Raze

It’s not “nuance”, you analysis isn’t based on reality, it’s easily debunked propaganda - Trump basically gave up in Syria and stopped US participation against Assad but kept up sanctions, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/trumps-syria-shambles/ Biden maintained the sanctions, that did lead to the collapse of Assad. But sanctions were in place since Obama and Obama and early in Trumps term they were doing actual military operations against Assad. Assad fell because of sanctions held by Trump but also Obama and Biden, and Turkeys influence. - decapitation strikes historically do not work, which is why since the decapitation Hezbollah has still killed dozens of idf with drones and a Lebanon peace deal hasn’t occurred. Trump has actually been more restrictive on Israel for what they can do in Lebanon. Publicly criticizing them and frustrating israel as it feels the US has made them sitting ducks to drones. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trump-says-israel-and-hezbollah-have-agreed-to-dial-back-fighting-after-mediated-talks https://www.axios.com/2026/07/14/trump-netanyahu-syria-lebanon-redeploy - Oct 7 happened because Trump pushed for the Abraham accords that were trying to force Arab states to agree to normalization with Israel without ending the occupation of Palestine and Netanyahu funded Hamas and reduced Gazas security giving them motivation and reason to strike. There’s no evidence humanitarian aid was what allowed for Oct 7. Trump allowed Israel to break the ceasefire he originally forced on them but the IDF themselves admitted the renewed offensive achieved nothing and the deal they accepted was the same one they rejected a year prior, meaning the 40 hostages they killed in that time and the international approval collapse that made israel the most hated country in the world according to polling were both for nothing. https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-report-said-to-find-israel-made-every-possible-mistake-in-recent-gaza-offensive/ https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-901047 Israel also rejected the Hamas disarmament because that isn’t their goal https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/08/06/hamas-disarmament-deal-netanyahu-israel-gaza/ - Iran is straight up a strategic disaster and the most absurd claim you’re making. The claim Iran was pursuing nukes is a lie, no evidence of this exists and US intelligence said it was false. Trump said the goal was to end Irans nuclear program, end he ballistic missile program, end support for militias, and that the regime would change. Since the war none of these have happened and Trump is already backing down from them. This has now become a negotiation over the strait, which Iran didn’t have before the war started, and is refusing to give up, not only that but Iran has destroyed US bases in the region and shown the US can’t defend gulf states from it. Iran is now in a dramatically more powerful position with far more leverage before the war. Iran already got paid by gulf states, and increased oil revenues because they let their ships out during the MOU. US has even started removing sanctions. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-removes-sanctions-three-irgc-linked-entities-treasury-website-shows-2026-08-05/ notice nothing is being talked about the nuclear program or any of the other issues which were the reasons for the war This is also a massive boon to China as the US had to reduce its presence in Asia.

I didn’t say femininity is machiavellian. Manipulation is defined as: the action of manipulating something in a skillful manner. "the format allows fast picture manipulation" the action of manipulating someone in a clever or unscrupulous way. "there was no deliberate manipulation of visitors' emotions" Arguably femininity is more manipulative and masculinity is more brute force. People who participate or are more accepting of transactional and unrestricted sociosexual relationships are more likely to exhibit dark triad traits, and people who are involved in sugar dating are shown to be more accepting of transactional or unrestricted sociosexual relationships.

Then that guy is a dumbass, that shows she isn’t that Machiavellian and hasn’t been desensitized and experienced at manipulating men. Granted it shows she just wants his money but if he’s doing sugar dating it sounds like he’s ok with that. Sugar dating is already dealing with transactional and manipulative relationships, he is just filtering the ones that aren’t good at it. Hes basically doing what girls do when they reject guys for any slight shyness, neediness, or lack of smoothness, then complain all the guys they date are arrogant manipulators or players. That’s who you are filtering for because they’re the ones who don’t do that.

Switch to practicing yoga and metta meditation to become grounded

3 of their candidates won despite being massively outspent with major endorsements to their opponents from centrist democrats https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/04/politics/live-news/primary-election-michigan-virginia https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/05/us/politics/michigan-house-primary-mckinney-thanedar.html https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/progressive-activist-wins-democratic-primary-one-nations-biggest-house-rcna590892

How many approaches did he do?

That’s pretty depressing. I heard a former PUA admit in the industry over 90% of guys drop out in 6 months with mediocre or worse results. I don’t know why it’s so difficult to succeed with this and the teaching methods are so ineffective. Its funny Owen and other former PUA guys bemoan the current situation of guys dropping out of society, dating nihilism, and Chad situationshop harems, and say it only happened because they got cancelled. In truth even at the height of the PUA movement maybe 0.01% of guys were actually using it successfully, it was barely making a dent. Though at least it sucked up enough oxygen so the blackpill and redpill bs couldn’t blow up like it did, but it may have actually created them by creating so many drop outs some of whom went negative.

@Miguel1 Do you still have a YouTube channel?

Except you endorsed RSD Luke and he said comfort comes before attraction Quote: “When cold approaching in a social setting you want to open in such a way that builds comfort first. This also applies to cold approach game as well” & “Now that we built comfort you can break it in order to spark a baseline level of attraction” Source: social circle blueprint 2.0 module 4 action plan page 14

Except Bradicus himself said comfort through safety and empathy is more important than attraction

Yawning

Who understands women more, the average man today, or the average man in the 90s?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/03/politics/us-military-iran-war-troops-punish Not sure what random troops can know that the analyst’s and generals don’t.

Their biggest weakness is they’re most popular among young voters and least popular among older voters, but most voters are older.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3miuaOWsj8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eit85FAj4wg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5JJQt_nHzQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88za65h7h70 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IqVDvnDEJU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn1qj1oE67o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJXDoKZhGYs

This was Owen Cook’s most viral clip https://www.instagram.com/p/DYCslvgJRnQ/?hl=en

That is false, the entire war was 3.4 to 1. But the majority of civilians were killed in the civil war and by insurgents. Coalition forces had a ratio of 1 to 2.

3 to 1 or 4 to 1 is far worse than average. US in Afghanistan was 1 to 3.5.