remember

reminds me of the symbol of the karmik wheele, like the symbol of tibetan book of dead. could be a sign that you are hung up in some kind of karmik pattern that repeats itself, what creates a distortion/fragmentation of time may be past lives or present life. either you are trapped without noticing what entraps you or it`s a sign that tells you: there will be a breakthrough soon, some kind of wakeup experience. btw your body/soul/mind might also tell you that you need to work on a breakthrough. the notion of life might give you a hint where it might be going. it might be a warning and at the same time a calling.

you don`t make sense that`s why you don`t understand it - if you don`t try to understand you can`t solve the riddle.

there are always alternatives, but i guess it`s ok to put a copyright on open source information at least somehow it has to be protected to not fall into the wrong hands.© https://creativecommons.org/

this is how twisted words can get. the same as calling something lawful stealing, or legalizing crimes. there is really something like proportionality in every system that if out of balance speaks of an ill system. proportionalities are not only of importance when people walk through a door but also in sense of calling a country wealthy when it isn`t even able to maintain wealth for a huge part of society. it`s generally funny how neo-liberalism seems to rather be neo-colonialism and neo-imperialism the last neo in these directions was neo-naziism - how funny that these words fit so perfectly to your picture of neo-marxism. but generally speaking even hitler wouldn`t have made it without taxes at least not far. don`t even know if this even is orange as it`s so beige.

@Zweistein the angel would probably say: what do we need dollars for as long as there is water! quak

@Emerald they say a rose is a rose, but not one is like another.

@kieranperez sometimes sources are interesting as a reference for writers because they where the first to ever write or formulate insights/ideas/concepts through observation so it could become a part/starting point of a certain kowledge body. as these new approaches towards world perception mark a certain twist in the development of mankind. if authors reference certain other authors to reference the foundation they built their reflections/theories upon, sometimes they use the first ever source as they either are not deep in the matter of crossreferencing of different authors on the same phenomenon, or they try to state that their reflections are independent from further historical developments and in that sense pure and close to the source of the thought. of course it`s interesting to know where someone is coming from historically in some sense, and a lot of scientiffical struggles are about who said what first, in that they are not very different than designers. in the end it`s a bigger achievement to be the first than to get it more accurate as it stimulates the wow effect in a historical setting. but in sense of comparing the different approches to a certain terminological concept it`s very interesting to read about the small differences in the concepts to understand their mechanical/dynamical structure sensing into the different perspectives to understand fast what approach someone has to the world, without maybe even knowing themselves what approch they have. i`m not a person who does that, but i know people who are pretty good in that and who love to get hung up on these little differences sometimes, as exactly the point of how we percive the world sometimes makes the difference in how we interact with the world. if you don`t want to discuss these on a referencial level, don`t get too hung up on the reference, get into the concept and perception of it, for your own metaphysics, that`s much more important. but if you want to diskuss these topics with people who are in it very deeply they will always mention names, as if the name was the concept, as if everyone would have read it. compare the differences and similarities - that`s making it easier - in the end they all talk about the same, with some marginal differences that might not be marginal at all. also for words like reason - it`s in a sense important to find out in what context reason might have been used during that time. you can compare it to what reason is defined as today. also maybe you are lucky and if you read kant you can find out what he meant with the word, how he defined it.

@tsuki no not funny it`s a mystery, a quest. the card you nurish the card you gain, but there is more than one card in the deck and you never know which one is hidden. and which one is yours to play. sometimes the cards play you much more than you could say you play the cards.

tarot is a gateway to purple, blue uses purple for alignment structure higher metaphysics, while purple focuses on little dayly battles. purple can undermine or enrich blue by swimming in the water blue disconnected itself from through dogmatism.

does someone know if it`s possible to cicle bikes on the moon?

yes we are talking about the proportion of values.

it looks like it grew out of nowhere. but i don`t see dollar notes, i see trees.

well yeah, wealth can not be created - only value can. wealth sometimes creates terrible value.

we are still talking about taxing aren`t we? not taking taxes is also money distribution. if someone distributes money by letting people work at least the distribution should be fair, don`t you think? everything else reminds me a little bit of slavery. let`s stay proportional.

universally speaking yes exactly that was what i was refering to. there are unemployed people who basically sit on a huge amount of money, sometimes even more than a whole country owns. the more democratic per capita the better. even though i`m not saying that it`s unfair if people own money in general i`m talking about the proportionality.

there is a difference between redistributing money to the democratic community or distributing all money to oneself.

or the one who`s growing a mustache?

@Andrew Rogers a war ends when a war ends. there are different stages in a war ending. by the way did the beardy guy say that? if you don`t know what the beardy guy said it`s not really truth if you quote him.