiration. Didn't had such an experience. However inspiration feels more true than other stuff. For me Inspiration is like a carrot in front of the donkey. You will not get it but it drives you. Sometimes I think you don't have any control. Life could be brutally force you to be in situations no matter how inspired one is or how engaged the person is. This is what I have learned so far. Sometimes it is nearly impossible for people to see the truth because they have much baggage, pressure, problems.

Use deep fakes and warp Leo with Taylor Swift. I can do this for you for a predefined donation amount.

If no thing need change at all, why does everything change all the time and nothing is permanent?

Look up Wikipedia Definition for incels.

So you are like 26? x D What I also often observe is if an age gap is too high a certain kind of parent-child relationship is evolving inside the actual relationship. This seems unhealthy to me because it looks like a compensation strategy in my pov.

There seems to be truth in it. I think people would get more conciouss about possible dynamics if someone who is well educated in this regard would make a video about it ;-) I don't like this weird relationships which seem toxic to me and I somehow get angry if I see this. Its strongly selfish of course.

I agree. Somehow I feel that if someone tells you about stuff like god and infinite goodness, it is asked to just believe stuff. And if you tell them they shouldn't just believe something, this doesn't change much. Because they have to trust you in the first place. I mean Leo's teachings seem to be consistent, carefully thought about and I am also sure that he has experienced the stuff as well, even if I cannot know it. It is told that you have to experience it by yourself. However, because of the prolog many people could now be biased and are maybe less prown to see the experiences from a more neutral perspective afterwards, before enlightenment. No hate, I think what he does is great. I watch the videos over years now, but currently I just became more sceptical, because I was tricked by another spiritual teacher who was fake as I found out by myself. And my concern is not about fakness, but more about the developmental stage and amount of ego. So I can verify who is the best I can follow or listen to. However, currently it's hard to decide for me as actualized.org resonates the most, but some parts of the teachings seem questionable to me.

I have to contemplate more about this. Maybe this is crap what I was thinking about.

@Leo Gura Thank you for your answer :-) Well, when I think about it, this seems to be conclusive. The only objection I have is: If a teaching is more indirect, isn't it also more conscious? For example, pointing to something with riddles or quests, rather than using terminology for the thing being pointed to. Because using terminology might leave room for fantasies. So it seems to me that the highest teachings are the most indirect.

@Leo Gura Can an ego recognize Love or just recognize an idea of Love? If Love is recognized isn't it the case that the ego is already dead? Can selfishness lead to selflessness? If you sell someone an idea of something instead of the actual thing, isn't that a lie and therefore not true? However, as you said Truth equals Love. Perhaps this is the reason why many enlightenment gurus do not teach Love.

This guy is fake. He took less Ritalin that's where his experience is coming from.