4201

Yes, there's an ego which wants to get better and is worried when their teacher, which has helped it a lot in the past years, starts showing obvious signs of unawareness and unhappiness. But should we just use the awareness of that story to stay blind to the content of this post? There's definitely a problem. Without doubt, complaining about it here is probably a worse solution that distancing ourselves from the teacher and finding more sources of information, new teachers and practicing ourselves. Yet it is painful to think of Leo in his current state, especially when it's Leo who taught me to avoid the traps he seems, from my limited judgemental point of view, to be falling into.

I've been pretty liberal with the bounds for the inputs/outputs of the neural network (traditionally always between 0 and 1 rather than any number on the real line) but I'm sure this can be easily fixed with some sigmoid and anti-sigmoid functions. Otherwise I'm using the simplest form of neural networks, of which you can learn about here: This doesn't prove anything about god's infinite intelligence, but it proves that you and the universe is equivalent to a neural network of infinite size, but you could also be equivalent to a neural network of some size, as well as the entirety of the universe. I like doing this little thing though, although it doesn't really prove much in practice it was interesting. Also I need to figure out what to do with time. Not sure what time would be, some extra parameter? One more output of the universe/input of the mind? I don't know.

Thanks, will keep at it!

Sure, I like you answer and I think it has a healthy, positive change oriented mindself toward growth and self actualization. However, it doesn't define what time is exactly. (as a mental construct). Sure time is a construction of God but then if you were God how would you invent time.

I don't think I need to. From the perspective of the mind, Reality is just some function, of possibly infinite complexity that maps your output neurons to your inputs by physical phenomenons of any sort. This function is equal to some neural network if the assumption is true. Perhaps that my assumption would prove your statement and perhaps the assumption is totally false. I have a "feel" that the assumption is not too crazy though. @Leo Gura That's what I did except my mind didn't want anything to do with looking at Truth. It kept looking away until it found a good enough distraction to get me to look away for good. This distraction was this proof. It's kind of frustrating though. I live my entire life pretending I'm all about awareness and Truth, yet when it comes to look at it I just voluntarily look away.