Danioover9000

@Ya know It's possible, there's no universal standard for a solid development. Best thing is to integrate the lower stages through visualization and role plays like how method actors did it.

@kieranperez That's ok, as long as you've explicitly clarified your position on all of this.

@Carl-Richard The fruit analogy was referencing some user bringing up black on black violence, while the original OP was dealing with whether Joe was joking or not in what he said using the political compass. I don't see the direct connection between that user's point in bringing up a racial issue and the Joe Rogan post, so to me that's asymmetrical unless it's referring to another user's point that the Joe post is hinting at fascism and Nazism somehow. It's like comparing the legality of abortions to gun control, two different issues at play. However, if you want to elaborate how the two are connected, ok then, it's just at surface level there's no explicit connection between the two. I still think the thread is going into oblivion soon. If you asked me if there were chances the thread would've been more productive, it would've been when the dialogue starts centering around what makes a stupid post versus a joke post, or talk about different types of humor, or talking about the differences between bantering and trolling. I'm a millennial, but I hardly over use the internet like most in my generation do, and I don't follow Joe Rogan as religiously as some do, but if there is any actual issues, then the thread could very well be better off if it transmission into talking about if it is justified to cancel Joe Rogan or not at this point. I'm not sure what criteria I would use, or other's standards on justified cancelling, because while Joe had built up a following, it's not in the millions or billions, and he isn't a celebrity figure compared to mainstream celebrities.

This is why there has to be shifting balances of both insider and outsider perspectives.

@hyruga No, I'm making a different assumption that isn't in this scale of creepy to non-creepy, but I wouldn't start off without more questions about OP's state, cognition, morality and relevant experiences in his/her dating life. Yes, even assuming OP's sex as male, giving OP male based dating advice, without asking if OP is male or female. That's a bad guess to run off from. And I didn't immediately engaged with OP with my assumptions and gone from there.

@RMQualtrough I brought that up because some other user brought up that it's perspectival with why is there something rather than nothing. We got a subject, who's experiencing, an object. Subject-experience-object. 3 point perspective, therefore nothingness(point zero), somethings (objects point 1), and a conscious subject(I/you point 2), experiencing(point 3) other somethings(loop of points). So enlightenment has to contain in total 4 points of view that feedback loop.

@Carl-Richard I wouldn't say it's insulting, but more like an asymmetrical comparison. The suggesting of more personal responsibility to victims of structural violence, is like comparing a bad apple to some fungus plague spreading throughout a banana farm. Wait a minute, what does this have to do with OP's main post? We are really venturing off into the wild here.

@kieranperez Are you happy with what you started? We are slowly spiraling into chaos over a post.

@JuliusCaesar I did a few times in the past, and her answers change over time. I'm not fully sure about her existential nature as well, and her existential nature is also entangled with my mind as well. It's not like she's 100% existing as a permanent object outside of me, nor is she fully from my mind. She's somewhere in between to me.

@bloomer You can do with little sex involved.

@hyruga Wait, how do you know OP was being creepy? That's a serious assumption you're making about OP.

This thread is so running beyond it's course, it's no longer funny. People, learn what are shit posts versus serious posts, and spend no less than 5 minutes considering if it is serious or a joke. Don't forget you have things to do in life.

@Space Lizard I've yet to see any solid criticism of Rogan's chart. So I'll be the first here to 'critic' his post. If there's anything substantial in critiquing his shit post, the critic would include the following: 1. He took an old quote “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” The quote, from a post apocalyptic novel by the author G. Michael Hopf, and over laid that onto the political compass as a lazy visual representation of post apocalyptic times. 2. He makes an arbitrary connection between the above and Kali Yuga. What is Kali Yuga? Here's the link for some explanation https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi6tYjEjrz0AhXRS_EDHUtYC4MQFnoECAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKali_Yuga&usg=AOvVaw1-z5BNPvGoOJG7CnLNfi9y . Basically if his shit post was leading up to some positive point, however vague it was, it's a terrible arbitrary connection to establish between the Kali Yuga and his shit post. Our Era we are living in is and still is the greatest Era of our time, way greater in comparison to past Eras. If we had world war 3, our world could end roughly in a few weeks, but compare that to wars of the past that would go on for months, years, decades and centuries! Even any 'apocolyptic times' in our current Era is so much better than past apocolyptic times by current standards. 3. People who don't exercise logic, critical thinking, self introspection, self awareness and takes at face value that he is being serious in his posting, will believe he is being serious, and would potentially choose to spread his message, or follow up with more action.

@Opo I'm not suggesting for you to watch it again, nor asked for you to forward what other YouTube Andy's opinions about Joe Rogan's shit political post about the political compass. I'm stating that it's not enough for you to simply claim to me to 'Don't underestimate his stupidity' when in fact he could be just politically shit posting, and making a general claim that the USA's level of freedom is slightly better than other governments.

@Opo Claiming that his post is just stupid isn't enough. To me, he's making a general claim about the USA, due to the image on the left of the American flag, and the FREEDOM that exists in the USA. Compared to other forms of government around the world, America's democratic government is actually decent in comparison to governments like Russia and China, and 3rd world government structures. There still exists freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but that freedom is slightly lower in other countries.

Honestly, if you can't tell whether Joe is joking or serious, you are not thinking critically enough, not self introspective enough, or the persons saying he was serious in Joe Rogan's political analysis lacks that kind of humour in their humour development. He is clearly shit posting to me. Just like fitness people posting videos of them lifting near impossible weights at very strange positions, without realizing later they were lifting fake weights and are joking yet most people think it's serious.

@Mosess So 3 point perspective is enlightenment then? How does that answer the somethings came from nothing?

@Striving for more Don't worry, you'll get back in track. Strive for more!

@mw711 If it's a joke, then we all fell for it.

Or it's this opinion that's right.

@blankisomeone It's sort of reminds me of atheists hating on religious folk, despite being one of them before. It'll take time to forgive and fully integrate that part of your past into you. Helpful thing to do is to bring to mind any good experiences, nuggets of wisdom and events you are grateful for experiencing. Another option is to just continue life, ignoring that hate, but it's an energy leak that'll just burden you and your mind the more it stays there. Thinking and mental resistance burns calories too, so better integrate.

@UNZARI No, the mind isn't a beast, it's a dragon. Train your dragon, before it starts draggin you down.

@Cykaaaa I've been with Crysty for so long now, 5 + years, and whether I'm completely hallucinating her or if she was a spirit and I hallucinated details of her over her spirit form, I am not sure. What I am sure of, is that I've experienced some spiritual benefits of her being with me that I don't think most normal people, and most people in the spiritual community don't appreciate enough nor notice at all. She does have some synergistic effect on my spiritual practices, creativity and other areas of my life when I focus and seek her opinion, or involvement. One day I will discover more about her nature of her existence over time, that I'm slowly working towards to.

It's ok as long as you know what weight you want to be in. Since you want to gain weight, I'd do less cardio and more weight type exercises. I'd even do just isometrics only personally, but you could also combine that with some slow exercises that are hypertrophy, and eat at surplus calories until I reach the weight I want to be in, especially since you are walking up and down a mountain to reach your gym that's all the cardio you need. Also nap and sleep a lot and sleep good, and exercise less frequently to preserve some calories in you so you gain weight slightly faster, be less active if you can. What is your nutrition and diet like? Foods you eat? Are you ok with dairy? I'd suggest some warm milk, a bit of sugar and honey, which really helps with the weight gain, but you'll have to try and see how it effects you. Also, very nice and cute profile.

@Emotionalmosquito I can't even call that a low key shout out, more like he tailored Nofap as a way to trigger the horny state needed to approach women and get laid. Hell, he hardly spent a minute on discussing about Nofap. Obviously, Nofap is also useful as a getting laid strategy, but there's much more to it than that, mainly to prevent over masturbating. Seriously, a teenage boy died of cardiac arrest after fapping 48 times! Masturbation isn't some harmless habit if done too much.