Raze

This guy is a shill who made the Kamala campaign spend their funds to pay him to interview her. Odds are hes a paid operative. The fact is he got his way, Bernie lost in both primaries he ran in partially because of many black voters. Yet despite this leading to disasters of two trump terms he just doubles down on accusing Bernie of racism for daring to suggest maybe something aside from the failed approach should be tried.

Maybe in theory, but generally the more you want something and the more you invest in it the more needy and attached you become. As a woman you would also find yourself more clingy or nervous around a guy you really like as opposed to one you only mildly like. If you spend lots of time and investment in a man you would find yourself being more prone to jealousy related to him opposed to a man you just met and haven’t invested in. it’s the same for guys.

That’s actually a common complaint from women we hear, the guys they are most interested in don’t want anything long term. Also again your idea of hyper masculine is not what we are referring to. Yes women mostly don’t prefer roided out body builders, probably not even for short term relationships. Your regular guy examples like Brad Pit or Ryan Gosling would be examples of the alpha. High status, tall, handsome, stoic, etc. Would you consider this video how a beta guy or regular guy operates? We who are arguing with you or most Guys using the term would not. If what you’re saying was true it would be easier for guys to get lots of women to enter short term relationships and harder to get them to enter long term relationships. But it really isn’t. The exception being if a guys lifestyle is a complete disaster but he’s also freakishly charming and handsome.

Yes, but the point is distribution. More women can have sex overall if a larger portion of women have sex with a smaller portion of men. Ex imagine there is 100 women and 100 men, 2 of the men sleep with all 100 women, now it’s 100 women who have each slept with 2 people, but 98 men who slept with no one and 2 who slept with 100.

Nope. The PA recognized Israel’s existence and it just lead to expanded settlement growth. Hamas offered a long term ceasefire in exchange for a state on the 67 borders which is de facto recognizing Israel, and it lead nowhere. The Arab states offered full normalization in exchange for a Palestinian state which would leave Israel intact, and it was rejected. At one point they even threatened to withdraw their recognition of Israel unless Israel would finally recognize their right to exist. https://www.timesofisrael.com/palestinians-said-set-to-withdraw-recognition-of-israel/ Still didn’t work. Those are the facts even if it is inconvenient to your narrative. Israel only wants recognition as a means to have a permanent apartheid state. No amount of recognition will be enough for them because their goal is to wipe out Palestinians as a people. A moral position would be to support protests of western governments until they pressure israel to recognize Palestine and free the people they are destroying. But you’d rather ignore reality and make up narratives to justify their war crimes for some reason, no matter how many times you are shown otherwise.

- those countries have 3 - 20x the population as Gaza - the difference is western governments are giving israel its arms, meaning they could stop it at any second, hence the protests

Point out to me - when did I say parading a corpse was legitimate - when was it said by israel they rejected the treaty because of the massacre - when did I say massacres are legitimate - when did I say Jews must go I get it’s easier to just argue with a fiction you invented in your head, but you can leave me out of it. the only one who thinks massacres of civilians and expulsion is justified, is YOU, because you keep insisting israel has no choice but to do it. You’ve attached yourself to a narrative not related to reality. We are literally talking about a peace treaty israel rejected that would have left Israel with their lands. Yet you concocted a narrative it’s all about expelling Jews therefore Jews are allowed to expel Palestinians. It’s beyond stupid. For the second time, Israel itself did not say they rejected the deal because of the massacre. Hamas itself claimed the massacre wasn’t in response to the peace deal, even though at the time they rejected it, though they would later accept it. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304102933/http://www.sptimes.com/2002/03/29/Worldandnation/Hamas_rejects_Arab_pe.shtml to break this down even further the sequence of events is, Palestinians and all Arab states offer a deal that is the opposite of expelling Jews -> Israel rejects it -> Israel attempts to expel Palestinians Your conclusion: the evil Palestinians want to expel Jews! The Jews must expel them. If you disagree with me you’re supporting expulsion. Did I mention israel is speaking the only language it can which is expulsion? So given that you keep saying I endorse massacres because I support resistance in any form, given you support Israel’s actions, by your own logic you think this is legitimate. https://youtu.be/qqusa-96WLs?si=UwYw64lp0j44q0d4&t=264 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqzE4hkuee4

This is basically a sequence of events you made up in your head. The Passover massacre was not why the treaty was rejected. Israel rejected the treaty because they are against ending the occupation period. Israel never even claimed the Passover massacre was why they rejected the treaty. Hamas never said they committed the massacre because they rejected the treaty. The PLO which represented the majority of Palestinians at the time condemned the massacre and arrested Hamas members in response. Electing Hamas was not because they approved of the Passover massacre, it was because the PLO failed to end the occupation after Israel rejected that treaty. Exit polls show the majority of Palestinian voters voted against the PLO for its corruption and failure to end the blockade, but still supported a two state solution.

You’re not trying to understand anything, you’re trying to reinforce an uneducated colonial framework. Irrelevant to what I said. Your point was that Palestinians rejected peace by electing Hamas, my point was that Israel already rejected peace when it failed to secure a resolution with the PLO, thereby Palestinians voted Hamas because the PLO had failed. Let’s put that aside, if Israel wants peace so bad why don’t they just ignore Hamas in Gaza entirely, and focus on the West Bank, Hamas was arrested / expelled from there and the PA in charge agreed to stop fighting israel at all. They did exactly what you demand. What was Israel’s response? Seize more land, build more settlements, and kill so many children that by September in 2023 it had been the deadliest year for children since the intifada.

That’s essentially what Lyubov was saying which you dismissed, The only difference is he’s assuming they prefer the short term guys but go for the long term ones as a consolation prize, and you’re saying they prefer the long term ones overall. I doubt this as in most cases I think she’d actually prefer the short term guy also had the qualities of stability and emotional intimacy for a long term relationship, but he either doesn’t or does but won’t stick around and give them to her.

Right, the guys you are describing as “regular” are not what most of us envison as regular guys. The guys you describe as alpha are not what most of us are referring to. We aren’t talking about massive hypermasculine body builders.

I think we are talking at cross purposes then. What you envision as examples of a regular guy / feminine guy and a GigaChad / Alpha, aren’t the same as what we are thinking of.

Then why do guys with careers like club promoters, musicians, or mma fighters tend to get so much more female attention than a average normal guy? Why does a dating app profile of a guy listing his height as 6’4, career as ceo, and photos like a mirror selfie showing abs or professional photos in a suit get way more matches than if a average guy makes a profile with a average job, average height, and average photos? What you’re saying simply doesn’t add up. We constantly hear women complaining about how they can’t find a good man or the guy they like won’t commit and just puts them in a situationship. If they like regular guys this shouldn’t happen as there is an infinite amount of regular guys. Yet we know plenty of regular guys and they aren’t running through women while more women are throwing themselves at them. Most regular guys are fighting over scraps at this point. We all get that most women don’t prefer some massive angry body builder caricature, but your narrative about women preferring regular guys and soft feminine men who chase them simply doesn’t match what we see in the real world.

A counter to this is a lot of male sex symbols aren’t necessarily hyper masculine, they are flowy and dandy like Harry Styles. Rather than the Jocko Willink type.

https://www.girlschase.com/content/attraction-either-there-or-it-isnt https://www.girlschase.com/article/giving-girl-archetypal-romance

It is massively censored so it is mostly for the minority who fall down the rabbit hole. There isn’t even a major active blackpill YouTube channel anymore, the last one quit months ago because of harassment.

I saw this a while back and think this is generally what the average woman’s preference is: Basically it’s not alpha v beta, it’s depending on the situation.

try break through difficult emotions by Shinzen Young https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYmenDQvFKQ

Title seems a bit misleading. Beta vs Alpha isn’t necessarily the same as ripped vs non-ripped. I read some comments from women about that pic and it seemed a lot of it was because his face looked older due to lighting.

Elon deleted the Epstein tweets, looks like he’s backtracking.

Sell your plasma and learn a trade try the almosthomeless subreddit for advice If you have internet access you can try looking for anyone requesting software tasks or a virtual assistant, or Craigslist Greece https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6NAC6ajkH8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbQr70rfwQg

Issue with that is she can view that as him trying to supplicate and buy her affection, and she’ll get the ick and reject at the drop of a hat if she gets a whiff of any neediness from him. I heard a story about a guy taking a PUA training and he was approaching women trying to woo them and getting rejected one after the other, then the instructor banned him from being allowed to take a woman’s number or take her to his room, basically banning him from actually getting any result with a woman, and suddenly women were interested in him, as he finally started interacting with them without seeking an outcome.

This is a good interview with a former blackpiller who managed to get success on what lead him to those mindsets Austen Summers also did a good video explaining issues with the blackpill This is a substack by a scientist that critiques blackpill beliefs with science https://nuancepill.substack.com/t/black-pill-critique @Leo Gura you can supplement a blackpill video with some info from these sources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf1yt3XTQHM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w27nenP7fsQ&list=PLeztx1--I_i-Uup3kAW7okkR2uGVkJ7pv&index=1&pp=iAQB https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCl_zBm2iTM

This is one area I think the advice is damaging, telling someone to “just approach” or “just try” without actually giving them specific advice on what can cause bad reactions, and a path to improve will just result in endless rejection and them doubling down on the blackpill beliefs.