Raze

That is not and never was what that meant from the Palestine movement. The PLO’s original goal was a equal federation when they used that term. The only group using it as justification for elimination of a people is israel, the ruling likud party has that in its charter and it is what they are actively doing, killing, expelling, and subjugating all palestinians.

Politics: https://www.youtube.com/@theburningarchive This is from a former government official, he has a anti-NATO bend but is not dogmatic https://www.youtube.com/@PBoyle The breakdowns from this one seem better quality to me than most channels https://www.youtube.com/@MallenBaker This channel used to do detailed debunkings of climate science misinformation on both sides, but now is focused on Trump. His analysis has more depth than other channels I’ve seen. https://www.youtube.com/@HorsesOnYT Good video essays on dark topics History: https://www.youtube.com/@FallofCivilizations a good podcast covering historical civilizations during their decline https://www.youtube.com/@hypohystericalhistory8133 detailed military history breakdown https://www.youtube.com/@HikmaHistory videos on the modern history of the Middle East https://www.youtube.com/@TheHistoryGuyChannel General history channel https://www.youtube.com/@VoicesofthePast this channel focuses on first hand accounts of historical events Science: https://www.youtube.com/@DebunktheFunkwithDrWilson He debunks science misinformation that trends https://www.youtube.com/@PatKellyTeaches essays on medical history https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-JMmQ70SXE this channel goes over evolutionary history of various animals https://www.youtube.com/usefulcharts this channel covers detailed charts made for various sociological topics Art / humanities: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekETL9LVHNQ this channel breaks down acting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imNtSPM3-r4 this channel covers lesser known lore and theories from various fictional works presented well https://www.youtube.com/@WorldLitArchive same government official from the politics list above, he discusses world literature here https://www.youtube.com/@WriteConscious This guy rants a lot but goes over writing and literature well https://www.youtube.com/@StripPanelNaked this discusses comic paneling in depth Crime: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnAwAhC7JLU the criminal psychology documentaries from this channel are the best I’ve seen Science / Spirituality: https://www.youtube.com/@societyforconsciousnessstu1330 https://www.youtube.com/@usccenterformindfulnesssci6073 https://www.youtube.com/@thescienceofconsciousness https://www.youtube.com/@QualiaResearchInstitute interviews / lectures: https://www.youtube.com/@robinsonerhardt This interviewer talks to people about politics and science, they aren’t mainstream figures but he brings out more depth than other interviewers but he doesn’t challenge them much https://www.youtube.com/@Nonzero the older videos are better but this hosts interviews usually conducted by Robert Wright, a famous evo psych author https://www.youtube.com/@davidbalcarras various lectures https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C8mgWtXr4 This channel is from an old guy who is processing videos he’s recorded since he was a teenager, so you see a unfiltered look at life decades ago

Probably his use of steroids causes him anger issues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTgrvy0IvkU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJG5JIwHR7w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXZInmLXr2U

No, he is wishing death an on organization that has been accused of conducting a war of extermination by even the former Israeli prime minister. Smotrich and Ben Gvir are conducting that war of extermination. You have continued to defend and apologize for the IDF to enable them to conduct this war of extermination. Morally he is superior to you, as wishing death on war criminals is not as wrong as excusing their actions.

.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-27/ty-article-magazine/.premium/idf-soldiers-ordered-to-shoot-deliberately-at-unarmed-gazans-waiting-for-humanitarian-aid/00000197-ad8e-de01-a39f-ffbe33780000 https://archive.ph/LNFr0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5qdBMIaS_c https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YxSeilcdmKw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-O-f3lfU6c

That’s been largely debunked https://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/

It’s very dumb reasoning. Nothing redpill about it, it’s common now in feminist / woke spaces. For one, the main reason most men didn’t pass on their genes was because they died young, not because of women not picking them. Secondly, all enduring civilizations got around this survival of the fittest by enforcing some kind of monogamy. So if we do enter such a system it could cause massive damage to society if not collapse it altogether, as family stability would collapse and most men would have no buy in and thus be less motivated to maintain society. It also assumes that the men women end up choosing are morally or civilization-ally superior, not true. The traits that are the most sexually attractive or lead to the most sex, are not necessarily the traits that make people more moral or better for maintaining civilization. There is plenty of evidence of this. Young men with higher IQs tend to lose their virginity later. Men with higher dark triad traits tend to have more sexual partners. It also isn’t even functioning as some Darwinian thing because we have birth control, and still maintain some monogamous structures. So what con end up happening is the woman can’t get any of the most wanted men to commit, then as she gets older settles for some lower value guy, whose genes she will actually pass on, or more likely - not at all. Because either after having experienced those guys she massively overestimates her mate value and won’t settle, or she just gets too busy or too old to have kids even if she gets married. That’s another thing, fertility rates are plummeting, they’re only held up largely by people in cultures that maintain the traditional monogamous structures that value marriage and having children early. So the closest thing to a Darwinian thing happening here is not less fit men being weeded out, but rather any culture that normalizes this being weeded out because it can’t sustain itself.

Genocide is defined as “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” Israel has said the goal is to expel Gazans, multiple Israeli officials said things like “there are no uninvolved civilians”, and has blocked food and medicine, and destroyed most civilian infrastructure, indicating they’re trying to destroy Gazas population as a whole.

https://www.vox.com/politics/378913/israel-gaza-genocide-icj https://www.commondreams.org/news/israel-is-committing-genocide-in-gaza https://archive.ph/Po29L

I also got this in my recommended a couple days ago. Strange.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/22/us/politics/iran-uranium-stockpile-whereabouts.html https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-22/ty-article-live/.premium/netanyahu-says-u-s-attacks-on-irans-nuclear-sites-were-fully-coordinated-with-israel/00000197-95b2-db6f-a9ff-b7fe0eec0000 Media will probably see this as a way to bait trump into more strikes by accusing him of failure.

Join the EPRC or the SEMA lab

The strike was extremely limited. It doesn’t seem to have even killed anyone. NYtimes reports a US official told them the site was damaged but not destroyed, and Iran claimed it evacuated all the uranium and tools. I think Iran will try and retaliate in some small way so as not to trigger a greater US reaction, and the US will avoid reacting to avoid a longer war. Maybe israel will cease strikes and the US will return to negotiating. But nothing has changed on that front aside from their project being set back, we don’t even know by how much. There demands very well will remain the same. The problem is, now israel is going to shift to demanding further strikes to ensure the facilities or destroyed and striking wherever they suspect the uranium was taken too, and if Iran decides to just rebuild and actually go for a weapon this time israel will demand even greater US intervention and we are at square one.

But that’s not why they attacked, israel has admitted they don’t believe they can destroy irans nuclear capability and are asking for US intervention. But now even US officials are saying they are unsure if the US can destroy the facilities https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/19/trump-caution-on-iran-strike-linked-to-doubts-over-bunker-buster-bomb-officials-say So it’s more plausible this can result in Iran trying to attain a nuke itself as a later date, as well as other countries in the region as that’s shown to be the only deterrence since the US and Israel didn’t uphold the JCPOA.

Tucker Carlson just did a interview with Ted Cruz, it gets very heated due to his snippy comments, some highlights: Ted has been responding with various tweets after it got published: my analysis: Tucker used to be ardently pro interventionism for example supporting the Iraq war and calling for war with Iran. Over time that shifted and he’s become radically non interventionist recently. I’m surprised Ted accepted his interview when he did something similar to Mike Pence regarding his support for Ukraine which caused damage to his presidential campaign.

Full video:

- the IAEA report did not say they were making nuclear weapons, the chief just confirmed this https://x.com/EyesOnSouth1/status/1935268489767342298 - this is what US intelligence said https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/17/politics/israel-iran-nuclear-bomb-us-intelligence-years-away https://www.ynetnews.com/article/syl7ulhxgx https://www.nbcnews.com/video/hospital-damaged-by-israeli-strike-in-western-iran-241723973849 Irrelevant, striking civil energy infrastructure is a breach of Geneva conventions. Are you ok with Iran striking Israel’s energy infrastructure?

“The Israeli people want peace” is a misnomer, they define peace as Palestinians accept permanent brutal subjugation and all surrounding states be either anarchic perpetual civil wars or controlled by dictators backed by the US and Israel who repress any effort to counter Israel’s aggression and apartheid. It looks like though israel is acting like the strikes are to stop nuclear weapons (Iran wasn’t pursuing weapons and Israel alone cannot do this), they are admitting it’s actually about regime change and beginning a propaganda campaign that Iranians actually support what they are doing. This is false, while the regime is unpopular it still maintains a significant support base, and even those that dislike the regime mostly also dislike Israel for its own repression of Palestinians (far more brutal than anything Iran does to its people). The bombing campaign so far has targeted energy infrastructure to crash the economy, and also hit a hospital and news station killing countless journalist. Israel is even using terrorist tactics such as car bombs and admits 90% of deaths are civilians. Right now even Iranian opposition figures outside the US are coming out against the bombing en masse. It’s likely even more extreme for the population in Iran. The ones supporting it are a minority who have a large funding base, such as the son of the former Monarch trying to position himself as a replacement.