Raze

The 1 in 5 statistic was debunked long ago and even the original researchers backtracked on it and claimed it doesn’t represent 1 in 5 women are raped. Ironically this is an example of an actual attack on men from the same crowd pushing the toxic masculinity narrative, a misleading statistic used to spread panic and villanize men. What are you even saying? Stop making incoherent statements. It was already legitimized, they get hundreds of millions of views. Kamala not going on unlegitimized her for millions of peoplw who get news from them. She needed them, they didn’t need her. This is quite a silly argument. The point of a politician campaigning is to get your message heard particularly by people on the fence or those who disagree with you. Democrat candidates regularly do interviews at Fox News. It’s especially ridiculous to still say this after Kamala lost. This would be an example of why her campaign was bad. Maybe I can understand it if you’re well in the lead, but they were neck to neck according to polls yet she ignored an opportunity to get hours of interrupted campaigning in the eyes of literally hundreds of millions of people, mostly independent young men the demographic she struggled with. I believe even her own campaign staff admitted it was a mistake.

It’s still ridiculous to say young men shifting right had nothing to do with the absolute disaster of messaging from the left. Young men have been seeing a non stop stream of men suck and male shaming from the same crowd that then demanded they vote democrat while democrats consistently refuse to say they’ll do anything for young men. Obviously that will have an effect.

That’s ridiculously wrong. The podcasts were Theo Von, Lex Fridman, and Joe Rogan. They are extremely soft interviewers who rarely get aggressive with guests let alone grill them. They interviewed multiple democrats and didn’t do that. Kamala not going on was beyond stupid. She literally said no to hundreds of millions of views in free media primarily with a demographic that had seen her message the least, young men.

Every one of those podcasts said they invited Kamala and she refused. This is what I mean when I say they didn’t move because they were targeted, they moved because they were pushed away by democrats, Kamala not attempting to reach out isn’t trump targeting them. Other democrats did go on them later and it went fine. Bernie Sanders went on them.

That’s not a funding effort specifically targeting young men. That is a media outlet. If just having a media outlet is brainwashing young men you can say democrats are brainwashing young women through left wing outlets like MSNBC. There was a recent effort on the right to court young men but it was small relatively and only after young men already started shifting right. It was basically just Josh Hawley. Democrats courting young women however was a much larger campaign for longer. See the women’s march. BTW, the democrats also recently invested in a campaign to court young men.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGom598qGrU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7BXI0odxP4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44LQLXt476o

Then why did young men vote democrat in 2020 at the margins young women voted democrat in 2024?

More billionaires backed Kamala Harris than Trump. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-harris-has-more-billionaires-prominently-backing-her-than-trump-bezos-and-griffin-weigh-in-updated/ That is false, there is a large network of left and center left media outlets

That’s ridiculous as young men shifted to the right, they didn’t suddenly become less mature. They are also shifting away from the right now. What actually happened is democrats alienated them with rhetoric so they moved right, but the right didn’t really serve them so they moved back to dem or went undecided. No they didn’t, there was no large scale funded effort by republicans to try and court young men. Men shifted there as democrats alienated them with rhetoric and republicans became popular on some alt media platforms democrats (purposefully) avoided. The rest of your comment is so stupid it doesn’t merit a response.

- None of this conflicts with the idea the left is partially responsible for a radicalization of the right. You mention reactionaries, they are reacting to something. You may say that it’s just exposing the development that was already there, but it’s still a radicalization. One example is how some communities become more racist as they go from being racially homogenous to having a significant minority, because now they see them as a significant force of outsiders as opposed to not a big deal. - We can even see this in polls with how opinions on things like immigration or gay marriage shifted to the right. (Though I think immigration shifted back recently) - Maybe genuine Green doesn’t demonize masculinity, but large swaths of the left who are enabled by stage green people clearly do. Even some feminist authors have acknowledged the term toxic masculinity is used by many to insult men, even if they claim that wasn’t the original intention.

You’re ignoring multiple left leaning millionaires and billionaires. George Soros for example has given hundreds of millions to left wing causes. There are even democrat politicians in office with hundreds of millions or even billions in net worth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ru4EX40al2A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REiKHCZpU6Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7ghrUIiyzM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsFHvXk4w4E https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-make-friends-master-key-new-friendships

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPKQuwyYScQ http://davidtianphd.com/masterclass-content/ https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-get-started-picking-girls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twTrrGiRXtY

Obviously, yes. First the democrats pushed neoliberal policies such as bailing out big banks, NAFTA, and letting big pharma get away with the opioid crisis, this devastated rural white communities. Then they started campaigning on unpopular fringe social issues like transgender kids, defund the police, and demonizing masculinity. Further worsening it by taking part in cancel culture and supporting corporations punishing left social issues to make themselves look better. Polls found one of the biggest reasons Kamala lost votes was because of woke issues she didn’t even bring up in the election, but she had done so in the past giving republicans easy fodder for ads. They had one ad where she said something about trans surgeries for inmates that apparently was very effective.

What is your opinion on this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35xqZnyPM7w Or this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orR7H8GnhCY

Force Israel to stop and Ukraine to agree to peace with Russia, force the UAE to stop in Somalia. Increase taxes on the rich and use it to fund UBI, Medicare for all, and a rebuilding of US infrastructure. Trump would be the most popular president in history, win a Nobel peace prize, and could have everything they rebuild be named after him and have statues of him everywhere.

They should have resisted NATO expansion and fought against US wars in Libya, Syria, and Iraq.

https://www.girlschase.com/article/meeting-women-social-circle-pros-and-cons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twTrrGiRXtY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZadNDSPl-A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciQ5rgdXVEQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPs5pn5I15g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuSpLsIptts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2pfWAauua8 https://www.girlschase.com/content/8-ways-build-social-circle-filled-awesome-people https://www.girlschase.com/article/how-escalate-girls-social-circle

Mamdani never said intifada, he was referring to people who say it

A significant amount of Obama voters voting for Trump and now a significant amount of conservatives supporting Mamdani disproves this.

No, they either want change to improve their lives or want the changes that are making their lives worse to stop. The democrats failed because while Obama won on change, they never delivered change aside from incremental small fixes and in many ways made their lives worse. Hillary and Kamala essentially ran on no change and Trump presented himself as the change candidate. The idea everyone likes the status quo is nonsense as they consistently are electing change candidates with uprisings in both the democrats and republicans with a rise of far left and far right candidates.

No, he’s saying the people saying globalize the intifada now are not necessarily supporting terrorism. He himself didn’t say the term either nor say he supports terrorism. Probably because human rights groups and legal experts have said the trial was a sham and they weren’t guilty and there was a movement to appeal the case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Land_Foundation_for_Relief_and_Development#Criticism_of_the_trial That’s not supporting the funding of Hamas if he thinks they didn’t do it. Btw, Israel’s government funded Hamas itself.

Nowhere in that does he say he supports terrorism, he just correctly points out most people using those terms aren’t using them as calls for terrorism. Intifada just means uprising, that can happen with or without terrorism. He also didn’t use that term.

A democrat similar to Mamdani who calls out the establishment and pushes for economic populism could get that and more. Obama got that because he campaigned on change and economic and medical reform. He was smart enough to not publicly gloat about being a neoliberal even though he was.